Skip to main content
Log in

Cervical cancer screening in the urgent care setting

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of cervical cancer screening in an urgent care clinic.

DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial.

SETTING: Public teaching hospital.

PATIENTS: Women presenting to the urgent care clinic whose evaluation necessitated a pelvic examination were eligible for participation. Women who had a hysterectomy, had a documented Pap test at our institution in the past year, did not speak English or Spanish, or had significant vaginal bleeding were excluded. Women presenting to the gynecology clinic for a scheduled Pap test were used as a comparison group for rates of follow-up, Pap smear adequacy, and Pap smear abnormalities.

INTERVENTIONS: Women randomized to the intervention group had a Pap test performed as part of their pelvic examination, while women in the usual care group were encouraged to schedule an appointment in the gynecology clinic at a later date. The women in the two groups completed identical questionnaires regarding cervical cancer risk factors and demographic information.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Ninety-four (84.7%) of 111 women in the intervention group received a Pap test, as compared with 25 (29%) of 86 in the usual care group (P<.01). However, only 5 (24%) of 21 women with abnormal Pap smears in the intervention group received follow-up compared with 6 (60%) of 10 women seen during the same time period in the gynecology clinic for self-referred, routine annual examinations (P=.11). Pap smears obtained in the urgent care clinic were similar to those in the gynecology clinic with regard to abnormality rate (22.3% vs 20%; P=.75, respectively) and specimen adequacy (67% vs 72%; P=.54, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: Urgent care clinic visits can be used as opportunities to perform Pap test screening in women who are unlikely to adhere to cervical cancer screening recommendations. However, to accure the full potential benefit from this intervention, an improved process to ensure patient follow-up must be developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control. Chronic disease reports: deaths from cervical cancer—United States, 1984–1986. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1989;38:650–2.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brinton LA, Fraumeni JF Jr. Epidemiology of uterine cervical cancer. J Chronic Dis. 1986;39:1051–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenwald P, Sondik EJ, eds. Cancer Control Objectives for the Nation: 1985–2000. National Cancer Institute Monograph 2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1986. NIH publication 86-2880.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Muir C, Waterhouse J, Powell J, Whelan S, eds. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. Vol. 88. Lyon, France: IARC; 1987:5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Martin LM, Calle EE, Wingo PA, Heath CW. Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Survey: are we closing the gaps? Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:82–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McGinnis JM, Lee PR. Healthy people 2000 at mid-decade. JAMA. 1995;273:1123–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parkin DM, Day NE. Evaluating and planning screening programs. In: Parkin DM, Wagner G, Muir C, eds. The Role of the Registry in Cancer Control. Vol. 66. Lyon, France: IARC; 1985:155.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Parker SL, Tang T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1997. CA 1997;47:5–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kosary CL, Ries LAG, Miller BA, Hankey BF, Harras P, Edwards BK, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1992: Tables and Graphs. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 1995. NIH publication 95-2789.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Makuc DM, Freid VM, Kleinman JC. National trends in the use of preventive health care by women. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:21–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. National Center of Health Statistics. Healthy People 2000 Review, 1993. Hyattsville, Md: Public Health Service; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. US Department of Health and Human Services and Institute of Medicine. Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1990. DHHS Publication 91-50212.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marcus AC, Crance LA, Kaplan CP, et al. Screening for cervical cancer in emergency centers and sexually transmitted disease clinics. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:454–5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kamb ML. Cervical cancer screening of women attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20(suppl 1):S98-S103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hogness CG, Englestad LP, Linck LM, et al. Cervical cancer screening in an urban emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21:933–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cunningham PJ, Kemper P. Ability to obtain medical care for the uninsured. JAMA. 1998;280:921–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldfrank LR. Emergency medicine. JAMA. 1995;273:1673–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mandelblatt J, Freeman H, Winczewski D, et al. Implementation of a breast and cervical cancer screening program in a public health emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28:493–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. The Medicaid Access Group. Access of medicaid recipients to outpatient care. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1426–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, Vranizan K, Stewart AL. Primary care and receipt of preventive services. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:269–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shea S, Misra D, Erlich MH, Field S, Francis CK. Predisposing factors for severe uncontrolled hypertension in an inner city minority population. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:635–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walter SD, Clarke EA, Hatcher J, Stitt LW. A comparison of physician and patient reports of Pap smear histories. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41:401–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pinkster J, Phillips RS, Davis RB, Iezzon LI. Use of follow-up services by patients referred from a walk-in unit: how can patient compliance be improved? Am J Med Qual. 1995;10:81–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Burger RA, Monk BJ, Van Nostrand KM, Greep A, Anton-Culver H, Manetta A. Single-visit program for cervical cancer prevention in a high-risk population. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;86:491–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lacey L, Whitfield J, DeWhite W, et al. Referral adherence in an inner city breast and cervical cancer screening program. Cancer. 1993;72:950–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mandelblatt J, Traxler M, Lakin P, et al, for the Harlem Study Team. Breast and cervical cancer screening of poor elderly, black women: Clinical results and implications. Am J Prev Med. 1993;9:133–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Malley AS, Mandelblatt J, Gold K, Cagney KA. Continuity of care and the use of breast and cervical cancer screening services in a multiethnic community. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1462–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rask KJ, Williams MV, Parker RM, McNagny SE. Obstacles predicting lack of a regular provider and delays in seeking care for patients at an urban public hospital. JAMA. 1994;271:1931–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Malone RE. Whither the almshouse? Overutilization of the role of the emergency department. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1998;23:795–832.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Krakau F, Hassler E. Provision for clinic patients in the emergency department produce more nonemergency visits. Am J Emerg Med. 1999;17:18–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holly Batal MD.

Additional information

Funding for this research was provided by the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Batal, H., Biggerstaff, S., Dunn, T. et al. Cervical cancer screening in the urgent care setting. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 389–394 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08001.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.08001.x

Key words

Navigation