Skip to main content

Is Daylight Saving Time Good or Bad for You?

Research shows that the benefits may outweigh the drawbacks

Silhouette Of Man In City At Sunset

On supporting science journalism

If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


A century ago, in 1918, the U.S. started the collective clock-changing ritual known as daylight saving time, or DST. Today more than 70 countries observe the practice, although how it is implemented has varied over the years. In general, the one-hour shift prevents sunrise from happening too early and allows sundown to go later, when compared with a typical work day of 9 A.M. to 5 P.M. Debates about the practice have raged since it began. In recent years the U.S. government's stated goal for DST is to save energy by adding natural light to evenings. Several new studies have pointed to some liabilities, such as higher rates of heart attacks and traffic accidents after citizens set their clocks forward each spring. “The shift to DST has some drawbacks,” but many ill effects last just a few days, says David Prerau, who wrote a book on the practice. “Balance that against eight months of later sunsets.”

None

Credit: Katie Peek; Source: Astronomical Applications Department of the U.S. Naval Observatory

Katie Peek is a science journalist and data-visualization designer with degrees in astrophysics and journalism. She is a contributing artist for Scientific American.

More by Katie Peek
Scientific American Magazine Vol 318 Issue 3This article was originally published with the title “The Case for Daylight Saving Time” in Scientific American Magazine Vol. 318 No. 3 (), p. 76
doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0318-76