Atlas-based Recognition of Anatomical Structures and Landmarks and the Automatic Computation of Orthopedic Parameters

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: This paper describes methods for the automatic atlas-based segmentation of bone structures of the hip, the automatic detection of anatomical point landmarks and the computation of orthopedic parameters to avoid the interactive, time-consuming preprocessing steps for the virtual planning of hip operations.

Methods: Based on the CT data of the Visible Human Data Sets, two three-dimensional atlases of the human pelvis have been built. The atlases consist of labeled CT data sets, 3D surface models of the separated structures and associated anatomical point landmarks. The atlas information is transferred to the patient data by a non-linear gray value-based registration algorithm. A surface-based registration algorithm was developed to detect the anatomical landmarks on the patient’s bone structures. Furthermore, a software tool for the automatic computation of orthopedic parameters is presented. Finally, methods for an evaluation of the atlas-based segmentation and the atlas-based landmark detection are explained.

Results: A first evaluation of the presented atlas-based segmentation method shows the correct labeling of 98.5% of the bony voxels. The presented landmark detection algorithm enables the precise and reliable localization of orthopedic landmarks. The accuracy of the landmark detection is below 2.5 mm.

Conclusion: The atlas-based segmentation of bone structures, the atlas-based landmark detection and the automatic computation of orthopedic measures are suitable to essentially reduce the time-consuming user interaction during the pre-processing of the CT data for the virtual three-dimensional planning of hip operations.

• References

• 1 Moody JE, DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Blackwell M, Colgan B, Nikou C. Gauging clinical practice: surgical navigation for Total Hip Replacement. In Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S. (eds) MICCAI 98. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 1998: 421-30.
  Google Scholar
• 2 Langlotz U, Lawrence J, Hu Q, Langlotz F, Nolte L-P. Image guided cup placement. In Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, Farman AG. (eds) CARS 99. Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. 1999: 717-21.
  Google Scholar
• 3 Harris SJ, Lin WJ, Fan KL, Hibberd RD, Cobb J, Middleton R, Davies BL. Experiences with robotic systems for knee surgery. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference of CVRMed and MRCAS. 1997; 757-66.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Richolt JA, Teschner M, Everett PC, Girod B, Millis MB, Kikinis R. Planning and evaluation of reorienting osteotomies of the proximal femur in cases of SCFE using virtual three-dimensional models. In Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S. (eds) MICCAI 98. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 1998
  Google Scholar
• 5 Handels H, Ehrhardt J, Plötz W, Pöppl SJ. Virtual planning of hip operations and individual adaption of endoprosthesis in orthopedic surgery. Int J Medical Informatics 2000; 58: 21-8.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Richolt JA, Hata N, Kikinis R, Kordelle J, Millis MB. Three-dimensional bone angle quantification. In Bankman I. (ed) Handbook of Medical Image Processing. Academic Press; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 7 Höhne KH, Bomanns M, Riemer M, Schubert R, Tiede U, Lierse W. A 3D anatomical atlas based on a volume model. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 1992; 12: 72-8.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Gee JC, Reivich M, Bajcsy R. Elastically deforming 3D atlas to match anatomical brain images. J Comp Assis Tomogr 1993; 17: 225-36.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kikinis R, Shenton ME, Iosifescu DV, McCarley RW, Saiviroonporn P, Hokama HH. et al. A digital brain atlas for surgical planning, model-driven segmentation and teaching. IEEE Trans Visualiz Comput Graphics 1996; 2: 232-41.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ackermann MJ. The Visible Human Project: A resource for anatomical visualization. In Cesnik B, McCray AT, Scherrer J-R. (eds) MEDINFO ’98. Proc of the 9th World Congress on Medical Informatics; Seoul, Korea. 1998: 1030-2.
  Google Scholar
• 11 Lorensen WE, Cline HE. Marching cubes: a high resolution 3-D surface construction algorithm. Computer Graphics 1987; 21: 163-9.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Woods RP, Grafton ST, Holmes CJ, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC. Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. J Comp Assis Tomogr 1998; 22: 141-54.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Collins DL, Neelin P, Peters TM, Evans AC. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Tailarach space. J Comp Assis Tomogr 1994; 18: 192-205.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Bajcsy R, Kovacic S. Multiresolution elastic matching. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 1989; 46: 1-21.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Christensen GE, Miller MI, Vannier M. 3D brain mapping using a deformable neuroanatomy. Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 609-18.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Bro-Nielsen M, Gramkow C. Fast fluid registration of medical images. In Höhne KH, Kikinis R. (eds) Proc of the Visualization in Biomedical Computing Conference; Hamburg, Germany. 1996: 267-76.
  Google Scholar
• 17 Maintz JBA, Viergever MA. A survey of medical image registration. Medical Image Analysis 1998; 2: 1-36.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Thirion JP. Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons. Medical Image Analysis 1998; 2: 243-60.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Dawant BM, Thirion J-P, Maes F, Vandermeulen D, Demaerel P. Automatic 3D segmentation of internal structures of the head in MR images using a combination of similarity and freeform transformations. In Hanson KM. (ed) Medical Imaging 1998: Image Processing (MI ’98). Proc. SPIE 3338; San Diego. 1998: 545-54.
  Google Scholar
• 20 Guimond A, Meunier J, Thirion J-P. Average brain models: A convergence study. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 2000; 77: 192-210.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Schroeder WJ, Zarge JA, Lorensen WE. Decimation of triangle meshes. In: SIGGRAPH92; Chicago. 1992: 163-9.
  Google Scholar
• 22 Rohr K. Differential Operators for Detecting Point Landmarks. Image and Vision Computing 1997; 15: 219-33.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Frantz S, Rohr K, Stiehl HS. Localization of 3D anatomical point landmarks in 3D tomographic images using deformable models. In Delp SL, DiGioia M, Jaramaz B. (eds) MICCAI 2000. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. 2000: 492-501.
  Google Scholar
• 24 Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans Patt Anal Machine Intell 1992; 14 (02) 239-56.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Andresen PR, Nielsen M. Non-rigid registration by geometry-constrained diffusion. Medical Image Analysis. 2001; 5: 81-8.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Schroeder WJ, Martin K, Lorensen WE. The Visualization Toolkit. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 27 Desbrun M, Meyer M, Schröder P, Barr AH. Implicit fairing of irregular meshes using diffusion curvature flow. In: SIGGRAPH’99. 1999: 317-24.
  Google Scholar
• 28 Preparata FP, Shamos MI. Computational Geometry: An Introduction. Springer: 1985
  Google Scholar
• 29 Clarenz U, Dziuk G, Rumpf M. On generalized mean curvature flow in surface processing. In Hildebrandt S, Karcher H. (eds) Geometric analysis and nonlinear partial differential equations. 2002
  Google Scholar
• 30 Nikou C, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM, Levison TJ. Description of anatomic coordinate systems and rationale for use in an image-guided Total Hip Replacement system. In: MICCAI 2000. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention. 2000: 1188-94.
  Google Scholar