Download PDF
Endoscopy 2005; 37(10): 1040-1045
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870327
ICCE 2005 Consensus
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

ICCE Consensus for Bowel Preparation and Prokinetics

R.  de Franchis, A.  Avgerinos, J.  Barkin, D.  Cave, B.  Filoche
  • 1Dept. of Internal Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
  • 2Second Dept. of Gastroenterology, Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • 3University of Miami School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida, USA
  • 4Dept. of Gastroenterology, St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center, Brighton, Massachusetts, USA
  • 5Service de Pathologie Digestive, Hôpital Saint Philibert, Lille, France
Publication sponsored by Given Imaging Ltd.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 September 2005 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Technical Challenges

Capsule endoscopy (CE) has become a standard procedure for the evaluation of the small bowel, and in several studies has been shown to be superior to other diagnostic methods [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

In spite of its great diagnostic accuracy, the yield of capsule endoscopy can be somewhat limited by two types of problem: firstly, the presence of dark intestinal contents in the distal small bowel, which may impair the visualization of the mucosa; and secondly slow gastric emptying and/or small bowel transit, which lead to the exhaustion of capsule batteries before the ileocecal valve is reached, thus causing incomplete small-bowel imaging in 17 - 25 % of cases [6] [7].

References

  • 1 Pennazio M, Santucci R, Rondonotti E. et al . Outcome of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding after capsule endoscopy: report of 100 consecutive cases.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 643-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Loftus E V, Jr. Capsule endoscopy for Crohn’s disease: ready for prime time?.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 14-16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Liangpunsakul S, Maglinte D D, Rex D K. Comparison of wireless capsule endoscopy and conventional radiologic methods in the diagnosis of small bowel disease.  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2004;  14 43-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Liangpumgsakul S, Chadalawada V, Rex D K. et al . Wireless capsule endoscopy detects small bowel ulcers in patients with normal results from state of the art enteroclysis.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 1295-1298
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Herrerias J M, Caunedo A, Rodriguez-Tellez M. et al . Capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease and negative endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 564-568
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Rondonotti E, Abbiati C, Signorelli C. et al . Reaching the ileocecal valve during capsule enteroscopy is independent both from intestinal preparation with laxatives and from the use of prokinetic drugs prior to the exam.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  126 A 461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rondonotti E, Herrerias J M, Pennazio M. et al . Complications, limitations and failures of capsule endoscopy: a review of 733 cases.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  [accepted for publication]
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Viazis N, Sgouros S, Papaxoinis K. et al . Bowel preparation increases the diagnostic yield of capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 534-538
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Niv Y, Niv G. Capsule endoscopy: role of bowel preparation in successful visualization.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;  39 1005-1009
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dai N, Gubler C, Hengstler P. et al . Improved capsule endoscopy after bowel preparation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 28-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 O’Loughlin C, Sable A I, Alazmi W, Barkin J S. Comparison of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage (PEG-EL) preparation versus standard preparation on small bowel mucosal visualization for wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE).  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 AB 322
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kim Y S, Chun H J, Kim K O. et al . Comparison of two bowel preparations for capsule endoscopy: NPO versus PEG.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 AB 169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fireman Z, Paz D. Capsule endoscopy: improving the transit time and the image view.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB 1807
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lapalus M, Saurin J, Mion F, Ponchon T. Prospective randomized single-blind trial on oral sodium phosphate efficacy for small intestine preparation before capsule endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 A 183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Reymunde A, Rivera J, Santiago N. Can the use of tegaserod improve the quality of imaging as well as the amount of bowel visualized by wireless endoscopy capsule.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;  98 AB 872
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Coron E, Sacher-Huvelin S, Le Rhun M. et al .Is preparation required before capsule endoscopy of the small bowel? Results of a pilot study.  in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, Florida, 2003. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2004: 63
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Chong A, Miller A, Taylor A, Desmond P. Randomised controlled trial of polyethylene glycol administration prior to capsule endoscopy.  in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, Florida, 2003. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2004: 57
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Ben Soussan E, Antonietti M, Lecleire S, Savoye G. Influence of bowel preparation for capsule endoscopy: quality of examination and transit time.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB 1829
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Shiotani A, Opekun O R, Graham D Y. Improved visualization of the small intestine using capsule endoscopy.  in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, Florida, 2005. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2005: 259
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Selby W. Complete small bowel transit in patients: determining factors and improvement with metoclopramide.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 80-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Stolpman D R, Fanning S, Faigel D O. Effect of phosphosoda preparation on gastric transit time for the given M2A capsule.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 AB 165
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Keuchel M, Voderholzer W, Schenk G. et al . Domperidone shortens gastric transit time of video capsule endoscope.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 (Suppl II) A185
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fireman Z, Mahajna E, Fish L. et al .Effect of erythromycin on gastric and small bowel transit time of video-capsule endoscopy.  in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Berlin, Germany, 2003. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2003: 15
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Romero J, Caunedo A, Alcazar J. et al .Effect of phosphosoda bowel preparation on gastric and intestinal transit time measured with capsule endoscopy.  in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, Florida, 2003. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2004: 55
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Schmelkin I. Tegaserod decreases small bowel transit times in patients undergoing capsule endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB 1819
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Coumaros D, Claudel L, Levy P, Doffoel M. Diagnostic value of capsule endoscopy (CE) in obscure digestive bleeding (ODB) and effect of erythromycin injection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB 1823
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pons Beltrán V, González Suarez B, González Asanza C. et al .Evaluation of different bowel preparations for the study with capsule endoscopy: preliminary results.  in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, Florida, 2005. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2005: 255
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Leung W K, Chan F KL, Fung S SL. et al .Role of oral erythromycin on gastric and small bowel transit of capsule endoscopy.  in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, Florida, 2005. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2005: 249
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Fireman Z, Kopelman Y, Fish L. et al . Effect of oral purgatives on gastric and small bowel transit time in capsule endoscopy.  Isr Med Assoc J. 2004;  6 521-523
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sachdev R, Hibberd P L, Mammen A, Cave D R. Reduction of gastric transit time of video capsule endoscopy by right lateral positioning.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  59 AB176
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Oeyen M, Adolphs J. Gastric passage of the capsule in relation to posture.  in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, Florida, 2005. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2005: 253
    Google Scholar
  • 32 O’Loughlin C, Slinde N. The effect of patient positioning on complete small bowel examination rates with wireless capsule endoscopy: an interim analysis.  in: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy, Miami, Florida, 2005. Yoqneam, Israel; Given Imaging 2005: 149
    Google Scholar

R. de Franchis, M. D.

Dept. of Internal Medicine · University of Milan · Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Service · IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico

Via Pace 9 · 20122 Milano · Italy ·

Fax: +39 02 5032 0747

Email: roberto.defranchis@unimi.it

      >