Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1391955
Inadvertent submucosal esophageal tunnel complicating ERCP
Publication History
Publication Date:
22 June 2015 (online)
A 62-year-old man presented with a 2-month history of cholestatic jaundice. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a heterogeneous tumor in the hepatic hilum, with dilated biliary tracts. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was performed. Following papillotomy, a partially covered metal stent was inserted for bile drainage ([Fig. 1]).
On withdrawal of the duodenoscope, bloody material was observed along the entire length of the esophagus. A forward-viewing gastroscope was used and revealed a 10-cm longitudinal tear with a submucosal tunnel in the middle-third of the esophagus ([Fig. 2]). A total of 28 endoclips were used to seal the laceration ([Fig. 3]). A chest radiograph revealed no pneumomediastinum ([Fig. 4]). The patient was treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics and parenteral nutrition. Repeat endoscopy 23 days later showed complete healing of the laceration, with ridge formation along the esophagus ([Fig. 5]). The patient had an unremarkable recovery.
ERCP is a minimally invasive procedure that is widely used for the diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic diseases. ERCP is still associated with several distinct complications including pancreatitis, hemorrhage, and duodenal or esophageal perforation [1]. Overall, complication rates range from 2 % to 10 %, with mortality rates ranging from 0.5 % to 1 % [2]. For esophageal perforations, the mortality rates are about 10 % to 50 % [3].
The rare complication of esophageal submucosal tunneling during an ERCP procedure has not been reported previously. The laceration may have resulted from injury during advancement of the duodenoscope. Careful maneuvers, especially when slightly increased resistance is encountered, could have prevented the complication. Immediate recognition of the laceration in the current case permitted timely closure of the wound to avoid further perforation.
Stent placement has been shown to be a safe option for treating esophageal lacerations, but stents are not beneficial for mucosal healing [4]. Endoscopic clip closure has been advocated for esophageal perforations, with satisfactory results [5]. The current case highlights the potential risks of esophageal laceration during ERCP. The clip closure technique is effective and safe in treating esophageal submucosal lacerations.
Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_CPL_1AK_2AC
-
References
- 1 Aliperti G. Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1996; 6: 379-407
- 2 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10
- 3 Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, Holscher M et al. Options in the management of esophageal perforation: analysis over a 12-year period. Dis Esophagus 2010; 23: 185-190
- 4 van Boeckel PG, Sijbring A, Vleggaar FP et al. Systematic review: temporary stent placement for benign rupture or anastomotic leak of the oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1292-1301
- 5 Huang J, Wen W, Tang X et al. Cap-assisted clip closure of large esophageal perforations caused by a duodenoscope during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (with video). Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014; 24: e101-e105