Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2022; 43(03): 218-232
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750346
Review Article

Usability and Acceptability of a Computer-Based Social Communication Intervention for Persons with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study

Peter Meulenbroek
1   College of Health Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
,
Leora R. Cherney 
2   Think and Speak, Shirley Ryan Ability Lab, Chicago, Illinois
3   Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, and Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported by NIDILRR ARRT. Grant # H133P120013/90AR5015: Dr. Cherney NIDILRR Mary E. Switzer Merit Research Fellowship #90SF0006: Dr. Meulenbroek
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Computer-based interventions for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are a rapidly developing treatment modality. However, the usability and acceptability of such treatments have not been thoroughly studied. We describe the user-experience of a computerized intervention in persons with TBI called the Work-Related Communication (WoRC) program. Two coders used qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews to complete a thematic content analysis along with a cost–benefit analysis. Ten participants with severe TBI more than 1-year postinjury were interviewed. Seven participants were male, and three were female. Their mean age was 41.6 years (standard deviation: 13.1). All had 4 years of college or less and experienced severe TBIs. A qualitative analysis of the WoRC program usability resulted in the categories of Content (aspects of treatment approach), Interface (aspects of presentation), and Abilities (aspects of the cognitive disorder). WoRC program acceptability categories emerged as Specific (trained strategies can be applied to specific scenarios) and Personal (individual factors related to willingness to implement the trained strategies). The cost–benefit analysis demonstrated a 50.2% reduction in treatment costs, indicating that computer-enhanced interventions are a potentially cost-effective way to increase behavioral outcomes. We discuss these findings as they relate to future development of computer-enhanced programs for persons with TBI.

Keywords

traumatic brain injury - adult - communicative disorders - job re-entry - attitude to computer


Publication History

Article published online:
20 July 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Maas AIR, Menon DK, Adelson PD. et al; InTBIR Participants and Investigators. Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2017; 16 (12) 987-1048
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Saltychev M, Eskola M, Tenovuo O, Laimi K. Return to work after traumatic brain injury: systematic review. Brain Inj 2013; 27 (13-14): 1516-1527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Corrigan JD, Cuthbert JP, Harrison-Felix C. et al. US population estimates of health and social outcomes 5 years after rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2014; 29 (06) E1-E9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CA, Edelaar MJ, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Prognostic factors of return to work after acquired brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj 2009; 23 (05) 385-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sale P, West M, Sherron P, Wehman PH. Exploratory analysis of job separations from supported employment for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1991; 6 (03) 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ezrachi O, Ben-Yishay Y, Kay T, Diller L. Predicting employment in traumatic brain injury following neuropsychological rehabilitation. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1991; 6 (03) 71-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Struchen MA, Clark AN, Sander AM, Mills MR, Evans G, Kurtz D. Relation of executive functioning and social communication measures to functional outcomes following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2008; 23 (02) 185-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Meulenbroek P, Cherney LR. The voicemail elicitation task: functional workplace language assessment for persons with traumatic brain injury. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2019; 62 (09) 3367-3380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Meulenbroek P, Turkstra LS. Job stability in skilled work and communication ability after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38 (05) 452-461
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cuthbert JP, Harrison-Felix C, Corrigan JD, Bell JM, Haarbauer-Krupa JK, Miller AC. Unemployment in the United States after traumatic brain injury for working-age individuals: prevalence and associated factors 2 years postinjury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2015; 30 (03) 160-174
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Faul M, Coronado V. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. In: Grafman J, Salazar AM. eds. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. Vol 127. Elsevier; 2015: 3-13
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Finkelstein E, Corso PS, Miller TR. The Incidence and Economic Burden of Injuries in the United States. New York; 2006
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Wehman P, Kregel J, Sherron P. et al. Critical factors associated with the successful supported employment placement of patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 1993; 7 (01) 31-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Yasuda S, Wehman P, Targett P, Cifu D, West M. Return to work for persons with traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 80 (11) 852-864
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Wehman P, Revell G, Kregel J. Supported employment: a decade of rapid growth and impact. Am Rehabil 1998; 24 (01) 31-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Meulenbroek P, Cherney LR. Computer-based workplace communication training in persons with traumatic brain injury: the work-related communication program. J Commun Disord 2021; 91: 106104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Phillips BN, Kaseroff AA, Fleming AR, Huck GE. Work-related social skills: definitions and interventions in public vocational rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 2014; 59 (04) 386-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Max W, MacKenzie EJ, Rice DP. Head injuries: costs and consequences. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1991; 6 (02) 76-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Meulenbroek P, O'Neil-Pirozzi TM, Sohlberg MM. et al. Tutorial: the speech-language pathologist's role in return to work for adults with traumatic brain injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2022; 31 (01) 188-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Wehman P, Kregel J, West M, Cifu D. Return to work for patients with traumatic brain injury. Analysis of costs. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 73 (04) 280-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tuominen R, Joelsson P, Tenovuo O. Treatment costs and productivity losses caused by traumatic brain injuries. Brain Inj 2012; 26 (13-14): 1697-1701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Turner-Stokes L, Dzingina M, Shavelle R, Bill A, Williams H, Sephton K. Estimated life-time savings in the cost of ongoing care following specialist rehabilitation for severe traumatic brain injury in the United Kingdom. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2019; 34 (04) 205-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Samuelsson K, Tropp M, Lundqvist A. Vocational rehabilitation after acquired brain injury: a Swedish study of benefits and costs. Open Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2014; 2 (03) 133-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Riegler LJ, Neils-Strunjas J, Boyce S, Wade SL, Scheifele PM. Cognitive intervention results in web-based videophone treatment adherence and improved cognitive scores. Med Sci Monit 2013; 19: 269-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Cherney LR. Aphasia treatment: intensity, dose parameters, and script training. Int J Speech Lang Pathol 2012; 14 (05) 424-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nudo RJ. Neural bases of recovery after brain injury. J Commun Disord 2011; 44 (05) 515-520
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008; 51 (01) S225-S239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McAlarney BP, Edwards DJ. Using telehealth technology to better treat TBI. Behav Healthc 2008; 28 (05) 38 , 40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Christopher E, Alsaffarini KW, Jamjoom AA. Mobile health for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the literature and mobile application market. Cureus 2019; 11 (07) e5120
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Des Roches CA, Kiran S. Technology-based rehabilitation to improve communication after acquired brain injury. Front Neurosci 2017; 11: 382-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Politis AM, Norman RS. Computer-based cognitive rehabilitation for individuals with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups 2016; 1 (02) 18-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jak AJ, Seelye AM, Jurick SM. Crosswords to computers: a critical review of popular approaches to cognitive enhancement. Neuropsychol Rev 2013; 23 (01) 13-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Togher L, Wiseman-Hakes C, Douglas J. et al; INCOG Expert Panel. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part IV: cognitive communication. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2014; 29 (04) 353-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tate R, Kennedy M, Ponsford J. et al. INCOG recommendations for management of cognition following traumatic brain injury, part III: executive function and self-awareness. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2014; 29 (04) 338-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Sohlberg MM, Turkstra L. Optimizing Cognitive Rehabilitation: Effective Instructional Methods. New York: Guilford Press; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Ehlhardt LA, Sohlberg MM, Kennedy M. et al. Evidence-based practice guidelines for instructing individuals with neurogenic memory impairments: what have we learned in the past 20 years?. Neuropsychol Rehabil 2008; 18 (03) 300-342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Lee H, Sullivan SJ, Schneiders AG. et al. Smartphone and tablet apps for concussion road warriors (team clinicians): a systematic review for practical users. Br J Sports Med 2015; 49 (08) 499-505
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bedell GM, Wade SL, Turkstra LS, Haarbauer-Krupa J, King JA. Informing design of an app-based coaching intervention to promote social participation of teenagers with traumatic brain injury. Dev Neurorehabil 2017; 20 (07) 408-417
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Brunner M, Hemsley B, Togher L, Palmer S. Technology and its role in rehabilitation for people with cognitive-communication disability following a traumatic brain injury (TBI). Brain Inj 2017; 31 (08) 1028-1043
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Egan J, Worrall L, Oxenham D. An Internet training intervention for people with traumatic brain injury: barriers and outcomes. Brain Inj 2005; 19 (08) 555-568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Cho J, Park D, Lee HE. Cognitive factors of using health apps: systematic analysis of relationships among health consciousness, health information orientation, eHealth literacy, and health app use efficacy. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16 (05) e125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014; 89 (09) 1245-1251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Chen X. Politeness processing as situated social cognition: a RT-theoretic account. J Pragmatics 2014; 71: 117-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Halliday MAK, Matthiessen CMIM. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold; 2004
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Holmes J, Stubbe M. Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. 1st ed. London: Longman; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Togher L, Hand L, Code C. Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Inj 1997; 11 (03) 169-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Togher L, Hand L. Use of politeness markers with different communication partners: an investigation of five subjects with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 1998; 12 (7–8): 755-770
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 National Center for O*NET Development. O*NET OnLine Help: Job Zones. Department of Labor. Updated June 12, 2018. Accessed July 10, 2018 at: https://www.onetonline.org/help/online/zones
    PubMed
  • 49 Schwandt T. Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry. Handbook of Qualitative Research Thousand Oaks, California: Sage; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 51 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). 2022 Medicare Fee Schedule for Speech-Language Pathologists. Rockville, MD; December 27, 2022
    PubMed
  • 52 Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 2008; 62 (01) 107-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Dicicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF. The qualitative research interview. Med Educ 2006; 40 (04) 314-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Burnard P. A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Educ Today 1991; 11 (06) 461-466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 (09) 1277-1288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3 (02) 77-101
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Meulenbroek P, Keegan LC. The life participation approach and social reintegration after traumatic brain injury. In: Holland A, Elman RJ. eds. The Social Imperative: Getting Back to Life After Aphasia, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Dementia. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2020: 181-207
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Kennedy MRT. Coaching College Students with Executive Function Problems. Guilford Press; 2017
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Ylvisaker M. Self-coaching: a context-sensitive, person-centred approach to social communication after traumatic brain injury. Brain Impair 2006; 7 (03) 246-258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar