FDA analyses of survival in older adults with metastatic non–small cell lung cancer in controlled trials of PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies
Introduction
In the United States, lung cancer is the second most common cancer after prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women [1]. Estimates for lung and bronchial cancer in the United States for 2018 are 234,030 new cases and 154,050 deaths, accounting for approximately 25% of cancer deaths [1]. Approximately 95% of all lung cancers are classified as either non–small cell lung cancer or small cell lung cancer, and the former comprises 80%–85% of the lung cancer cases in the US. The majority of these patients (approximately 57%) present with a locally advanced or metastatic stage, when curative treatments such as surgical resection and concurrent chemoradiation are not an appropriate option, leading to a 5-year survival of less than 5% for patients with Stage IV lung cancer [2].
Lung cancer is also a disease that predominantly affects older adults, with approximately 70% of new cases diagnosed in patients aged 65 years and older and 37% of new cases diagnosed in patients aged 75 years and older [3]. Although most cancers occur in older patients, accrual of older patients to cancer clinical trials has been a persistent challenge. In an FDA analysis of older adults with lung cancer enrolled on clinical trials leading to drug approval, approximately 40% of clinical trial participants were 65 years or older, compared with 70% of all new cases of stage IV lung cancer. This divergence appears to be driven by the dramatic difference seen for patients aged 75 years and older, comprising only 9% of clinical trial participants compared with 37% of new cases in the United States [4] (Fig. 1). As a result, the availability of data regarding the relative safety and efficacy of new drugs in older patients with lung cancer is limited.
The treatment landscape for advanced lung cancer has dramatically shifted in recent years with the introduction of programmed death 1 receptor (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) blocking antibodies and targeted agents. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1, including the PD-L1, pathway have demonstrated significant activity in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with improvement in survival in the second-line setting. PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies have been of particular interest when considering the concept of immunosenescence and its potential impact on treatment efficacy in older adults.
Nivolumab, a PD-1 blocking antibody, was approved in 2015 based on the survival results of the CheckMate 017 trial, a randomized, open-label study enrolling patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC who had experienced disease progression during or after 1 prior platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 status [5]. The application went through an expedited review process, given the survival advantage observed with nivolumab when compared with docetaxel (median overall survival [OS]: 9.2 v 6.0 months; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44–0.79; P < .001), the primary efficacy endpoint. The indication was later expanded to include the second-line treatment of patients with nonsquamous NSCLC. This approval was based on the CheckMate 057 trial, which demonstrated improved OS compared with docetaxel with a HR of 0.73 (95% CI 0.60–0.89; P = .0015), corresponding to an estimated median OS of 12.2 months among patients randomized to the nivolumab arm compared with 9.4 months in the docetaxel arm [6].
Pembrolizumab, also a PD-1 blocking antibody was initially granted accelerated approval in October 2015 based on a single arm analysis of an expansion cohort of KEYNOTE-01, limited to patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. In October 2016, pembrolizumab was approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 as determined by an FDA approved test, as follows: (a) first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors have high PD-L1 expression (TPS ≥ 50%), with no epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase genomic tumor aberrations and (b) treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1 (TPS ≥ 1%) with disease progression on or after platinum-containing therapy. These supplemental approvals were based on 2 randomized, active-controlled trials demonstrating statistically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and OS for patients randomized to pembrolizumab compared with chemotherapy. In KEYNOTE-024, patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC and TPS ≥ 50% who received pembrolizumab had a statistically significant improvement in OS (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.41–0.89; P = .005) and significant improvement in PFS (HR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.37–0.68, P < .001) compared to patients who received platinum-doublet chemotherapy. In KEYNOTE-010, patients with disease progression on or after platinum-containing therapy and TPS ≥ 1% were randomized to receive pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks (Q3W), pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg IV Q3W, or docetaxel Q3W. The HR for OS was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.58–0.88) with P < .001 comparing the pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg arm with the docetaxel arm, while the HR for OS was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.49–0.75) with P < .001 for the comparison of the pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg arm with the docetaxel arm [7].
More recently in 2017, FDA granted accelerated approval to pembrolizumab in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin for the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC. Approval was based on overall response rate and PFS [8].
In 2016, FDA approved atezolizumab, a PD-L1 blocking antibody, for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC whose disease had progressed during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy. The approval was based on the results of 2 randomized open-label trials (OAK and POPLAR) that demonstrated consistent results in efficacy and safety in patients with NSCLC. The OAK trial demonstrated improved OS (HR 0.74, 95% CI: 0.63–0.87, P = .0004), corresponding to an estimated median OS of 13.8 months in the atezolizumab arm and 9.6 months in the chemotherapy arm. The POPLAR trial also suggested an improvement in OS (HR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.52–0.92) corresponding to estimated median OS of 12.5 months and 9.7 months for the atezolizumab and docetaxel arms, respectively [9].
Section snippets
Methods
We identified 4 clinical trials submitted to FDA in support of new clinical indications, all of which enrolled patients with advanced or metastatic squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC who had progression of disease on or after platinum-containing therapy (Table 1). Demographics, efficacy, and safety data from these trials were pooled and aggregated to explore potential differences in efficacy and safety based on age. The demographics were analyzed in all patients and in the following age subgroups:
Results
A total of 2,824 patients with NSCLC that had progressed on or after platinum-based therapy were randomized to treatment with a PD-1 or PD-L1 blocking antibody or to docetaxel across the 4 clinical trials. Approximately 57% of patients were younger than 65 years and less than a quarter of patients were over 70 years of age.
Table 2 summarizes and highlights the baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics for the 1,859 patients randomized to PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies.
Discussion
PD-1 and PD-L1 blocking antibodies have dramatically altered the treatment landscape for patients with NSCLC; however, little is known about the safety and efficacy of these drugs in older adults. Our analysis suggests that older adults, including those over 75, derive similar benefits in overall survival with PD-1/PD-L1 blocking antibodies for treatment of their advanced NSCLC as their younger counterparts. Older patients enrolled in these trials also appear to tolerate these drugs (based on
Conclusion
Global demographic changes in coming decades will have implications for an increase in aging patients with cancer. It is critical to increase the knowledge base to better inform care for older adults with cancer. Multiple strategies will be needed which engage a diverse group of stakeholders including patients, physicians, advocacy groups, and regulatory bodies.
Conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the authors.
References (11)
- et al.
Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2017) - et al.(2018)
- et al.
SEER cancer statistics review
SEER data submission posted to the SEER website
(2017) - Cancer Stat Facts Lung and Bronchus Cancer...
- et al.
FDA analysis of enrollment of older adults in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 10 year experience by the US FDA
J Clin Oncol
(2017)
Cited by (74)
Traitement du cancer bronchique chez le sujet âgé
2023, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires ActualitesTargeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) for treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC); the recent advances
2023, Pathology Research and PracticeTraitements systémiques du cancer bronchique non à petites cellules chez les sujets âgés
2022, Revue des Maladies Respiratoires ActualitesAnal cancer in older adults: A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology review paper
2022, Journal of Geriatric OncologyCitation Excerpt :Notably, median age was 63 years (46–82 years) in the KEYNOTE-028 trial and 61 years (32–79 years) in the KEYNOTE-158 trial [114]. Although none of these studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of these therapeutic approaches specifically in older adults, several meta-analyses have suggested that immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective in both younger and older patients without added toxicities [115–118]. Ongoing clinical trials are currently evaluating combinations of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in the first-line setting (NCT04444921, NCT04472429, and NCT03519295) and combination of nivolumab +/− ipilimumab in subsequent lines of therapy (NCT02314169) (Table 1).
Note: This is a U.S. government work. There are no restrictions on its use.
- 1
Contributed equally to this manuscript.