Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

The danger of using axioms in software metrics

The danger of using axioms in software metrics

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Software — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

The authors contrast axiom sets used in mathematics with those used in software metrics research. There are striking differences in the way the two types of axiom sets are derived and their intended purpose. In particular, axiom sets in software metrics are primarily used for purposes of definition, whereas in mathematics they are used for logical deduction. In addition, software metrics axiom sets have been developed without a consensus as to valid example measures and without a common understanding of the data to which they apply. The authors conclude that there is a non-negligible risk that inappropriate axiom sets will not be detected which may lead to an incorrect assessment of the validity of some software measures.

References

    1. 1)
      • E.J. Weyuker . Evaluating software complexity measures. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. , 9 , 1357 - 1365
    2. 2)
      • A. Melton , D. Gustafson , J. Bieman , A. Baker . A mathematical perspective for software measures research. Softw. Eng. J. , 5 , 246 - 254
    3. 3)
      • H. Wussing . (1984) The genesis of the abstract group concept.
    4. 4)
      • N.E. Fenton . (1991) Software metrics: A rigorous approach.
    5. 5)
      • R.E. Prather . An axiomatic theory of software complexity measure. Computer J. , 340 - 347
    6. 6)
      • T. Demarco . (1982) Controlling software projects.
    7. 7)
      • L.C. Briand , S. Morasca , V.R. Basili . Property-based software engineering measurement. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. , 1 , 68 - 86
    8. 8)
      • N.E. Fenton . Software measurement: A necessary scientific basis. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. , 3 , 199 - 206
    9. 9)
      • B.A. Kitchenham , S.L. Pfleeger , N.E. Fenton . Towards a framework for software measurement validation. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. , 12 , 929 - 944
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-sen_19971723
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-sen_19971723
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address