Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) 2023; 58(01): 157-163
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1756328
Artigo Original
Trauma

O uso do escore SARC-F como auxiliar na prevenção de fraturas por fragilidade

Article in several languages: português | English
Carlos Augusto Nunes Martini 
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT), Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Carolina Souza Weigert 
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT), Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Anderson Carlos Bigolin Stiegemaier 
1   Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT), Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Ana Paula Ribeiro Bonilauri Ferreira 
2   Departamento Científico, Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia (IOT), Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Ellen Liceras Gonçalves 
3   Universidade da Região de Joinville, UNIVILLE, Joinville, SC, Brasil
,
Sandro Fortes Valle 
3   Universidade da Região de Joinville, UNIVILLE, Joinville, SC, Brasil
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Resumo

Objetivo O presente estudo teve como objetivo relacionar o escore strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F) com a presença ou não de fratura por fragilidade na população acima de 60 anos.

Métodos O risco de sarcopenia foi determinado por meio da aplicação do questionário SARC-F, sendo os pacientes divididos em 2 grupos, de acordo com a ocorrência ou não de fratura por fragilidade (n = 100).

Resultados Foram levantados 32 casos de fratura de rádio distal e 18 casos de fratura de fêmur proximal. Uma maior pontuação no SARC-F determina bem entre ter ou não ter fratura por fragilidade, estimando que a cada ponto a mais no escore há um acréscimo de 70% na chance de o paciente ter fratura, independentemente da idade, sexo e índice de massa corporal (IMC).

Conclusão Houve correlação direta entre uma maior pontuação no SARC-F e aumento na chance de fratura por fragilidade.

Palavras-chave

fatores de risco - fraturas por osteoporose - osteogênese imperfeita - osteoporose - sarcopenia

Suporte Financeiro

Não houve suporte financeiro de fontes públicas, comerciais, ou sem fins lucrativos.


* Trabalho desenvolvido no Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Joinville, SC, Brasil.




Publication History

Received: 26 January 2022

Accepted: 26 July 2022

Article published online:
18 October 2022

© 2022. Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 

  • Referências

  • 1 Shah GM, Gong HS, Chae YJ, Kim YS, Kim J, Baek GH. Evaluation and Management of Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia in Patients with Distal Radius Fractures. Clin Orthop Surg 2020; 12 (01) 9-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Borgström F, Karlsson L, Ortsäter G. et al; International Osteoporosis Foundation. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Arch Osteoporos 2020; 15 (01) 59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zerbini CAF, Albergaria BH. The brazilian FRAX model: an introduction. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2018; 64 (06) 481-483
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wu Q, Xiao X, Xu Y. Performance of FRAX in Predicting Fractures in US Postmenopausal Women with Varied Race and Genetic Profiles. J Clin Med 2020; 9 (01) 285
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Li G, Thabane L, Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, Levine MA, Adachi JD. An overview of osteoporosis and frailty in the elderly. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18 (01) 46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wong RMY, Wong H, Zhang N. et al. The relationship between sarcopenia and fragility fracture-a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 2019; 30 (03) 541-553
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM. et al; European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing 2010; 39 (04) 412-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Woo J, Leung J, Morley JE. Validating the SARC-F: a suitable community screening tool for sarcopenia?. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2014; 15 (09) 630-634
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ha YC, Won Won C, Kim M, Chun KJ, Yoo JI. SARC-F as a Useful Tool for Screening Sarcopenia in Elderly Patients with Hip Fractures. J Nutr Health Aging 2020; 24 (01) 78-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wu TY, Liaw CK, Chen FC, Kuo KL, Chie WC, Yang RS. Sarcopenia Screened With SARC-F Questionnaire Is Associated With Quality of Life and 4-Year Mortality. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17 (12) 1129-1135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Blalock SJ, DeVellis RF, Giorgino KB. et al. Osteoporosis prevention in premenopausal women: using a stage model approach to examine the predictors of behavior. Health Psychol 1996; 15 (02) 84-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kirk B, Phu S, Brennan-Olsen SL, Bani Hassan E, Duque G. Associations between osteoporosis, the severity of sarcopenia and fragility fractures in community-dwelling older adults. Eur Geriatr Med 2020; 11 (03) 443-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Balogun S, Winzenberg T, Wills K. et al. Prospective associations of osteosarcopenia and osteodynapenia with incident fracture and mortality over 10 years in community-dwelling older adults. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2019; 82: 67-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Winzenberg TM, Oldenburg B, Frendin S, Jones G. The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT). BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2003; 4: 17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Barbosa-Silva TG, Menezes AM, Bielemann RM, Malmstrom TK, Gonzalez MC. Grupo de Estudos em Composição Corporal e Nutrição (COCONUT). Enhancing SARC-F: Improving Sarcopenia Screening in the Clinical Practice. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2016; 17 (12) 1136-1141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Scott D, Seibel M, Cumming R. et al. Does Combined Osteopenia/Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia Confer Greater Risk of Falls and Fracture Than Either Condition Alone in Older Men? The Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2019; 74 (06) 827-834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Coughlan T, Dockery F. Osteoporosis and fracture risk in older people. Clin Med (Lond) 2014; 14 (02) 187-191
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Vandenbroucke A, Luyten FP, Flamaing J, Gielen E. Pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old. Clin Interv Aging 2017; 12: 1065-1077
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Warriner AH, Patkar NM, Curtis JR. et al. Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis?. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64 (01) 46-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Court-Brown CM, Duckworth AD, Ralston S, McQueen MM. The relationship between obesity and fractures. Injury 2019; 50 (08) 1423-1428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Rolland Y, Dupuy C, Abellan Van Kan G. et al. Sarcopenia Screened by the SARC-F Questionnaire and Physical Performances of Elderly Women: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 18 (10) 848-852
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Silva Parra BFC, Matos LBN, Ferrer R, Toledo DO. SARCPRO: Proposta de protocolo para sarcopenia em pacientes internados. BRASPEN J 2019; 34 (01) 58-63
    Google Scholar