Abstract
A major goal for neonatology training programs is to produce neonatologists who will pursue careers that combine clinical and research responsibilities. However, there appears to be a continuing decline in the number of trainees who choose academic, as opposed to private sector, jobs. The reason for this decline is perhaps best addressed by the people making career choices now, the recent trainees. Although many factors influence any individual's career choice, information from recent fellows indicates that several major factors play a strong role: finances; time demands; adequacy of research training; and academic institutions' attitudes toward recent trainees. Whereas the first two factors have been addressed by prior studies, the latter two factors have been less explored. The responses of a few recent trainees to an informal survey will be used to guide a discussion that focuses on the factors of research training and academic status. Ways to improve the success of training programs in producing academic neonatologists will be suggested, including the proposal of a research training curriculum, changes in the structure of post-fellowship academic status and increased encouragement of collaborative research efforts. A future survey of a broad group of recent trainees about their career choices and about proposals for training changes, such as those considered here, is needed to evaluate programs aimed at increasing the number of neonatologists engaged in research.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gruskin A, Williams RG, McCabe ER, Stein F, Strickler J, Chesney RW et al. Final report of the FOPE II pediatric subspecialists of the Future workgroup. Pediatrics 2000; 106(5): 1224–1244.
Jones Jr MD, Boat TF, Stockman III JA, Clark EB, Minaga-Miya K, Gilchrist GS et al. Federation of pediatric organizations subspecialty forum. J Pediatr 2001; 139(4): 487–493.
Zemlo TR, Garrison HH, Partridge NC, Ley TJ . The physician-scientist: career issues and challenges at the year 2000. FASEB J 2001; 14: 221–230.
Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE . The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005. JAMA 2005; 294: 1343–1351.
FOPE II: A project of the pediatric community. Summary of survey findings: neonatology. 1998 Available on www.aap.org.
Cull WL, Yudkowsky BK, Shipman SA, Pan RJ . Pediatric training and job market trends: results from the American Academy of Pediatrics third-year resident survey, 1997–2002. Pediatrics 2003; 112(4): 787–792.
American Association of Medical Colleges. Report on medical school faculty salaries, 2002–2003 January 2004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Perinatology website (http://www.nature.com/jp)
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Penn, A. Perspectives of recent trainees on career choices in neonatology. J Perinatol 26 (Suppl 2), S53–S56 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211527
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211527
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
National professional society augments career development and leadership amongst neonatal fellows and early career neonatologists
Journal of Perinatology (2022)
-
Essentials of neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship: scholarship perspective
Journal of Perinatology (2022)
-
Policy priorities for child health: results from a membership survey of the Society for Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research (2018)
-
Preparedness of pediatric residents for fellowship: a survey of US neonatal–perinatal fellowship program directors
Journal of Perinatology (2016)