Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Department of medicine chairs have a critical role in the promotion of clinician-educators. Our primary objective was to determine how chairs viewed: 1) the importance of specific areas of clinician-educator performance in promotion decisions; and 2) the importance and quality of information on available measures of performance. A secondary objective was to compare the views of department chairs with those of promotion and tenure committee chairs.
METHODS: In October 1997, a questionnaire was mailed to all department chairs in the United States and Canada asking them to rate the importance of 11 areas of clinician-educators’ performance in evaluating them for promotion. We also asked them to rate 36 measures of performance. We compared their responses to a similar 1996 survey administered to promotion committee chairs.
RESULTS: One hundred fourteen of 139 department chairs (82%) responded to the survey. When considering a clinician-educator for promotion, department chairs view teaching skills and clinical skills as the most important areas of performance, as did the promotion committee chairs. Of the measures used to evaluate teaching performance, teaching awards were considered most important and rated as a high-quality measure. When evaluating a clinician-educator’s clinical skills, peer and trainee evaluation were considered as the most important measures of performance, but these were rated low in quality. Patient satisfaction and objective outcome measures also were viewed as important measures that needed improvement. Promotion committee chairs placed more emphasis on productivity in publications and external grant support when compared to department chairs.
CONCLUSION: It is reassuring that both department chairs and promotion committee chairs value teaching skills and clinical skills as the most important areas of a clinician-educator’s performance when evaluating for promotion. However, differences in opinion regarding the importance of several performance measures and the need for improved quality measures may represent barriers to the timely promotion of clinician-educators.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levinson W, Branch WT, Kroenke K. Clinician-educators in academic medical centers: a two-part challenge. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:59–64.
Osborne LM, Sostok M, Castellano PZ, Blount W, Branch WT. Recruiting and retaining clinician-educators: lessons learned from three programs. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 2):83–9.
Jacobs MB, Tower D. Enhancing the training of internal medicine residents at Stanford by establishing a model group practice and raising its clinician-educators’ status. Acad Med. 1992;67:623–30.
Friedman RH, Pozen JT, Rosencrans AL, Eisenberg JM, Gertman PM. General internal medicine units in academic medical centers: their emergence and functions. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:233–8.
Cantor JC, Cohen AB, Barker DC, Shuster AL, Reynolds RC. Medical educator’s view on medical education reform. JAMA. 1991;265:1002–6.
Levinson W, Rubenstein A. Mission critical—integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:840–4.
Batshaw ML, Plotnick LP, Petty BG, Woolf PK, Mellitis ED. Academic promotion at a medical school. Experience at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. N Engl J Med. 1988;318:741–7.
Barondes JA. The academic health center and the public agenda: whose three-legged stool? Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:962–7.
Maudsley RF. Faculty roles and academic promotion. Annals R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1996;29:298–301.
Carey RM, Wheby MS, Reynolds RE. Evaluating faculty clinical excellence in the academic health sciences center. Acad Med. 1993;68:813–7.
Bickel J. The changing faces of promotion and tenure at U.S. Medical Schools. Acad Med. 1991;66:249–56.
Stossel TP. Volume: papers and academic promotion. Ann Intern Med. 1991;106:146–8.
Jones RF, Gold JS. Faculty appointment and tenure policies in medical schools: a 1997 status report. Acad Med. 1998;73:211–9.
Greer DS. Faculty rewards for the generalist clinician-teacher. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5(suppl 1):53–8.
Baldwin CD, Levine HG, McCormick DP. Meeting the faculty development needs of generalist physicians in academia. Acad Med. 1995;70(suppl 1):97–103.
Jones RF, Froom JD. Faculty and administration views of problems in faculty evaluation. Acad Med. 1994;69:476–83.
Beasley BW, Wright SM, Cofrancesco J, Babbott SF, Thomas PA, Bass EB. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators in the United States and Canada. JAMA. 1997;278:723–28.
Sheffield JVL, Wipf JE, Buchwald D. Work activities of clinician-educators. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:406–9.
Lubitz RM. Guidelines for promotion of clinician-teachers. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 2):71–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dr. Wright is an Arnold P. Gold Foundation Associate Professor of Medicine.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atasoylu, A.A., Wright, S.M., Beasley, B.W. et al. Promotion criteria for clinician-educators. J GEN INTERN MED 18, 711–716 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10425.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.10425.x