Endoscopy 2019; 51(04): E71-E72
DOI: 10.1055/a-0824-6087
E-Videos
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic removal of two long iron rods impacted in the stomach

Liansong Ye*
Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
,
Xianhui Zeng*
Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
,
Xuli Wang
Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
,
Chuanjun Tang
Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
,
Jiang Du
Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
,
Yuhang Zhang
Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
,
Bing Hu
Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
18 January 2019 (online)

A 20-year-old man was referred for left epigastralgia, with a history of eating barbecued food and alcoholic intoxication 2 days earlier. On physical examination, he had abdominal tension and tenderness, without obvious rebound pain. Abdominal imaging revealed two long rods (17 cm and 13 cm) in the stomach, without signs of perforation or other conditions ([Fig. 1]). Upper endoscopy revealed that the proximal ends of the iron rods were impacted in the gastric body ([Fig. 2 a]), while the distal ends were impacted in the gastric antrum ([Fig. 2 b]). We used endoscopic grasping forceps to gently grip the proximal ends of the rods and remove them as we withdrew the endoscope ([Fig. 3], [Video 1]). There was no perforation, and only surrounding mucosal hyperemia and edema were noted. The patient’s symptoms disappeared, and he was discharged from our hospital on the same day.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Two long rods impacted in the stomach as shown on abdominal imaging.
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 a The proximal ends of the rods impacted in the gastric body. b The distal ends of the rods impacted in the gastric antrum
Zoom Image
Fig. 3 The two rods of more than 10 cm in length, after removal.

Video 1 Endoscopic removal, by means of grasping forceps, of two long iron rods impacted in the stomach.


Quality:

Ingested long foreign bodies are always associated with high rates of perforation, and urgent endoscopic intervention is strongly recommended [1]. A snare, basket, overtube, or even a double-channel endoscope may be helpful to remove such long objects [2] [3]; however, it is extremely difficult to remove objects longer than 10 cm, and surgery is frequently required [3]. In the present case, we demonstrated the use of grasping forceps for successful removal of two iron rods that were more than 10 cm in length, each with both ends impacted in the stomach. We suggest that grasping forceps can also play a positive role in the extraction of impacted long foreign bodies. Maneuvering the proximal end of the object into the transparent cap of the endoscope is beneficial for preventing mucosal injury.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AO_2AL

Endoscopy E-Videos
https://eref.thieme.de/e-videos

Endoscopy E-Videos is a free access online section, reporting on interesting cases and new techniques in gastroenterological endoscopy. All papers include a high quality video and all contributions are freely accessible online.
This section has its own submission website at https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/e-videos

* These authors contributed equally to this work.


 
  • References

  • 1 Birk M, Bauerfeind P, Deprez PH. et al. Removal of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in adults: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 489-496
  • 2 Ikenberry SO, Jue TL, Anderson MA. et al. Management of ingested foreign bodies and food impactions. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1085-1091
  • 3 Li ZS, Sun ZX, Zou DW. et al. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper-GI tract: experience with 1088 cases in China. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 485-492