Evidence of Hyperacusis in Canaries with Permanent Hereditary High-Frequency Hearing Loss

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The mechanisms that underlie hyperacusis are poorly understood, due in part to the lack of a behavioral animal model. Traditional self-report methods used to measure loudness and loudness discomfort are not suitable for use with animals because the animals cannot provide subjective responses about the magnitude of an internal psychological perception. Instead, reaction time (RT) measures have been used in animals to estimate loudness perception. In the present study, the authors demonstrate that RTs are shorter at moderate and high sound levels in canaries of a strain with a hereditary high-frequency hearing loss than in normal canaries, indicating increased loudness. As far as we know, this is the first report of hyperacusis in a nonhuman animal and demonstrates that RT is a potentially useful measure in animal models of hyperacusis.

REFERENCES

• 1 Formby C, Gold S L. Modification of loudness discomfort level: evidence for adaptive chronic auditory gain and its clinical relevance.  Semin Hear. 2002;  23 21-34
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Baguley D M. Hyperacusis.  J R Soc Med. 2003;  96 582-585
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Goldstein B, Shulman A. Tinnitus-hyperacusis and the loudness discomfort level test-a preliminary report.  Int Tinnitus J. 1996;  2 83-89
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Anari M, Axelsson A, Eliasson A, Magnusson L. Hypersensitivity to sound: questionnaire data, audiometry, and classification.  Scand Audiol. 1999;  28 219-230
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Formby C, Gold S L, Keaser M L, Laws K, Hawley M. Secondary benefit from tinnitus retraining therapy: Clinically significant increases in loudness discomfort levels and expansion of the auditory dynamic range.  Semin Hear. 2007;  28 227-260
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Fletcher H F, Munson W A. Relation between loudness and masking.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1937;  9 1-10
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Zwicker E, Scarf B. A model of loudness summation.  Psychol Rev. 1965;  72 3-26
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Viemeister N F. Intensity discrimination of noise in the presence of band-reject noise.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1974;  56 1594-1600
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Liberman M C. Auditory nerve responses from cats raised in a low-noise chamber.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1978;  63 442-455
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Bartnik G, Hawley M L, Rogowski M, Raj-Koziak D, Fabijanska A, Formby C. Distortion product otoacoustic levels and input/output-growth functions in normal-hearing individuals with tinnitus and/or hyperacusis.  Semin Hear. 2007;  28 303-318
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Katzenell U, Segall S. Hyperacusis: review and clinical guidelines.  Otol Neurotol. 2001;  22 321-327
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Sammeth C A, Preves D A, Brandy W T. Hyperacusis: case studies and evaluation of electronic loudness suppression devices as a treatment approach.  Scand Audiol. 2000;  29 28-36
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Chocholle R. Variation des temps de reaction auditif en function de l'intensite a diverses frequencies.  Annee Psychol. 1940;  41 65-124
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Pfingst B E, Hienz R, Kimm J, Miller J. Reaction-time procedure for measurement of hearing I. Suprathreshold functions.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1975;  57 421-438
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Marshall L, Brandt J F. The relationship between loudness and reaction time in normal-hearing listeners.  Acta Otolaryngol. 1980;  90 244-249
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Buus S, Greenbaum H, Scharf B. Measurements of equal loudness and reaction times.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1982;  72(suppl) S94
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Dooling R J, Zoloth S R, Baylis J R. Auditory sensitivity, equal loudness, temporal resolving power, and vocalizations in the house finch (Carpoacus mexicanus).  J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1978;  92 867-876
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Leibold L J, Werner L A. The relationship between intensity and reaction time in normal-hearing infants and adults.  Ear Hear. 2002;  23 92-97
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Little N, May B. Equal loudness contours in the domestic cat. Paper presented at: the Annual Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology February 19-24, 2005 New Orleans, LA;
  Google Scholar
• 20 Khalfa S, Bruneau N, Rogé B et al.. Increased perception of loudness in autism.  Hear Res. 2004;  198 87-92
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Okanoya K, Dooling R J. The method of constant stimuli in testing auditory sensitivity in small birds. In: Klump GM, Dooling RJ, Fay RR, Stebbins WC Methods in Comparative Psychoacoustics. Basel, Switzerland; Birkhäuser Verlag 1995: 161-169
  Google Scholar
• 22 Lauer A M. Perceptual consequences of early-onset hereditary hearing loss in the Belgian waterslager canary (Serinus canarius).  Diss Abstr. 2006; 
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Kähärit K, Zachau G, Ekhöf M, Sandsjö L, Möller C. Assessment of hearing and hearing disorders in rock/jazz musicians.  Int J Audiol. 2003;  42 279-288
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Qiu C, Salvi R, Ding D, Burkard R. Inner hair cell loss leads to enhanced response amplitudes in auditory cortex of unanesthetized chinchillas: evidence for increased system gain.  Hear Res. 2000;  139 153-171
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Salvi R J, Wang J, Ding D. Auditory plasticity following cochlear damage.  Hear Res. 2000;  147 261-274
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Wang J, Ding D, Salvi R J. Functional reorganization in chinchilla inferior colliculus associated with chronic and acute cochlear damage.  Hear Res. 2002;  168 238-249
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Amanda M LauerPh.D. 

Dept. of Otolaryngology, Johns Hopkins University

720 Rutland Ave., 521 Traylor Research Building, Baltimore, M21205

Email: alauer2@jhmi.edu