Nuklearmedizin 2020; 59(02): 172
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708369
Wissenschaftliche Poster
Radiomics
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Glioblastoma segmentation using unsupervised machine learning

S Castaneda
1   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Tübingen
,
P Katiyar
2   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Tübingen
,
J Disselhorst
2   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Tübingen
,
B Bender
3   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Department of Neuroradiology, Tübingen
,
M Reimold
1   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Tübingen
,
J Hempel
3   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Department of Neuroradiology, Tübingen
,
U Ernemann
3   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Department of Neuroradiology, Tübingen
,
B Pichler
2   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Tübingen
,
C la Fougère
1   Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen, Department of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Molecular Imaging, Tübingen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 April 2020 (online)

 

Ziel/Aim Multiparametric PET/MRI data of glioblastoma is complex and requires thorough understanding in order to produce: accurate tumor delineations, reliable segmentations of tumor heterogeneity, predict aggressiveness, stratify risk and therapy response assessments. Supervised machine learning (ML) approaches are not easily interpretable. Here, we focused on the segmentation using multiparametric MRI using an unsupervised ML approach.

Methodik/Methods 50 publicly available patient datasets belonging to the BRATS competition 2016 were used for analysis [1]. The datasets consist of T2 FLAIR, T2- and T1-weighted images pre- and post-injection of contrast agent. Pathological regions using provided radiological labels from the competition were provided per patient, which served as ground truth. We applied a gaussian mixture model with an increasing number of clusters until the calculated dice coefficient on the pathological region best approximated the ground truth.

Ergebnisse/Results Our results show a median detection accuracy of 0.996, a positive predictive value of 0.80, and a dice coefficient of 0.68 using 9 clusters to segment the data. The tumor regions are characterized by increments in signal intensity in pathological region, predominantly contrast enhanced and T2 FLAIR, however to a lesser degree than cerebrospinal fluid and necrotic regions. Healthy gray matter and white matter regions, with different grades of signal intensity were successfully discriminated from pathological regions.

Schlussfolgerungen/Conclusions Our results show multiparametric data using gaussian mixture models can produce accurate and specific tumor segmentations. However, this methodology still lacks accurate sensitivity for all pathological tissue, and though it can serve as a tool to understand the multidimensional variations in the tissue and their relationship, it still does not capture all of the tissue of interest. Following steps involve comparisons to supervised ML methods and addition of specific PET radiotracers.