Knowledge and Process Management in Health Care Organizations

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: Medical knowledge management and care process management have become to be considered as valuable strategic assets that can lead to sustained increase in Health Care Organization (HCO) performance. Thus, it is essential to investigate which are the enablers for promoting knowledge-based organizations (people, organization, process, and system perspectives). Although they are essential for a HCO to manage knowledge effectively, it is still unclear how to employ them in more principled fashion. This requires innovative management strategies to determine effective ways of utilizing knowledge resources and capabilities available both within and outside the organization.

Method: This paper reviews knowledge and process management theories, methods, and technologies that are potentially effective in building high performance HCOs. They come from a variety of fields behind computer science and medical informatics, e.g. from business and organization sciences to psychological and cognitive sciences, from epistemology to sociology. However, the success in developing future Health Information Systems (HIS) requires their incorporation into a new conceptual framework after recognizing how peculiar are the characteristics of HCOs with respect to other organizations. Investigating the nature of knowledge, in general, and of medical knowledge, in particular, is essential to define which services the future HIS should provide to foster collaboration between patients and health professionals. The knowledge creation process is then described in order to emphasize its dynamic and social characteristics. The potential of workflow technology for building innovative HISs is analyzed together with several basic research issues which are very challenging for researchers in the field.

Result: A framework for augmenting the conceptual analysis of theories, methods, tools and effects of knowledge management in building high performance HCOs.

• References

• 1 Davenport TH, Prusak L. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 2 Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press; 2001
  Google Scholar
• 3 Hamel G, Prahalad CK. Competing for the Future. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1994
  Google Scholar
• 4 Leonard-Barton D. Well-springs of Knowledge: Building and Sustaining the Sources of Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 1995
  Google Scholar
• 5 Stewart TA. Intellectual Capital: the New Wealth of Organizations. New York, NY: Doubleday; 1997
  Google Scholar
• 6 Garvin DA. Learning in Action: a Guide to Putting the Learning Organizations to Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 7 Chuang S-H. A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an empirical investigation. Expert Systems with Applications 2004; 27 (03) 459-65.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Institute of Medicine. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 9 Barley V, Neale G, Burns-Cox C, Savage P, Machin S, El Sobky A. et al. Reducing error, improving safety. British Medical Journal 2000; 321 7259 505-14.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Millenson ML. Demanding Medical Excellence. Chicago, MI: The University Chicago Press; 1999
  Google Scholar
• 11 Fieschi M, Dugour J-C, Staccini P, Gouvernet J, Bouhaddou O. Medical decision support systems: old dilemmas and new paradigms. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (03) 190-8.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Searle JR. The Construction of Social Reality. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1995
  Google Scholar
• 13 Hutchins E. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1995
  Google Scholar
• 14 Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. Mechanisms for producing a working knowledge: enacting, orchestrating and organizing. Information and Organization 2003; 13 (03) 203-29.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Wenger E, McDermott R, Snyder W. Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2002
  Google Scholar
• 16 Coiera E. Four rules for the reinvention of health care. British Medical Journal 2004; 328 7449 1197-9.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Drucker PF. Knowledge-worker productivity: the biggest challenge. California Management Review 1999; 41 (02) 79-94.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Cohen SS, Prusak L. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organization Work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2001
  Google Scholar
• 19 Cappelli P. A market driven approach to retaining talent. Harvard Business Review. 2000. January to February 103-11.
  Google Scholar
• 20 Dessler G. How to earn your employees. Academy of Management Executive 1999; 13 (02) 58-67.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Liebowitz J. Knowledge management and its link to artificial intelligence. Expert Systems with Applications 2001; 20 (01) 1-6.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Minsky M. Steps Toward Artificial Intelligence. In Feigenbaum EA, Feldman J. editors Computers and Thought. New York, NY: Mac Graw Hill; 1963
  Google Scholar
• 23 Newell A, Simon HA. Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1972
  Google Scholar
• 24 Simon HA. Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York, NY: John Wiley; 1957
  Google Scholar
• 25 Kurzweil R. Intelligent Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003
  Google Scholar
• 26 Block N. The Computer Model of Mind. In Osherson DH, Smith EE. editors Thinking: An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990
  Google Scholar
• 27 Maturana H, Varela F. The Tree of Knowledge. Boston, MA: New Science Library; 1987
  Google Scholar
• 28 Varela F, Thompson JE, Rosch E. The Embodied Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1992
  Google Scholar
• 29 Winograd T, Flores F. Understanding Computers and Cognition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex; 1986
  Google Scholar
• 30 Varela F, Bourgine P. Towards a Practice of Autonomous Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003
  Google Scholar
• 31 McDermott R. Why information technology inspired, but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review 1999; 41 (03) 103-17.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Cook SDN, Brown JS. Bridging epistemologies: the generative dancing between organizational knowledge and organizational learning. Organization Science 1999; 10 (04) 381-400.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Brown JS, Duguid P. Balancing act: how to capture knowledge without killing it. Harvard Business Review. 2000. May-June 2000: 73-80.
  Google Scholar
• 34 Panzarasa S, Maddè S, Quaglini S, Pistarini C, Stefanelli M. Evidence-based careflow management systems: the case of post-stroke rehabilitation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2002; 35 (02) 123-39.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Quaglini S, Stefanelli M, Cavallini A, Micieli G, Fassino C, Mossa C. Guideline-based careflow systems. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2000; 20 (01) 5-22.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Smith B. The ecological approach to information processing. In Nyíri JC. editor Mobile Communication: Essays on Philosophy, Psychology and Education. Vienna: Passagen Verlag; 2003: 1724-32.
  Google Scholar
• 37 Gibson JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin; 1979
  Google Scholar
• 38 Donald M. Origins of Modern Mind: Three Stages of Evolution of Culture and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1991
  Google Scholar
• 39 Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension. London, UK: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1966
  Google Scholar
• 40 Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind over Machine. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1986
  Google Scholar
• 41 Patel VL, Arocha JF, Kaufman DR. A primer on aspects of cognition for Medical Informatics. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 2001; 8 (04) 324-43.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Nonaka I, Takeuchi H. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford, UK: University Press; 1995
  Google Scholar
• 43 Stefanelli M. The socio-organizational age of artificial intelligence in medicine. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2001; 23 (01) 25-47.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Choi B, Lee H. Knowledge managemnt strategy and its link to knowledge creation process. Expert Systems with Applications 2002; 23 (03) 173-87.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Stefanelli M. The role of methodologies to improve efficiency and effectiveness of care delivery processes for the year 2013. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 66 1-3 39-44.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Bellazzi R, Zupan B. Intelligent data analysis – a special issue on intelligent data analysis. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (05) 362-4.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Russel J, Greenhalgh T, Boynton P, Rigby M. Soft networks for bridging the gap between research and practice: illuminative evaluation of CHAIN. British Medical Journal 2004; May 15 328 7449 1174-7.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Wyatt JC. Management of explicit and tacit knowledge. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2001; 9: 6-9.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Hansen MT, Nohria N, Tierney T. What’s strategies for managing knowledge. Harvard Business Review. 1999. March-April 106-16.
  Google Scholar
• 50 Boland RJ, Tenkasi RV. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science 1995; 6 (04) 350-72.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA, Haux R. IMIA working conference on health information systems 2002 Heidelberg – practical HIS experiences. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (01) VI-VIII.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Kuhn KA, Giuse DA, Talmon J. The Heidelberg Conference: setting an agenda for the AMIA working group on Health Information Systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 69 2-3 77-82.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Giuse DA, Kuhn KA. Health iformations systems challenges: the Heidelberg conference and the future. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 69 2-3 105-14.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Hartswood MJ, Procter RN, Rouchy P, Rouncefield M, Slack R, Voss A. Working IT out in medical practice: IT systems design and development as co-production. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (04) 392-7.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Organizational issues = change. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 69 2-3 197-203.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Wyatt JC, Wyatt SM. When and how to evaluate health information systems?. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 69 2-3 251-9.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Gustafson DH, Wyatt JC. Evaluation of ehealth systems and services. British Medical Journal 2004; May 15 328 7949 1150
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Davidow W, Malone M. The Virtual Corporation, Structuring and Revitalizing the Corporation for the 21st Century. New York, NY: Harper Business; 2003
  Google Scholar
• 59 Wright P, Snell S. Toward a unifying framework for exploring fit and flexibility in strategic resource management. Academy of Management Review 1998; 23: 756-72.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Ghemawat P, Costa R. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management Journal 1993; 14: 59-73.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Thompson J. Organizations in Action. New York, NY: MacGraw-Hill; 1967
  Google Scholar
• 62 Burns T, Stalker J. The Management of Innovation. London, UK: Tavistock; 2003
  Google Scholar
• 63 Daft R. Essentials of Organization Theory and Design. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 64 Tushman M, O’Reilly CA. Winning through Innovation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2003
  Google Scholar
• 65 Adler P, Goldoftas B, Levine D. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science 1999; 10: 43-68.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Newell S, Huang JC, Galiers RD, Pan SL. Implementing enterprise resource planning and knowledge management systems in tandem: fostering efficiency and complementarity. Information and Organization 2003; 13 (01) 25-52.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Lee Z, Lee J. An ERP implementation case study from a knowledge transfer perspective. Journal of Information Technology 2000; 15: 281-8.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Shanks G, Seddon P. Editorial. Journal of Information Technology 2000; 15: 243-4.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Special Issue on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP). Communications of the ACM 43[4]. 2000
  PubMed
• 70 Starbuck W. Learning by knowledge intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies 2002; 29: 713-40.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Von Krogh G, Ichijo K, Nonaka I. Enabling Knowledge Creation. New York, USA: Oxford University Press; 2001
  Google Scholar
• 72 Wenger E. Communities of Practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 73 Feifer C, Fifield J, Ornstein O, Karson AS, Westfall Bates D, Jones KR. et al. From research to daily clinical practice: what are the challenges in “translation”?. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 2004; 30 (05) 235-45.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Pratt W, Reddy MC, McDonald DW, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Gennari J. H. Incorporating ideas from computer-supported cooperative work. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2004; 37 (02) 128-37.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Brennan P, Safran C. Report of conference track 3: patient empowerment. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 69 2-3 301-4.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Ash J, Gorman P, Lavelle M, Stavri P, Lyman J, Fornier L. et al. Perceptions of physicians order entry: results of a cross-site qualitative study. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (04) 313-23.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Beyer H, Holtzblatt K. Contestual Design: Defining Customer Centered Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 78 Greenbaum J, Kyng M. Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1991
  Google Scholar
• 79 Norman DA, Draper SW. eds User Centered System Design. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003
  Google Scholar
• 80 van der Aalst WMP, van Hee K. Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2002
  Google Scholar
• 81 Halverson CA. Activity theory and distributed cognition: or what does CSCW need to do with theories?. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2002; 11: 243-67.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 Redmiles D. Introduction to the special issue on activity theory and the practice of design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2002; 11: 1-11.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Engeström Y. Coordination, Cooperation and Communication in the Courts. Mind, Culture, and Activity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997: 369-88.
  Google Scholar
• 84 Salomon G. (ed.) Distributed Cognitions. Learning in doing: Social, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1993
  Google Scholar
• 85 Clark A. Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997
  Google Scholar
• 86 Simon HA. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1990
  Google Scholar
• 87 Workflow Management Coalition. Workflow Handbook 1997. Lawrence P. ed New York, NY: John Wiley; 1997
  Google Scholar
• 88 Weske M, van der Aalst WMP, Verbeek HMW. Advances in business process management. Decision Support Systems 2004; 50 (01) 1-8.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Kumar A, Smith B, Pisanelli D, Gangemi A, Stefanelli M. An ontological framework for the implementation of clinical guidelines in health care organizations. In Pisanelli D. editor Ontologies in Medicine. IOS Press; 2004: 95-107.
  Google Scholar
• 90 Kumar A, van der Aalst WMP, Verbeek E. Dynamic work distribution in workflow management systems: how to balance quality and p erformance. Journal of Management Information Systems 2002; 18 (03) 157-93.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 91 Klein M, Dellarocas C. A knowledge-based approach to handling exceptions in workflow systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2000; 9: 399-412.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 92 Luo Z, Sheth A, Kochut K, Miller J. Exception handling in workflow systems. Applied Intelligence 2000; 13: 125-47.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 93 Chiu D, Li Q, Karlapalem K. Web interfacedriven cooperative exception handling in ADOME workflow management system. Information Systems 2001; 26 (02) 93-120.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 94 Hwang S, Tang J. Consulting past exceptions to facilitate workflow exception handling. Decision Support Systems 2004; 37: 49-69.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 95 Coiera E. Interaction design theory. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 69 2-3 205-22.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 96 Coiera E. When communication is better than computation. Journal of American Medical Informatics Association 2000; 7 (03) 277-86.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 97 Berg M, Toussaint P. The mantra of modeling and the forgotten power of paper: a sociotechnical view on the development of process-oriented ICT in health care. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; 69 2-3 223-34.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 98 Garrod S. How groups co-ordinate their concepts and terminology: implications for medical informatics. Methods Inf Med 1998; 37: 471-6.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 99 Atkinson P. Medical Talk and Medical Work. London, UK: Sage; 1995
  Google Scholar
• 100 Micieli G, Cavallini A, Quaglini S. Guideline compliance improves stroke outcome – A preliminary study in 4 districts in the Italian Region of Lombardia. Stroke 2002; 33: 1341-7.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 101 Quaglini S, Cavallini A, Gerzeli S, Micieli G. Economic benefit from clinical practice guideline compliance in stroke patient management. Health Policy 2004; 69: 305-15.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 102 Fox MS, Gruninger M. Enterprise modeling. AI Magazine 1998; Fall 1998: 109-21.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 103 Smith B, Searle JR. The construction of social reality: an exchange. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 2003; 62 (02) 285-309.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 104 Weigand H, de Moor A. Workflow analysis with communication norms. Data & Knowledge Engineering 2003; 47 (03) 349-69.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 105 Zhuge H. Component-based workflow systems development. Decision Support Systems 2003; 35 (04) 517-36.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 106 Li H, Yang Y, Chen TY. Resource constraints analysis of workflow specifications. The Journal of Systems and Software 2003; 73 (02) 271-85.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 107 Yang G. Process library. Data & Knowledge Engineering 2004; 50 (01) 35-62.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 108 van der Aalst WMP. Three good reasons for using a Petri-net-based Workflow Management System. In Wakayama T, Kannapan T, Khoong CM, Navathe S, Yates J. editors Information and Process Integration in Enterprises: Rethinking Documents. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998: 161-82.
  Google Scholar
• 109 Liu D, Wang J, Chan S, Sun J, Zhang L. Modeling worflow peocess with colored Petri nets. Computers in Industry 2002; 49 (03) 267-81.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 110 van der Aalst WMP, ter Hofstede AHM. YAWL: yet another workflow language. Information Systems, in press
  PubMed
• 111 Schultz KA, Orlowska M-E. Facilitating crossorganizational workflows with a workflow view view approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering, in press.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 112 Schimm G. Mining exact models of concurrent workflows. Computers in Industry, in press.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 113 Madhusudan T, Zhao JL, Marshall B. A casebased reasoning framework for workflow model management. Data & Knowledge Engineering 2004; 50 (01) 87-115.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 114 Zhuge H. Workflow- and agent-based cognitive flow management for distributed team cooperation. Information & Management 2003; 40: 419-29.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 115 Rinderle S, Reichert M, Dadam P. Correctness criteria for dynamic changes in workflow systems – a survey. Data & Knowledge Engineering 2004; 5 (01) 9-34.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 116 Müller R, Greiner U, Rahm E. Agent Work: a workflow system supporting rule-based workflow adaptation. Data & Knowledge Engineering, in press.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 117 Mentzas G, Halaris C, Kavadias S. Modelling business processes with workflow systems: an evaluation of alternative approaches. International Journal of Information Management 2001; 21 (02) 123-35.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 118 Chung PWH, Cheung L, Stader J, Jarvis P, Moore J, Macintosh A. Knowledge-based process management – an approach to handling adaptive workflow. Knowldge-Based Systems 2003; 16 (03) 149-60.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 119 Weigand H, van den Heuvel W. Cross-organizational workflow integration using contracts. Decision Support Systems 2002; 33 (03) 247-65.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 120 Liu D, Wu M, Lee S. Role-based authorizations for workklow systems in support of task-based separation of duty. The Journal of Systems and Software, in press.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 121 Lechleitner G, Pfeiffer K-P, Wilhelmy I, Ball M. Cerner Millennium^TM: the Innsbruck experience. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (01) 8-15.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 122 Gell G, Schmücker P, Pedevilla M, Leitner H, Naumann J, Fuchs H. SAP and Partners: IS-HTM and IS-H*MED*. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (01) 16-24.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 123 Haux R, Seggeweis C, Baldauf-Sobez W, Kullmann P, Reichert H, Luedecke L. et al. Soarian^TM: workflow management applied for health care. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (01) 25-36.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 124 Degoulet P, Marin L, Lavril M, Le Bozec C, Delbecke E, Meaux JJ. et al. The HEGP componentbased clinical information system. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003; Mar 69 2-3 115-26.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 125 Kuhn KA, Lenz R, Elstner T, Siegele H, Moll R. Experiences with a generator tool for building clinical application modules. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (01) 37-44.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 126 Giuse DA. Provider order entry with integrated decision support: from academia to industry. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (01) 45-50.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar