Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74(03): 176-184
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1342923
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endonasal Access to the Upper Cervical Spine, Part One: Radiographic Morphometric Analysis

Harminder Singh
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
,
Bartosz T. Grobelny
2   Department of Neurosurgery, New York University, New York, New York, USA
,
James Harrop
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
,
Marc Rosen
4   Department of Otolaryngology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
,
Robert M. Lober
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
,
James Evans
3   Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

17 October 2012

22 January 2013

Publication Date:
01 April 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives To determine the anatomical relationships that may influence endonasal access to the upper cervical spine.

Setting We retrospectively analyzed computed tomography of 100 patients at a single institution.

Participants Participants included adults with imaging of the hard palate, clivus, and cervical spine without evidence of fracture, severe spondylosis, or previous instrumentation.

Main Outcome Measures Morphometric analyses of hard palate length and both distance and angle between the hard palate and odontoid process were based on radiographic measurements. Descriptive zones were assigned to cervical spine levels, and endoscopic visualization was simulated with projected lines at 0, 30, and 45 degrees from the hard palate to the cervical spine.

Results We found an inverse relationship between hard palate length and the lowest zone of the cervical spine potentially visualized by nasal endoscopy. The distance between the posterior tip of the hard palate and the odontoid tip, and the angle formed between the two, directly influenced the lowest possible cervical exposure.

Conclusions Radiographic relationships between hard palate length, distance to the odontoid, and the angle formed between the two predict the limits of endonasal access to the cervical spine. These results are supported by cadaveric data in Part Two of this study.

Keywords

cervical spine - endoscopic - minimally invasive - morphometric - odontoidectomy - transnasal
 

  • References

  • 1 Apuzzo ML, Weiss MH, Heiden JS. Transoral exposure of the atlantoaxial region. Neurosurgery 1978; 3 (2) 201-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Crockard HA. [Ventral approaches to the upper cervical spine]. Orthopade 1991; 20 (2) 140-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Crockard HA. Transoral surgery: some lessons learned. Br J Neurosurg 1995; 9 (3) 283-293
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Frempong-Boadu AK, Faunce WA, Fessler RG. Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (5, Suppl): S60-S66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kingdom TT, Nockels RP, Kaplan MJ. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniocervical junction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995; 113 (4) 393-400
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Menezes AH. Surgical approaches: postoperative care and complications “transoral-transpalatopharyngeal approach to the craniocervical junction.”. Childs Nerv Syst 2008; 24 (10) 1187-1193
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Menezes AH, VanGilder JC. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the anterior craniocervical junction. Ten-year experience with 72 patients. J Neurosurg 1988; 69 (6) 895-903
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Menezes AH, VanGilder JC, Graf CJ, McDonnell DE. Craniocervical abnormalities. A comprehensive surgical approach. J Neurosurg 1980; 53 (4) 444-455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shaha AR, Johnson R, Miller J, Milhorat T. Transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the upper cervical vertebrae. Am J Surg 1993; 166 (4) 336-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Welch WC, Kassam A. Endoscopically assisted transoral-transpharyngeal approach to the craniovertebral junction. Neurosurgery 2003; 52 (6) 1511-1512
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yang SY, Gao YZ. Clinical results of the transoral operation for lesions of the craniovertebral junction and its abnormalities. Surg Neurol 1999; 51 (1) 16-20
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nayak JV, Gardner PA, Vescan AD, Carrau RL, Kassam AB, Snyderman CH. Experience with the expanded endonasal approach for resection of the odontoid process in rheumatoid disease. Am J Rhinol 2007; 21 (5) 601-606
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kassam AB, Snyderman C, Gardner P, Carrau R, Spiro R. The expanded endonasal approach: a fully endoscopic transnasal approach and resection of the odontoid process: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2005; 57 (1, Suppl): E213 , discussion E213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Alfieri A, Jho HD, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic endonasal approach to the ventral cranio-cervical junction: anatomical study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2002; 144 (3) 219-225 , discussion 225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Messina A, Bruno MC, Decq P , et al. Pure endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy: anatomical study. Neurosurg Rev 2007; 30 (3) 189-194 , discussion 194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wu JC, Huang WC, Cheng H , et al. Endoscopic transnasal transclival odontoidectomy: a new approach to decompression: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (1) (Suppl. 01) ONSE92-4 , discussion E94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Laufer I, Greenfield JP, Anand VK, Härtl R, Schwartz TH. Endonasal endoscopic resection of the odontoid process in a nonachondroplastic dwarf with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: feasibility of the approach and utility of the intraoperative Iso-C three-dimensional navigation. Case report. J Neurosurg Spine 2008; 8 (4) 376-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Baird CJ, Conway JE, Sciubba DM, Prevedello DM, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Kassam AB. Radiographic and anatomic basis of endoscopic anterior craniocervical decompression: a comparison of endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. Neurosurgery 2009; 65 (6, Suppl): 158-163 , discussion 63–64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cornelius JF, Kania R, Bostelmann R, Herman P, George B. Transnasal endoscopic odontoidectomy after occipito-cervical fusion during the same operative setting—technical note. Neurosurg Rev 2011; 34 (1) 115-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 de Almeida JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH , et al. Defining the nasopalatine line: the limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (2) 239-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Dasenbrock HH, Clarke MJ, Bydon A , et al. Endoscopic image-guided transcervical odontoidectomy: outcomes of 15 patients with basilar invagination. Neurosurgery 2012; 70 (2) 351-359 , discussion 359–360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Di Lorenzo N, Fortuna A, Guidetti B. Craniovertebral junction malformations. Clinicoradiological findings, long-term results, and surgical indications in 63 cases. J Neurosurg 1982; 57 (5) 603-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cantarella G, Mazzola RF, Benincasa A. A possible sequela of transoral approach to the upper cervical spine. Velopharyngeal incompetence. J Neurosurg. Sci 1998; 42 (1) 51-55
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Hadley MN, Spetzler RF, Sonntag VK. The transoral approach to the superior cervical spine. A review of 53 cases of extradural cervicomedullary compression. J Neurosurg 1989; 71 (1) 16-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Spetzler RF, Hadley MN, Sonntag VK. The transoral approach to the anterior superior cervical spine. A review of 29 cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1988; 43: 69-74
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Blazier CJ, Hadley MN, Spetzler RF. The transoral surgical approach to craniovertebral pathology. J Neurosci Nurs 1986; 18 (2) 57-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar