Review article
The Use of Bronchial Blockers for Providing One-Lung Ventilation

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2009.05.014Get rights and content

Section snippets

The Choice: Double-Lumen Tube Versus Bronchial Blocker

The relatively large lumens of a double-lumen tube (DLT) facilitate faster lung deflation. They also allow for the passage of a suction catheter, which could be used for suctioning or applying continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A DLT is indicated when there is bleeding or infection in one lung; this would best protect the unaffected lung from contamination, and allow for effective suctioning of the diseased lung. It is easier to apply CPAP to the deflated lung when using a DLT because

Early History of BBs

The use of a BB was first reported by Magill in 1936.6 This BB consisted of a rubber tube with an inflatable cuff at the distal end. A stylette in its lumen facilitated positioning, which was accomplished via a rigid bronchoscope. An endotracheal tube would then be placed in the trachea to allow ventilation of the contralateral lung.

In the past, a vascular embolectomy catheter such as the Fogarty catheter was commonly used for providing OLV. However, these catheters contain low-volume,

Univent Tube and the Uniblocker

The first modern BB was reported in 1982 by Inoue et al7 and was termed the “Univent” tube (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan). This tube contained a channel inside the lumen of an SLT along the side of the tube with the concave curvature. There was a BB that was contained within this channel, which could be advanced into either mainstem bronchus. The Univent tube was modified in 2001, to the system that is currently available, which is termed the “Torque Control Blocker Univent” (TCB). The blocker of the TCB

Evaluation With Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy

One of the keys to success in the use of either a DLT or BB is being skilled in fiberoptic bronchoscopy and familiarity with the tracheobronchial anatomy. This was shown by Campos et al22 in a study of anesthesiologists with limited thoracic experience. Limitations and errors in applying these skills were the 2 major factors that led to failure in the placement in 25 of 66 patients (38%) and were similar among both residents and attendings.

Bronchoscopy generally should be performed in a

Presence of a Tracheostomy

There are currently no DLTs sold in the United States that are designed for use via a tracheostomy. Alternatively, it might be possible to perform laryngoscopy and to place a DLT through the vocal cords. As the distal end of the DLT passes through the vocal cords, the tracheostomy tube can be removed. The DLT then can be advanced distally into the mainstem bronchus. However, in some cases, such as a fresh tracheostomy, it may be desirable to not remove the indwelling tracheostomy tube.

BBs can

Pediatrics

Providing OLV can be particularly challenging in the pediatric population. DLTs can be used in adults and older children but cannot be placed in infants and young children; the smallest size available is 26F or 28F, depending on the manufacturer. One method commonly used in the past had been to advance an SLT into the contralateral mainstem bronchus. In a series of 15 children undergoing thoracotomy, a 7F Fogarty catheter was placed initially in the trachea and advanced until resistance was

Summary

The use of BBs as a means for providing OLV has grown. There are multiple choices of BB that are currently available and have been discussed in this review. The use of a BB can be especially advantageous in a patient with a difficult airway in whom a SLT can be used and then will not have to be changed. Whether a DLT or BB is chosen as the technique, it is important that the practitioner be familiar with the device.22 The ABCs of lung isolation that must be adhered to have been described by

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (55)

  • A.R. Robinson et al.

    Lung isolation using a laryngeal mask airway and a bronchial blocker in a patient with a recent tracheostomy

    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (2008)
  • P. Ruiz

    Sequential lobar-lung lobar isolation using a deflecting tip bronchial blocker

    J Clin Anesth

    (2006)
  • D. Amar et al.

    One-lung isolation using a double-balloon blocker technique

    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (2005)
  • E. Camci et al.

    Techniques and complications of one-lung ventilation in children with supportive lung disease: Experience in 15 cases

    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (2001)
  • J.D. Tobias

    Variations on one-lung ventilation

    J Clin Anesth

    (2001)
  • S.H. Wald et al.

    Experience with the Arndt paediatric bronchial blocker

    Br J Anaesth

    (2005)
  • P. Slinger

    Con: The new bronchial blockers are not preferable to double-lumen tubes for lung isolation

    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (2008)
  • E. Cohen

    Pro: The new bronchial blockers are preferable to double-lumen tubes for lung isolation

    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (2008)
  • J.H. Campos

    Progress in lung separation

    Thorac Surg Clin

    (2005)
  • L. Yuceyar et al.

    Bronchial rupture with a left-sided polyvinylchloride double lumen tube

    Acta Anaesthiol Scand

    (2003)
  • J. Benumof et al.

    Tracheal tear caused by extubation of a double-lumen tube

    Anesthesiology

    (2002)
  • J.W. Magill

    Anesthesia in thoracic surgery with special reference to lobectomy

    Proc R Soc Med

    (1936)
  • S.M. Neustein et al.

    Proper lateralization of left-sided double-lumen tubes

    Anesthesiology

    (1989)
  • J.H. Campos et al.

    Comparison of a modified double-lumen endotracheal tube with a single-lumen tube with enclosed bronchial blocker

    Anesth Analg

    (1996)
  • J.H. Campos et al.

    A structural complication in the torque control blocker Univent: Fracture of the blocker cap connector

    Anesth Analg

    (2003)
  • K.A. Thielmeier et al.

    Complication of the Univent tube (letter)

    Anesthesiology

    (1996)
  • P. Dougherty et al.

    A potentially serious complication that resulted from improper use of the Univent tube

    Anesthesiology

    (1992)
  • Cited by (0)

    William C. Oliver, Jr, MD

    Paul G. Barash, MD

    Section Editors

    View full text