Issue 23, 1999

The role of hydrogen-bonding interactions in stabilising trigonal planar copper(I) in Cu(BF4)–pyridazine–nitrile systems

Abstract

Regardless of conditions, reaction of [Cu(NCMe)4][BF4] with pyridazine (pydz) or 3-methylpyridazine (Mepydz) in MeCN or with pydz in PhCN invariably gave tris-bridged dinuclear cations, [{Cu(NCR)}2(µ-diimine)3]2+. Structural analysis, by single crystal X-ray diffraction, of complexes containing [{Cu(NCMe)}2(µ-pydz)3]2+, [{Cu(NCMe)}2(µ-Mepydz)3]2+ and [{Cu(NCPh)}2(µ-pydz)3]2+ confirmed the presence of two tetrahedral copper(I) centres bridged by three pyridazine molecules and terminally co-ordinated by nitriles. This chemistry contrasts with that for 2-cyanoguanidine (cnge), a planar nitrile with considerable hydrogen-bonding potential, which leads to both bis- and tris-bridged dinuclear cations, [{Cu(cnge)}2(µ-pydz)2]2+ and [{Cu(cnge)}2(µ-pydz)3]2+. Whereas the tris-bridged cation is based on four-co-ordinate tetrahedral copper(I), the bis-bridged cation contains three-co-ordinate trigonal planar copper(I). The unique ability of cnge to stabilise co-ordinatively unsaturated copper(I) in the solid state with pydz bridged dications is attributed to the formation of an extended 2-D sheet architecture based on hydrogen-bonding intermolecular interactions. This type of molecular construction, which is common to all copper(I)–cnge three-co-ordinate structures, suggests that the three-co-ordinate geometry is not an intrinsic property of copper(I) systems but a result of the efficient packing of parallel two-dimensional sheets. Treatment of [{Cu(NCMe)}2(µ-diimine)3]2+ with CO led to [{Cu(CO)}2(µ-diimine)3]2+; reaction of [{Cu(cnge)}2(µ-diimine)2]2+ with CO or PPh3 gave [{Cu(cnge)(L)}2(µ-diimine)2]2+ (L = CO or PPh3). Recrystallisation of [{Cu(cnge)(PPh3)}2(µ-diimine)2]2+ yielded a variety of crystalline products including [Cu(pydz)2(PPh3)2][BF4] and [{Cu(PPh3)}2(µ-pydz)3][PF6]2. Structural studies confirmed the former to be a mononuclear cation with four monodentate (two pydz and two Ph3P) ligands and the latter to be a tris(µ-pydz) dinuclear cation with terminal Ph3P molecules. The copper(I) co-ordination geometries in both complexes are tetrahedral, the three-co-ordinate copper(I) geometry of [{Cu(cnge)}2(µ-diimine)2]2+ being lost on treatment with Ph3P. In the absence of structural data, [{Cu(CO)}2(µ-diimine)3]2+ and [{Cu(cnge)(CO)}2(µ-diimine)2]2+ are considered to comprise tris- and bis-(µ-diimine) dinuclear cations based on tetrahedral copper(I) with terminal CO.

Supplementary files

Article information

Article type
Paper

J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 4251-4259

The role of hydrogen-bonding interactions in stabilising trigonal planar copper(I) in Cu(BF4)–pyridazine–nitrile systems

A. S. Batsanov, M. J. Begley, M. W. George, P. Hubberstey, M. Munakata, C. E. Russell and P. H. Walton, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1999, 4251 DOI: 10.1039/A906192D

To request permission to reproduce material from this article, please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

If you are an author contributing to an RSC publication, you do not need to request permission provided correct acknowledgement is given.

If you are the author of this article, you do not need to request permission to reproduce figures and diagrams provided correct acknowledgement is given. If you want to reproduce the whole article in a third-party publication (excluding your thesis/dissertation for which permission is not required) please go to the Copyright Clearance Center request page.

Read more about how to correctly acknowledge RSC content.

Spotlight

Advertisements