Corrigendum: Epigenetic silencing of the XAF1 gene is mediated by the loss of CTCF binding

XAF1 is a tumour suppressor gene that compromises cell viability by modulating different cellular events such as mitosis, cell cycle progression and apoptosis. In cancer, the XAF1 gene is commonly silenced by CpG-dinucleotide hypermethylation of its promoter. DNA demethylating agents induce transcriptional reactivation of XAF1, sensitizing cancer cells to therapy. The molecular mechanisms that mediate promoter CpG methylation have not been previously studied. Here, we demonstrate that CTCF interacts with the XAF1 promoter in vivo in a methylation-sensitive manner. By transgene assays, we demonstrate that CTCF mediates the open-chromatin configuration of the XAF1 promoter, inhibiting both CpG-dinucleotide methylation and repressive histone posttranslational modifications. In addition, the absence of CTCF in the XAF1 promoter inhibits transcriptional activation induced by well-known apoptosis activators. We report for the first time that epigenetic silencing of the XAF1 gene is a consequence of the loss of CTCF binding.

Here, we demonstrated that CTCF directly regulates XAF1 expression by binding to a methylation-sensitive CTCF-binding site in its promoter. The absence of CTCF promotes epigenetic silencing of the XAF1 promoter by both accelerated CpG-dinucleotide methylation and the transition from active to repressive HPMs. Importantly, in cancer cell lines, the lack of CTCF regulation on the XAF1 promoter via methylation on its cognate binding site partially blocks its transcriptional responsiveness to two well-known transcriptional activators, TNF-α or IFN-α . These findings uncover for the first time an epigenetic mechanism involved in establishing the repressive configuration of the XAF1 promoter and, consequently, transcriptional unresponsiveness.

Results
Specific CpG-dinucleotide methylation impedes full XAF1 responsiveness to either TNF-α or IFN-α in MCF-7 cells. As expected based on previous reports showing that XAF1 promoter is hypermethylated in cancer 9,12,17 , here, pre-exposure to demethylating agents increased the transcriptional activation of XAF1 in basal conditions ( Supplementary Fig.1a). To test XAF1 dynamic expression, we used two well-known XAF1 transcriptional activators, TNF-α and IFN-α [29][30][31] Demethylating conditions were required to display full transcriptional activation of XAF1 at both the mRNA and protein levels HPRT mRNA was used as loading control. Results are presented in terms of fold change. The means from three independent experiments were plotted with ± SEM, *P < 0.05. (b) MCF-7 cells were treated as shown in (a). Using a specific antibody, XAF1 was immunoprecipitated from equal quantities of total extracted proteins for each condition. XAF1, CTCF and GAPDH protein levels were measured by Western blot. (c) MCF-7 cells were pre-treated as in (a) before stimulation with IFN-α at the indicated concentrations. mRNA expression of both XAF1 and CTCF was analysed by qPCR after normalizing with HPRT mRNA. The mean from three independent replicates were plotted with + SEM, *P < 0.05. (d) MCF-7 cells were pre-treated and stimulated as shown in (c). Western blot analysis was performed as shown in (b). 5-Aza-2′ -deoxycytidine (5-A-DC); Trichostatin-A (TSA).
after TNF-α (Fig. 1a,b) or IFN-α (Fig. 1c,d) exposure. To extend these observations to another unrelated cancer cell line, we used ACHN cells, which have previously been shown to be responsive to IFN-α in demethylating conditions 32 . As observed with MCF-7 cells, we observed a dramatic increase in XAF1 responsiveness in demethylating conditions (Fig. 2a). As a positive control, we used the Colo205 cell line that presents an unmethylated XAF1 promoter 9 . Even without previous exposure to epigenetic modifiers, we observed a clear XAF1 transcriptional activation by TNF-α exposure ( Supplementary Fig. 1b). We then reasoned that differential dinucleotide CpG methylation between control cells and cells treated with demethylating agents could help us to identify which DNA segments are important for the full responsiveness of XAF1. To this end, we performed bisulphite genomic sequencing using a specific set of (a) ACHN cells were pre-treated with 5-Aza-2′ -deoxycytidine (5 μ M) and Trichostatin-A (0.2 μ M) for 3 days before stimulation with either TNF-α or IFN-α . Non-demethylated cells were stimulated with either TNF-α or IFN-α . mRNA expression of XAF1, CTCF and HPRT was analysed by qPCR. Results are presented in terms of fold change. The means from three independent experiments were plotted with ± SEM, *P < 0.05. (b) MCF-7 cells were either treated or not treated with demethylating agents, as shown in (a). Bisulphite sequencing was then performed. A schematic representation of the XAF1 promoter shows the locations of 11 CpG-dinucleotides sites from − 22 to − 500 bp relative to the TSS. Methylated and unmethylated CpGs are depicted as filled and open circles, respectively (c) MCF-7 cells were treated as shown in (a). ChIP assays were performed using a specific antibody against CTCF protein. The CTCF-binding site in the XAF1 promoter was analysed by PCR in the DNA recovered after ChIP (Left panel). As positive and negative controls of CTCF-DNA interaction, three specific sets of primers were included. Two of them were directed to previously validated CTCF binding sites (c-Myc and IGF2) as positive controls, and one was a negative control. The input represents soluble chromatin that was reversed cross-linked and amplified by PCR (central panel). RT-PCR was performed from cells used for ChIP assays. 5-Aza-2′ -deoxycytidine (5-A-DC); Trichostatin-A (TSA).
primers to amplify the XAF1 promoter. Exposure to 5-aza-2′ -deoxycytidine (5-A-DC) and trichostatin-A (TSA) induced consistent demethylation of three CpG dinucleotides in MCF-7 cells ( Fig. 2b; A, B and C). These results indicate that full transcriptional activation of the XAF1 gene is associated with a specific CpG-dinucleotide methylation state of its promoter.
CTCF interacts with the XAF1 promoter when cells are stimulated with TNF-α or IFN-α. CTCF is known to regulate the expression of diverse tumour suppressor genes by directly binding to promoter sequences 28 . We searched for transcription binding sites in a window of − /+ 10 bp of the DNA sequence adjacent to each CpG that was demethylated as a consequence of epigenetic modifiers. Interestingly, we identify a putative CTCF binding site that overlapped the CpG dinucleotide located at − 388 bp relative to the transcription start site (Fig. 2b). Supporting the relevance of this site, its presence was confirmed in an experimentally validated CTCF-binding site database 33 (Fig. 3a,b). To experimentally validate this, ChIP assays were performed in MCF-7 cells after stimulation with TNF-α or IFN-α . As shown in Fig. 2c, in basal conditions, we could not find a detectable association of CTCF with the putative CTCF binding site in the XAF1 promoter. This result could be explained by a methylation-sensitive CTCF binding mechanism. To directly test this, we exposed the cells to demethylating agents before stimulation with TNF-α or IFN-α . As expected, the association of CTCF with the XAF1 promoter was detected only after DNA demethylation and stimulation with TNF-α or IFN-α (Fig. 2c). This observation correlated with an increased transcriptional activation when the cells were previously exposed to the epigenetic modifiers (Fig. 2c, third panel). Additionally, we validated this CTCF binding site using an additional cell line. As in MCF-7 cells, we observed a dramatic increase in the interaction of CTCF with the XAF1 promoter when the cells were stimulated with either TNF-α or IFN-α after exposure to demethylating agents ( Supplementary Fig. 1c). These results support a methylation-sensitive association of CTCF with the XAF1 promoter.

XAF1 expression is regulated by CTCF.
To further define the role of CTCF on XAF1 mRNA expression, we used specific siRNAs to downregulate CTCF expression in a series of loss-of-function experiments. We verified the efficacy of these siRNAs at both mRNA and protein levels ( Supplementary  Fig. 1d). Because previous reports have shown that demethylating agents increase XAF1 induction by IFN in ACHN cells 32 , we used this cell line to analyse the effect of these siRNAs on XAF1 transcriptional responsiveness to TNF-α or IFN-α . As described above, demethylating conditions are necessary to uncover the CTCF-binding site (Fig. 2b,c). We clearly observed lower levels of XAF1 mRNA in cells transfected with the siRNAs against CTCF than those transfected with control siR-NAs (Fig. 4a). Additionally, we confirmed the regulatory effect of CTCF on the XAF1 promoter using the secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter gene assays. In these assays, the enzymatic activity drove by the XAF1 promoter region comprising − 3000 bp to + 350 bp relative to the transcription After that, the cells were transiently transfected with CTCF siRNAs or control scramble siRNAs. qPCR analyses were performed to measure the expression of both XAF1 and CTCF mRNA. HPRT was used as loading control. The means from three independent experiments were plotted with + SEM, *P < 0.05. (b) MCF-7 cells were transitorily co-transfected with both Wild-type-XAF1-promoter-SEAP or Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter-SEAP constructs and pMetLuc, which was used for transfection normalization. Data are represented as the means + SEM from three independent experiments, *P < 0.05. (c) MCF-7 stable clones of CTCF/Tet-On were stimulated with tetracycline at the indicated concentrations. Using qPCR assays, XAF1 and CTCF mRNA expression was normalized to HPRT, used as a loading control. The mean and range were plotted from two independent stable cell lines. (d) MCF-7-CTCF/Tet-On and MCF-7 Empty/Tet-On cell lines were transitory co-transfected with Wild-type-XAF1-promoter-SEAP and pMetLuc. After 48 h, tetracycline was added for 24 h. Data are represented as the means + SEM from three independent experiments, *P < 0.05. 5-Aza-2′ -deoxycytidine (5-A-DC); Trichostatin-A (TSA); CTCF-binding site (CBS).
Scientific RepoRts | 5:14838 | DOi: 10.1038/srep14838 start site (Wild-type-XAF1-promoter-SEAP) was compared with the same region with a deletion of the core CTCF binding site (Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter-SEAP). The absence of the CTCF binding site in the XAF1 promoter inhibits its basal transcriptional activation (Fig. 4b). To further support these results, we also conducted gain-of-function experiments by analysing the effects of CTCF overexpression on XAF1 mRNA expression. To achieve this, we engineered a Tet-on CTCF system in the MCF-7 cell line. In demethylating conditions, the overexpression of CTCF mediated by tetracycline addition induced transcriptional activation of XAF1 (Fig. 4c). Additionally, these cells were transfected with the Wild-type-XAF1-promoter-SEAP construct. After tetracycline addition, we observed a significant increase in the enzymatic activity of the reporter in cells overexpressing CTCF (Fig. 4d). On the other hand, we evaluated the role of CTCF over-expression in terms of transcriptional responsiveness of XAF1 in TNF-α -or IFN-α -treated cells. Although we detected an increase in XAF1 levels in cells over-expressing CTCF, the TNF-α or IFN-α -mediated transcriptional increase was not modified by CTCF overexpression (supplementary Fig. 2a). This points toward a shared signalling mechanism and supports the role of CTCF in the effects of these cytokines on XAF1 regulation, with additional factors needed for maximal responsiveness. Thus, both gain and loss of function approaches showed the participation of CTCF in XAF1 expression.
CTCF protects the XAF1 gene from epigenetic silencing. The insulating action of CTCF protects several genes from epigenetic silencing 28,34 . In particular, it has been described that the absence of CTCF in tumour suppressor gene promoters induces their epigenetic silencing, which supports the role of CTCF in cancer [35][36][37] . To test the possible epigenetic-mediated regulation of CTCF on the XAF1 gene, we compared the XAF1 promoter activity in a genomic integrated context by measuring a GFP reporter gene. For this, we compared the wild type XAF1 promoter with the CTCF-deletion (Δ -CTCF-XAF1) construct. Supporting the insulating role of CTCF on the XAF1 gene, cells with the Δ -CTCF-XAF1 promoter showed lower GFP levels than those with the wild-type XAF1 promoter after 60 days of continuous culture (Fig. 5a). To further support this finding, single-cell clones for each transfection were isolated and propagated for an additional 35 days. As expected by the previous result, silencing of GFP expression levels was mainly observed in single-cell clones with the integrated Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter (Fig. 5a), pointing toward an epigenetic-protective effect of the CTCF binding site. A possible alternative explanation for the difference in GFP expression levels between transfections could be attributed to a distinct number of integration events. To exclude this possibility, the transgene copy number was measured by real-time PCR as previously reported 38 . The difference between GFP expression levels driven by the Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter and wild-type-XAF1-promoter was independent of the transgene copy number ( Supplementary Fig. 2b). To gain insight into the epigenetic mechanism involved in GFP silencing of the Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter, we hypothesized that loss of the CTCF-binding site could promote 1) accelerated CpG methylation or 2) acquisition of a repressive chromatin configuration based on HPMs (or both). To test the first hypothesis, sequencing of the sodium bisulphite-modified genomic DNA from three single-cell clones for each transfection was performed. To discriminate endogenous XAF1 promoter amplification, a nested-PCR strategy was performed in which the first set of primers annealed to plasmid sequences surrounding the exogenous XAF1 promoter ( Fig. 5b and Supplementary Fig. 2c). We observed that the Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter is more susceptible to dinucleotide-CpG methylation than the wild-type-XAF1-promoter in a genomic-integrated context (Fig. 5b). To test our second hypothesis, ChIP assays were performed using specific antibodies directed to H3K4-2me or H3K9-3me posttranslational modifications in single-cell clones from each stable transfection. To interrogate the relative enrichment of repressive or active HPMs in the transgene, we designed a pair of primers that anneal to the plasmid sequence immediately after the exogenous XAF1 promoter ( Fig. 5c and Supplementary Fig. 2c). Lower levels of the H3K4-2me posttranslational modification, a marker for transcription activity, were observed in cell single clones from the Δ -CTCF XAF1-promoter (Fig. 5c). As expected, the Δ -CTCF XAF1 promoter was enriched with the repressive H3K9-3me modification (Fig. 5c). Overall, these findings support the notion that CTCF regulates DNA methylation in the XAF1 promoter; thus, loss of CTCF in its cognate-binding site induces DNA-methylation and polarization from active to repressive HPM, which in turn induces transcriptional repression. XAF1 expression is modulated by CTCF in apoptotic conditions. It has been well described that XAF1 expression reactivation has a crucial role in apoptosis induced by TNF-α /cycloheximide (CHX) or IFN-α /TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) 6,22 . To test if CTCF could regulate XAF1 expression in apoptotic conditions, MCF-7 cells were exposed to either TNF-α /CHX or IFN-α / TRAIL. Cytotoxicity induced by the co-treatment of either TNF-α /CHX or IFN-α /TRAIL was analysed by cell viability assays (Supplementary Fig. 2d). As expected, we observed the transcriptional activation of XAF1 after exposure to both regimens (Fig. 6a,b). To assess the biological relevance of CTCF-mediated XAF1 transcription, single-cell clones with the wild type-or Δ -CTCF-XAF1 promoter were exposed to inducers of apoptosis. After that, FACS was used to measure GFP-reporter gene activity. Whereas the wild-type promoter activity correlated with the XAF1 transcriptional activation, the Δ -CTCF-XAF1 promoter did not present any transcriptional activity (Fig. 6c). Several reports have shown that XAF1 is an IFN-stimulated gene in cancer cells 30,39,40 . Because its promoter is commonly hypermethylated in these Scientific RepoRts | 5:14838 | DOi: 10.1038/srep14838 cells, transcriptional activation of the XAF1 gene could be dependent on IFN-α -mediated demethylation and could thus rely on CTCF 20 . Supporting this hypothesis, we found that single-cell clones with the Δ -CTCF-XAF1 promoter were unable to respond to IFN-α , indicating that CTCF could be relevant in the IFN-α -mediated induction of XAF1 (Fig. 6c).

Discussion
In cancer, it has been described that the XAF1 gene is transcriptionally silenced by CpG-dinucleotide hypermethylation in its promoter 9,17,41 . Exposure to demethylating agents induces XAF1 transcriptional activation, thereby compromising cell viability by promoting apoptosis 4,21 , mitotic catastrophe 4,8 or cell cycle inhibition 8 . Thus, CpG methylation in the XAF1 promoter represents the main epigenetic mechanism involved in XAF1 silencing and, consequently, in resistance against apoptosis. However, the deregulation of epigenetic mechanism is implicated in a variety of diseases 42 , including cancer [43][44][45] . CTCF is a multi-task protein involved in chromatin regulation, with profound consequences in gene expression 23,24 . In a panel of breast cancer cell lines, heightened CTCF expression was associated with apoptosis (a) The timeline for stable transgenic cell line generation using peGFPN1-XAF1 or peGFPN1-Δ -CTCF-XAF1 plasmids. The detection of GFP expression for each cell line was performed using FACS. Single-cell clones were generated at day 60. (b) Right, bisulphite sequencing was performed from single-cell clones containing either peGFPN1-XAF1 or peGFPN1-Δ -CTCF-XAF1 constructs. The exogenous XAF1 promoter was specifically amplified using a nested-PCR strategy in which the first amplification was performed using primers recognizing plasmid sequences. Methylated and unmethylated CpGs are depicted as filled and open circles, respectively. Left, histograms from each single cell clones are showed (c) ChIP assays were performed from stable single-cell clones using specific antibodies against H3K4-2me or H3K9-3me. Data are represented as the means ± SEM from three single-cell clones. Red triangle symbols the deletion of the CTCF binding site.
Scientific RepoRts | 5:14838 | DOi: 10.1038/srep14838 resistance 46 . The protective action of CTCF is explainable, in part, by negative regulation of the Bax gene, which increases the apoptotic threshold 47 . It has also been clearly demonstrated that CTCF regulates the chromatin configuration of many tumour suppressor genes, affecting their transcription rates 28 . Here, we describe that CTCF interacts with the XAF1 promoter, thereby regulating its chromatin configuration and, consequently, its transcriptional responsiveness to well-known activators. We were able to demonstrate two biological scenarios. First, CTCF maintains an open-chromatin configuration in the XAF1 promoter, as assessed by the presence of both active HPMs (Fig. 5c) and de-methylated CpG dinucleotides (Fig. 5b), allowing high transcriptional responsiveness to activators (Figs 1 and 6c). Second, the loss of CTCF regulation in the XAF1 promoter, explained by the fact that CTCF interaction with its cognate binding site in the XAF1 promoter is methylation sensitive (Fig. 2b,c), induces polarization from active to repressive HPMs (Fig. 5c) and accelerates CpG-dinucleotide methylation (Fig. 5b). This closed chromatin state represses transcriptional activation (Fig. 6c) and possibly contributes to apoptotic resistance. Thus, CTCF is a determinant that confers a permissive chromatin configuration to the XAF1 gene, which is critical for apoptotic program culmination.
In X-chromosomal inactivation, certain genes escape from the epigenetic silencing mechanism. CTCF mediates this escape by inhibiting the propagation both of methylation and of repressive HPMs from surrounding silent regions 34 . In this scenario, CTCF mediates the shift between an open and closed chromatin configuration by functioning as a scaffold protein to attract different enzymatic complexes involved in HPMs 35,48,49 . Concordantly, epigenetic silencing of CTCF-regulated genes is observed when CTCF is unable to interact with its DNA-binding site by a methylation-sensitive interaction that favours the presence of repressive, HPMs 27,35,50 . Importantly, reports showing the biological weight of different HPMs in the XAF1 promoter are missing. In the present report, assessing long-term transgenic behaviour allowed us to uncover the actions of CTCF on the chromatin configuration of the XAF1 promoter (Fig. 5). We observed for the first time that the absence of local CTCF in the XAF1 promoter induces the transition from active to repressive HPMs. We envision that the loss of CTCF affinity to its cognate binding-site in the XAF1 promoter could be the first driving event for the transcriptional repression of the XAF1 gene. Additional experiments are needed to support this, but it has been reported that CTCF posttranslational modifications impair its ability to interact with DNA targets [51][52][53][54] . Thus, lack of CTCF in its cognate site allows its methylation, impeding re-association of CTCF to it even with new posttranslational modifications arise. Consequently, this induces accelerated CpG-dinucleotide methylation and polarization from active to repressive HPM and a consequent XAF1 transcriptional silencing.
It has been described that the nuclear matrix plays an important role in the regulation of gene transcription. Chromatin is anchored by short stretches of DNA sequences called matrix attachment regions (MARs). MARs range in size from 100 to 2000 bp and are rich in AT dinucleotide pairs and repetitive sequences. Both chromatin loop formation and the transcriptional activation of genes surrounded by MARs are dependent on nuclear matrix anchorage 55 . This is explainable by the fact that transcriptional factors are present in the nuclear matrix 56 . CTCF associates with the nuclear matrix 57,58 and mediates the anchoring of DNA sequences to it, as observed in the 5′ -HS4 chicken β -globin insulator 58 . In addition, the association of CTCF with the nuclear matrix depends on nucleophosmin/B23 59 . However, it has been observed that IFN-γ induces transcriptional activation of major histocompatibility complex genes, which coincides with the reorganization of chromatin loops 60 . Interestingly, DNA anchorage to the nuclear matrix after IFN-γ exposure was associated with CTCF binding sites 60 . Therefore, CTCF reconfigures genomic regions by forming loops that affect the transcriptional gene landscape. In the present paper, we demonstrate that in cancer cells, CTCF is unable to associate with its cognate DNA-binding site in the XAF1 promoter if it is methylated (Fig. 7a), thus effectively rendering it unresponsive to well-known In demethylating conditions, CTCF is able to interact with its cognate DNA-binding site, inhibiting both CpG-dinucleotide methylation and repressive histone posttranslational modifications such as H3K9-2me. After treatment with transcriptional activators such as TNF-α or IFN-α , the association between CTCF and nucleophosmin/ B23 is induced, allowing XAF1 promoter anchorage to the nuclear matrix and inducing transcriptional activation. Additionally, several subunits of CTCF could bridge additional genomic regions from interchromosomal or intrachromosomal locations to the same genomic anchor to which the XAF1 promoter is attached. The inhibition of CpG-dinucleotide methylation could be mediated by the inhibitory action of PARP-1 on DNMT1.
Scientific RepoRts | 5:14838 | DOi: 10.1038/srep14838 activators (Fig. 7a). However, after demethylating the cognate site, CTCF is now able to associate with the XAF1 promoter to enhance transcriptional activation (Fig. 2). One intriguing possibility is that CTCF could be able to attract DNA to the nuclear matrix, mediating faster chromatin loop formation in the nuclear matrix after exposure to exogenous stimuli. Although not tested, we envision that CTCF could be able to attract the XAF1 promoter to the nuclear matrix by its association with nucleophosmin/B23, thereby inducing both chromatin loop formation and transcriptional activation of the XAF1 gene (Fig. 7b). In cancer, this putative mechanism would not occur due to the absence of CTCF in its DNA-binding site via a methylation-sensitive mechanism (Fig. 7a).
Finally, we demonstrate for the first time that CTCF is critical to maintaining key CpG-dinucleotides demethylated in the XAF1 promoter (Fig. 5b). This could be explainable by previous reports showing that CTCF associates with and activates PARP-1, which negatively regulates DNMT1, thus maintaining the CpG dinucleotides within the CTCF-binding sites free from methylation 61,62 . Additionally, a pool of PARP is located in the nuclear matrix and is implicated in chromatin loop formation. Although not tested, an interesting hypothesis would be the possibility that PARP-1 is a mediator of the effects of CTCF (Fig. 7b). Further experiments are required to test this.
In conclusion, we demonstrate a novel functional CTCF binding site in the XAF1 promoter. The association of CTCF with its binding site induces an open chromatin configuration by enriching active HPMs and maintaining CpG-dinucleotides free from methylation. In cancer, methylation negatively affects the interaction between CTCF and the XAF1 promoter, disabling the protective epigenetic actions of CTCF against the closed-chromatin configuration. Our finding are consistent with CTCF acting as key regulatory element in the well-accepted observation that CpG-dinucleotide methylation on the XAF1 promoter inhibits its transcriptional activation. The absence of CTCF regulation of the XAF1 gene may constitute a selective advantage during clonal evolution by means of increasing the apoptotic threshold.

Methods
Cell culture and reagents. MCF-7 (HTB22) cells were acquired from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). ACHN (CRL-1611) cells were acquired from the ATCC, and maintained in Eagle's Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were grown in a humidified incubator that was maintained at 37 °C with 5% CO 2 . Demethylating conditions were established by treating the cell lines for 3 days with 0.2 μ M Trichostatin-A (TSA) and 5 μ M 5-aza-2′ -deoxycytidine (5-A-DC) (SIGMA). Daily, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing 5-A-DC and TSA. The transfection of constructs was performed using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). TNF-α and IFN-α were purchased from R&D and PROSPEC, respectively.

Constructs.
Genomic DNA isolated from peripheral human blood was used as a template. Primers used in this work are listed in Supplementary Table S1. Specific primers were designed to amplify by PCR the region from − 1200 to + 350 bp relative to the transcription start site (TSS) from the XAF1 gene (XAF1.2). The PCR product was purified and cloned into pTZ57r/t (Thermo). Then, XAF1.2 was subcloned into the peGFP-N1 (Clontech) expression vector to produce peGFP-N1-XAF1-promoter. Deletion of the CTCF-binding site from the peGFP-N1-XAF1-promoter plasmid was performed using the QuickChange Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies). Following the manufacturer's protocol, we generated peGFP-N1-Δ -CTCF-XAF1. Specific primers were designed to amplify by PCR the genomic region from − 3000 to + 350 bp relative to the transcription start site from the XAF1 gene (XAF1-promoter). The PCR product was cloned using GeneJET PCR cloning kit (Fermentas) and was then subcloned into pSEAP2-Basic (Clontech), a secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) gene reporter expression vector, to produce the wild-type-XAF1-promoter-SEAP construct. Using a QuickChange Lightning Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies), we generated the Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter-SEAP construct, which lacked the CTCF binding site. To generate an inducible system for CTCF overexpression, CTCF was amplified from cDNA using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) and cloned into pQCXIP (Clontech). It was then subcloned into pTRE-Tight-Bi-AcGFP1 (Clontech) to produce pTRE-Tight-Bi-AcGFP1-CTCF. All plasmids were confirmed by capillary sequencing.
Transient and stable transfection of MCF-7 cells. MCF-7 cells were seeded in 12-well plates one day before transfection. The cells were co-transfected with 0.625 μ g of either wild-type-XAF1-promoter-SEAP or Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter-SEAP plasmids and 0.625 pg of pMetLuc (Clontech), which is a plasmid encoding secreted Metridia luciferase used for transfection normalization. After 24 h, the transfection medium was changed out for fresh medium. After 48 h, the medium was collected to measure both SEAP and Luciferase activities using the Great EscAPe SEAP chemiluminescence kit (Clontech) and Ready-To-Glow-Secreted Luciferase Reporter Assay (Clontech), respectively.
For inducible CTCF overexpression, MCF-7 cells were transfected with 2 μ g pTet-On plasmid (Clontech), which encodes the rTet repressor protein. The cells were selected in G418 (1000 μ g/mL) for 4 weeks. The pool of the resulting colonies was then expanded under G418 selection and cotransfected with 2 μ g pTRE-Tight-Bi-AcGFP1-CTCF with 1 μ g pQPCXIP empty plasmid. Stable cell clones were selected with puromycin after two weeks of selection.
Scientific RepoRts | 5:14838 | DOi: 10.1038/srep14838 MCF-7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates. After 1 day, the cells were transfected with 2 μ g of either peGFP-N1-XAF1-promoter or peGFP-N1-Δ -CTCF-XAF1-promoter plasmids. After 48 h, the cells were selected with G418 (1000 μ g/mL) for 4 weeks. Then, G418-resistan cells were analysed by fluorescence activate cell sorting (FACS). The resistant cells were further cultured for 30 days in the absence of G418 and were analysed by FACS. Then, single cell clones were isolated. The single cell clones were continuously cultured further in the absence of G418 for 35 days, and reporter gene expression was evaluated by FACS.
Transient transfection of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) against CTCF. ACHN and MCF-7 cells were seeded in 6-well plates. After one day, the cells were treated in demethylating conditions, as indicated above. The cells were then transfected with 0.1 μ M human CTCF small interfering RNAs (siR-NAs; Qiagen) using Lipofectamine ® 2000 (Invitrogen). After 24 h, the transfection medium was replaced with fresh medium containing demethylating agents. RNA isolation was performed 48 h post-transfection using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). RNA was converted to cDNA using random primers and SuperScript ® VILO (Invitrogen).
Bisulphite DNA sequencing analysis. DNA was extracted from either MCF-7 cells or MCF-7 stable cell lines using the FlexiGene DNA Kit (Qiagen). DNA (1.5 μ g) was bisulphite converted using the Zymo EZ DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The bisulphite-converted DNA was subjected to PCR amplification using specific primers to the XAF1 promoter (XAF-EnBis/XAF-EnBia). A nested-PCR amplification strategy was used to amplify DNA converted from stable cell lines using specific primers against the plasmid sequence (1.2GFPBis/1.2GFPBia) in the first PCR reaction to avoid amplification of the XAF1 endogenous promoter. The product from this PCR was used in a second round of PCR amplification using specific primers against the XAF1 promoter, as described above. PCR products were gel purified and cloned using the GeneJET PCR cloning kit (Fermentas), and positive clones were sent for sequencing.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation. Cells (3 × 10 6 ) were fixed with 1% formaldehyde and neutralized by adding 0.125 M glycine. The cells were then lysed in cell lysis buffer (10 mM EDTA, 50 mM TRIS-HCl pH 8, 1% SDS, protease inhibitor cocktail). The cell lysate was sonicated to obtain soluble chromatin with a mean length of 400 bp. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) was performed using a specific antibody raised against CTCF (C02-2899; Cell Signaling Technology) or CTCF (07-729; Millipore). Specific antibodies against H3K9me3 (ab8898 Abcam) and H3K4me2 (7766 Abcam ab) were used to perform ChIP assays on soluble chromatin from single cell clones. The DNA recovered after ChIP was subjected to PCR amplification using the following primers: XAF-CTCF-s/XAF-CTCF-as was used for the putative CTCF binding site of the XAF1 promoter; two set of primers, IGF2-CTCF-s/IGF2-CTCF-as 63 and MYC-CTCF-s/MYC-CTCF-as 64 , were used as positive controls for the CTCF-DNA interaction; and a negative control, NEG-CTCF-s/NEG-CTCF-as, was also included.
Immunoblotting. Protein fractions were subjected to either 15% or 18% SDS-PAGE and transferred to Immobilon P membranes (Millipore). Next, the membranes were incubated with the indicated antibodies overnight, and the blots were visualized using the Immobilon Western kit (Millipore) with a peroxidase-labelled secondary antibody, according to the manufacturer's protocols.
Protein immunoprecipitation assay. The cells were washed with PBS, scraped and centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 3 min. The cells were lysed using 1 mL of TNTE-5 buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton, 1 mM EDTA and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail) and incubated at 4 °C for 15 min. The lysates were centrifuged at 14000 g for 10 min. The supernatants were incubated with 10 μ L of recombinant protein G agarose beads (Life Technologies) for 1 h. After incubation, the lysates were centrifuged at 14000 g for 30 sec. The supernatants were incubated overnight at 4 °C with 3 μ L of primary antibody with constant agitation. Next, 20 μ L of recombinant protein G agarose beads was added to each lysate, and the lysates were then incubated with constant agitation for 1 h on ice. The lysates were next centrifuged at 14000 g for 10 sec. The resulting pellets were washed twice with TNTE-1 buffer (50 mM Tris at pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Triton, 1 mM EDTA and 1X protease inhibitor cocktail), followed by boiling in Laemmli sample solution (100 mM Tris pH 6.8, 20% Glycerol, 2% SDS, 0.05% bromophenol blue and 100 mM DTT) for further analysis.
Cell viability assay. Cell viability was measured colorimetrically using the MTS-PMS assay (CellTiter 96 ® Aqueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay; Promega) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, the cells were seeded in 96-well plates, and 24 h after treatment, the reagents from the kit were added to the culture medium. After 2 h of incubation, the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 490 nm using a microplate reader.

RT-qPCR.
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, 2 μ g of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis with random hexamers. Quantitative PCR was carried out using an ABI PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems) using IDT Prime Time qPCR Primers and ZEN Double-Quenched Probe for detecting XAF1, CTCF, and HPRT genes. The TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) was used. The geometric mean of housekeeping gene HPRT was used as an internal control to normalize the variability in expression levels. Results were analyzed by the comparative 2 −ΔΔCT method to calculate fold changes in gene expression 65 . The plotted results include the mean + s.e.m. from at least three independent biological experiments.
Statistical analysis. GraphPad Prism version 5.0 for Mac Os X (La Jolla, CA) was used to perform statistical analyses. One-way analysis of variance was performed, and the Bonferroni post-test was used at 95% confidence intervals to determine significant differences.