The Ultrasonic Coagulating and Cutting System Injures Nerve Function

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Background: Although, many surgeons have used ultrasonic coagulating and cutting systems and shears (LCS) when carrying out endoscopic thyroidectomies and parathyroidectomies, in our experience some patients had temporary paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) after these operations. We had sometimes noticed that the heat of the blade of the LCS was increased just after use; therefore, we designed an RLN model, and investigated the damage to the RLN which could be attributed to the heat of the LCS.
Methods: We investigated the effects of the heat of the LCS blade on rat femoral and sciatic nerves, using temperature measurement, histological examination and evoked electromyography.
Results: The temperature of the LCS blade exceeded 150 °C after 30 seconds when it was not used for cutting. When we used the LCS to cut rat muscle or fat tissue, the temperature of the blade exceeded 100 °C after 20 seconds. There was no damage to the nerve histologically when the LCS was used for less than 20 seconds at a distance of 3 mm. Electrophysiological study showed that touching the nerve with the LCS blade after only 5 seconds of use resulted in damage to the nerve.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that the RLN should not be touched directly with the blade just after it has been used, and that it is possible to use the LCS at a distance of 3 mm from the RLN for less than 20 seconds at level 3. In order to maintain these distances, the RLN must be endoscopically visualized during surgery of the neck.

References

• 1 Ameral J F. The experimental development of an ultrasonically activated scalpel for laparoscopic use.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;  4 92-99
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Amaral J F. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 200 consecutive patients using an ultrasonically activated scalpel.  Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;  5 255-262
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Rothenberg S S. Laparoscopic Splenectomy using the harmonic scalpel.  J Laparoendosc Surg. 1996;  6 (Suppl. 1) S61-S63
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Tazaki H, Baba S, Murai M. Technical improvements in laparoscopic adrenalectomy.  Tech Urol. 1995;  1 222-226
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Helal M, Albertini J, Lockhart J, Albrink M. Laparoscopic nephrectomy using the harmonic scalpel.  J Endourol. 1997;  11 267-268
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Kanauchi H, Yamasaki K, Ogawa T, Miura Y. Endoscopic thyroidectomy in porcine.  Endcrinol J. 1996;  45 135-136
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Gagner M. Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.  Br J Surg. 1996;  83 875
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Naitoh T, Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz B, Heniford B T. Endoscopic endocrine surgery in the neck.  Surg Endosc. 1998;  12 202-205
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Yeung G HC, Ng J WT. The technique of endoscopic exploration for parathyroid adenoma of the neck.  Aust NZ J Surg. 1998;  68 147-150
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Brunt L M, Jones D B, Wu J S. et al . Experimental development of an endoscopic approach to neck exploration and parathyroidectomy.  Surgery. 1997;  122 893-901
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Henry J F, Defechereux , Gramatica L, de Boissezon C. Minimally invasive videoscopic parathyroidectomy by lateral approach.  Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 1999;  383 298-301
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Shimizu K, Akira S, Jasmi A Y. et al . Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of thyroid tumors with a very minimal neck wound.  J Am Coll Surg. 1999;  188 697-703
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Jones D B, Quasebarth M A, Brunt L M. Videoscopic thyroidectomy: Experimental development of a new technique.  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Techniques. 1999;  9 167-170
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

T. Owaki, M.D.

First Department of Surgery · Kagoshima University School of Medicine ·

8-35-1 Sakuragaoka · Kagoshima City · Kagoshima, 890-8520 · Japan

Fax: + 81-99-2657426 ·

Email: towaki@m2.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp