Bewegungsverhalten des N. auriculotemporalis während physiologischer Bewegungen der Mandibula und der HWS

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der N. mandibularis und seine Äste müssen sich bei Bewegungen des Kiefers und der HWS an die veränderten umliegenden Strukturen anpassen, um die Funktionsfähigkeit zu erhalten. Ziel dieser Querschnittstudie war herauszufinden, ob sich die Neurodynamik des N. auriculotemporalis mithilfe von Sonografie untersuchen lässt. Dazu wurde bei 21 Probanden der N. auriculotemporalis im Querschnitt (transversal) und in longitudinaler Ansicht während verschiedener kombinierter Kiefer- und zervikaler Bewegungen aufgezeichnet und beurteilt.

Die transversale Untersuchung ergab die signifikant größten Bewegungen bei hochzervikaler Flexion der HWS und gleichzeitiger Laterotrusion der Mandibula zur Gegenseite. Die longitudinale Untersuchung zeigte eine vermehrte Bewegung des Nervs bei Einstellung der HWS in hochzervikaler Flexion im Vergleich zur habituellen Position bei Depression und Laterotrusion der Mandibula zur Gegenseite (nicht signifikant). Eine Korrelation zwischen den Resultaten der transversalen longitudinalen Messung war nicht nachweisbar. Die Ergebnisse lassen annehmen, dass vor allem hochzervikale Flexion, Laterotrusion und Depression einen Einfluss auf die Dynamik des N. auriculotemporalis haben.

Abstract

During movements of the mandible and cervical spine the auriculotemporal nerve and its branches must adjust to the changed surrounding structures in order to maintain functional capability. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to identify whether the auriculotemporal nerve’s neurodynamics can be investigated using sonography. For this purpose the transverse section and the longitudinal view of the auriculotemporal nerve were recorded and evaluated during various combined movements of the mandible and cervical spine.

The transverse investigation demonstrated the largest significant movements during high cervical flexion with concomitant laterotrusion of the mandible to the opposite side. The longitudinal investigation showed increased neural movement in end of range high cervical flexion when compared to the habitual position in mandible depression and laterotrusion to the opposite side (not significant). A correlation between the results of the transverse longitudinal measurement could not be identified. The results allow the assumption that high cervical flexion, laterotrusion and depression predominantly have influence on the auriculotemporal nerve’s dynamics.

Anmerkungen

eingereicht: 30.3.2012 | akzeptiert: 27.4.2012

• Literatur

• 1 Andersen NB, Bovim G, Sjaastad O. The frontotemporal peripheral nerves. Topographic variations of the supraorbital, supratrochlear and auriculotemporal nerves and their possible clinical significance. Surg Radiol Anat 2001; 23: 97-104
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Baumel JJ, Vanderheiden JP, McElenny JE. The auriculotemporal nerve of man. American Journal of Anatomy 1971; 130: 431-440
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bonjardim LR, Lopes-Filho RJ, Amado G et al. Association between symptoms of temporomandibular disorder and gender, morphological occlusion, and psychological factors in a group of university students. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2009; 20: 190-194
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Breig A. Biomechanics of the central nervous system. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell; 1960
  Google Scholar
• 5 Butler DS. Mobilisation des Nervensystems. Berlin: Springer; 1998
  Google Scholar
• 6 Butler DS. The sensitive nervous systeme. Adelaide: Noigroup; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 7 Colins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres?. Pain 1997; 72: 95-97
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Conti PCR, Ferreira PM, Pegoraro LF et al. A cross-sectional study of prevalence and etiology of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders in high school and university students. J Orofac Pain 1996; 10: 254-262
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Conti A, Freitas M, Conti P et al. Relationship between signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and orthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. Angle Orthodontist 2003; 73: 411-417 Conti A, Freitas M, Conti P, Henriques J, Janson G. Relationship between signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorders and orthodontic treatment: a cross-sectional study. Angle Orthodontists 2003; 73: 411–417
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Coppieters MW, Stappaerts KH, Everaert DG et al. Addition of test components during neurodynamic testing: effect on range of motion and sensory responses. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 2001; 31: 226-237
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Coppieters MW, Hough AD, Dilley A. Different nerve-gliding exercises induce different magnitudes of median nerve longitudinal excursion: an in-vivo study using dynamic ultrasound imagine. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 2009; 39: 164-171
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Costen JB. Syndrome of ear and sinus symptoms dependent upon disturbed function of the temporomandibular joint. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 1997; 106: 805-819
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Devor M, Seltzer Z. Pathophysiology of damaged nerves in relation to chronic pain. In: Wall P, Melzack R, Hrsg. Textbook of pain. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1999
  Google Scholar
• 14 Devor M. Nerves hurt. Eur J Pain 2009; 13: 1-2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Dilley A, Greening J, Lynn B et al. The use of cross-correlation analysis between high-frequency ultrasound images to measure longitudinal median nerve movement. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2001; 27: 1211-1218
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Doursounian L, Alfonso JM, Iba-Zizen MT et al. Dynamics of the junction between the medulla and the cervical spinal cord: an in-vivo study in the sagittal plane by magnetic resonance imagine. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy 1989; 11: 313-322
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ellis R, Hing W, Dilley A et al. Reliability of measuring sciatic and tibial nerve movement with diagnostic ultrasound during a neural mobilisation technique. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 2008; 34: 1209-1216
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Fernandes PRB, de Vasconsellos HA, Okeson JP et al. The anatomical relationship between the position of the auriculotemporal nerve and mandibular condyle. Cranio, the Journal of Craniomandibular Practice 2003; 21: 165-171
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Fornage B. Peripheral nerves of the extremities: Imaging with US. Radiology 1988; 167: 179-182
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Go JL, Kim PE, Zee CS. The trigeminal nerve. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MRT 2001; 22: 502-520
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Gülekon N, Anil A, Poyraz A et al. Variations in the anatomy of the auriculotemporal nerve. Clinical Anatomy 2005; 18: 15-22
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Hall T, Zusman M, Elvey R. Adverse mechanical tension in the nervous system? Analysis of straight leg raise. Manual Therapy 1998; 3: 140-146
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Hough A, Moore A, Jones M. Measuring longitudinal nerve motion using ultrasonography. Manual Therapy 2000; 5: 173-180
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Hough A, Moore A, Jones M. Peripheral nerve motion measurement with spectral doppler sonography: a reliability study. Journal of Hand Surgery 2000; 25: 585-589
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Isberg AM, Isacsson G, Williams WN et al. Lingual numbness and speech articulation deviation associated with temporomandibular joint disk displacement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1987; 64: 9-14
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Loughner BA, Larkin LH, Mahan PE. Nerve entrapment in the lateral pterygoid muscle. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1990; 69: 299-306
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Lund JP, Widmer CG, Feine JS. Validity of Diagnostic and Monitoring Tests Used for Temporomandibular Disorders. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1133-1143
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Lundborg G. Nerve Injury and Repair. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingston; 1988
  Google Scholar
• 29 Martinoli C, Bianchi S, Derchi LE. Ultrasonography of peripheral nerves. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT, and MRI 2000; 21: 205-213
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 McGrath PA, Seifert CE, Speechley KN et al. A new analogue scale for assessing children’s pain: an initial validation study. Pain 1996; 64: 435-443
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Millesi H, Zoch G, Riehsner R. Mechanical properties of peripheral nerves. Clinical Orthopedics and Related Research 1995; 314: 76-83
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Møller AR. The cranial nerve vascular compression syndrome. Acta Neurochirurgica 1991; 113: 18-23
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. St. Louis: Mosby; 2007
  Google Scholar
• 34 Paulus W, Evers S, May A et al. Therapie und Prophylaxe von Gesichtsneuralgien und anderen Formen der Gesichtsschmerzen. Schmerz 2003; 17: 74-91
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Pedullà E, Meli GA, Garufi A et al. Neuropathic Pain in Temporomandibular Joint Disorders: Case-Control Analysis by MR Imaging. AJNR 2009; 30: 1414-1418
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Von Piekartz HJM. Vorschlag für einen neurodynamischen Test des N. mandibularis. Reliabilität und Referenzwerte. manuelletherapie 2001; 5: 56-66
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Von Piekartz HJM. Untersuchung und Behandlung des kranialen Nervengewebes. In: Von Piekartz HJM, Hrsg. Kiefer, Gesichts- und Zervikalregion. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2005
  Google Scholar
• 38 Von Piekartz HJM, Doppelhofer D. Gesichtsschmerzen und der neurodynamische Test des N. mandibularis. Physiotherapie 2007; 2: 15-24
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Schmidt BL, Pogrel MA, Necoechea M et al. The distribution of the auriculotemporal nerve around the temporomandibular joint. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 86: 165-168
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Silvestri E, Martinolo C, Derchi LE et al. Echotexture of peripheral nerves: correlation between US and histologic findings and criteria to differentiate tendons. Radiology 1995; 197: 291-296
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Trepel M. Neuroanatomie. Struktur und Funktion. München: Elsevier; 2008
  Google Scholar
• 42 Upton ARM, McComas AJ. The double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. Lancet 1973; 18: 359-361
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Valle-Corotti K, Pinzan A, Valle CVM et al. Assessment of temporomandibular disorder and occlusion in treated class III malocclusion patients. Journal of Applied Oral Science 2007; 15: 110-114
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Visscher C, De Boer W, Lobbezoo F et al. Is there a relationship between head posture and craniomandibular pain?. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 1030-1036
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Whitaker RH, Borley NR. Anatomiekompass. Taschenatlas der anatomischen Leitungsbahnen. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2003
  Google Scholar
• 46 World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki on Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. 2008 www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar