Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Post-Transplant Events

Real-time PCR assays based on distinct genomic regions for cytomegalovirus reactivation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Summary:

Real-time PCR has many advantages compared with antigenemia and qualitative PCR assays for detecting cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in patients following SCT. However, the procedure used in each report was not standardized. This study compares the CMV load detected by real-time PCR assays amplifying distinct genomic regions. Real-time PCR assays based on US17, UL65, immediate early protein (IE) and glycoprotein B(gB) were selected and comparisons were made between each genomic region, and with antigenemia and nested PCR (IE region) in 18 SCT patients. The CMV load detected by real-time PCR using all combinations of primers targeting distinct genomic regions and by antigenemia assays correlated well. However, US17 and UL65-PCR could detect CMV earlier than gB-PCR, antigenemia and nested PCR assays. In longitudinal analysis, gB-PCR demonstrated a trend for showing a lower viral load in some patients than US17-, UL65- and IE-PCR. Moreover, the results suggest that a cutoff level of 500 copies/ml might be used to decide when to initiate treatment. We propose that monitoring should be carried out using real-time PCR assays targeting the US17 region and that a CMV load of 500 copies/ml could be used as a cutoff value for initiating treatment in patients following SCT, receiving immunoglobulin prophylaxis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Forman SJ, Zaia JA . Treatment and prevention of cytomegalovirus pneumonia after bone marrow transplantation: where do we stand? Blood 1994; 83: 2392–2398.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leruez-Ville M, Ouachee M, Delarue R et al. Monitoring cytomegalovirus infection in adult and pediatric bone marrow transplant recipients by a real-time PCR assay performed with blood plasma. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 2040–2046.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Caliendo AM, Schurman R, Yen-Lieberman B et al. Comparison of quantitative and qualitative PCR assay for cytomegalovirus DNA in plasma. J Clin Microbiol 2001; 39: 1334–1338.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Li H, Dummer S, Estes WR et al. Measurement of human cytomegalovirus loads by quantitative real-time PCR for monitoring clinical intervention in transplant recipients. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 187–191.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yakushiji K, Gondo H, Kamezaki K et al. Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: comparison of an antigenemia assay and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29: 599–606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gondo H, Minematsu T, Harada M et al. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia for rapid diagnosis and monitoring of CMV-associated disease after bone marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol 1994; 86: 130–137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nichols WG, Corey L, Gooley T et al. Rising pp65 antigenemia during preemptive anticytomegalovirus therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors, correlation with DNA load, and outcomes. Blood 2001; 97: 867–874.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Machida U, Kami M, Fukui T et al. Real-time automated PCR for early diagnosis and monitoring of cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38: 2536–2542.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanaka N, Kimura H, Iida K et al. Quantitative analysis of cytomegalovirus load using a real-time PCR assay. J Med Virol 2000; 60: 455–462.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yun Z, Lewensohn-Fuchs I, Ljungman P, Vahlne A . Real-time monitoring of cytomegalovirus infections after stem cell transplantation using the TaqMan polymerase chain reaction assays. Transplantation 2000; 69: 1733–1736.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Boeckh M, Gallez-Hawkins GM, Myerson DJ et al. Plasma polymerase chain reaction for cytomegalovirus DNA after allogeneic marrow transplantation: comparison with polymerase chain reaction using peripheral blood leukocytes, pp65 antigenemia, and viral culture. Transplantation 1997; 64: 108–113.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herrmann B, Larsson VC, Rubin CJ et al. Comparison of a duplex quantitative real-time PCR assay and the COBAS amplicor CMV monitor test for detection of cytomegalovirus. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 1909–1914.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerna G, Baldanti F, Middeldorp JM . Clinical significance of expression of human cytomegalovirus pp67 late transcript in heart, lung, and bone marrow transplant recipients as determined by nucleic acid sequence-based amplification. J Clin Microbiol 1999; 37: 902–911.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ikewaki J, Ohtsuka E, Kawano R et al. Real-time PCR assay compared to nested PCR and antigenemia assays for detecting cytomegalovirus reactivation in adult T-cell leukemia–lymphoma patients. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41: 4382–4387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka T, Kanda Y, Kami M et al. Monitoring cytomegalovirus infection by antigenemia assay and two distinct plasma real-time PCR methods after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 315–319.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cha TM, Tom E, Kemble GW et al. Human cytomegalovirus clinical isolates carry at least 19 genes not found in laboratory strains. J Virol 1996; 70: 78–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasmussen L, Resta S, Merigan T . Human cytomegalovirus glycoprotein–receptor interactions. Transplant Proc 1991; 23 (Suppl 3): 60–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Retiere C, Lesimple B, Lepelletier D et al. Association of glycoprotein B and immediate early-1 genotypes with human leukocyte antigen alleles in renal transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus infection. Transplantation 2003; 75: 161–165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shepp DH, Match ME, Ashraf AB et al. Cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B group associated with retinitis in AIDS. J Infect Dis 1996; 174: 184–187.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mori T, Okamoto S, Watanabe R et al. Dose-adjusted preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease based on real-time polymerase chain reaction after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 29: 777–782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Ikewaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ikewaki, J., Ohtsuka, E., Satou, T. et al. Real-time PCR assays based on distinct genomic regions for cytomegalovirus reactivation following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 35, 403–410 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704791

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1704791

Keywords

Search

Quick links