Abstract
Frequent monitoring of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity is essential to prevent drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Current ALT assays are restricted to centralized clinical laboratories, making frequent patient monitoring logistically difficult. To address this, we demonstrated the capability of commercial foundry manufactured silicon nanowire field effect transistor (SiNW-FET) biosensors in a form factor that enables frequent near-patient monitoring. Here, we designed an ALT assay, by coupling the ALT-catalyzed production of pyruvate to the reduction of ferricyanide, enabling both spectrophotometric and electrical measurement of ALT activity. The two methods yield comparable ALT activity detection across a dynamic range wide enough to monitor patients at risk for DILI. This study demonstrates kinetic activity measurement of an endogenous enzyme using uncoupled SiNW-FETs, and commercial manufacturing of SiNW-FET sensor arrays for use in a portable biosensor platform.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Liver toxicity is the most common cause for premature termination of drug trials and removal of previously approved drugs from the market1,2. Therefore, drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a major safety concern throughout the drug development pipeline3. DILI events traditionally fell into two categories: direct hepatoxicity and idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity4. The latency period for direct DILI is typically 1–5 days after dosage, while idiosyncratic DILI is not dose dependent, and the latency period varies from days to years5. DILI resulting from the action of a drug, rather than the drug itself, has recently been characterized as indirect hepatoxicity and typically takes months to manifest5. The diversity in DILI latency period must be addressed with frequent patient monitoring.
The first line screening for acute liver injury is to assay serum activity of the enzyme alanine aminotransferase (ALT, BRENDA: EC 2.6.1.2)6. As ALT is present in high concentrations in hepatocytes and released upon liver injury, its activity determination is the preferred test for ongoing monitoring of DILI7. There are five defined severity levels of DILI, Level 1–Level 5, which correlate with elevated serum ALT activity8. When serum ALT activity increases above 3X the upper limit of normal (ULN) during a clinical trial (Level 2 DILI), it is recommended to assay the patient’s ALT level every three days9,10. If serum ALT activity remains above 5X ULN for two weeks or exceeds 8X ULN at any point (Level 3 DILI), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires removing the patient from the clinical trial2,7. The severity of DILI experienced in a clinical trial may vary by the drug and the population exposed to it8, therefore any method for monitoring ALT activity must have a dynamic range that covers up to 8X the ULN, encompassing both Level 2 and Level 3 DILI. The current gold-standard ALT activity measurement is an absorbance-based assay that requires a large, automated platform in a clinical laboratory. With ALT measurements limited to a centralized laboratory, delays between prognostic indications of liver failure and subsequent clinical intervention are likely unavoidable. In addition to logistical burden and laborious process, these tests are further impractical in resource limited settings due to large instrument form factor, acquisition costs, and operator requirements.
Silicon nanowire field effect transistors (SiNW-FETs) that can measure the change in ion concentration in an electrolyte solution, are a promising solution to address the above limitations. SiNW-FETs have been widely employed to detect numerous physiologically relevant charged species11,12,13,14, including protein15,16,17,18,19 and DNA20,21,22 biomarkers. The nanowire architecture boosts the sensitivity of a FET several orders of magnitude12,23 which is largely achieved by minimizing the footprint of sensing elements so that they approach the dimension of the biomolecules to be monitored. The sensitivity of sensors is thus greatly enhanced due to the increased surface area to volume ratio12,24,25. Specificity for label-free detection of individual biomarkers is typically achieved by functionalization of the sensor surface with analyte binding partners15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22 or ion sensitive functional groups11,12,13,14,24. As enzyme activity is measured by the rate of its catalyzed reaction, real-time data recording by SiNW-FET allows the determination of reaction kinetics15, and provides an opportunity to develop diagnostic assays for clinically relevant biomarker enzymes using SiNW-FETs. Enzyme coupled FETs have been widely used to monitor the conversion of a specific substrate24,26,27,28,29 but to our knowledge, an uncoupled SiNW-FET has not been used to kinetically monitor the activity of an endogenous human enzyme.
In this work, we combined the principle of FETs30,31 and SiNW biosensing architecture to obtain the needed sensing capability for serum ALT enzyme activity on a portable SiNW-FET biosensor system. With product development and commercialization in mind, our SiNW-FET biosensors were designed and fabricated by scalable and wafer-level manufacturing processes. Hundreds of nanowire sensor dies were simultaneously produced. The sensing surfaces were modified to facilitate the measurement of serum ALT activity using an assay chemistry optimized for SiNW-FET detection. These sensors in a portable, low-cost device that can detect abnormally elevated ALT levels near patient will enable frequent monitoring of DILI in clinical trial participants to prevent severe liver damage. This is not otherwise possible for outpatients in traditional clinical settings. We sought to address this unmet clinical need by generating and characterizing a commercially scalable SiNW-FET biosensor platform, capable of detecting a wide dynamic range of serum ALT activity.
Results
SiNW-FETs as portable ALT biosensors
Frequent monitoring of patient serum ALT activity is required during pharmaceutical clinical trials to determine the occurrence and severity of DILI. A reliable, portable, and inexpensive biosensor that can be used outside a laboratory setting would provide an easy option for monitoring of ALT during drug treatment protocols. For example, over a typical treatment period of 3-6 months with an immunocheckpoint inhibitor, it is recommended to initially monitor ALT weekly, increasing to every 3 days if ALT is elevated beyond 3X the patient’s upper limit of normal10. We fabricated SiNW-FET biosensors for this purpose and for eventual integration into a portable biosensor platform. Leveraging standard semiconductor processing in commercial foundries is crucial to keep the cost of SiNW-FET biosensors low, making it affordable and available for a broad population of patients.
Silicon nanowire sensor arrays were fabricated using a wafer-level manufacturing process originated and scaled up from research laboratory protocols11,32. The process involves silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers as a substrate for hosting SiNW-FET biosensor dies. Commercially available SOI wafers (SOITEC, Bernin, France) produced by mature, industrial grade processes carry a single crystalline silicon epitaxy layer. This layer has minimal crystalline defects and enables the reliable operation of nanowire sensors. Identical design patterns of nanowire sensors were transferred to the SOI substrate in the unit of a die via planar layer-by-layer semiconductor processing techniques (Fig. 1a). Approximately 700 sensor dies were produced from an 8-inch diameter wafer. The key elements of each nanowire sensor die included the drain and source terminals, nanowire array, and sensing area (Fig. 1b). A cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image revealed nanowire width as narrow as ~20 nm (Fig. 1c). Each sensor die is then diced off from the wafer and surface-functionalized with 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APTES) for ALT detection. To facilitate electrical readout using a multiplexing platform, the sensor die is mounted and electrically connected to a predesigned printed circuit board (PCB) via commercial die-attachment and encapsulated wire-bonding services. With dimensions of 5.0 mm×5.0 mm, the sensor die is small enough to fit onto the PCB board 2.0 cm × 2.4 cm in size (Fig. 1d).
While arranged as a nanowire sensor array consisting of 7 test sensors on each die, every individual test sensor is electrically accessible via the finger pads located at the right end of the PCB board (Fig. 1d). From there, the signal from each sensor is recorded on a multiplexing platform. Each sensor operates independently on the principle of SiNW-FET. That is, each nanowire bridging the drain and source terminal forms an electrical channel with a finite electrical conductivity. When the sensing surfaces of the nanowire sensor are exposed to an electrolyte solution, the presence of biomarkers changes the surface ionic charge density along the liquid/sensor interface and modulates the conductivity of the nanowire channel through a field effect. The change in conductivity is detectable using a sensitive ammeter under a fixed voltage difference across the source and drain terminals, gated by additional potentials applied to the silicon substrate (back-gate voltage) and to a reference electrode in the solution (fluid-gate voltage). A set of dependable fluid-gate and back-gate voltages helps maintain a favorable signal-to-noise ratio and a consistent baseline conductivity of the nanowire channel (Fig. 1e). As our assay was performed in physiological conditions in the presence of salts, we estimate the Debye screening length to be ~0.7 nm. Therefore, due to the short Debye screening length, the response of each sensor to our assay is local. This is possible because the separation between each sensor and each array is greater than the estimated Debye screening length. As a result, concurrent measurements of ALT signals from multiple sensors are viable without the concern of interdependence.
Application of ferricyanide–ferrocyanide redox couple to ALT assay
Absorbance based ALT assays on automated clinical platforms, in accordance with IFCC guidelines, measure the reduction rate of pyruvate by protonated (H+) nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) in a reaction catalyzed by lactate dehydrogenase33. Conversion of NADH to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) is monitored spectrophotometrically at 340 nm. To design a SiNW-FET compatible ALT assay, we sought to couple ALT generation of pyruvate to a change in charge. The changes in local ion concentration alter the surface potential and electric field, which modulate the resistance of SiNW-FETs11.
Pyruvate oxidase (POX, BRENDA: EC 1.2.3.3), a flavoprotein, catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate to yield acetate and carbon dioxide34. Electrochemical assays for ALT activity based on POX modified electrodes35,36,37 or employing ferrocene containing compounds as redox mediators38,39,40 have been reported previously. The final step in the reaction mechanism of POX in vivo is the reoxidation of the flavin by ubiquinone41. In vitro, ferricyanide is used as a soluble oxidant to monitor POX enzyme activity spectrophotometrically42,43. When used as an oxidant, ferricyanide is reduced to ferrocyanide, resulting in a change in local ion charges that can be detected by a SiNW-FET24,26. Primary amines from APTES layer functionalized on the surface of the sensor, are protonated at physiological pH in serum samples (Fig. 2). The negatively charged ferricyanide ions are attracted close to the sensor surface by electrostatic force. Reactions that convert ferricyanide to ferrocyanide lead to changes in electric field near the surface of the sensor, due to the difference in the ion charges. We have validated that APTES functionalization is essential to the sensitivity of detecting the conversion of the negatively charged ions (Supplementary Fig. 1), which allows this reported conjugation-free method, without coupling any enzyme or substrate on the sensor surface for enzyme activity measurement.
We designed our ALT assay by coupling the production of pyruvate to the reduction of ferricyanide though POX for optical and electrical detection. The designed ALT assay chemistry, conducted at 37 °C, begins with ALT converting L-alanine and alpha-ketoglutarate to pyruvate and glutamate. POX converts pyruvate to acetyl phosphate and reduces flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) to hydroquinone form of FAD (FADH2). Ferricyanide subsequently reduces to ferrocyanide via oxidation of FADH2. Although protons are also produced in the assay, serum has enough buffering capacity to yield a much smaller signal change due to pH compared to the ferricyanide to ferrocyanide conversion (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Analytical performance of the ALT assay
The first focus of this report was to test the performance of the proposed chemistry to measure ALT enzyme kinetics over a clinically relevant linear range. Unless otherwise noted, the ALT enzyme standard was assayed in-house to determine activity (Supplementary Fig. 3). The assay chemistry was tested by adding a dilution series of ALT and assay reagent mixture to a 96-well microplate and monitoring the absorbance at 420 nm for 20 min at 37 °C. The ALT reaction was monitored kinetically by the consumption of ferricyanide during the assay period, reflected in a decrease in absorbance at 420 nm (Fig. 3a). The rate of the reaction is proportional to ALT activity, which is illustrated by the linear correlation between the slope of the ferricyanide consumption and ALT activity (Fig. 3c).
The upper limit of normal (ULN) for serum ALT activity varies at different laboratories, influenced by the clinical diversity in local reference populations44. To comply with FDA clinical trial stopping rules for DILI, any assay for ALT must cover up to 8X ULN (Supplementary Table 1)2. As the goal of our assay is to monitor serum ALT activity as an indicator for DILI, we sought to design the assay linear up to 8X ULN, with 50 units per liter (U/L) as 1X ULN to cover an inclusive range for most populations. To demonstrate the assay linear range, we constructed a standard curve of slope vs ALT activities and confirmed that the assay was linear between 50 and 450 U/L (Fig. 3c). The 95% confidence interval for the slope of linear regression line was [9.4e−6, 1.0e−5], AU/s vs ALT (U/L). R2 was 0.99 for the linear fit of the calibration curve, indicating the assay was linear over the target ALT activity range of interest. The limit of blank (LOB), defined as the minimum distinguishable analytical signal, \({S}_{m}\), was then calculated45,46
here \({\underline{S}}_{bl}\) is the mean signal from n = 10 measurements of samples with 0 U/L ALT, 1.1e−4 ± 1.1e−5 AU/s, \({s}_{{bl}}\) is the standard deviation of the signal from n = 10 blank measurements, 4.4e–6 ± 4.4e−7 AU/s, and we obtained an \({S}_{m}\) equal to 1.2e−4 ± 1.2e−5 AU/s.
The slope from the calibration curve in Fig. 3c, \(m,\) was then used to calculate the limit of detection (LOD), \({c}_{m}\), defined as the smallest quantity of analyte that is statistically significant from a blank sample45,46, as follows:
here \(s\) is the standard deviation from n = 10 measurements of 50 U/L ALT, 1.3e−5 ± 1.3e−4 AU/s, and we obtained a LOD equal to 4.1 ± 0.4 U/L ALT.
ALT assay using SiNW-FET biosensors
The next focus of this report was to test the ALT assay chemistry we developed on the SiNW-FETs, which have been previously used to detect proteins15,16,17,18,19, nucleic acids20,21,22, and viruses47,48 but have not been used for an activity assay of an endogenous human enzyme. In this study, we used a sensor die with SiNW-FETs functionalized with primary amines to detect ALT enzyme activity in human serum. To perform the ALT assay on the SiNW-FETs, a dilution series of ALT samples were individually combined with assay reagent mixture and delivered to the sensor using a syringe and flow chamber. Throughout each ALT assay the direct current through the nanowire was recorded in real time on a SiNW-FET biosensor for 20 min (Fig. 3b). The electronic reading of the ALT assay monitors the consumption of ferricyanide during the assay period, reflected in a decrease in baseline current. The rate of decrease in baseline current is representative of the reaction rate (Fig. 3c). The 95% confidence interval for the slope of linear regression line was [1.6e−4, 1.8e−4], nA/s vs ALT (U/L). R2 was 0.99 for the linear fit of the calibration curve, indicating that the reaction rate was proportional to ALT activity and the assay is linear between 50 and 450 U/L ALT, comparable to sophisticated optical measurement using a microplate reader.
The SiNW-FET biosensors used in this study contain an array of 7 nanowire sensors capable of monitoring the consumption of ferricyanide simultaneously. We next sought to compare the response of each nanowire sensor in the array to the ALT assay. A dilution series of ALT samples was delivered to one sensor die and the multiplexed current monitored for 16 min. The consumption of ferricyanide during the assay reaction resulted in a decrease in baseline current with a similar pattern across all the SiNW-FET arrays (Fig. 4). The analogous response of all sensors demonstrates that the ALT assay is robust among SiNW-FET arrays.
ALT assay data reporting for monitoring DILI
To use SiNW-FET biosensors for the monitoring of DILI, we sought to obtain a single value of enzyme activity from seven simultaneous ALT assay measurements on a SiNW-FET sensing array. Deploying miniaturized sensors in a spatially distributed array increases the confidence of detection by cross-referencing the response from each individual sensor19,49. In addition, averaging multiple independent signals improves the signal-to-noise ratio proportional to the square root of the number of signals averaged50. Typically, enzyme activity is reported from a fixed time interval throughout a kinetic read. For a near-patient device, the time for the sample to reach the sensor may not be tightly controlled, making it difficult to use a fixed time window from a pre-set point in the reaction for calculation. To address that, we designed an assay reporting method that outputs enzymatic activity independent of assay start time, averaged from seven sensors.
The current output from individual assays on n = 7 SiNW-FET arrays was normalized by the full range of the signal change on each sensor, and ensemble averaged at each time bin (Fig. 5a). The slopes of a linear regression in 160 (s) windows were calculated across the time range of 300–600 (s) and the maximum slope was selected. We constructed a standard curve of maximum slope vs ALT activity from three replicates of an ALT dilution series, collected on three separate days on the same n = 7 SiNW-FET arrays on a single sensor die (Fig. 5b). The 95% confidence interval for the slope of the linear regression line was [3.4e−4, 4.3e−4]. To compare the standard curve from the maximum slope to that calculated from a fixed interval, we also calculated the slope of the linear regression line between 300 and 460 (s) (Fig. 5c). We constructed a standard curve containing the slope obtained from 300 to 460 (s) vs ALT activity from the same set of data (Fig. 5d). The 95% confidence interval for the slope of the regression line was [3.5e−4, 4.5e−4]. As the 95% confidence intervals of the slopes from Fig. 5b and d overlap, there is no statistically significant difference between the linear regression lines applied to both datasets. Therefore, taking the maximum slope as the rate of ALT reaction is equivalent to taking the slope from a fixed interval during the reaction. Selecting the maximum slope makes the rate of ALT reaction independent of the exact start time of the reaction, which is highly applicable to a near-patient monitoring device.
Assessment of interference from endogenous analytes
Lastly, we evaluated five common substances present in whole blood for potential interference in the ALT assay (Supplementary Fig. 4). Assay interference was defined as a statistically significant difference in the slope of the assay calibration line with the interferant from the slope of the assay calibration line with vehicle control. All substances tested showed no significant interference in the ALT assay at above physiological levels, including unconjugated bilirubin (≤3 mg/dL), hemoglobin (≤2.5 g/L), glucose (≤25 mM), pyruvate (≤320 µM), and Intralipid induced lipemia (L-index ≤ 200). The upper limit of normal for the substances tested are as follows, unconjugated bilirubin (0.15 mg/dL), hemoglubin (0.05 g/L), glucose (7.8 mM), and pyruvate (160 µM). While L-index is poorly correlated to serum triglyceride concentration, lipemia is defined as turbidity in serum and plasma. The industry standard assay, Roche Cobas ALTL, has no reported interference up to an L-index of 150. The substances we tested represent a superset of those evaluated for commercially available assays. These results suggest that our assay will perform reliably in a clinically diverse patient population.
Discussion
In these studies, we have demonstrated the capability of real-time serum ALT activity determination in a clinically relevant range for monitoring DILI using SiNW-FETs. We developed an assay chemistry that couples the ALT-catalyzed production of pyruvate to the reduction of ferricyanide, which can be monitored spectrophotometrically on a microplate reader and electronically on a commercially manufacturable SiNW-FET biosensor array. The assay is linear up to 8X ULN on both the microplate reader and SiNW-FET biosensor array, designed to cover the range required for frequent liver function monitoring in patients at risk for DILI. The measurement results can be obtained within 600 s, providing a rapid and reliable ALT assay reading. Finally, we designed a method for determining the rate of ferricyanide consumption that is independent of assay start time, which will be critically important for future integration of the biosensing platform into a portable, near-patient device.
Many efforts have been made to develop assays with SiNW biosensors, primarily in academic settings23,51,52. However, successful commercialization of SiNW-based biosensing technology is scarce due to the limitations in traditional synthesis approaches51,53. Notably, we can successfully manufacture the sensor arrays in a cost-efficient wafer-level process, ready for scale-up and close to commercialization. The nanowires in the SiNW-FET biosensor arrays are designed and fabricated with equal width across nanowires, which enables reliable biomarker detection. This is an attribute difficult to obtain using traditional nanowire synthesis methods. Data collection from a single sensor die containing 7 simultaneously recording SiNW-FET arrays on the multiplexing platform improves the signal-to-noise ratio and provides high sensitivity for ALT activity measurement.
A low-cost, portable device for quantitative monitoring of serum ALT activity will relieve the logistical and financial burdens in the way of routine monitoring for liver function and DILI. Colorimetric paper devices for portable ALT measurements have been reported54,55, but these devices are marginally quantitative and do not provide a wide enough dynamic range to monitor up to Level 3 DILI, required in pharmaceutical clinical trials. Quantitative measurement of ALT in a portable electronic sensor has been previously described in the literature37,38,56,57,58,59,60,61. Her et al. have demonstrated the possibility of sensing ALT by monitoring pH changes57. The three-electrode sensor described by Song et al. produced the lowest LOD of 1.3 U/L60 while Thuy and Tseng’s platinum electrode accomplished the largest dynamic range of 10–900 U/L61. While these analytical characterizations demonstrate the utility of these assays for ALT quantification, all measurements were carried out in buffer or buffer diluted serum. We describe the first electrical POC assay validated in serum, limiting the practicality of comparisons to these previous characterizations. Furthermore, the current gold standard ALT test is done with an automated analyzer in a centralized laboratory and requires venipuncture blood draw in a clinical setting. Patients with an aversion or fear of needles may delay receiving necessary testing if venipuncture is required62. The manufacturable SiNW-FET biosensors described in this paper will be integrated into a platform that requires 10 µl of blood from a finger prick, significantly less than clinical venipuncture and possible in a variety of settings.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated multiplexed electrical detection of serum ALT activity on a close-to-commercialization SiNW-FET biosensor platform. Measurement on multiple sensors simultaneously and subsequent data processing will enable reliable data reporting. We demonstrate the application of an uncoupled SiNW-FET biosensor to kinetically measure the activity of an endogenous human enzyme in undiluted human serum. Integration of the SiNW-FET biosensors described here into a portable platform will provide opportunities for routine monitoring of liver function and can be deployed in many near patient settings.
Methods
Reagents
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) depleted human serum and partially purified human ALT protein were obtained from Aalto Scientific (Eatonton, GA). L-alanine, alpha-ketoglutaric disodium salt dihydrate, potassium ferricyanide, potassium phosphate dibasic, thiamine pyrophosphate, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APTES), sodium hydroxide, anhydrous ethanol, pyruvate, glucose, unconjugated bilirubin, hemoglobin, and Intralipid (20% emulsion) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Pyruvate oxidase was obtained from A.G. Scientific (San Diego, CA). Assay mixture consisted of 500mM L-alanine, 15 mM alpha-ketoglutarate, 3.5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 25 mM potassium phosphate, 0.23 mM thiamine pyrophosphate, 20 mM magnesium chloride and 10 U/mL pyruvate oxidase in ALT depleted human serum.
Optical detection of ferricyanide reduction
Ferricyanide, a yellow Fe3+ complex, is reduced to ferrocyanide, a colorless Fe2+ complex. In addition to the electrical measurement described above, this reduction can be monitored spectroscopically at 420 nm. The conversion of ferricyanide to ferrocyanide was measured on a Varioskan LUX™ plate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham MA) by monitoring the absorbance of ALT containing assay mixture at 420 ± 6 nm, in 30 s intervals over 1 h at 37 °C. The Varioskan LUX was equipped with a dispenser to inject 196 µl assay mixture to microplate wells containing 4ul ALT enzyme prior to initiating the kinetic read sequence. Data was acquired in SkanIt software version 6.1.1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Data plotting and calculation of slope from kinetic results was done in MATLAB R2021b (MathWorks, Natick, MA).
Sensor surface modification
The nanowires were functionalized with primary amines to attract negatively charged species at physiological pH. For this purpose, the sensor die was hydroxylated with oxygen plasma in a Plasma Etch PE-50 (Plasma Etch, Carson City, NV) plasma cleaner at 100 W, 30 cc/min, for 90 s. The sensor was immediately silanized by immersion in 5% APTES in 95% ethanol solution at pH 5.5 for 20 min. The sensors were washed twice in 95% ethanol and once in 0.1 mM NaOH prior to curing overnight in a 120 °C oven.
Electrical detection of ferricyanide reduction
The silicon nanowire sensor was wire-bonded and mounted on a printed circuit board (PCB) electrically accessible by its finger pads. The device was sealed in a flow chamber together with an Ag/AgCl reference electrode, and solutions containing ALT protein and ALT reaction mixture were hand delivered to the sensor using a syringe. The flow chamber was kept in a dry incubator (Fisher Scientific, Hampton, NH) set to 37 °C for the duration of each experiment. The baseline current of the nanowire decreases as ferricyanide reduces to ferrocyanide due to a change in the charge distribution in the vicinity of the nanowire. The source–drain voltage was 200 mV, the fluid-gate voltage was −400 mV, and the back-gate voltage was 0 V. The source–drain voltage was controlled and monitored using a source meter 2400 (Keithly Instruments, Solon, OH), and both fluid-gate voltage and back-gate voltage were controlled with a lock in amplifier SR810 (Stanford Research Systems, Sunnyvale, CA). Multiplexed measurement of 7 nanowire sensor arrays was achieved by continuously switching the sensor array being monitored by a single source meter. During each cycle, each sensor array is recorded individually, excluding external circuit effects from the measurement.
Sensor data processing
Sensor data was acquired with custom LabView 2017 software (National Instruments, Austin, TX), stored as ‘.csv’ files and subsequently analyzed using MATLAB R2021b. Measured current obtained from multiple sensors was boxcar averaged at each measurement cycle and offset to an equal baseline at 144 s for each sensor (Fig. 4). The average measurement cycle time was 31.7 ± 0.12 (s). To normalize signals from different sensors with different baselines, the resulting current was rescaled to interval [0 100] by the maximum, ymax, and minimum, ymin of the data from each sensor
here %FS represents percent full current scale. The rescaled current values from multiple sensors were subsequently ensemble averaged (Fig. 5a, c). Slope was reported as the maximum slope across a 160 s time window of the curve (Fig. 5b) or from a fixed time interval (Fig. 5d).
Safety Information
ALT depleted human serum was pre-screened for blood borne pathogens prior to shipment from the manufacturer. Appropriate PPE for working with pre-screened human serum was a lab coat, eye protection, and gloves. Liquid biological waste was treated with 10% bleach prior to disposal in a laboratory sink with copious amounts of water. Plastic consumables that were in contact with biologicals were disposed of by Stericycle (Bannockburn, IL).
Data availability
The data in this manuscript is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding authors, with permission from FemtoDx, Inc.
Code availability
Essential code in this manuscript is available upon reasonable request from the corresponding authors, with permission from FemtoDx, Inc.
References
Chen, M. et al. FDA-approved drug labeling for the study of drug-induced liver injury. Drug Discov. Today 16, 697–703 (2011).
FDA, U. Guidance for Industry Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Premarketing Clinical Evaluation. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Silver Spring, MD. (2009).
Avigan, M. I. DILI and drug development: a regulatory perspective. Semin. Liver Dis. 34, 215–226 (2014).
Zimmerman, H. J. Hepatotoxicity: The Adverse Effects of Drugs and Other Chemicals on the Liver (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999).
Hoofnagle, J. H. & Björnsson, E. S. Drug-induced liver injury—types and phenotypes. New Engl. J. Med. 381, 264–273 (2019).
Senior, J. R. Alanine aminotransferase: a clinical and regulatory tool for detecting liver injury–past, present, and future. Clin. Pharmacol. Therapeutics 92, 332–339 (2012).
Drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Current Status and Future Directions for Drug Development and the Post-market Setting. A Consensus by A Cioms Working Group (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences, 2020).
Watkins, P. B., Seligman, P. J., Pears, J. S., Avigan, M. I. & Senior, J. R. Using controlled clinical trials to learn more about acute drug-induced liver injury. Hepatology 48, 1680–1689 (2008).
Andrade, R. J. et al. EASL clinical practice guidelines: drug-induced liver injury. J. Hepatol. 70, 1222–1261 (2019).
Brahmer, J. R. et al. Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 1714–1768 (2018).
Chen, Y., Wang, X., Erramilli, S., Mohanty, P. & Kalinowski, A. Silicon-based nanoelectronic field-effect pH sensor with local gate control. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 223512 (2006).
Cui, Y., Wei, Q., Park, H. & Lieber, C. M. Nanowire nanosensors for highly sensitive and selective detection of biological and chemical species. Science 293, 1289–1292 (2001).
Bi, X., Agarwal, A. & Yang, K.-L. Oligopeptide-modified silicon nanowire arrays as multichannel metal ion sensors. Biosensors Bioelectron. 24, 3248–3251 (2009).
Luo, L. et al. Silicon nanowire sensors for Hg2+ and Cd2+ ions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 193101 (2009).
Maedler, C. et al. Sensing of the melanoma biomarker TROY using silicon nanowire field-effect transistors. ACS Sensors 1, 696–701 (2016).
Chen, Y. et al. Nanoelectronic detection of breast cancer biomarker. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 233702 (2010).
Stern, E. et al. Label-free immunodetection with CMOS-compatible semiconducting nanowires. Nature 445, 519–522 (2007).
Huang, Y.-W. et al. Real-time and label-free detection of the prostate-specific antigen in human serum by a polycrystalline silicon nanowire field-effect transistor biosensor. Anal. Chem. 85, 7912–7918 (2013).
Zheng, G., Patolsky, F., Cui, Y., Wang, W. U. & Lieber, C. M. Multiplexed electrical detection of cancer markers with nanowire sensor arrays. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1294–1301 (2005).
Wu, C.-C. et al. Label-free biosensing of a gene mutation using a silicon nanowire field-effect transistor. Biosensors Bioelectron. 25, 820–825 (2009).
Hu, W.-P., Tsai, C.-C., Yang, Y.-S., Chan, H. W.-H. & Chen, W.-Y. Synergetic improvements of sensitivity and specificity of nanowire field effect transistor gene chip by designing neutralized DNA as probe. Sci. Rep. 8, 12598 (2018).
Lin, C.-H. et al. Recovery based nanowire field-effect transistor detection of pathogenic avian influenza DNA. Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 51, 02BL02 (2012).
Mu, L. et al. Silicon nanowire field-effect transistors—a versatile class of potentiometric nanobiosensors. IEEE Access 3, 287–302 (2015).
Wang, X., Chen, Y., Gibney, K. A., Erramilli, S. & Mohanty, P. Silicon-based nanochannel glucose sensor. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 013903 (2008).
Huber, C. A. et al. Nanowire array composites. Science 263, 800–802 (1994).
Shul’ga, A. A., Koudelka-Hep, M., de Rooij, N. F. & Netchiporouk, L. I. Glucose-sensitive enzyme field effect transistor using potassium ferricyanide as an oxidizing substrate. Anal. Chem. 66, 205–210 (1994).
Chae, M.-S., Yoo, Y. K., Kim, J., Kim, T. G. & Hwang, K. S. Graphene-based enzyme-modified field-effect transistor biosensor for monitoring drug effects in Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Sensors Actuators B: Chem 272, 448–458 (2018).
Caras, S. & Janata, J. Field effect transistor sensitive to penicillin. Anal. Chem. 52, 1935–1937 (1980).
Vijayalakshmi, A. et al. Enzyme field effect transistor (ENFET) for estimation of triglycerides using magnetic nanoparticles. Biosensors Bioelectron. 23, 1708–1714 (2008).
Bergveld, P. Development, operation, and application of the ion-sensitive field-effect transistor as a tool for electrophysiology. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-19, 342–351 (1972).
Bergveld, P. Development of an ion-sensitive solid-state device for neurophysiological measurements. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-17, 70–71 (1970).
Mateen, F. Micro-nano biosystems: silicon nanowire sensor and micromechanical wireless power receiver. Doctoral dissertation, (Boston University, 2018).
Schumann, G. et al. IFCC primary reference procedures for the measurement of catalytic activity concentrations of enzymes at 37 °c. part 4. reference procedure for the measurement of catalytic concentration of alanine aminotransferase. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 40, 718–724 (2002).
Williams, F. R. & Hager, L. P. Crystalline flavin pyruvate oxidase from Escherichia coli. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 116, 168–176 (1966).
Peguin, S., Coulet, P. R. & Bardeletti, G. Pyruvate oxidase and oxaloacetate decarboxylase enzyme electrodes. Analytica Chim. Acta 222, 83–93 (1989).
Kihara, K., Yasukawa, E., Hayashi, M. & Hirose, S. Determination of glutamate-pyruvate transaminase activity in blood serum with a pyruvate oxidase/poly(vinyl chloride) membrane sensor. Analytica Chim. Acta 159, 81–86 (1984).
Xuan, G. S., Oh, S. W. & Choi, E. Y. Development of an electrochemical immunosensor for alanine aminotransferase. Biosensors Bioelectron. 19, 365–371 (2003).
Han, Y. D., Song, S. Y., Lee, J. H., Lee, D. S. & Yoon, H. C. Multienzyme-modified biosensing surface for the electrochemical analysis of aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase in human plasma. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 400, 797–805 (2011).
Dang, L. A., Haccoun, J., Piro, B. & Pham, M. C. Reagentless recycling of pyruvate oxidase on a conducting polymer-modified electrode. Electrochim. Acta 51, 3934–3943 (2006).
Pierrat, O., Bourdillon, C., Moiroux, J. & Laval, J.-M. Enzymatic electrocatalysis studies of Escherichia Coli pyruvate oxidase, incorporated into a biomimetic supported bilayer. Langmuir 14, 1692–1696 (1998).
Koland, J. G., Miller, M. J. & Gennis, R. B. Reconstitution of the membrane-bound, ubiquinone-dependent pyruvate oxidase respiratory chain of Escherichia coli with the cytochrome d terminal oxidase. Biochemistry 23, 445–453 (1984).
Russell, P., Hager, L. P. & Gennis, R. B. Characterization of the proteolytic activation of pyruvate oxidase. Control by specific ligands and by the flavin oxidation-reduction state. J. Biol. Chem. 252, 7877–7882 (1977).
Mather, M. W. & Gennis, R. B. Kinetic studies of the lipid-activated pyruvate oxidase flavoprotein of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 16148–16155 (1985).
Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A. Influence of local reference populations on upper limits of normal for serum alanine aminotransferase levels. Arch. Internal Med. 168, 663 (2008).
Kaiser, H. Quantitation in elemental analysis. Anal. Chem. 42, 26A–59A (1970).
Long, G. L. & Winefordner, J. D. Limit of detection a closer look at the IUPAC definition. Anal. Chem. 55, 712A–724A (1983).
Patolsky, F. et al. Electrical detection of single viruses. Proc. Nat Acad. Sci. 101, 14017–14022 (2004).
Zhang, G.-J. et al. Silicon nanowire biosensor for highly sensitive and rapid detection of Dengue virus. Sensors Actuators B: Chem. 146, 138–144 (2010).
Musial, P. G., Baker, S. N., Gerstein, G. L., King, E. A. & Keating, J. G. Signal-to-noise ratio improvement in multiple electrode recording. J. Neurosci. Methods 115, 29–43 (2002).
Binkley, D. & Dessy, R. Data manipulation and handling. J. Chem. Educ. 56, 148 (1979).
Patolsky, F., Zheng, G. & Lieber, C. M. Nanowire sensors for medicine and the life sciences. Nanomedicine 1, 51–65 (2006).
Vu, C. A. & Chen, W. Y. Field-effect transistor biosensors for biomedical applications: recent advances and future prospects. Sensors 19, 4214 (2019).
Mazzola, L. Commercializing nanotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1137–1143 (2003).
Pollock, N. R. et al. A paper-based multiplexed transaminase test for low-cost, point-of-care liver function testing. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 152ra129–152ra129 (2012).
Wang, H.-L., Chu, C.-H., Tsai, S.-J. & Yang, R.-J. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase detection on paper-based analytical devices with inkjet printer-sprayed reagents. Micromachines 7, 9 (2016).
Hsueh, C.-J., Wang, J. H., Dai, L. & Liu, C.-C. Determination of alanine aminotransferase with an electrochemical nano Ir-C biosensor for the screening of liver diseases. Biosensors 1, 107–117 (2011).
Her, J.-L., Pan, T.-M., Lin, W.-Y., Wang, K.-S. & Li, L.-J. Label-free detection of alanine aminotransferase using a graphene field-effect biosensor. Sensors Actuators B: Chem. 182, 396–400 (2013).
Jamal, M., Worsfold, O., McCormac, T. & Dempsey, E. A stable and selective electrochemical biosensor for the liver enzyme alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Biosensors Bioelectron. 24, 2926–2930 (2009).
la Cour, J. B., Generelli, S., Barbe, L. & Guenat, O. T. Low-cost disposable ALT electrochemical microsensors for in-vitro hepatotoxic assessment. Sensors Actuators B: Chem. 228, 360–365 (2016).
Song, M.-J., Yun, D.-H., Min, N.-K. & Hong, S.-I. Electrochemical biosensor array for liver diagnosis using silanization technique on nanoporous silicon electrode. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 103, 32–37 (2007).
Thuy, T. & Tseng, T. A Micro-platinum wire biosensor for fast and selective detection of alanine aminotransferase. Sensors 16, 767 (2016).
McLenon, J. & Rogers, M. A. M. The fear of needles: a systematic review and meta analysis. J. Adv. Nursing 75, 30–42 (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the editors of Communications Engineering and the reviewers for their patience, thoughtful comments, and guidance throughout the publication process. We also acknowledge the contributions of Dr. Robert Dinello and Dr. Aye Myat Thinn in the early stage of ALT assay development at FemtoDx.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.A.M. and D.Z. contributed equally to all experiment design, data acquisition and interpretation for the article. K.A.M., D.Z., J.S.C. performed ALT assay experiments and analyzed data. K.A.M wrote all MATLAB code. J.J.D. designed and laid out the SiNW dies. J.J.D. and K.M. designed and built the measurement setup as wells as performed sensor characterization. P.M. and S.E. conceived the study. P.M., S.E., S.P., and T.C.L. provided technical advice. K.A.M., D.Z., and J.J.D. wrote the manuscript with feedback from E.K.L., B.M.M., and J.S.C.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
K.A.M., D.Z., J.S.C., J.J.D., K.M., E.K.L., B.M.M., T.C.L., and P.M. have financial interests in/relative to FemtoDx, Inc., which could potentially benefit from the outcomes of this research. S.E. and S.P. are advisors. S.E. and P.M. cofounded FemtoDx. None of the authors has any competing non-financial interests otherwise than stated.
Peer review
Peer review information
Communications Engineering thanks Ozlem Yesil-Celiktas and Tie Li for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Mengying Su and Rosamund Daw.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Muratore, K.A., Zhou, D., Du, J.J. et al. Alanine aminotransferase assay biosensor platform using silicon nanowire field effect transistors. Commun Eng 2, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-023-00057-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44172-023-00057-4