Institution-Specific Perinatal Emergency Checklists: Multicenter Report on Development, Implementation, and Sustainability

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine endorse checklist use to improve obstetric care. However, there is limited research into development, implementation, and sustained use of perinatal emergency checklists to inform individual institutions. This study aimed to investigate the development and implementation of perinatal emergency checklists in diverse hospital settings in the United States.

Study Design A qualitative study was conducted individually with clinicians from three health care systems. The participants developed and implemented institution-tailored perinatal emergency checklists. Interview transcriptions were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results The study sites included two health care systems and one individual hospital. Delivery volumes ranged from 3,500 to 48,000 deliveries a year. Interviews were conducted with all 10 participants approached. Checklists for 19 perinatal emergencies were developed at the three health care systems. Ten of the checklist topics were the same at all three institutions. Participants described the checklists as improving patient care during crises. The tools were viewed as opportunities to promote a shared mental model across clinical roles, to reduce redundancy and coordinate obstetric crisis management. Checklist were developed in small groups. Implementation was facilitated by those who developed the checklists. Participants agreed that simulation was essential for checklist refinement and effective use by response teams. Barriers to implementation included limited clinician availability. There was also an opportunity to strengthen integration of checklists workflow early in perinatal emergencies. Participants articulated that culture change took time, active practice, persistence, reinforcement, and process measurement.

Conclusion This study outlines processes to develop, implement, and sustain perinatal emergency checklists at three institutions. Participants agreed that multiple, parallel implementation tactics created the culture shift for integration. The overview and specific Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research components may be used to inform adaptation and sustainability for others considering implementing perinatal emergency checklists.

Key Points

• Perinatal emergency checklists reduce redundancy and coordinate obstetric crisis management.

• Perinatal emergency simulation is essential for checklist refinement and effective team use.

• Integrations of perinatal emergency checklists requires culture change and process measurement.

Publication History

Received: 01 June 2022

Accepted: 10 November 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 November 2022

Article published online:
16 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D. et al. Vital signs: pregnancy-related deaths, United States, 2011–2015, and strategies for prevention, 13 states, 2013–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68 (18) 423-429
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S. et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (26) 2725-2732 [ Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 21;356(25):2660]
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Committee Opinion No. 680: the use and development of checklists in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (05) e237-e240
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Bajaj K, Rivera-Chiauzzi EY, Lee C. et al. Validating obstetric emergency checklists using simulation: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 2016; 33 (12) 1182-1190
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Arriaga AF, Bader AM, Wong JM. et al. Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists. N Engl J Med 2013; 368 (03) 246-253
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Labs A. Ariadne Labs OR crisis checklists. Accessed July 23, 2021 at: https://www.ariadnelabs.org/resources/downloads/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Society for Pediatric Anesthesia. Pedi crisis critical events checklists. Accessed August 1, 2021 at: http://www.pedsanesthesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/SPAPediCrisisChecklistsJuly2018.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Checklist for treatment of local anesthetic systemic toxicity. Accessed August 1, 2021 at: https://www.asra.com/advisory-guidelines/article/3/checklist-for-treatment-oflocal-anesthetic-systemic-toxicity
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States. Emergency treatment of an acute malignant hyperthermia event. Accessed August 1, 2021 at: https://www.mhaus.org/healthcareprofessionals/managing-a-crisis/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR. et al; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (05) 491-499
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Dryver E, Lundager Forberg J, Hård Af Segerstad C, Dupont WD, Bergenfelz A, Ekelund U. Medical crisis checklists in the emergency department: a simulation-based multi-institutional randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Saf 2021; 30 (09) 697-705
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Committee Opinion No. 680: the use and development of checklists in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (05) e237-e240
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations for the Prevention and Treatment of Postpartum Hemorrhage. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012
  Google Scholar
• 14 The Joint Commission. R3 Report Issue 24: PC standards for maternal safety. Accessed May 13, 2021 at: https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/r3-report/r3-report-issue-24-pc-standards-for-maternal-safety/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Abir G, Austin N, Seligman KM, Burian BK, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN. Cognitive aids in obstetric units: design, implementation, and use. Anesth Analg 2020; 130 (05) 1341-1350
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Hannenberg A, Angle H, Margulies S. et al. Introduction to Newton-Wellesley's labor & delivery crisis checklists. Accessed April 29, 2021 at: https://www.emergencymanuals.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/09/OBCC-w-Intro.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Stanford Medicine. Cognitive aids in medicine, OB Anesthesia Emergency Manual. Accessed April 29, 2021 at: https://med.stanford.edu/cogaids/obanesem.html
  PubMed
• 18 California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Maternal quality improvement toolkits. Accessed April 29, 2021 at: https://www.cmqcc.org/resources-tool-kits/toolkits
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Combs CA, Montgomery DM, Toner LE. et al. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: checklist for initial management of amniotic fluid embolism. Accessed October 1, 2021 at: https://www.smfm.org/publications/381-smfm-special-statement-checklist-for-initial-management-of-amniotic-fluid-embolism
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA. Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014; 89 (09) 1245-1251
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Henrich N, Benotti E, Berry W. et al. Cognitive aids for operating room crises–a thematic analysis of implementer experiences. medRxiv 2020; DOI: 10.1101/2020.11.18.20234054.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009; 4: 50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Gawande A. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right. New York, NY: Picador; 2010
  Google Scholar
• 24 Catchpole K, Russ S. The problem with checklists. BMJ Qual Saf 2015; 24 (09) 545-549
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Fridrich A, Imhof A, Schwappach DLB. How much and what local adaptation is acceptable? A comparison of 24 surgical safety checklists in Switzerland. J Patient Saf 2021; 17 (03) 217-222
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Fausett MB, Propst A, Van Doren K, Clark BT. How to develop an effective obstetric checklist. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (03) 165-170
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Alidina S, Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Hannenberg AA. et al. Factors associated with the use of cognitive aids in operating room crises: a cross-sectional study of US hospitals and ambulatory surgical centers. Implement Sci 2018; 13 (01) 50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Hamm RF, Wang E, O'Rourke K, Romanos A, Srinivas SK. Institution of a comprehensive postpartum hemorrhage bundle at a large academic center does not immediately reduce maternal morbidity. Am J Perinatol 2019; 36 (01) 15-21
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Kirchner JE, Smith JL, Powell BJ, Waltz TJ, Proctor EK. Getting a clinical innovation into practice: an introduction to implementation strategies. Psychiatry Res 2020; 283: 112467
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Wensing M, Wollersheim H, Grol R. Organizational interventions to implement improvements in patient care: a structured review of reviews. Implement Sci 2006; 1: 2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Lyndon A, Malana J, Hedli LC, Sherman J, Lee HC. Thematic analysis of women's perspectives on the meaning of safety during hospital-based birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2018; 47 (03) 324-332
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material