Issue 10, 2012

Two new competitive ELISA methods for the determination of caffeine and cotinine in wastewater and river waters

Abstract

Two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) for the determination of caffeine and cotinine in water samples were validated and evaluated for the analysis of river and wastewater samples. The caffeine ELISA shows an IC50 ranging from 2.21 to 2.73 ng ml−1, a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.135 ng ml−1 and cross-reacts with paraxanthine (CR% = 63), theophylline (CR% = 5.2), and theobromine (CR% = 2.8); while the cotinine ELISA shows an IC50 ranging from 0.38 to 0.45 ng ml−1, a LOD of 0.047 ng ml−1 and cross-reacts with 3′-hydroxycotinine (CR% = 32) and nicotine (CR% = 1.1). Calibration curves were constructed in buffer in the concentration range 0.175–5 ng ml−1 for the caffeine ELISA and 0.05–5 ng ml−1 for the cotinine ELISA. Precision and accuracy were also evaluated. For the two assays, repeatability and reproducibility, expressed as the relative standard deviation of the absorbance, were within 3% and 8%, respectively. From the spiking experiment, the recovery of caffeine found in river and wastewater was between 94–101% and 89–110%, respectively; while the recovery of cotinine found in river and wastewater was between 95–105% and 99–115%, respectively. Fifteen river water samples and four wastewater samples from different wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) were analyzed by ELISA and confirmed by LC-MS/MS. Comparing the two methods a correlation coefficient of 0.935 was obtained, showing a small overestimation of the ELISAs with respect to LC-MS/MS.

Graphical abstract: Two new competitive ELISA methods for the determination of caffeine and cotinine in wastewater and river waters

Article information

Article type
Paper
Submitted
09 Apr 2012
Accepted
24 Jul 2012
First published
25 Jul 2012

Anal. Methods, 2012,4, 3364-3371

Two new competitive ELISA methods for the determination of caffeine and cotinine in wastewater and river waters

S. Nicolardi, S. Herrera, M. J. Martínez Bueno and A. R. Fernández-Alba, Anal. Methods, 2012, 4, 3364 DOI: 10.1039/C2AY25359C

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Social activity

Spotlight

Advertisements