Treatment Model in Children with Speech Disorders and Its Therapeutic Efficiency

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Introduction Speech articulation disorders affect the intelligibility of speech. Studies on therapeutic models show the effectiveness of the communication treatment.

Objective To analyze the progress achieved by treatment with the ABAB—Withdrawal and Multiple Probes Model in children with different degrees of phonological disorders.

Methods The diagnosis of speech articulation disorder was determined by speech and hearing evaluation and complementary tests. The subjects of this research were eight children, with the average age of 5:5. The children were distributed into four groups according to the degrees of the phonological disorders, based on the percentage of correct consonants, as follows: severe, moderate to severe, mild to moderate, and mild. The phonological treatment applied was the ABAB—Withdrawal and Multiple Probes Model. The development of the therapy by generalization was observed through the comparison between the two analyses: contrastive and distinctive features at the moment of evaluation and reevaluation.

Results The following types of generalization were found: to the items not used in the treatment (other words), to another position in the word, within a sound class, to other classes of sounds, and to another syllable structure.

Conclusion The different types of generalization studied showed the expansion of production and proper use of therapy-trained targets in other contexts or untrained environments. Therefore, the analysis of the generalizations proved to be an important criterion to measure the therapeutic efficacy.

• References

• 1 Lamprecht RR (Org.). Phonological Acquisition of Portuguese: Development Profile and Allowances for Therapy. 1a ed. Porto Alegre. Art Med 2004;
  Google Scholar
• 2 Yavas MS, Hernandorena CLM, Lamprecht RR. Phonological Assessment of Child. 2a ed. Porto Alegre. Art Med 2003;
  Google Scholar
• 3 Mota HB, Keske-Soares M, Bagetti T, Ceron MI, Melo Filha MGC. Comparative analyzes of the efficiency of three different models of phonological therapy. Pro Fono 2007; 19 (1) 67-74
  Google Scholar
• 4 Elbert M, Gierut JA. Handbook of Clinical Phonology. 1st ed. London, UK: Taylor and Francis; 1986
  Google Scholar
• 5 Gierut JA. Complexity in phonological treatment: clinical factors. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 2001; 32 (1) 229-241
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 6 Tyler AA, Figurski GR. Phonetic inventory changes after treating distinctions along an implicational hierarchy. Clin Linguist Phon 1994; 8 (2) 91-107
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 7 Shriberg LD, Kwiatkowski J. Phonological disorders I: a diagnostic classification system. J Speech Hear Disord 1982; 47 (3) 226-241
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 8 Mota HB. Segmental acquisition of Portuguese: an implicational model of feature complexity. Letras Hoje 1997; 32 (4) 23-47
  Google Scholar
• 9 Powell TW, Elbert M. Generalization following the remediation of early- and later-developing consonant clusters. J Speech Hear Disord 1984; 49 (2) 211-218
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 10 Mota HB, Pereira LF. The generalization in phonological therapy in speech disorders: experience with two children. Pro Fono 2001; 13 (2) 141-146
  Google Scholar
• 11 Blanco APF. The generalization in the model modified cycles in patients with different degrees of severity of phonological disorder [dissertation]. Santa Maria, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Center of Health Sciences; 2003
  Google Scholar
• 12 Mota HB, Bagetti T, Keske-Soares M, Pereira LF. The generalization in subjects with mild-moderate phonological disorder treated by the model of maximum oppositions. Rev Soc 2004; 9 (2) 102-111
  Google Scholar
• 13 Bagetti T, Mota HB, Keske-Soares M. Model modified maximum opposition: a proposed treatment for phonological disorders. Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2005;10(1):36–14.
  Google Scholar
• 14 Keske-Soares M. Speech therapy based on implicational hierarchy of distinctive features applied in children with phonological disorders [thesis]. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Faculty of Letters; 2001
  Google Scholar
• 15 Mota HB, Keske-Soares M, Ferla A Zasso LV, Dutra LV. Comparative study of generalization in three model of therapy for phonological disorders. Saúde: Rev Centro Ciência Saúde 2002; 28 (1) 36-47
  Google Scholar
• 16 Ceron MI, Pagliarin KC, Keske-Soares M. Advances in the treatment of children with phonological disorders. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 17 (2) 189-195
  Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ceron MI, Keske-Soares M. Phonological therapy: the generalization to items not used in the treatment (other words). Rev CEFAC 2007; 9 (4) 453-460
  Google Scholar
• 18 Ceron MI, Keske-Soares M. Phonological therapy: the generalization inside a sound class and for other sound classes. Rev CEFAC 2008; 10 (3) 311-320
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 19 Keske-Soares M, Pagliarin KC, Ghisleni MRL, Lamprecht RR. Non linear acquisition during the therapeutic process. Letras de Hoje 2008; 43 (3) 22-26
  Google Scholar