Consideration in Hemophilia Therapy Selection

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2006.02.002Get rights and content

The risk of pathogen transmission via clotting factor therapies has been reduced over the last two decades through the development of effective and progressively more sensitive pathogen screening and inactivation methods and the introduction of recombinant clotting factors for hemophilia, beginning with recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) in 1992. However, new understanding about the potential for transmission of an emerging infectious agent through blood and blood products has renewed concerns about vulnerabilities that remain in plasma-derived and some recombinant clotting therapies that still use plasma components during some stages of the manufacturing process. In the 1980s, patients with hemophilia became “canaries in the coal mine” for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the blood supply. Moving forward, healthcare providers must continue to take a proactive role in educating themselves about new information regarding emerging pathogens and develop approaches to discussing this risk with their patients as part of their therapy selection process.

Section snippets

Increasing Use of Recombinant Therapies

In 2004, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported on the distribution of clotting factor therapies among the nearly 14,000 persons with clotting disorders who had registered in the CDC’s Universal Data Collection surveillance program, beginning in 1998.2 In the 12 months preceding entry into the surveillance program, the majority of patients with hemophilia A (62.7%) and hemophilia B (56.1%) had used a recombinant therapy (Table 1).2 This is reflective of similar trends

The Healthcare Provider’s Responsibilities in Therapy Selection

The hemophilia community has developed deep beliefs and concerns about its access to treatment options and the appropriate conditions for making therapy selections. Patients with hemophilia have embraced the concept of “patient choice” to allow both their unrestricted access to all therapy choices and their right to full participation in the final decision on therapy choice. The steady trend detected among private third-party payers to reduce patient therapy options through formulary

Overview of Hemophilia Therapy Selection Criteria

In order to comprehensively and appropriately guide patient selection in hemophilia therapy, it is necessary to consider all the following criteria:

  • Safety and efficacy

  • Potential for inhibitor development

  • Convenience

  • Consistency of supply

  • Company reputation

  • Cost-benefit ratio

  • Reimbursement

  • Patient preference

Safety and efficacy are, as with most therapies, the most important criteria in therapy selection, but the choice in hemophilia therapy is substantially complicated by fear of inhibitor

Selection Criteria: Safety From Blood-Borne Pathogens

Safety and efficacy have long been the most important considerations in selection of factor replacement therapy.5, 6, 10, 11 Safety with regard to infectious pathogen risk has been enhanced through effective and progressively more sensitive pathogen screening of blood products and their derivatives. Most known blood-borne pathogens are identifiable, but a high degree of sensitivity in their identification is less common.

Selection Criteria: Concerns About Inhibitor Development

In addition to issues of product safety and efficacy, patients with hemophilia are concerned about the potential for inhibitor development. Inhibitors that develop in a patient in response to one FVIII clotting therapy will not only make that therapy but all FVIII clotting therapies ineffective. Up to 30% of previously untreated patients33 and approximately 1% of previously treated patients34 develop inhibitors. No particular therapy is associated with increased inhibitor development: ongoing

Conclusion

Patients with hemophilia have expressed that, historically, they have been the “canaries in the coal mine” for HIV in the blood supply. Healthcare providers, government, and industry have an ongoing responsibility to be proactive about threats to patient safety, even when levels of acceptable risk are hard to define. Clinicians should work closely with patients to choose the safest and most appropriate hemophilia therapy, especially when the criteria for selection are complex and competitive.

References (41)

  • A. Farrugia

    Evolving perspectives in product safety for haemophilia

    Haemophilia

    (2002)
  • R. Miller

    The responsibility of separating truth from myth to patient and family

    Haemophilia

    (2001)
  • D. Magli-Barioz et al.

    Evaluation of the impact of information about treatment-related risks in patients receiving blood-derived or recombinant medications

    Haemophilia

    (2004)
  • C.K. Kasper

    Concentrate safety and efficacy

    Haemophilia

    (2002)
  • AABB: All About Blood. Available at: http://www.aabb.org/All_About_Blood/FAQs/aabb_faqs.htm, accessed December...
  • C. Giachetti et al.

    Highly sensitive multiplex assay for detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and hepatitis C virus RNA

    J Clin Microbiol

    (2002)
  • Guidance for IndustryUse of Nucleic Acid Tests on Pooled and Individual Samples from Donors of Whole Blood and Blood Components (including Source Plasma and Source Leukocytes) to Adequately and Appropriately Reduce the Risk of Transmission of HIV-1 and HCV

    (2004)
  • UpdateWest Nile Virus screening of blood donations and transfusion-associated transmission—United States, 2003

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (2004)
  • J. Rajcani

    Molecular mechanisms of virus spread and virion components as tools of virulence. A review

    Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung

    (2003)
  • M.S. Klempner et al.

    Crossing the species barrier—One small step to man, one giant leap to mankind

    N Engl J Med

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text