Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52418-4, published online 23 January 2024

The original version of this Article contained an error in the Methods section.

Under the subheading, ‘CT imaging protocol’,

“The CT scanning parameters included a tube voltage of 120 kV, tube current auto, pixel size 0.976 × 0.976  0mm2, and slice thickness 2.5 mm.”

now reads:

“The CT scanning parameters included a tube voltage of 120 kV, tube current auto, pixel size 0.976 × 0.976  mm2, and slice thickness 2.5 mm.”

The original Article has been corrected.