Endosc Int Open 2014; 02(01): E28-E36
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365281
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Adverse events in older patients undergoing ERCP: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lukejohn W. Day*
1   Division of Gastroenterology, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California, United States
2   GI Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Program, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
,
Lisa Lin*
3   Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
,
Ma Somsouk
1   Division of Gastroenterology, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, San Francisco, California, United States
2   GI Health Outcomes, Policy and Economics (HOPE) Research Program, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 13 November 2013

accepted after revision 20 January 2014

Publication Date:
07 March 2014 (online)

Background and study aims: Biliary and pancreatic diseases are common in the elderly; however, few studies have addressed the occurrence of adverse events in elderly patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Our objective was to determine the incidence rates of specific adverse events in this group and calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for selected comparison groups.

Patients and methods: Bibliographical searches were conducted in Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases. The studies included documented the incidence of adverse events (perforation, pancreatitis, bleeding, cholangitis, cardiopulmonary adverse events, mortality) in patients aged ≥ 65 who underwent ERCP. Pooled incidence rates were calculated for each reported adverse event and IRRs were determined for available comparison groups. A parallel analysis was performed in patients aged ≥ 80 and ≥ 90.

Results: Our literature search yielded 7429 articles, of which 69 studies met our inclusion criteria. Pooled incidence rates for adverse events (per 1000 ERCPs) in patients aged ≥ 65 were as follows: perforation 3.8 (95 %CI 1.8 – 7.0), pancreatitis 13.1 (95 %CI 11.0 – 15.5), bleeding 7.7 (95 %CI 5.7 – 10.1), cholangitis 16.1 (95 %CI 11.7 – 21.7), cardiopulmonary events 3.7 (95 %CI 1.5 – 7.6), and death 7.1 (95 %CI 5.2 – 9.4). Patients ≥ 65 had lower rates of pancreatitis (IRR 0.3, 95 %CI 0.3 – 0.4) compared with younger patients. Octogenarians had higher rates of death (IRR 2.4, 95 %CI 1.3 – 4.5) compared with younger patients, whereas nonagenarians had increased rates of bleeding (IRR 2.4, 95 %CI 1.1 – 5.2), cardiopulmonary events (IRR 3.7, 95 %CI 1.0 – 13.9), and death (IRR 3.8, 95 %CI 1.0 – 14.4).

Conclusions ERCP appears to be safe in elderly patients, except in the very elderly who are at higher risk of some adverse events. These data on adverse event rates can help to inform clinical decision-making, the consent process, and comparative effectiveness analyses.

* Lukejohn W. Day, MD and Lisa Lin, MD are the first authors.


 
  • References

  • 1 CDC. Trends in aging: United states and worldwide. MMWR; 2003 Accessed on August 1, 2013 at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5206a2.htm
  • 2 Baron TH, Mallery JS, Hirota WK et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and treatment of patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 643-649
  • 3 Costamagna G, Shah SK, Tringali A. Current management of postoperative complications and benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2003; 13: 635-648 ix ix
  • 4 Harness JK, Strodel WE, Talsma SE. Symptomatic biliary tract disease in the elderly patient. Am Surg 1986; 52: 442-445
  • 5 Lukens FJ, Howell DA, Upender S et al. ERCP in the very elderly: outcomes among patients older than eighty. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 847-851
  • 6 Siegel JH, Kasmin FE. Biliary tract diseases in the elderly: management and outcomes. Gut 1997; 41: 433-435
  • 7 Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-1788
  • 8 Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-918 PubMed
  • 9 Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 467-473
  • 10 Ali M, Ward G, Staley D et al. A retrospective study of the safety and efficacy of ERCP in octogenarians. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 586-590 PubMed
  • 11 Aparicio DPS, Sakai CM, Bueno T et al. Analysis of the role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as a therapeutic method for the elderly. Gastrenterologia Endoscopia Digestiva 2007; 26: 31-35
  • 12 Ashton CE, McNabb WR, Wilkinson ML et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in elderly patients. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 683-688
  • 13 Avila-Funes JA, Montaño-Loza A, Zepeda-Gómez S et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly. Rev Invest Clin 2005; 57: 666-670
  • 14 Chong VH, Yim HB, Lim CC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: outcomes, safety and complications. Singapore Med J 2005; 46: 621-626
  • 15 Fritz E, Kirchgatterer A, Hubner D et al. ERCP is safe and effective in patients 80 years of age and older compared with younger patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 899-905
  • 16 Hammerle CW, Chung MJ, Pandey A et al. Complications of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: A prospective analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB162-AB163
  • 17 Hisai H, Tanaka I, Abe S et al. Efficacy and safety of ERCP procedures in patients 90 years of age and older. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: A62-A63
  • 18 Hu KC, Chu CH, Shih SC et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients 85 years of age and older. Journal of Internal Medicine of Taiwan 2006; 17: 233-239
  • 19 Hu KC, Chang WH, Chu CH et al. Findings and risk factors of early mortality of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in different cohorts of elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 2009; 57: 1839-1843 PubMed
  • 20 Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J et al. Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 417-423
  • 21 Kim JE, Cha BH, Lee SH et al. [Safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograpy in very elderly patients]. Korean J Gastroenterol 2011; 57: 237-242
  • 22 Köklü S, Parlak E, Yüksel O et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: a prospective and comparative study. Age Ageing 2005; 34: 572-577
  • 23 MacMahon M, Walsh TN, Brennan P et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the elderly: a single unit audit. Gerontology 1993; 39: 28-32
  • 24 Mitchell RM, O’Connor F, Dickey W. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is safe and effective in patients 90 years of age and older. J Clin Gastroenterol 2003; 36: 72-74
  • 25 Obana T, Fujita N, Noda Y et al. Efficacy and safety of therapeutic ERCP for the elderly with choledocholithiasis: comparison with younger patients. Intern Med 2010; 49: 1935-1941
  • 26 Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. ERCP in octogenerians: a safe and efficient investigation. Age Ageing 2008; 37: 595-599
  • 27 Rodríguez-González FJ, Naranjo-Rodríguez A, Mata-Tapia I et al. ERCP in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 220-225
  • 28 Talar-Wojnarowska R, Szulc G, Woźniak B et al. Assessment of frequency and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients over 80 years of age. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2009; 119: 136-140
  • 29 Zuckerman M, Garcia C, Lopez O et al. ERCP in the elderly. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 36
  • 30 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
  • 31 Bickerstaff KI, Berry AR, Chapman RW et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for the palliation of ampullary carcinoma. Br J Surg 1990; 77: 160-162
  • 32 Boytchev I, Pelletier G, Prat F et al. [Late biliary complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones in patients older than 65 years of age with gallbladder in situ]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2000; 24: 995-1000
  • 33 Cappell MS. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with endoscopic sphincterotomy for symptomatic choledocholithiasis after recent myocardial infarction. Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1827-1831
  • 34 Croker JR, Williams SG, Charlton M et al. Endoscopic therapy for bile duct stones in a geriatric population. Postgrad Med J 1992; 68: 457-460
  • 35 Lee TH, Han JH, Kim HJ et al. Is the addition of choleretic agents in multiple double-pigtail biliary stents effective for difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients? A prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 96-102
  • 36 Arthur JD, Edwards PR, Chagla LS. Management of gallstone disease in the elderly. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003; 85: 91-96
  • 37 Riphaus A, Stergiou N, Wehrmann T. Sedation with propofol for routine ERCP in high-risk octogenarians: a randomized, controlled study. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 1957-1963
  • 38 Scapa E, Berant A, Leibovitz A et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in octogenarians. J Clin Gastroenterol 1996; 22: 21-22
  • 39 Testoni PA, Giussani A, Vailati C et al. Precut sphincterotomy, repeated cannulation and post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with bile duct stone disease. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 792-796
  • 40 Tobal D, Tobal F. Endoscopy in the elderly. Findings justify risks?. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB216
  • 41 Wang XF, Zhou XP, Li SG et al. Rational therapy for elderly patients aged over 80 with acute obstructive suppurative cholangitis. World Chin J Digestology 2008; 16: 3005-3008
  • 42 Garcia-Cano Lizcano J, Gonzalez Martin JA, Taberna Arana L et al. [Therapeutic biliary endoscopy in patients over 90 years of age]. Med Interna 2002; 19: 409-411
  • 43 Grönroos JM, Salminen P, Laine S et al. Feasibility of ERCP procedures in patients 90 years of age and older. J Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 44: 227-228
  • 44 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Tanaka N et al. Propofol sedation for endoscopic procedures in patients 90 years of age and older. Digestion 2008; 78: 20-23
  • 45 Huguet JM, Sempere J, Bort I et al. [Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients aged more than 90 years old]. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 28: 263-266
  • 46 Salminen P, Grönroos JM. Anesthesiologist assistance in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures in the elderly: is it worthwhile?. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2011; 21: 517-519
  • 47 Vracko J, Markovic S, Wiechel KL. Conservative treatment versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the initial management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients at high surgical risk. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 773-778
  • 48 Cocking JB, Ferguson A, Mukherjee SK et al. Short-acting general anaesthesia facilitates therapeutic ERCP in frail elderly patients with benign extra-hepatic biliary disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 12: 451-454
  • 49 Thomopoulos KC, Vagenas K, Assimakopoulos SF et al. Endoscopic retrogade cholangiopancreatography is safe and effective method for diagnosis and treatment of biliary and pancreatic disorders in octogenarians. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2007; 70: 199-202
  • 50 Grönroos JM. Clinical success of ERCP procedures in nonagenarian patients with bile duct stones. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2011; 20: 146-149
  • 51 Akkiz H, Akinoglu A, Colakoglu S et al. Endoscopic management of biliary hydatid disease. Can J Surg 1996; 39: 287-292
  • 52 Alderson D, Lavelle MI, Venables CW. Endoscopic sphincterotomy before pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981; 282: 1109-1111
  • 53 Bajaj JS, Spinelli KS, Dua KS. Postoperative management of noniatrogenic traumatic bile duct injuries: role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 974-977
  • 54 Cheon YK, Cho KB, Watkins JL et al. Frequency and severity of post-ERCP pancreatitis correlated with extent of pancreatic ductal opacification. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 385-393
  • 55 Chow S, Bosco JJ, Heiss FW et al. Successful treatment of post-cholecystectomy bile leaks using nasobiliary tube drainage and sphincterotomy. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 1839-1843
  • 56 Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-88
  • 57 Davidson BR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct calculi in patients with gall bladder in situ considered unfit for surgery. Gut 1988; 29: 114-120
  • 58 Deans GT, Sedman P, Martin DF et al. Are complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy age related?. Gut 1997; 41: 545-548
  • 59 Elmi F, Silverman WB. Outcome of ERCP in the management of duct-to-duct anastomotic strictures in orthotopic liver transplant. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52: 2346-2350
  • 60 England RE, Martin DF. Endoscopic management of Mirizzi’s syndrome. Gut 1997; 40: 272-276
  • 61 Fisher L, Fisher A, Thomson A. Cardiopulmonary complications of ERCP in older patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 948-955
  • 62 Güitrón-Cantú A, Adalid-Martínez R, Gutiérrez-Bermúdez JA et al. [In Process Citation]. Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2010; 75: 267-272
  • 63 Iles-Shih L, Hilden K, Adler DG. Combined ERCP and EUS in one session is safe in elderly patients when compared to non-elderly patients: outcomes in 206 combined procedures. Dig Dis Sci 2012; 57: 1949-1953
  • 64 Itoi T, Ishii K, Itokawa F et al. Large balloon papillary dilation for removal of bile duct stones in patients who have undergone a billroth ii gastrectomy. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: S98-S102
  • 65 Kim HJ, Choi HS, Park JH et al. Factors influencing the technical difficulty of endoscopic clearance of bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 1154-1160
  • 66 Kogure H, Tsujino T, Yagioka H et al. Self-expandable metallic stents for malignant biliary obstruction with an anomalous pancreaticobiliary junction. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 787-791
  • 67 May GR, Cotton PB, Edmunds SE et al. Removal of stones from the bile duct at ERCP without sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39: 749-754
  • 68 Morelli J, Mulcahy HE, Willner IR et al. Long-term outcomes for patients with post-liver transplant anastomotic biliary strictures treated by endoscopic stent placement. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 374-379
  • 69 Nojkov B, Cappell MS. Safety and efficacy of ERCP after recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 870-880
  • 70 Paik WH, Park YS, Hwang JH et al. Palliative treatment with self-expandable metallic stents in patients with advanced type III or IV hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a percutaneous versus endoscopic approach. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 55-62
  • 71 Sharara AI, El Hajj II, Mroueh M et al. Prophylaxis with ertapenem in patients with obstructive jaundice undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: safety, efficacy, and biliary penetration. South Med J 2011; 104: 189-194
  • 72 Sherman S, Shaked A, Cryer HM et al. Endoscopic management of biliary fistulas complicating liver transplantation and other hepatobiliary operations. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 167-175
  • 73 Sutton VR, Hong MK, Thomas PR. Using the 4-hour Post-ERCP amylase level to predict post-ERCP pancreatitis. JOP 2011; 12: 372-376
  • 74 Vaira D, D’Anna L, Ainley C et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet 1989; 2: 431-434
  • 75 Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Wilcox CM. Prospective evaluation of indeterminate ERCP findings by intraductal ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 2086-2092
  • 76 Kouklakis G, Gatopoulou A, Lirantzopoulos N et al. Evaluation of guide wire cannulation technique in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2009; 18: 185-188
  • 77 Murata A, Motomura Y, Akahoshi K et al. Therapeutic ERCP for choledocholithiasis in patients 80 years of age and older. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009; 43: 289-290
  • 78 Pisello F, Geraci G, Li Volsi F et al. Permanent stenting in “unextractable” common bile duct stones in high risk patients. A prospective randomized study comparing two different stents. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2008; 393: 857-863
  • 79 Straja D, Daha C, Simion L. [Endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of common bile duct benign lesions (experience with 100 cases)]. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2001; 96: 521-526
  • 80 Thomas PR, Sengupta S. Prediction of pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography by the 4-h post procedure amylase level. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 16: 923-926
  • 81 Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones in patients 90 years of age and older. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 187-191
  • 82 Hui CK, Liu CL, Lai KC et al. Outcome of emergency ERCP for acute cholangitis in patients 90 years of age and older. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004; 19: 1153-1158
  • 83 Siegel JH. Duodenoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of the “sump syndrome”. Dig Dis Sci 1981; 26: 922-928
  • 84 Yancik R. Cancer burden in the aged: an epidemiologic and demographic overview. Cancer 1997; 80: 1273-1283
  • 85 Fulton MM, Allen ER. Polypharmacy in the elderly: a literature review. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2005; 17: 123-132
  • 86 Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 417-423
  • 87 Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
  • 88 Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Rev Gastroenterol Disord 2002; 2: 147-168
  • 89 Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-147
  • 90 Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians. Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc 2012; 60: E1-E25
  • 91 Uijen AA, van de Lisdonk EH. Multimorbidity in primary care: prevalence and trend over the last 20 years. Eur J Gen Pract 2008; 14 (Suppl. 01) 28-32
  • 92 Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother 2007; 5: 345-351
  • 93 Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S et al. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet 2013; 381: 752-762