Corrigendum: A Versatile Multiple Target Detection System Based on DNA Nano-assembled Linear FRET Arrays

Scientific Reports 6: Article number: 26879; published online: 27 May 2016; updated: 07 July 2016 The Acknowledgements section in this Article is incomplete. “This work is continuously supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos 21171019, 51373023), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and NCET-11-0584.

. Scheme of multiple detection platforms based on DNA assembled linear extending FRET. P1, P2, P3, P4 represent different probes, which consist of designed DNA sequences, and D1, D2, D3, D4 represent different dyes attached to the probes, respectively. (a) In the absence of target (no target), P1, P2, P3 and P4 could self-assemble into a linear structure, leading to successive fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) between the donors and acceptors, i.e. FRET1, FRET2 and FRET3; (b) When target sequence T1 was added, the effective FRET1 would be weakened; (c) When target sequences T1 and T2 were simultaneously added, the effective FRET1 and FRET2 would be weakened; (d) When target sequences T1, T2 and T3 were simultaneously added, the effective FRET1, FRET2 and FRET3 would be weakened. In this communication, a versatile, scalable and multiplex detection system was reported based on an extending FRET cascades on a linear DNA photonic-wire. To prove this concept, up to four different probes (P1, P2, P3, P4) were coupled together to form the sequential FRET detection system. As shown in Fig. 1, four kinds of dye modified DNA probes with different sequences were designed. Four kinds of dyes (AMCA (D1), FAM (D2), Cy3 (D3) and ROX (D4)) with overlapping absorption and emission spectra (shown in Supporting Information Fig. S1) were modified on the probes and utilized as the photo-energy donor, acceptor or mediator, respectively [37][38][39] . Using such platform, seven combinations of three kinds of targets could be successfully detected through the changes of fluorescence spectra before and after the addition of targets. This FRET-based versatile detection system is extremely significant for the development of rapid, simple and sensitive detection platform. The method could be extended to a general platform for multiplex detection through more-step FRET by attaching more probes with overlapping absorption and emission spectra.

Results and Discussion
The sequences of DNA probes are shown in Table S1, and their MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis are shown in Fig. S2. The probes consist of two distinct functional domains. One domain is the probe sequence, which could sense and bind the target sequence, and the other domain is the connecting sequence, which is complementary to adjacent probes and could form stable duplex sequences. The stepwise formation of the DNA nanowire structures of the hybridization structure of four probes (P1, P2, P3, P4, P1-P2, P1-P2-P3, P1-P2-P3-P4) were verified by PAGE under non-denaturing conditions (Fig. S3). The single strand P1, P2, P3 and P4 alone showed a band of relatively high mobility. However, the assemblies of four building blocks showed a single band of steadily decreasing mobility, indicating that a well-defined hybridization structure was formed. Through the sequential arrangement of dye in an appropriate space and orientation, a highly efficient multistep FRET-based detection system could be constructed through the noncovalent DNA recognition in aqueous media.
As the simplest example, when the system consists of only two oligo-DNA sequences, the system could be used to detect one kind of target. As shown in Fig. 2a, in the absence of target 1 (T1), probe P1 and P2 would be partly hybridized, which would lead to the quenching of fluorescence from donor chromophores (D1) and the increasing of fluorescence from acceptor chromophores (D2) due to the FRET effect (Fig. 2b, curve IV). However, when T1, which is fully complementary to P1, was added, it will bind strongly to P1, replace P2 in the P1-P2 conjugates, and effective FRET could be decreased. The corresponding fluorescence spectra changes are shown in Fig. 2b (curve I, II, III). The fluorescence of D1 was intensified along with the increase of the target concentration, and the fluorescence of D2 was decreased at the same time. The same experiment was also performed for the combination of P2-P3 and P3-P4 ( Supporting Information, Fig. S4). These results indicated that single-step FRET could be used to detect single DNA from the changes of fluorescence that were distinguishable from the background.
Two-step FRET detection system were further investigated. A schematic illustration of the experimental procedure is shown in Fig. 3. In the absence of target, P1, P2 and P3 could generate an assembled structure by partly complementary pairing between each other. And at this situation, effective FRET1 and FRET2 occurred between P1/P2 and P2/P3 donor-acceptor pairs. When target strand T1 and T2, which possess a sequence that is fully  Table 1. Summary of the fluorescence changes in the three-step FRET detection system with the addition of different target combination. "−" represent fluorescence decline and "+" represent fluorescence increase.
complementary to the P1 and P2 respectively, are added, the system would form the combinations of T1/P1 and T2/P2, and the chromophores moving far away from each other (Fig. 3a), and no effective FRETs occurred. Different excitation wavelengths (364nm, 457nm) were used to detect the effective changes of FRET1 and FRET2 as the targets were added. Different fluorescence changes were exhibited when only one or both targets were simultaneously added. As shown in Fig. 3b,c, when T1 and T2 were added simultaneously, the fluorescence of D1 greatly increased under 364 nm excitation wavelengths (Fig. 3b), and at the same time the increase of fluorescence from D2 and the decline of fluorescence from D3 were observed at an excitation wavelength of 457 nm (Figs 3 and S5). Furthermore, the changes of fluorescence intensity increase with the increase of the concentration of T1 and T2. At the cases of only one target present, the increase of fluorescence from D1 were observed on addition of only T1 under 364 nm excitation wavelengths, and at the same time, no obvious changes of fluorescence from D2 and D3 were found at an excitation wavelength of 457 nm. Comparatively, the increase of fluorescence from D2 and the decline of D3 were observed when only T2 was added, and no changes of fluorescence from D1, as shown in supporting information (Fig. S6). The fact that obvious fluorescence changes from P1-P2-P3 conjugates with different targets was observed at an excitation wavelength of 364 nm and 457 nm indicates that two targets could be detected by the two-step FRET detection platform. Three-step FRET based detection platform was further investigated through a more complex P1-P2-P3-P4 system. Firstly, the mixed solution of P1, P2, P3 and P4 (in 1:1:1:1 ratio) was prepared. As shown in Fig. 4a, in the absence of target, P1, P2, P3 and P4 could self-assemble into an assembled structure from these flexible components by partly complementary pairing between each other. At this situation, effective FRET1, FRET2 and FRET3 would happen between P1/P2, P2/P3 and P3/P4 donor-acceptor pairs (Fig. 4a). When the solution system was titrated with different target or target combination, it would display obvious different fluorescence spectra. As shown in Fig. 4a, when the target mixture (T1, T2, T3) were added, no FRET steps occurred. Correspondingly, the increase of fluorescence from D1 (Fig. 4b), D2 (Fig. 4c), D3 (Fig. 4d), and the decline of fluorescence from D4 (Figs 4d and S7) were observed. Furthermore, through this three-step FRET based detection platform, seven kinds of target combinations could be identified, which were one-target (T1, T2, T3), combinations of two targets (T1-T2, T2-T3, T1-T3) and combinations of three targets (T1-T2-T3), respectively. The typical results of single target and two target combinations (here, single target T1 and two targets T1\T3 combinations was selected as the examples) were shown in supporting information (Fig. S8). From the fluorescence spectra, the increase of fluorescence from D1 were observed on addition of only T1 under 364 nm excitation wavelengths, and no changes of fluorescence from D2, D3, D4 were found at an excitation wavelength of 457 nm and 520 nm, as shown in supporting Fig. S8b, c, d). As shown in supporting Fig. S8f-h, the fluorescence of D1 and D3 become stronger, and D2 display no change when T1 and T3 were added simultaneously. Based on the changes of fluorescence spectra, the detection results of seven kinds of combinations of three targets were summarized in Table 1.
The above fluorescence analysis results could be further verified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) under non-denaturing conditions. As the examples, Fig. 5 shows the PAGE analysis results of the three representative situations, i.e. two probe-composed system for one target (a), three probe-composed system for two target detection (b), and four probe-composed system for three target detection (c), respectively. As shown in Fig. 5, the different assembles in the analysis system showed different bands due to their different mobility. The PAGE analysis result was consistent with the corresponding fluorescence analysis and diagrammatic sketch.
In summary, a versatile DNA nanowire based on extending FRET linearly arrays was successfully assembled with four dye-DNA probes. The fluorescence spectroscopy produced significant changes before and after the addition of different target combinations into the detection system because of the DNA nanowire was broke by target. Furthermore, specific aptamer molecules could bind to various specific target species, such as small organics, peptides, proteins, and metal ions with high affinity and specificity, this method could be extended to a long nanowire for multiplex detection through such multiple step FRET system, which could distinguish more targets and their combinations theoretically.

Experimental Section
Standard automated oligonucleotide solid-phase synthesis was performed on a BioAutomation MerMade 4 DNA synthesizer. UV-Vis spectra were measured on a Shimadzu U-1800 spectrophotometer. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed using an Elite P230PII series HPLC. Gel electrophoresis experiments were carried out on an acrylamide 20 × 20 cm vertical DYCZ24 electrophoresis unit. All fluorescence spectra were recorded on a Hitachi F-4500 FL Spectrophotometer in PBS buffer.
The oligonucleotides were constructed on CPG supports using conventional phosphoramidite chemistry. For the sequences modified by fluorescence group in the interior or at the end of the DNA sequence, the coupling and deprotection times were extended to eight and two minutes, respectively. Products were cleaved from the support by treatment with concentrated NH 4 OH for 16 h at 55 °C. The NH 4 OH solution was decanted and dried down to yield the crude DNA mixture. The crude mixture obtained was purified by preparative reverse-phase HPLC with 0.03 M triethylammonium acetate (TEAA), pH 7 and a 1%/min gradient of 95% CH 3 CN/5% 0.03 M TEAA at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Quantification was estimated based on UV-Vis absorbance at 260 nm.
The representative extending FRET-based DNA detection system (200 mM NaCl, 25 mM Tris acetate, pH 8.2) containing various probe combinations (with 100 nM P1 and/or P2 and/or P3 and/or P4) was annealed in the presence or absence of a certain concentration DNA targets (T1, T2, T3 and their combinations) from 90 °C to 20 °C, then stored at this temperature over 2 h. All fluorescence measurements were initially carried out at 20 °C in above buffer system. Annealed structures were further verified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) under non-denaturing conditions. All of the final assemblies were characterized using 7% native polyacrylamide gel (run at constant current of 10 mA, 4 °C and visualized using StainsAll ® ).