Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Iterative design and evaluation of rule-based cropping systems: methodology and case studies. A review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The economic and regulatory context of crop production changes rapidly, but concerns about agricultural sustainability, including environmental impacts, are increasing steadily. To cope with complexity and uncertainty, innovative methodologies are required for designing, managing and evaluating prototype cropping systems. A generic approach combining iteratively design of cropping systems and evaluation of their performances is presented in this review article. It includes 5 main steps: (1) defining the set of goals and constraints for each cropping system, (2) identifying a suitable agronomic strategy, (3) formulating the consistent set of technical decision rules, (4) applying and evaluating the rule-based system, and (5) validating or refining the strategy and the rules. This methodology was applied to a range of environmental and production contexts, in a perspective of integrated crop production (ICP) prototyping. Three cropping system experiments conducted in France were brought together to demonstrate the potentialities of this system approach and discuss the methodological bottlenecks to address. The three case studies differed by the context of crop production and resource use: adaptation to limited irrigation water (Toulouse), introduction of innovative cropping systems (Versailles), and substitution of herbicides by non-chemical methods (Dijon). The consequences of the specific objectives in each case study on the experimental design and the evaluation process were discussed. Special attention was paid to the time step of the evaluation process, the duration of the improvement loops when prototyping cropping systems, the global evaluation of the systems and the evaluation of individual decision rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altieri M.A. (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture, Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP), London, UK, 433 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attonaty J.M., Chatelin M.H., Poussin J.C., Soler L.G. (1993) Advice and decision support systems in agriculture: new issues. Farm level information systems, Woudschoten, Zeist, The Netherlands, pp. 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubertot J.N., Barbier J.M., Carpentier A., Gril J.J., Guichard L., Lucas P., Savary S., Savini I., Voltz M. (2005) Pesticides, Agriculture et Environnement. Réduire l’utilisation des pesticides et en limiter les impacts environnementaux, Synthèse de l’expertise scientifique collective INRA-CEMAGREF, 63 p.

  • Aubry C., Papy F., Capillon A. (1998) Modelling decision-making processes for annual crop management, Agr. Syst. 56, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barralis G., Chadoeuf R., Lonchamp J.P. (1988) Longévité des semences de mauvaises herbes annuelles dans un sol cultivé, Weed Res. 28, 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernoux M., Cerri C.C., Cerri C.E.P., Neto M.S., Metay A., Perrin A.S., Scopel E., Razafimbelo T., Blavet D., Piccolo M.D., Pavei M., Milne E. (2006) Cropping systems, carbon sequestration and erosion in Brazil, a review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 26, 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M., Guichard L., de Tourdonnet S., Saulas P., Picard D. (2005a) Evaluation of the agronomic, economic and environmental impacts of no-tillage cropping systems. Results of a long-term experiment in France, Proceedings of the III World Congress on Conservation Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya, CD-Rom.

  • Bertrand M., Guichard L., Meynard J.M., Picard D., Saulas P. (2005b) Conception de systèmes de culture durables et innovants en grande culture. Le cas de l’essai de longue durée de “La Cage” á Versailles, 10e Colloque International du SIFEE, Angers, CD-Rom.

  • Boiffin J., Malezieux E., Picard D. (2001) Cropping systems for the future, in: Nösberger J., Geiger H.H., Struik P.C. (Eds.), Crop Science, Cab International, pp. 261–279.

  • Buhler D.D. (1992) Population dynamics and control of annual weeds in corn (Zea mays) as influenced by tillage systems, Weed Sci. 40, 241–248.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cady F.B. (1991) Experimental design and data management of rotation experiments, Agron. J. 83, 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capillon A., Fleury A. (1986) Conception d’itinéraires techniques respectant la diversité des exploitations agricoles: les enseignements d’un essai, Bulletin Technique d’Information, Ministère de l’Agriculture 408, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatelin M.H., Aubry C., Leroy P., Papy F., Poussin J.C. (1993) Pilotage de la production et aide á la décision stratégique, Cah. Économ. Sociol. Rurales 28, 119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbach N., Dürr C., Roger-Estrade J., Caneill J. (2005) How to model the effects of farming practices on weed emergence, Weed Res. 45, 2–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debaeke P., Hilaire A. (1997) Production of dryland and irrigated crops under different crop rotations and input levels in Southwestern France, Can. J. Plant Sci. 77, 539–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debaeke P., Nolot J.M., Raffaillac D. (2005) Mise au point de systèmes de culture adaptés á la ressource en eau: enseignements tirés de l’expérimentation SGCI de Toulouse (1995–2002), C.R. Acad. Agric. Fr. 91, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debaeke P., Nolot J.M., Raffaillac D. (2006) A rule-based method for the development of crop management systems applied to grain sorghum in south-western France, Agr. Syst. 90, 180–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debaeke P., Petit M.S., Bertrand M., Mischler P., Munier-Jolain N., Nolot J.M., Reau R., Verjux N. (2008) Évaluation des systèmes de culture en stations et en exploitations agricoles : où en sont les méthodes? in: Reau R., Doré T. (Eds.), Des systèmes de culture innovants et durables : quelles méthodes pour les mettre au point et les évaluer? Educagri editions, pp. 149–168.

  • Drinkwater L.E. (2002) Cropping systems research: reconsidering agricultural experimental approaches, Hortechnology 12, 355–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Titi A. (1992) Integrated farming: an ecological farming approach in European agriculture, Outlook Agr. 21, 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frangenberg A. (2000) Sustainable development of agricultural process and consequences of the implementation of Agenda 21. Integrated crop management as fundamental basis for sustainable production, Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer 53, 131–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland J.M., Frampton G.K., Cilgi T., Wratten S.D. (1994) Arable acronyms analysed — a review of integrated arable farming systems research in Western Europe, Ann. Appl. Biol. 125, 399–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston A.E. (1997) The value of long-term field experiments in agricultural, ecological, and environmental research, Adv. Agron. 59, 291–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan V.W.L., Hutcheon J.A., Donaldson G.V., Farmer D.P. (1997) Research into and development of integrated farming systems for less-intensive arable crop production: experimental progress (1989–1994) and commercial implementation, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 64, 141–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsaeth A., Eltun R. (2000) Nitrogen mass balances in conventional, integrated and ecological cropping systems and the relationship between balance calculations and nitrogen runoff in an 8-year field experiment in Norway, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 79, 199–214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langeveld J.W.A., van Keulen H., de Haan J.J., Kroonen-Backbier B.M.A., Oenema J. (2005) The nucleus and pilot farm research approach: experiences from The Netherlands, Agr. Syst. 84, 227–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lançon J., Wery J., Rapidel B., Angokaye M., Gerardeaux E., Gaborel C., Ballo D., Fadegnon B. (2007) An improved methodology for integrated crop management systems, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 27, 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy P., Deumier J.M., Debaeke P. (1997) Aide á la décision pour la gestion des systèmes irrigués en grande culture, Actes du Colloque “Aide á la décision et choix de stratégies dans les entreprises agricoles”, INRA & Conseil Régional de Picardie, Laon, 10–11 décembre 1996, pp. 101–108.

  • Macé K., Morlon P., Munier-Jolain N., Quere L. (2007) Time scales as a factor in decision-making by French farmers on weed management in annual crops, Agr. Syst. 93, 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynard J.M., Doré T., Lucas P. (2003) Agronomic approach: cropping systems and plant diseases, C.R. Biol. 326, 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meynard J.M., Girardin P. (1991) Produire autrement, Le Courrier de l’Environnement INRA 12, 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard J.M., Reau R., Robert D., Saulas P. (1996) Évaluation expérimentale des itinéraires techniques, in: Expérimenter sur les conduites de cultures: un nouveau savoir-faire au service d’une agriculture en mutation, DERF-ACTA, Paris, pp. 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynard J.M., Savini I. (2003) La désintensification: point de vue d’un agronome, Dossier de l’Environnement de l’INRA 24, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortensen D.A., Bastiaans L., Sattin M. (2000) The role of ecology in the development of weed management systems: an outlook, Weed Res. 40, 49–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munier-Jolain N.M., Chauvel B., Gasquez J. (2002) Long-term modelling of weed control strategies: analysis of threshold-based options for weed species with contrasted competitive abilities, Weed Res. 42, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munier-Jolain N.M., Faloya V., Davaine J.B., Biju-Duval L., Meunier D., Martin C., Charles R. (2004) A cropping system experiment for testing the principles of integrated weed management: first results, In Annales AFPP, XIIe colloque international sur la biologie des mauvaises herbes, Dijon, pp. 147–156.

  • Munier-Jolain N.M., Savois V., Kubiak P., Maillet-Mézeray J., Jouy L., Quere L. (2005) DECID’Herb, a decision support system on the WEB, designed for sustainable weed management in cultivated fields, Proc. XIIIth Conf. EWRS, Bari, Italy.

  • Nolot J.M, Debaeke P. (2001) A generic model to manage N in cropping systems differing by water availability, Proc. 11th Nitrogen Workshop, Reims, France, 9–12 September 2001, pp. 401–402.

  • Nolot J.M., Debaeke P. (2003) Principes et outils de conception, conduite et évaluation de systèmes de culture, Cah. Agric. 12, 387–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papy F. (2001) Interdépendance des systèmes de culture dans l’exploitation, in: Malézieux E., Trébuil G., Jaeger M. (Eds.), Modélisation des agroécosystèmes et aide á la décision, CIRAD-INRA, pp. 51–74.

  • Posner J.L., Casler M.D., Baldock J.O. (1995) The Wisconsin integrated cropping systems trial: combining agroecology with production agronomy, Am. J. Alternative Agric. 10, 98–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudel D.D., Horwath W.R., Lanini W.T., Temple S.R., van Bruggen A.H.C. (2002) Comparison of soil N availability and leaching potential, crop yields and weeds in organic, low-input and conventional farming systems in northern California, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 90, 125–137.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reau R., Meynard J.M., Robert D., Gitton C. (1996) Des essais factoriels aux essais “conduite de culture”, in: Expérimenter sur les conduites de cultures: un nouveau savoir-faire au service d’une agriculture en mutation, DERF-ACTA, Paris, pp. 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reau R., Landé N. (2006) Évaluation a priori de systèmes de cultures innovants conçus par des experts et adaptés á des contextes régionaux, Rapport final de l’action 1, Projet ADAR “ systèmes de culture innovants ”, 27 p.

  • Reganold J.P., Glover J.D., Andrews P.K., Hinman H.R. (2001) Sustainability of three apple production systems, Nature 410, 926–930.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richter D.D., Hofmockel M., Callaham M.A., Powlson D.S., Smith P. (2007) Long-term soil experiments: Keys to managing Earth’s rapidly changing ecosystems, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 71, 266–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scopel E., Findeling A., Chavez Guerra E., Corbeels M. (2005) Impact of direct sowing mulch-based cropping systems on soil carbon, soil erosion and maize yield, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 25, 425–432.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sebillotte M., Soler L.G. (1988) Le concept de modèle général et la compréhension du comportement de l’agriculteur, C.R. Acad. Agric. Fr. 74, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soane B.D., Ball B.C. (1998) Review of management and conduct of long-term tillage studies with special reference to a 25-yr experiment on barley in Scotland, Soil Till. Res. 45, 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varvel G.E. (1994) Rotation and nitrogen fertilization effects on changes in soil carbon and nitrogen, Agron. J. 86, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken P. (1986) From conventional to integrated agriculture, Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 34, 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken P. (1992) A methodic way to more sustainable farming systems, Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 40, 209–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vereijken P. (1997) A methodical way of prototyping integrated and ecological arable farming systems (I/EAFS) in interaction with pilot farms, Eur. J. Agron. 7, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viaux P., Lemaitre G., Gouet J.P., Robert D. (1994) Étude expérimentale de systèmes de production en grande culture, in: Recherches-système en agriculture et développement rural : Symposium international, Montpellier, pp. 248–257.

  • Vocanson A. (2006) Évaluation ex ante d’innovations variétales en pois d’hiver (Pisum sativum L.) : approche par modélisation au niveau de la parcelle et de l’exploitation agricole, Thèse INA PG, 294 p.

  • Wallach D., Makowski D., Jones J.W. (2006) Working with dynamic crop models: evaluation, analysis, parameterization and applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 447 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agrosystèmes et Développement Territorial, INRA, UMR 1248 INRA / ENSAT, BP 52627, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France

    Philippe Debaeke

  2. Biologie et Gestion des Adventices, INRA, UMR 1210 INRA / ENESAD / Université de Bourgogne, 17 rue de Sully, BP 86510, 21065, Dijon, France

    Nicolas Munier-Jolain

  3. UMR 211 INRA / AgroParisTech, Agronomie, INRA, BP 1, 78850, Thiverval-Grignon, France

    Michel Bertrand, Laurence Guichard & Patrick Saulas

  4. Domaine Expérimental d’Auzeville, INRA, BP 52627, 31326, Castanet-Tolosan, France

    Jean-Marie Nolot

  5. Domaine Expérimental d’Époisses, INRA, BP 86510, 21065, Dijon, France

    Vincent Faloya

Authors
  1. Philippe Debaeke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicolas Munier-Jolain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michel Bertrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Laurence Guichard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jean-Marie Nolot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vincent Faloya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Patrick Saulas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philippe Debaeke.

About this article

Cite this article

Debaeke, P., Munier-Jolain, N., Bertrand, M. et al. Iterative design and evaluation of rule-based cropping systems: methodology and case studies. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 29, 73–86 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008050

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008050

Search

Navigation