Blastocyst Versus Day 2 or 3 Transfer

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The formulation of new sequential culture media, capable of supporting the development of viable human blastocysts, has reopened the discussion regarding the best day for embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization (IVF). Although several laboratories have reported overall increases in implantation rate and IVF efficiency following the transfer of blastocysts, others have failed to observe any benefit from extended culture. While culture conditions for the mammalian embryo undoubtedly have improved significantly over the past few years, relatively little attention has been paid to the quality of oocytes derived from ovarian hyperstimulation or the quality and receptivity of the endometrium following such hormonal regimes. It appears that differences in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation are among the major factors determining embryo quality and subsequent implantation. This therefore has confounded comparisons between different laboratories. In spite of this there are a growing number of reports demonstrating that the advantages of extended culture and blastocyst transfer, such as increased implantation rates, are not limited to specific groups of patients or specific etiologies. Rather, blastocyst transfer may be of benefit to the majority if not all patients attending for IVF.

REFERENCES

• 1 Edwards R G, Brody S A. History and ethics of assisted human conception. In: Principles and Practice of Assisted Human Reproduction Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1995: 17-47
  Google Scholar
• 2 Cohen J, Elsner C, Kort H. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation.  Hum Reprod . 1990;  5 7-13
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Bongso A, Ng S C, Fong C Y. Improved pregnancy rate after transfer of embryos grown in human fallopian tubal cell coculture.  Fertil Steril . 1992;  58 569-574
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Menezo Y, Hazout A, DuMont M, Herbaut N, Nicollet B. Coculture of embryos on Vero cells and transfer of blastocysts in humans.  Hum Reprod . 1992 (suppl 1);  7 (101-106)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Hardy K, Robinson F M, Paraschos T, Wicks R, Franks S, Winston R M. Normal development and metabolic activity of preimplantation embryos in vitro from patients with polycystic ovaries.  Hum Reprod . 1995;  10 2125-2135
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Simon C, Garcia Velasco J J, Valbuena D. Increasing uterine receptivity by decreasing estradiol levels during the preimplantation period in high responders with the use of a follicle-stimulating hormone step-down regimen.  Fertil Steril . 1998;  70 234-239
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Marston J H, Penn R, Sivelle P C. Successful autotransfer of tubal eggs in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta).  J Reprod Fertil . 1977;  49 175-176
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Croxatto H B, Ortiz M E, Diaz S, Hess R, Balmaceda J, Croxatto H D. Studies on the duration of egg transport by the human oviduct II: Ovum location at various intervals following luteinizing hormone peak.  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 1978;  132 629-634
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Edwards L J, Williams D A, Gardner D K. Intracellular pH of the mouse preimplantation embryo: amino acids act as buffers of intracellular pH.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 3441-3448
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Lane M. Mechanisms for managing cellular and homeostatic stress in vitro.  Theriogenology . 2001;  55 225-236
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Hammer M A, Kolajova M, Leveille M, Claman P, Baltz J M. Glycine transport by single human and mouse embryos.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 419-426
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Ahuja K K, Smith W, Tucker M, Craft I. Successful pregnancies from the transfer of pronucleate embryos in an outpatient in vitro fertilization program.  Fertil Steril . 1985;  44 181-184
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Gardner D K, Pool T B, Lane M. Embryo nutrition and energy metabolism and its relationship to embryo growth, differentiation, and viability.  Semin Reprod Med . 2000;  18 205-218
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Gardner D K, Leese H J. The role of glucose and pyruvate transport in regulating nutrient utilization by preimplantation mouse embryos.  Development . 1988;  104 423-429
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Gardner D K. Changes in requirements and utilization of nutrients during mammalian preimplantation embryo development and their significance in embryo culture.  Theriogenology . 1998;  49 83-102
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Gardner D K, Lane M, Calderon I, Leeton J. Environment of the preimplantation human embryo in vivo: metabolite analysis of oviduct and uterine fluids and metabolism of cumulus cells.  Fertil Steril . 1996;  65 349-353
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Iritani A, Nishikawa Y, Gomes W R, VanDemark N L. Secretion rates and chemical composition of oviduct and uterine fluids in rabbits.  J Anim Sci . 1971;  33 829-835
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Miller J G, Schultz G A. Amino acid content of preimplantation rabbit embryos and fluids of the reproductive tract.  Biol Reprod . 1987;  36 125-129
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Lane M, Gardner D K. Regulation of ionic homeostasis by mammalian embryos.  Semin Reprod Med . 2000;  18 195-204
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Lane M, Gardner D K. Amino acids and vitamins prevent culture-induced metabolic perturbations and associated loss of viability of mouse blastocysts.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 991-997
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Ertzeid G, Storeng R. Adverse effects of gonadotrophin treatment on pre- and postimplantation development in mice.  J Reprod Fertil . 1992;  96 649-655
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Ertzeid G, Storeng R. The impact of ovarian stimulation on implantation and fetal development in mice.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 221-225
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Vander Auwera I, Pijnenborg R, Koninckx P R. The influence of in-vitro culture versus stimulated and untreated oviductal environment on mouse embryo development and implantation.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 2570-2574
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Pellicer A, Valbuena D, Cano F, Remohi J, Simon C. Lower implantation rates in high responders: evidence for an altered endocrine milieu during the preimplantation period.  Fertil Steril . 1996;  65 1190-1195
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 1968-1974
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Adams C E. Retention and development of eggs transferred to the uterus at various times after ovulation in the rabbit.  J Reprod Fertil . 1980;  60 309-315
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Gardner D K, Lane M. Embryo culture systems. In: Gardner DK, Trounson AO, eds. Handbook of in Vitro Fertilization Boca Raton: CRC Press 1993: 85-114
  Google Scholar
• 28 Bavister B D. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts.  Hum Reprod Update . 1995;  1 91-148
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Pool T B, Atiee S H, Martin J E. Oocyte and embryo culture: basic concepts and recent advances.  Infertility and Reproductive Medicine Clinics of North America . 1998;  9 181-203
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Cohen J, Gilligan A, Garrisi J. Setting up an ART laboratory. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, eds. London: Martin Dunitz; 2001: 17-25
  Google Scholar
• 31 Gardner D K, Lane M. Embryo culture. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, eds. Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques London: Martin Dunitz; 2001: 203-222
  Google Scholar
• 32 Gardner D K, Lane M. Culture of viable human blastocysts in defined sequential serum-free media.  Hum Reprod . 1998 (suppl 3);  13 (148-159)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Gardner D K, Lane M. Embryo culture systems. In: Trounson AO, Gardner DK, eds. Handbook of in Vitro Fertilization Boca Raton: CRC Press 1999: 205-264
  Google Scholar
• 34 Patton P E, Sadler-Fredd K, Burry K A. Development and integration of an extended embryo culture program.  Fertil Steril . 1999;  72 418-422
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Schoolcraft W B, Gardner D K. Blastocyst culture and transfer increases the efficiency of oocyte donation.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  74 482-486
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Langley M T, Marek D M, Gardner D K, Doody K M, Doody K J. Extended embryo culture in human assisted reproduction treatments.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 902-908
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Scott L A, Smith S. The successful use of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 1003-1013
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Tesarik J, Junca A M, Hazout A. Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 1396-1399
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Edwards R G, Beard H K. Is the success of human IVF more a matter of genetics and evolution than growing blastocysts?.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 1-4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Gerris J, De Neubourg D, Mangelschots K, Van Royen E, Van de Meerssche M, Valkenburg M. Prevention of twin pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection based on strict embryo criteria: a prospective randomized clinical trial.  Hum Reprod . 1999;  14 2581-2587
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Gardner D K, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft W B. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  73 1155-1158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Braude P, Bolton V, Moore S. Human gene expression first occurs between the four- and eight-cell stages of preimplantation development.  Nature . 1988;  332 459-461
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Taylor D M, Ray P F, Ao A, Winston R M, Handyside A H. Paternal transcripts for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and adenosine deaminase are first detectable in the human preimplantation embryo at the three- to four-cell stage.  Mol Reprod Dev . 1997;  48 442-448
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Janny L, Menezo Y J. Evidence for a strong paternal effect on human preimplantation embryo development and blastocyst formation.  Mol Reprod Dev . 1994;  38 36-42
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Miller J, Smith T. The effect of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and semen parameters on blastocyst development in vitro.  Hum Reprod . 2001;  16 918-924
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Huisman G J, Fauser B C, Eijkemans M J, Pieters M H. Implantation rates after in vitro fertilization and transfer of a maximum of two embryos that have undergone three to five days of culture.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  73 117-122
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Scholtes M C, Zeilmaker G H. A prospective, randomized study of embryo transfer results after 3 or 5 days of embryo culture in in vitro fertilization.  Fertil Steril . 1996;  65 1245-1248
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Gardner D K, Schoolcraft W B, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Stevens J, Hesla J. A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 3434-3440
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Coskun S, Hollanders J, Al-Hassan S, Al-Sufyan H, Al-Mayman H, Jaroudi K. Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a controlled randomized trial.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 1947-1952
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Milki A A, Fisch J D, Behr B. Two-blastocyst transfer has similar pregnancy rates and a decreased multiple gestation rate compared with three-blastocyst transfer.  Fertil Steril . 1999;  72 225-228
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Marek D, Langley M, Gardner D K, Confer N, Doody K M, Doody K J. Introduction of blastocyst culture and transfer for all patients in an in vitro fertilization program.  Fertil Steril . 1999;  72 1035-1040
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Rijnders P M, Jansen C A. The predictive value of day 3 embryo morphology regarding blastocyst formation, pregnancy and implantation rate after day 5 transfer following in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.  Hum Reprod . 1998;  13 2869-2873
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Racowsky C, Jackson K V, Cekleniak N A, Fox J H, Hornstein M D, Ginsburg E S. The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  73 558-564
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Shapiro B S, Harris D C, Richter K S. Predictive value of 72-hour blastomere cell number on blastocyst development and success of subsequent transfer based on the degree of blastocyst development.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  73 582-586
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Alikani M, Calderon G, Tomkin G, Garrisi J, Kokot M, Cohen J. Cleavage anomalies in early human embryos and survival after prolonged culture in-vitro.  Hum Reprod . 2000;  15 2634-2643
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Alikani M, Cohen J, Tomkin G, Garrisi G J, Mack C, Scott R T. Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation.  Fertil Steril . 1999;  71 836-842
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Cruz J R, Dubey A K, Patel J, Peak D, Hartog B, Gindoff P R. Is blastocyst transfer useful as an alternative treatment for patients with multiple in vitro fertilization failures?.  Fertil Steril . 1999;  72 218-220
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Wilson M, Hartke K, Kiehl M, Rodgers J, Brabec C, Lyles R. The integration of blastocyst transfer for all patients.  Fertil Steril. 2001 In press; 
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Gardner D K, Vella P, Lane M, Wagley L, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft W B. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts increases implantation rates and reduces the need for multiple embryo transfers.  Fertil Steril . 1998;  69 84-88
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Milki A A, Hinckley M D, Fisch J D, Dasig D, Behr B. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with day 3 embryo transfer in similar patient populations.  Fertil Steril . 2000;  73 126-129
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Balaban B, Urman B, Alatas C, Mercan R, Aksoy S, Isiklar A. Blastocyst-stage transfer of poor-quality cleavage-stage embryos results in higher implantation rates.  Fertil Steril . 2001;  75 514-518
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Gardner D K, Lane M, Schoolcraft W B. Culture and transfer of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF.  Hum Reprod . 2000 (suppl 6);  15 (9-23)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Doody K J. Which patients should have blastocyst transfer?. In: Gardner DK, Lane M, eds. ART and the Human Blastocyst. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2001: 167-183
  Google Scholar
• 64 Gardner D K, Schoolcraft W B, McMillan W H. What is the rate limiting factor at implantation: embryo quality or endometrial receptivity?.  Fertil Steril . 2000 (suppl 1);  73 (S154-S154)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Schoolcraft W B, Surrey E, Gardner D K. Embryo transfer: techniques and variables affecting success.  Fertil Steril. 2001 In press; 
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Hardy K, Spanos S, Becker D, Iannelli P, Winston R M, Stark J. From cell death to embryo arrest: mathematical models of human preimplantation embryo development.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;  98 1655-1660
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Castelbaum A, Lessey B. Infertility and implantation defects.  Infertility and Reproductive Medicine Clinics of North America . 2001;  12 427-446
  PubMedGoogle Scholar