Normal Shoulder Ultrasound: Anatomy and Technique

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Shoulder ultrasound (US) is one of the most common applications of musculoskeletal US due to the high incidence of rotator cuff disorders. It can be used effectively for the diagnosis of rotator cuff diseases, and several studies have shown very high sensitivity and specificity for rotator cuff tears comparable with that of MRI. Shoulder US has several advantages over MRI such as lower cost, comparatively easier availability, short examination duration, dynamic capability, and ability to perform guided injection at the same appointment. However, it depends on the skill of the operator and therefore requires a standardized detailed protocol to avoid errors in diagnosis. A symptomatic area–only focused examination should not be performed because it is not uncommon to have symptoms away from the actual site of pathology. Detailed understanding of what anatomy can be evaluated is required, and this article discusses the relevant anatomy covering the rotator cuff, subacromial bursa, and acromioclavicular joint. The equipment requirements and technique of examination of different anatomical structures with transducer positions and normal sonographic appearances are described. Pitfalls and artifacts associated with shoulder US are covered; understanding them is crucial to avoid misinterpretation of findings.

• References

• 1 Jacobson JA. Shoulder US: anatomy, technique, and scanning pitfalls. Radiology 2011; 260 (1) 6-16
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Prato N , et al. US of the shoulder: non-rotator cuff disorders. Radiographics 2003; 23 (2) 381-401 ; quiz 534
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. A comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82 (4) 498-504
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Le Corroller T, Cohen M, Aswad R, Pauly V, Champsaur P. Sonography of the painful shoulder: role of the operator's experience. Skeletal Radiol 2008; 37 (11) 979-986
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Werner A, Mueller T, Boehm D, Gohlke F. The stabilizing sling for the long head of the biceps tendon in the rotator cuff interval. A histoanatomic study. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28 (1) 28-31
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Minagawa H, Itoi E, Konno N , et al. Humeral attachment of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus tendons: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (3) 302-306
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Bianchi S, Martinoli C. The shoulder. In: Bianchi S, Martinoli C, , eds. Ultrasound of the Musculoskeletal System. Milan, Italy: Springer Verlag; 2007: 219
  Google Scholar
• 8 Ruotolo C, Fow JE, Nottage WM. The supraspinatus footprint: an anatomic study of supraspinatus insertions. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (3) 246-249
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Burkhart SS, Esch JC, Jolson RS. The rotator crescent and rotator cable: an anatomic description of the shoulder's “suspension bridge.”. Arthroscopy 1993; 9 (6) 611-616
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Sheah K, Bredella MA, Warner JJ, Halpern EF, Palmer WE. Transverse thickening along the articular surface of the rotator cuff consistent with the rotator cable: identification with MR arthrography and relevance in rotator cuff evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193 (3) 679-686
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Kask K, Kolts I, Lubienski A, Russlies M, Leibecke T, Busch LC. Magnetic resonance imaging and correlative gross anatomy of the ligamentum semicirculare humeri (rotator cable). Clin Anat 2008; 21 (5) 420-426
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Morag Y, Jamadar DA, Boon TA, Bedi A, Caoili EM, Jacobson JA. Ultrasound of the rotator cable: prevalence and morphology in asymptomatic shoulders. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 198 (1) W27–W30
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Alasaarela E, Tervonen O, Takalo R, Lahde S, Suramo I. Ultrasound evaluation of the acromioclavicular joint. J Rheumatol 1997; 24 (10) 1959-1963
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Jamadar DA, Robertson BL, Jacobson JA , et al. Musculoskeletal sonography: important imaging pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (1) 216-225
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Farin PU. Sonography of the biceps tendon of the shoulder: normal and pathologic findings. J Clin Ultrasound 1996; 24 (6) 309-316
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Armstrong A, Teefey SA, Wu T , et al. The efficacy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of long head of the biceps tendon pathology. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15 (1) 7-11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Crass JR, Craig EV, Feinberg SB. The hyperextended internal rotation view in rotator cuff ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 1987; 15 (6) 416-420
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Ferri M, Finlay K, Popowich T, Stamp G, Schuringa P, Friedman L. Sonography of full-thickness supraspinatus tears: comparison of patient positioning technique with surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184 (1) 180-184
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Crass JR, Craig EV, Feinberg SB. Ultrasonography of rotator cuff tears: a review of 500 diagnostic studies. J Clin Ultrasound 1988; 16 (5) 313-327
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Bureau NJ, Beauchamp M, Cardinal E, Brassard P. Dynamic sonography evaluation of shoulder impingement syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187 (1) 216-220
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar