Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective analysis of hospital support required and complications following discharge to the community

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 55, pages 610–614 (2001)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the commonest method of long-term enteral nutrition. In the UK there is no nationally funded framework to provide community support for patients with gastrostomies.

Objectives: To assess the hospital support required and the complications occurring in a cohort of patients discharged into the community with a gastrostomy in-situ.

Design and setting: We prospectively collected data between June and November 1998 regarding patients (n=87) with PEG complications in the community following discharge from two adjacent hospitals in South Yorkshire (Rotherham District General Hospital and the Royal Hallamshire Hospital).

Results: The mortality within this cohort during the study period was 17.2%. Of these 15 patients 10.3% (n=9) were thought to have died as a result of the progression of their disease, whilst in the other 6.9% (n=6) pneumonia was documented as the cause of death. Problems with gastrostomies requiring telephone advice occurred in 24.1% of patients and 65.5% necessitated a home visit. However during this period of 6 months, 23% of patients were admitted as an emergency, accounting for 61 in-patient days. All were from nursing or residential homes and the emergency occurred after normal surgery hours. General practitioners dealt with aspiration pneumonia in 25.2% of the cohort but other tube problems were referred to the endoscopy unit.

Discussion: This is the first study to specifically highlight the specialist intervention and support required by patients discharged into the community with PEGs, a group for whom there is often no formal aftercare. A specialist nurse or dietician could establish a liaison service focusing on primary care and using hospital resources when appropriate. This study provides further evidence to support the recommendations for tube feeding made by the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2001) 55, 610–614

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman RJ, Kemle KA, Vogel RL & Griffin RC (1998) Emergency department use by nursing home residents Ann. Emerg. Med. 31 749–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elia M (1995) An international perspective of artificial nutrition support in the community Lancet 345 1345–1349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elia M, Cottee S & Holden C et al (1994) Enteral and parenteral nutrition in the community. A report by a working party of the British Association for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (BAPEN). Maidenhead: BAPEN

  • Gauderer MWL, Ponsky JL & Izant RJ (1980) Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique J. Paediatr. Surg. 15 872–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson SE, Wenig BL & Watkins JL (1992) Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 101 46–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grant M, Rudberg MA & Brody JA (1998) Gastrostomy placement and mortality among hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries J.A.M.A. 279 1973–1976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heaney A & Tham TCK (2000) General practitioners views on percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies Gut 46(Suppl 2) A1 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard L, Ament M, Fleming R, Shike M & Steiger E (1995) Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States Gastroenterology 109 355–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • James A, Kapur K & Hawthorne AB (1998) Long-term outcome of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in patients with dysphagic stroke Age Ageing 27 671–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • L'Estrange F (1997) An audit of adult patients on home enteral tube feeding in a region of Northern Ireland J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 10 277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara ER, Flood P & Kennedy NP (2000) Enteral tube feeding in the community: a survey of adult patients discharged from a Dublin Hospital Clin. Nutr. 19 15–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Norton B, Homer-Ward M, Donnelly MT, Long RG & Holmes GKT (1996) A randomised prospective comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and naso-gastric tube feeding after acute dysphagic stroke Br. Med. J. 312 13–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys (1993): The 1991 Census: Persons aged 60 and Over London: HMSO.

  • Parker T, Neale G & Elia M (1996a) Home enteral tube feeding in East Anglia Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 50 47–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker T, Neale G, Cottee S & Elia M (1996b) Management of artificial nutrition in East Anglia: a community study J. R. Coll. Physicians Lond. 30 27–32

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan S, Clark L, Arnold K, Parnell D, Jackson JHD & Swift CG (1999) Multidisciplinary percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy clinic-one year on Age Ageing 28(Suppl 1) 2 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabeneck L, Wray NP & Petersen NJ (1996) Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes J. Gen. Intern. Med. 11 287–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders DS, Carter MJ, D'Silva J, James G, Bolton RP & Bardhan KD (2000) Survial analysis in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy: a worse outcome in patients with dementia Am. J. Gastroenterol. 95 1472–1475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. DS Sanders: Guarantor: DS Sanders.

  2. DS Sanders, MJ Carter, J D'Silva, ME McAlindon, PJ Willemse and KD Bardham: Contributors: DSS, JD'S, MEMcA and MJC were involved in writing of the manuscript and data collection. PJW and KDB were responsible for the initial study concept and revision of the final manuscript

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK

    DS Sanders, MJ Carter & ME McAlindon

  2. Rotherham District General Hospital, Rotherham, UK

    J D'Silva, PJ Willemse & KD Bardham

Authors
  1. DS Sanders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. MJ Carter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J D'Silva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. ME McAlindon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. PJ Willemse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. KD Bardham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to DS Sanders.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanders, D., Carter, M., D'Silva, J. et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective analysis of hospital support required and complications following discharge to the community. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 610–614 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601197

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601197

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links