The Feasibility of a Trial of Labor after Two Cesarean Deliveries: Outcomes and Prognostic Factors for Success

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to determine whether a trial of labor after two cesarean deliveries (TOLAC2) increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes and identify prognostic factors for TOLAC2 success.

Study Design A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single medical center. The study group was comprised of women with a history of TOLAC2. Outcomes were compared with women undergoing trial of labor after one previous cesarean delivery (TOLAC1). The primary outcome was trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) success. Secondary outcomes included mode of delivery, uterine rupture, and combined adverse outcome (CAO; uterine rupture, postpartum hemorrhage, 5-minute Apgar score < 7, pH < 7.1). Logistic regression was used for the multivariate analysis to identify prognostic factors for TOLAC2 success.

Results A total of 381 women who underwent TOLAC2 were compared with 3,635 women who underwent TOLAC1. Women attempting TOLAC2 were less likely to achieve vaginal births after cesarean delivery (VBAC; 80.8 and 92.5%; odds ratio [OR]: 0.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26–0.47; p < 0.001) and more likely to experience uterine rupture (0.8 vs. 0.2%; OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.1–15.9; p = 0.02) but not CAO (4.2 vs. 4.8%; OR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.5–1.5; p = 0.3). TOLAC2 women with no previous vaginal deliveries had a lower chance of VBAC and a higher risk of uterine rupture compared with TOLAC1 women without a prior vaginal delivery (45.2 vs. 86.3%; OR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.07–0.25; p < 0.001; 2.3 vs. 0%) and TOLAC2 women with a prior vaginal delivery (45.2 vs. 85.3%; OR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.1–0.3; p < 0.0001; 2.4 vs. 0.6%; OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 0.4–46.3; p = 0.3). Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of vaginal delivery is an independent predictor of TOLAC2 success.

Conclusion Women attempting TOLAC2 are less likely to achieve VBAC and are at greater risk of uterine rupture compared with those attempting TOLAC1. Despite these risks, the overall success rates remain very high, and the absolute risk of adverse outcomes is still very low. Prior vaginal delivery seems to have a protective effect on TOLAC outcomes. These data should be used to counsel women and assist in decision-making when considering the mode of delivery in women with two previous cesarean sections.

Key Points

• TOLAC2 has a lower chance of success and higher rate of uterine rupture compared with TOLAC1.

• Previous vaginal delivery is an independent predictor of TOLAC2 success.

• Overall TOLAC2 outcomes are associated with high chances of success and low risk of uterine rupture.

Ethics Approval

The local ethical review board approved the study (approval number: MHMC-0025-21)..

Publication History

Received: 25 March 2023

Accepted: 21 July 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
24 July 2023

Article published online:
11 September 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (06) 1226-1232
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Miller DA, Chollet JA, Goodwin TM. Clinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177 (01) 210-214
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. ACOG practice bulletin no. 205: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (02) e110-e127
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (25) 2581-2589
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Hashima J. et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) evidence report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010
  Google Scholar
• 6 Macones GA, Cahill A, Pare E. et al. Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192 (04) 1223-1228 , discussion 1228–1229
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Miller DA, Diaz FG, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84 (02) 255-258
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Rotem R, Hirsch A, Sela HY, Samueloff A, Grisaru-Granovsky S, Rottenstreich M. Maternal and neonatal outcomes following trial of labor after two previous cesareans: a retrospective cohort study. Reprod Sci 2021; 28 (04) 1092-1100
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Landon MB, Spong CY, Thom E. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Risk of uterine rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108 (01) 12-20
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, Zelop CM, Cohen A, Lieberman E. Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181 (04) 872-876
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Dombrowski M, Illuzzi JL, Reddy UM. et al. Trial of labor after two prior cesarean deliveries: patient and hospital characteristics and birth outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (01) 109-117
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Davidson C, Bellows P, Shah U. et al. Outcomes associated with trial of labor after cesarean in women with one versus two prior cesarean deliveries after a change in clinical practice guidelines in an academic hospital. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33 (09) 1499-1504
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Horgan R, Hossain S, Fulginiti A. et al. Trial of labor after two cesarean sections: a retrospective case-control study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48 (10) 2528-2533
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Tahseen S, Griffiths M. Vaginal birth after two caesarean sections (VBAC-2)-a systematic review with meta-analysis of success rate and adverse outcomes of VBAC-2 versus VBAC-1 and repeat (third) caesarean sections. BJOG 2010; 117 (01) 5-19
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Landon MB, Leindecker S, Spong CY. et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193 (3 Pt 2): 1016-1023
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Zhang H, Liu H, Luo S, Gu W. Oxytocin use in trial of labor after cesarean and its relationship with risk of uterine rupture in women with one previous cesarean section: a meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21 (01) 11
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Trojano G, Damiani GR, Olivieri C. et al. VBAC: antenatal predictors of success. Acta Biomed 2019; 90 (03) 300-309
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Miller ES, Grobman WA. Obstetric outcomes associated with induction of labor after 2 prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213 (01) 89.e1-89.e5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C. et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2010; (191) 1-397
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Durnwald CP, Ehrenberg HM, Mercer BM. The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191 (03) 954-957
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Srinivas SK, Stamilio DM, Sammel MD. et al. Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: does maternal age affect safety and success?. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2007; 21 (02) 114-120
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Fore MS, Allshouse AA, Carlson NS, Hurt KJ. Outcomes of trial of labor after cesarean birth by provider type in low-risk women. Birth 2020; 47 (01) 123-134
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Guise JM, McDonagh MS, Osterweil P, Nygren P, Chan BK, Helfand M. Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section. BMJ 2004; 329 (7456) 19-25
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material