Download PDF
Semin Liver Dis 2001; 21(2): 161-178
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-15343
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

MRI Evaluation of the Liver

Kimberly L. Beavers1 , Richard C. Semelka2
  • 1Department of Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • 2Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2001 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Following the introduction of rapid, high-quality scan techniques and the development of new, tissue-specific contrast agents, the applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for liver imaging continue to grow. MRI using a T1-weighted sequence, T2-weighted sequence, and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient echo sequences is very effective at both detecting and characterizing various hepatic lesions. The use of a growing number of contrast agents has the potential to increase the sensitivity and specificity of liver MRI in numerous pathological conditions by improving morphological and functional information. This article examines the current status of liver MRI, highlighting technical and methodological approaches, contrast agents, and main clinical applications. MRI appears to be an ideal diagnostic tool for the detection and characterization of liver disease.

KEYWORD

Contrast agents - diagnosis - liver - magnetic resonance imaging

REFERENCES

  • 1 Hamm B, Thoeni R F, Gould R G. Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging.  Radiology . 1994;  190 417-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Semelka R C, Worawattanakul S, Kelekis N L. Liver lesions detection, characterization, and effect on patient management: comparison of single-phase spiral CT and current MR techniques.  J Magn Reson Imag . 1997;  7 1040-1047
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Semelka R C, Helmberger T K. Contrast agents for MR imaging of the liver.  Radiology . 2000;  218 27-38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Semelka R C, Balci N C, Op de Beeck B, Reinhold C. Evaluation of a 10-minute comprehensive MR imaging examination of the upper abdomen.  Radiology . 1999;  211 189-195
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Semelka R C, Willms A B, Brown M A. Comparison of breath-hold T1-weighted MR sequences for imaging of the liver.  JMRI . 1994;  4 759-765
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Rofsky N M, Lee V S, Laub G. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.  Radiology . 1999;  212 876-884
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Lee V S, Lavelle M T, Rofsky N M. Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality.  Radiology . 2000;  215 365-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Rofsky N M, Lee V S, Laub G. Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.  Radiology . 2000;  212 876-884
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Semelka R C, Kelekis N L. Liver. In: Semelka RC, Ascher SM, Reinhold C, eds. MRI of the Abdomen and Pelvis: A Text-Atlas New York: Wiley-Liss 1997: 19-135
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Kelekis N L, Semelka R C, Woosley J T. Malignant lesions of the liver with high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images.  J Magn Reson Imag . 1996;  6 291-294
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Low R N, Francis I R, Sigeti J S, Foo T K. Abdominal MR imaging: comparison of T2-weighted fast conventional spin-echo, and contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging.  Radiology . 1993;  186 803-811
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Semelka R C, Cumming M J, Shoenut J P. Islet cell tumors: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with dynamic gadolinium enhancement and fat suppression.  Radiology . 1993;  186 799-802
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Larson R E, Semelka R C, Bagley A S. Hypervascular malignant liver lesions; comparison of various MR imaging pulse sequences and dynamic CT.  Radiology . 1994;  192 393-399
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Low R N, Semelka R C, Worawattanakul S. Extra hepatic abdominal imaging in patients with malignancy: comparison of MR imaging and helical CT with subsequent surgical correlation.  Radiology . 1999;  210 625-632
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Oi H, Murakami T, Kim T. Dynamic MR imaging and early-phase helical CT for detection small intrahepatic metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma.  AJR . 1996;  366 369-374
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yamashita Y, Mitsuzaki K, Yi T. Small hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver damage: prospective comparison of detection with dynamic MR imaging and helical CT of the whole liver.  Radiology . 1996;  200 79-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Semelka R C, Shoenut J P, Ascher S M. Solitary hepatic metastasis: comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging with fat-suppressed T2-weighted, breath-hold T1-weighted FLASH, and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced FLASH sequences.  J Magn Imag . 1994;  4 319-323
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Whitney W S, Herfkens R J, Jeffrey R B. Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5T.  Radiology . 1993;  189 863-870
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mahfouz A D, Hamm B, Taupitz M, Wold K J. Hypervascular liver lesions: differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from malignant tumors with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.  Radiology . 1993;  186 133-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Peterson M A, Baron R L, Murakami T. Hepatic malignancies: usefulness of acquisition of multiple arterial and portal venous phase images at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging.  Radiology . 1996;  201 337-345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Whitney W S, Herfkens R J, Jeffrey R B. Dynamic breath-hold multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imagining with gadolinium enhancement for differentiating hepatic hemangiomas from malignancies at 1.5 T.  Radiology . 1993;  189 863-870
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Yamashita Y, Fan Z M, Yamamoto H. Spin-echo and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histopathologic findings.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1994;  4 83-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yoshida H, Itai Y, Ohtomo K. Small hepatocellular carcinoma and cavernous hemangioma; differentiation with dynamic FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA.  Radiology . 1989;  171 339-342
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kelekis N L, Semelka R C, Siegelman E S. Focal hepatic lymphoma: magnetic resonance demonstration using current techniques including gadolinium enhancement.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1997;  15 625-636
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Balci N C, Semelka R C, Noone T C. Pyogenic hepatic abscesses: MRI findings on T1- and T2-weighted serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo image.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1999;  9 285-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Semelka R C, Brown E D, Ascher S M. Hepatic hemangiomas: a multi-institutional study of appearance of T2-weighted and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo MR images.  Radiology . 1994;  192 401-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Semelka R C, Hussain S M, Marcos H B, Woosley J T. Perilesional enhancement of hepatic metastases: correlation between MR imaging and histopathologic findingsinitial observations.  Radiology . 2000;  215 89-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Eisenberg L B, Lee J KT. Transient increased segmental hepatic enhancement distal to portal vein obstruction on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced gradient echo MR images.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1995;  4 375-377
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Schlund J F, Semelka R C, Kettritz U. Correlation of perfusion abnormalities on CTAP and immediate postintravenous gadolinium-enhanced gradient echo MRI.  Abdom Imaging . 1996;  21 49-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Noone T C, Semelka R C, Woosley J T, Pisano E D. Ultrasound and MR findings in acute Budd-Chiari syndrome with histopathologic correlation.  J Comput Assist Tomgr . 1996;  20 819-822
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Noone T, Semelka R C, Siegelman E. Budd Chiari syndrome: spectrum of appearances of acute, subacute, and chronic disease with magnetic resonance imaging.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 2000;  11 44-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Giovagnoni A, Paci E, Terilli F. Quantative MR imaging data in the evaluation of hepatic metastases during systemic chemotherapy.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1995;  5 27-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Worawattanakul S, Semelka R C, Kelekis N L, Woosley J T. Angiosarcoma of the liver: MR imaging pre- and post-chemotherapy.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1997;  15 613-617
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Semelka R C, Kelekis N, Burdeny D, Lee J KT. Chemotherapy-treated liver metastases mimicking hemangiomas on MR images.  Abdom Imaging . 1999;  24 378-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Mathie D, Rahmouni A, Anglade M C. Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: assessment with contrast-enhanced Turbo-FLASH MR imaging.  Radiology . 1991;  180 25-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Mahfouz A E, Hamm B, Wolf K J. Peripheral washout: a sign of malignancy on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images of focal liver lesions.  Radiology . 1994;  190 49-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Low R N, Sigeti J S, Francis I R. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging versus spin-echo MR imaging, CT and cholangiography.  AJR . 1994;  162 315-323
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Low R N, Sigeti J S. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.  AJR . 1994;  162 1131-1136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Worawattanakul S, Semelka R C, Noone R C. Cholangiocarcinoma: spectrum of appearances on MR images using current techniques.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1998;  16 993-1003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Seneterre E, Tauourel P, Bouvier Y. Detection of hepatic metastases: ferumoxides-enhanced MR imaging versus unenhanced MR imaging and CT during arterial portography.  Radiology . 1996;  200 785-792
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Ward J, Niak K S, Gurthrie J A. Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis.  Radiology . 1999;  210 459-466
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Ros P R, Freeny P C, Harms S E. Hepatic MR imaging with ferumoxides: a multicenter clinical trial of the safety and efficacy in the detection of focal hepatic lesions.  Radiology . 1995;  196 481-488
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Oudkert M, van den Heuvel G A, Wielopolski P A. Hepatic lesions: detection with ferumoxide-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging.  Radiology . 1997;  203 449-456
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Blakeborough A, Ward J, Wilson D. Hepatic lesion detection at MR imaging: a comparative study with four sequences.  Radiology . 1997;  203 759-765
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Shamsi K, Blazer T, Saini S. Superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (SHU 555 A): evaluation of efficacy in three doses for hepatic MR imaging.  Radiology . 1998;  206 365-371
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Mergo P, Helmberger T, Nicolas A. Ring enhancement in ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide MR imaging: a potential new sign for characterization of liver lesions.  AJR . 1996;  166 379-384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Kopp A F, Laniado M, Dammann F. MR imaging of the liver with Resovist: safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic properties.  Radiology . 1997;  204 749-756
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Vogl T J, Hammerstingl R, Schwarz W. Magnetic resonance imaging of focal liver lesions: comparison of the superparamagentic iron oxide Resovist versus gadolinium-DTPA in the same patient.  Invest Radiol . 1996;  31 696-708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hammerstingl R, Vogl T J, Schwarz W. Contrast-enhanced MRI of focal liver lesions: differentiation and detection of primary and secondary liver lesions using Resovist-enhanced versus gadolinium-enhanced MRI in the same patient.  Acta Radiol . 1998;  5 75-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Reimer P, Rummeny E J, Daldrup H E. Clinical results with Resovist: a phase 2 clinical trial.  Radiology . 1995;  195 489-496
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Liou J, Lee J K, Borrello J A, Brown J J. Differentiation of hepatomas from nonhepatomatous masses: use of MnDPDP-enhanced MR images.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1994;  12 71-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Wang C, Ahlstrom H, Ekholm S. Diagnostic efficiency of Mn-DPDP in MR imaging of the liver: a phase III multicenter study.  Acta Radiol . 1997;  38 643-649
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Mitchell D G, Alam F. Mangafodipir trisodium: effects on T2-and T1-weighted MR cholangiography.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1999;  9 366-368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Caudann R, Morana G, Pirovano G P. Focal malignant liver lesions: MR imaging enhanced with gadolinium benzoxypropionictetra-acetate (BOPTA)preliminary results of phase II clinical application.  Radiology . 1996;  199 513-520
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging.  Radiology . 1995;  195 785-792
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Vogl T J, Jummel S, Hammerstingl R. Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.  Radiology . 1996;  200 59-67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Vassiliades V G, Foley W D, Alarcon J. Hepatic metastases CT versus MR imaging at 1.5T.  Gastrointest Radiol . 1991;  16 159-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Semelka R C, Schlund J F, Molina P L. Malignant liver lesions: comparison of spiral CT arterial portography and MR imaging for diagnostic accuracy, cost, and effect on patient management.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1996;  1 39-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Hagspiel K D, Neidl K F, Eichenberger A C. Detection of liver metastases: comparison of superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced and unenhanced MR imaging at 1.5T with dynamic CT, intraoperative US, and percutaneous US.  Radiology . 1995;  196 471-478
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Kettritz U, Schlund J F, Wilbur K. Comparison of gadolinium with manganese-DPDP for liver lesion detection and characterization: preliminary results.  Magn Reson Imaging . 1996;  14 1185-1190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Vogl T J, Hammerstingl R, Schwarz W. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced versus gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging for differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions.  Radiology . 1996;  198 881-887
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Rofsky N M, Weinreb J C, Bosniak M A. Renal lesion characterization with gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging: efficacy and safety in patients with renal insufficiency.  Radiology . 1991;  180 85-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Low R N, Carter W D, Saleh F, Sigeti J S. Ovarian cancer: comparison of findings with perfluorocarbon-enhanced MR imaging, In-111-SYT-103 immunoscintigraphy, and CT.  Radiology . 1995;  195 391-400
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Semelka R C, Shoenut J P, Magro C M. Renal cancer staging: comparison of contrast-enhanced CT and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed spin-echo and gradient-echo MR imaging.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1993;  3 597-602
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 McFarland E F, May Smith W W, Saini S. Hepatic hemangiomas and malignant tumors: improved differentiation with heavily T2W spin-echo MR imaging.  Radiology . 1994;  193 43-47
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Elizondo G, Weissleder R, Stark D D. Amebic liver abscess: diagnosis and treatment of evaluation with MR imaging.  Radiology . 1992;  185 1-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Marti-Bonmati L, Lonjedo E, Poyados C, Casillas C. Mn-DPDP enhancement characteristics and differentiation between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic livers.  Invest Radiol . 1998;  33 717-722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Bachmann R, Kreft B, Dombrowski F. Enhanced tumor detection in the presence of liver cirrhosis: experimental study on the diagnostic value of a superparamagnetic iron oxide MR imaging contrast agent.  J Magn Reson Imaging . 1999;  9 251-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Kanematsu M, Hoshi H, Yamada T. Small hepatic nodules in cirrhosis: ultrasonographic, CT, and MR imaging findings.  Abdom Imaging . 1999;  24 47-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Kuwatsuru R, Brasch R C, Muhler A. Definition of liver tumors in the presence of diffuse liver disease: comparison of findings at MR imaging with positive and negative contrast agents.  Radiology . 1997;  202 131-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Guyader D, Gandon Y, Sapey T. Magnetic resonance iron-free nodules in genetic hemochromatosis.  Am J Gastroenterol . 1999;  94 1083-1086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Mitchell D G, Saini S, Weinreb J. Hepatic metastases and cavernous hemangiomas: distinction with standard-and triple-dose gadoteridol-enhanced MR imaging.  Radiology . 1994;  193 49-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Lencioni R, Donati F, Copmo D. Detection of colorectal liver metastases: prospective comparison of unenhanced and ferumoxides-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T, dual-phase spiral CT, and spiral CT during arterial portography.  MAGMA . 1998;  7 76-87
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Strotzer M, Fmeinwieser J, Schmidt J. Diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: comparison of spiral-CTAP combined with intravenous contrast-enhanced spiral CT and SPIO-enhanced MR combined with plain MR imaging.  Acta Radiol . 1997;  38 986-992
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Lencioni R, Mascalchi M, Caramella D, Bartolozzi C. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: differentiation from adenomatous hyperplasia with color Doppler US and dynamic Gd-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging.  Abdom Imaging . 1996;  21 41-48
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R, Caramella D. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with percutaneous ethanol injection: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR imaging.  AJR . 1994;  162 827-831
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Fujita T, Honjo K, Ito K. Dynamic MR follow-up of small hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous ethanol injection therapy.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1998;  22 379-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Sironi S, DeCobelli F, Livraghi T. Small hepatocellular carcinoma treated with percutaneous ethanol injection: unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging follow-up.  Radiology . 1994;  192 407-412
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
      >