Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Photoinduced electron transfer in α-helical polypeptides: dependence on conformation and electron donor-acceptor distance

  • Paper
  • Published:
Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Long distance electron transfer in proteins is a multiple-pathway process whose kinetics is modulated by the dynamics of flexible peptide chains. Such complexity can be observed even in relatively simple systems, e.g. donor-bridge-acceptor, where the bridge is a polypeptide α-helix. We have investigated a series of 24-residue helical polypeptides that exist as monomers in water-alcohol media. The principal chromophore and electron acceptor, a pyrene moiety, is connected to the N-terminus via a flexible linker. The electron donor, a tryptophan residue, was placed various distances away from the pyrene-labeled terminus. Time-resolved emission spectroscopy, associated with the fluorescent pendant, pyrene, was employed to study the photoinduced electron-transfer kinetics for the polypeptide analogs. Mechanisms involving only through-bond pathways could not account for the pattern of measured fast charge-separation rates. When the electron donor was placed far enough from the acceptor (i.e. at least six residues apart), a decrease in the electron-transfer rates with the donor-acceptor distance was observed. The emission decays for polypeptides with the electron donor exhibited complex behavior and could not be fit using a single-exponential function. For the treatment of the time-resolved data, a multi-exponential model was developed that is based on the assumption of a Gaussian distribution of the classical electronic coupling β values among the conformers responsible for the observed electron-transfer processes. This approach proved to be informative because, in addition to the mean values of the electron-transfer rate constants, the widths of the distributions of these rates illustrate the size of the conformational space explored by the flexible chains that provide pathways for electron transfer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. For reviews, see: a V. I. Vullev and G. Jones, II., Photoinduced charge transfer in helical polypeptides, Res. Chem. Intermed., 2002, 28, 795–815.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Y. Ogawa, Electron transfer within synthetic polypeptides and de novo designed proteins, Mol. Supramol. Photochem., 1999, 4, 113–150.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. M. W. Mutz, J. F. Wishart and G. L. McLendon, Electron transfer kinetics of bifunctional redox protein maquettes, Adv. Chem. Ser., 1998, 254, 145–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Rabanal, B. R. Gibney, W. F. DeGrado, C. C. Moser and P. L. Dutton, Engineering photosynthesis: synthetic redox proteins, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1996, 243, 213–218.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Morita, S. Kimura, S. Kobayashi and Y. Imanishi, Photocurrent generation under a large dipole moment formed by self-assembled monolayers of helical peptides having an N-ethylcarbazolyl group, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 2850–2859.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. M. Galka and H.-B. Kraatz, Electron transfer studies on self-assembled monolayers of helical ferrocenoyl-oligoproline-cystamine bound to gold, ChemPhysChem, 2002, 356–359.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Katz, V. Heleg-Shabtai, I. Willner, H. K. Rau and W. Haehnel, Surface reconstitution of a de novo synthesized hemoprotein for bioelectronic applications, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 3253–3256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Jones II, V. I. Vullev, E. H. Braswell and D. Zhu, Multistep photoinduced electron transfer in a de novo helix bundle: multimer self-assembly of peptide chains including a chromophore special pair, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 388–389.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Jones II and V. I. Vullev, Photoinduced electron transfer between non-native donor-acceptor moieties incorporated in synthetic polypeptide aggregates, Org. Lett., 2002, 4, 4001–4004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. V. I. Vullev and G. Jones II, Photoinduced electron transfer in alkanoylpyrene aggregates in conjugated polypeptides, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 8611–8615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Jones II and V. I. Vullev, Contribution of a pyrene fluorescence probe to the aggregation propensity of polypeptides, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 2457–2460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Jones II and V. I. Vullev, Ground- and excited-state aggregation properties of a pyrene derivative in aqueous media, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105, 6402–6406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. M. A. Fox and E. Galoppini, Electric field effects on electron transfer rates in dichromophoric peptides: The effect of helix unfolding, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 5277–5285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. E. Galoppini and M. A. Fox, Effect of the electric field generated by the helix dipole on photoinduced intramolecular electron transfer in dichromophoric α-helical peptides, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 2299–2300.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C. A. Slate, D. R. Striplin, J. A. Moss, P. Chen, B. W. Erickson and T. J. Meyer, Photochemical energy transduction in helical proline arrays, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 4885–4886.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. S. Isied, Long-range intramolecular electron transfer reactions across simple organic bridges, peptides, and proteins, Adv. Chem. Ser., 1997, 253, 331–347.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. W. A. Eaton, Fast kinetics and mechanisms in protein folding, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct., 2000, 29, 327–359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Acording to Marcus theory,11 the electron-transfer rate constant can be expressed as where R is the electron-transfer pathway distance, λ is \(\Delta {G {\left( 0 \right)}} = NF\left( {E_{{D { \bullet + }}} {\left( 0 \right)} - E_{{D { \bullet - }}} {\left( 0 \right)}} \right) - {E_{00}} - \frac{{{{\left( {\Delta e} \right)} 2}}}{{\varepsilon R}}\) the reorganization energy29 and ΔG(0) is the change in the free energy of the process, which was estimated using the Weller equation25

  19. R. A. Marcus and N. Sutin, Electron transfers in chemistry and biology, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1985, 811, 265–322.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. W. Mutz, M. A. Case, J. F. Wishart, M. R. Ghadiri and G. L. McLendon, De novo design of protein function: predictable structure-function relationships in synthetic redox proteins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 858–859.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Sisido, S. Hoshino, H. Kusano, M. Kuragaki, M. Makino, H. Sasaki, A. T. Smith and K. P. Ghiggino, Distance dependence of photoinduced electron transfer along α-helical polypeptides, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 10407–10415.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. E. Atherton and R. C. Sheppard, Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis, A Practical Approach, IRL Press, Oxford, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reagent R consists of 5% (v/v) thioanisole, 3% (v/v) anisole and 2% (v/v) 1,2-ethanedithiol dissolved in trifluoroacetic acid

  24. N. Greenfield and G. D. Fasman, Computed circular dichroism spectra for the evaluation of protein conformation, Biochemistry, 1969, 10, 4108–4116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Y. H. Chen, J. T. Yang and K. H. Chau, Determination of the helix and beta form of proteins in aqueous solution by circular dichroism, Biochemistry, 1974, 13, 3350–3359.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. G. Jones, II and V. I. Vullev, Medium effects on the photophysical properties of terbium(III) complexes with pyridine-2,6-dicarboxylate, Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2002, 1, 925–933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. A more accurate approach for calculation of ket values is to take the difference between the non-radiative decay rate constants, knr, in the presence and absence of an electron donor, i.e. ket = knr(TT1pWX)–knr(TT1pW9F), where the values of knr are calculated from the fluorescence quantum yields, Φ, and the lifetimes, τ, of the corresponding species: knr = (1 − Φ)/τ. However, this method is only possible when the electron-transfer system exhibits a discrete number of lifetimes, τi, so that the corresponding quantum yields, Φi, can be assigned.17 When τ has a continuous distribution, calculation of the corresponding Φ(τ) from the total quantum yield that is measured is not a trivial task. Therefore, for all systems reported in this publication (except for TT1pW9 under denaturing conditions, where mono-exponential emission decay was observed), a simplified approach for calculation of the values of ket was used (eqn. 3).

  28. Circular dichroism measurements revealed that the six polypeptide analogs described in this study have the same secondary structures when they are dissolved in identical solvents; hence, the environment around the principal chromophore, the pyrene, will not change when the electron donor, tryptophan, is moved along the peptide chain or replaced with phenylalanine. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that electron transfer is the predominant contribution to the changes in the values of non-radiative rate constants in eqn. 3.

  29. F. W. Fifield, Analytical environmental data: assessment and interpretation, Environ. Anal. Chem., 1995, 10–31.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation, ed. G. D. Fasman, Plenum Press, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. Serrano and A. R. Fersht, Capping and α-helix stability, Nature, 1989, 342, 296–299.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Attempts to denature TT1p with GuHCl in water or 50% methanol led to precipitate formation.

  33. In order for multiple non-radiative or emission rate constants to be measured from an ensemble of conformers, each of the conformers should be ‘frozen’ for a period longer than the lifetime of the excited state of the chromophore, i.e. the rates of exchange between the different conformers should be slower than the rates of the photophysical processes under observation. Therefore, the multi-exponential emission decays measured for the helical polypeptides result from conformational dynamic processes with time constants in the micro- and millisecond domains. The dynamic processes of the polypeptides that occur in the nanosecond and sub-nanosecond time domains will not produce discernible decay rate constants, rather, they will result in a single average rate.

  35. Following the principle of using as few fitting parameters as possible makes the Gaussian distribution multi-exponential function, defined by eqn. 2 and 5, a good choice for treatment of complex decay data because it has only three fitting parameters: τ(0), Δκ, and α(0). Bi- and tri-exponential decay functions, however, have four and six fitting parameters, respectively.

  36. J. Wofgang, S. M. Risser, S. Priyadarshy and D. N. Beratan, Secondary structure conformations and long range electronic interactions in oligopeptides, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1997, 101, 2986–2991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. I. Daizadeh, E. S. Medvedev and A. A. Stuchebrukhov, Effect of protein dynamics on biological electron transfer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1997, 94, 3703–3708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. A. A. Stuchebrukhov and E. S. Medvedev, Inelastic tunneling in long-distance biological electron transfer reactions, J. Chem. Phys., 1997, 107, 3821–3831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. P. A. Thompson, W. A. Eaton and J. Hofrichter, Laser temperature jump study of the helix ←→ coil kinetics of an alanine peptide interpreted with a ‘kinetic zipper’ model, Biochemistry, 1997, 36, 9200–9210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Williams, T. P. Causgrove, R. Gilmanshin, K. S. Fang, R. H. Callender, W. H. Woodruff and R. B. Dyer, Fast events in protein folding: helix melting and formation in a small peptide, Biochemistry, 1996, 35, 691–697.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. V. Munoz, P. A. Thompson, J. Hofrichter and W. A. Eaton, Folding dynamics and mechanism of β-hairpin formation, Nature, 1997, 390, 196–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. It has been established that in a case of direct contact between pyrene and indole moieties, exciplex emission in the 500 nm region appears that has a charge-transfer character and is solvent dependent.31 We have not observed even traces of emission in that wavelength region, suggesting that neither of the five peptide analogs exist in a conformation that provides direct donor–acceptor contact.

  44. N. Helsen, L. Viaene, M. Van der Auweraer, F. C. De Schryver, Influence of the substitution on intramolecular exciplex formation between pyrene and indole moieties, J. Phys. Chem., 1994, 98, 1532–1543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. P. Van Haver, N. Helsen, S. Depaemelaere, M. Van der Auweraer, F. C. De Schryver, The influence of solvent polarity of the nonradiative decay of exciplexes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991, 113, 6849–6857.

  46. J. P. Palmans, M. Van der Auweraer, A. Swinnen, F. C. De Schryver, Intermolecular exciplex formation between pyrene derivatives and 1,2-dimethylindole, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1984, 106, 7721–7728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. This is publication no. 15 in the series Photoactive Polypeptides from Boston University.

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xin Zhou

    Present address: Center for Biomedical Inventions, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA

  2. Valentine I. Vullev

    Present address: Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, 12 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemistry and the Photonics Center, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02215, USA

    Guilford Jones II, Xin Zhou & Valentine I. Vullev

Authors
  1. Guilford Jones II
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Valentine I. Vullev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

This paper is dedicated to Professor Fred Lewis on the event of his 60th birthday.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, G., Zhou, X. & Vullev, V.I. Photoinduced electron transfer in α-helical polypeptides: dependence on conformation and electron donor-acceptor distance. Photochem Photobiol Sci 2, 1080–1087 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1039/b306490e

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/b306490e

Search

Navigation