The Five-substitution Option Enhances Teams’ Running Performance at High Speed in Football

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to describe how the introduction of the five-substitution option affected football teams’ running performance. A comparative analysis was performed in 17 professional football teams for the 2019-2020 (up to three substitutions) vs 2020–2021 (five substitutions option) seasons in LaLiga. The five-substitution option increased the number of substitutions (from 2.9±0.1 to 4.2±1.0 substitutions/match, respectively; p<0.01, Effect Size (ES)=2.11) but it did not change the time selected for the first substitution (from 57.5±13.0 to 56.2±13.7 min; p=0.06, ES=0.1). Total running distance was similar between seasons but running distance at 21.0–23.9 km/h (from 3.0±0.4 to 3.2±0.4 km; p=0.01, ES=0.6) and at≥24.0 km/h (from 3.0±0.6 to 3.2±0.5 km; p=0.01, ES=0.3) were higher with the five-substitution option. These increases were associated with a higher distance covered by starting players (p<0.05) rather than an effect of substitute players. With the five-substitution option, team coaches increased the number of substitutions per match which enhanced the possibilities of the team’s staff to manage players’ physical load. The five-substitution option allowed also increased running performance at≥21.0 km/h during the matches.

Publication History

Received: 20 June 2022

Accepted: 08 November 2022

Article published online:
20 January 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Barnes C, Archer D, Hogg B. et al. The evolution of physical and technical performance parameters in the English Premier League. Int J Sports Med 2014; 35: 1095-1100 DOI: 10.1055/S-0034-1375695.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Nassis GP, Massey A, Jacobsen P. et al. Elite football of 2030 will not be the same as that of 2020: Preparing players, coaches, and support staff for the evolution. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 962-964 DOI: 10.1111/sms.13681.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Souza DB, González-García J, Campo RLD. et al. Players’ physical performance in LaLiga when the competition resumes after COVID-19: insights from previous seasons. Biol Sport 2021; 38: 3-7 DOI: 10.5114/biolsport.2020.96856.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Ekstrand J. Keeping your top players on the pitch: the key to football medicine at a professional level. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 723-724 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092771.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Gualtieri A, Rampinini E, Sassi R. et al. Workload monitoring in top-level soccer players during congested fixture periods. Int J Sports Med 2020; 41: 677-681 DOI: 10.1055/a-1171-1865.
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Ekstrand J, Waldén M, Hägglund M. Hamstring injuries have increased by 4% annually in men’s professional football, since 2001: a 13-year longitudinal analysis of the UEFA Elite Club injury study. Br J Sports Med 2016; 50: 731-737 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095359.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Moreno-Pérez V, Del Coso J, Romero-Rodríguez D. Effects of home confinement due to COVID-19 pandemic on eccentric hamstring muscle strength in football players. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 2010-2012 DOI: 10.1111/sms.13768.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Corsini A, Bisciotti GN, Eirale C. et al. Football cannot restart soon during the COVID-19 emergency! A critical perspective from the Italian experience and a call for action. Br J Sports Med 2020; 47: 807-808 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102306.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Brito de Souza D, López-Del Campo R, Resta R. et al. Running patterns in laliga before and after suspension of the competition due to COVID-19. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 666593 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.666593.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Seshadri DR, Thom ML, Harlow ER. et al. Case Report: Return to Sport Following the COVID-19 Lockdown and Its Impact on Injury Rates in the German Soccer League. Front Sports Act Living 2021; 3: 604226 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.604226.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Herrero-Gonzalez H, Martín-Acero R, Del Coso J. et al. Position statement of the Royal Spanish Football Federation for the resumption of football activities after the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54: 1133-1134 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102640.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Mohr M, Nassis GP, Brito J. et al. Return to elite football after the COVID-19 lockdown. Manag Sport Leis 2022; 27: 172-180 DOI: 10.1080/23750472.2020.1768635.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Fédération Internationale de Football Association. Five-substitute Option Extended into 2021 in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic (July 15, 2020). In internet: https://www.fifa.com/media-releases/five-substitute-option-extended-into-2021-in-response-to-covid-19-pandemic; (July 9, 2021)
  PubMed
• 14 Leite W, Figueredo R. Is there a need to increase the number of substitutions in modern professional football?. Fizička kultura 2020; 74: 5-18
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Mota GR, Dos Santos IA, Arriel RA. et al. Is it high time to increase elite soccer substitutions permanently?. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 7008
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Bengtsson H, Ekstrand J, Waldén M. et al. Muscle injury rates in professional football increase with fixture congestion: an 11-year follow-up of the UEFA Champions League injury study. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 566-567 DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093494.19.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Dupont G, Nedelec M, McCall A. et al. Effect of 2 soccer matches in a week on physical performance and injury rate. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38: 1752-1758 DOI: 10.1177/0363546510361236.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Hills S, Barwood M, Radcliffe J. et al. Profiling the responses of soccer substitutes: a review of current literature. Sports Med 2018; 48: 2255-2269 DOI: 10.1007/S40279-018-0962-9.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Bradley P, Noakes T. Match running performance fluctuations in elite soccer: indicative of fatigue, pacing or situational influences?. J Sports Sci 2013; 31: 1627-1638 DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2013.796062.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Bradley PS, Lago-Peñas C, Rey E. Evaluation of the match performances of substitution players in elite soccer. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2014; 9: 415-424 DOI: 10.1123/IJSPP.2013-0304.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Felipe JL, Garcia-Unanue J, Viejo-Romero D. et al. Validation of a video-based performance analysis system (Mediacoach) to analyze the physical demands during matches in LaLiga. Sensors 2019; 19: 4113 DOI: 10.3390/s19194113.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Linke D, Link D, Lames M. Football-specific validity of TRACAB’s optical video tracking systems. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0230179 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230179.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Pons E, García-Calvo T, Resta R. et al. A comparison of a GPS device and a multi-camera video technology during official soccer matches: Agreement between systems. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0220729 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220729.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Del Coso J, Brito de Souza D, Moreno-Perez V. et al. Influence of players’ maximum running speed on the team’s ranking position at the end of the Spanish Laliga. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17: 8815 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17238815.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988
  PubMed
• 26 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM. et al. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-13 DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Union of European Football Associations. Five substitutes confirmed for EURO games (March 31, 2021). In Internet: https://www.uefa.com/uefaeuro/history/news/0267-11edb3a2bdcc-a27ac6b6b226-1000--five-substitutes-for-euro-games/;(July9,2021)
  PubMed
• 28 Ribeiro CFB, Siqueira L, dos S. et al. The three and six-substitution rules in football: A preliminary comparative analysis in quantitative replacing, game statistics, win rate and winning probability. Motriz: Revista de Educação Física 2020; 26: e10200188 DOI: 10.1590/S1980-6574202000020188.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Varela-Quintana C, Del Corral-Cuervo J, Prieto-Rodríguez J. The effect of an additional substitution in association football. Evidence from the Italian Serie A. Revista de Psicologia do Esporte 2016; 25: 101-105 Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/comocitar.oa?id=235146293024
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Errekagorri I, Castellano J, Echeazarra I. et al. The effects of the Video Assistant Referee system (VAR) on the playing time, technical-tactical and physical performance in elite soccer. Int J Perform Anal Sport 2020; 20: 808-817 DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2020.1788350.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 CIES Football Observatory. Effective Playing Time in 37 European Competitions (December 3, 2018). In Internet: https://football-observatory.com/Effective-playing-time-in-37-European-2150; (September 7, 2021)
  PubMed
• 32 Lorenzo-Martínez M, Padrón-Cabo A, Rey E. et al. Analysis of physical and technical performance of substitute players in professional soccer. Res Q Exerc Sport 2020; 92: 599-606 DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2020.1755414.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

• Supplementary Material