Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the educational and administrative structure and content of internal medicine subinternship (SI) programs at medical schools throughout the United States.
DESIGN: A cross-sectional mailed survey of internal medicine SI directors at U.S. medical schools.
MAIN RESULTS: Responses were received from 100 (80%) of 125 eligible programs. Seventy-five percent of schools require a SI for graduation; 26% of these schools require the completion of a medical SI. Nationally, about 75% of all medical students opt to complete a medical SI. Dedicated SI administrative committees exist at 46% of medical schools. A minority of programs provide students with explicit curricula (31%) or exclusive conference time (36%). In 44% of programs, subinterns are used by hospital departments of medicine as intern substitutes. Subinterns are responsible for sign-out and cross-coverage in about half of the programs, and all patient orders entered by subinterns require cosignature. Subintern evaluation criteria include attending evaluation (100%), resident evaluation (80%), case write-ups (27%), supervised clinical examination (20%), written examination (14%), and oral examination (3%).
CONCLUSION: Although most medical schools offer an SI in internal medicine and many require it, the experience often lacks clearly defined curricular goals and often does not provide medical students with house-staff-level responsibilities. In an effort to ease the transition from undergraduate to postgraduate training, further studies are needed to define which educational and structural components of the medicine SI should be developed and emphasized.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fagan MJ, Curry RH, Gallagher SJ. The evolving role of the acting internship in the medical school curriculum. Am J Med. 1998;104:409–12.
Gorrol AH, Morrison G, Bass EB, Platt R, Whelan A. Core Medicine Clerkship Curriculum Guide. A Cooperative Project of the Society of General Internal Medicine and the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Health Resources and Services Administration, 1998. The Guide is also available at www.sgim.org.
Jablonover RS, Blackman DJ, Bass EB, Morrison G, Goroll AH. Evaluation of a national curriculum reform effort for the medicine core clerkship. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:484–90.
Goroll AH, Morrison G, Bass EB, et al. Reforming the core curriculum in internal medicine: the SGIM/CDIM project. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:30–7.
Varner KS, ed. AAMC Curriculum Directory 1998–1999. 27th Ed. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges; 1998.
Firth-Cozens J. Emotional distress in junior house officers. BMJ. 1987;295:533–6.
Jolly BC, Macdonald MM. Education for practice: the role of practical experience in undergraduate and general clinical training. Med Educ. 1989;23:189–95.
Hannon FB. A national medical education needs’ assessment of interns and the development of an intern education and training programme. Med Educ. 2000;34:275–84.
Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine, Evaluation Task Force Study Results, 1996. http://www.im.org/cdim. Washington, DC: CDIM.
Phelen S, Obenshain SS, Galey WR. Evaluation of the noncognitive professional traits of medical students. Acad Med. 1993;68:799–803.
Hunt DD. Functional and dysfunctional characteristics of the prevailing model of clinical evaluation systems in North American medical schools. Acad Med. 1992;67:254–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Received from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sidlow, R. The structure and content of the medical subinternship. J GEN INTERN MED 16, 550–553 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016008550.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016008550.x