Abstract
Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are proton-gated cation channels widely expressed in the nervous system. ASIC gating is modulated by divalent cations as well as small molecules; however, the molecular determinants of gating modulation by divalent cations are not well understood. Previously, we identified two small molecules that bind to ASIC1a at a novel site in the acidic pocket and modulate ASIC1 gating in a manner broadly resembling divalent cations, raising the possibility that these small molecules may help to illuminate the molecular determinants of gating modulation by divalent cations. Here, we examined how these two groups of modulators might interact as well as mutational effects on ASIC1a gating and its modulation by divalent cations. Our results indicate that binding of divalent cations to an acidic pocket site plays a key role in gating modulation of the channel.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are proton-gated cation channels widely expressed in nervous systems1,2. At least four genes encode various homomeric (ASIC1a, ASIC1b, ASIC2a, ASIC3, and ASIC4) and heteromeric channels3,4. The homomeric ASIC1a is a major proton sensor in the brain and is involved in synaptic function5,6,7,8 and neuronal injury9,10,11,12,13. ASIC3, on the other hand, plays a role in pain perception14,15.
Gating of ASIC channels is modulated by divalent cations and small molecules alike. Divalent cations have been shown to stabilize the closed state and/or block open channels16,17,18,19,20,21. However, the molecular determinants of their gating modulation are poorly understood despite the fact that several divalent cation binding sites have been identified22. Recently, we reported that two small molecules, JNJ-799760 and JNJ-67869386, bind to a novel site in the acidic pocket and, as with divalent cations, also stabilize the closed state of ASIC1 (chicken ASIC1 and rat ASIC1a)23. Here, leveraging the known molecular mechanism of JNJ-799760, we examined the interactions between JNJ-799760 and divalent cations. In addition, we further studied mutational effects on ASIC1a gating and its modulation by divalent cations. Our results indicate that binding of divalent cations to an acidic pocket site plays a key role in gating modulation of ASIC1.
Results
Divalent cations and JNJ compounds modulate ASIC1a channel gating kinetics in a similar manner
Previously23, we showed that two small-molecules, JNJ-799760 and JNJ-67869386, bind to the same site in the acidic pocket, decrease the rate of activation and accelerate the rate of deactivation in response to step pH changes (also see Fig. 1a for JNJ-799760). Divalent cations (2 mM Ca2+ plus 1 mM Mg2+ in Fig. 1b) exert similar effects on the channel kinetics. The effects of divalent cations on ASIC1a are rapid and at quasi equilibrium as channels open and close (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1). As such, the current amplitude is independent of the concentration of divalent cations in the holding pH buffer and is instead dependent only on their concentrations in the test pH buffer (Fig. 1d). In addition, divalent cations have also been shown to cause fast open channel block of ASIC1a19. At 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ and test pH of 5.0, this block is ~ 20% in our experiments (Fig. 1d).
As with the activation kinetics, the desensitization kinetics are also similarly affected by divalent cations and the JNJ compounds. As shown in Fig. 2a and Fig. 2b, divalent cations increase the rate of open-channel desensitization, as do JNJ-799760 and JNJ-6786938623. Furthermore, both groups of modulators decrease the rate of closed-state desensitization17,23.
Divalent cations and the JNJ compounds both stabilize the closed state
Consistent with their effects on channel kinetics, divalent cations cause an acidic shift in the pH dependence of channel activation. As shown in Fig. 3a, the pH50 is 7.01 in nominally divalent cation-free buffer vs 6.31 in the presence of 2 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Mg2+.
To avoid complications on open channel properties, we took advantage of the fast kinetics of divalent cations on activation (Fig. 1c and d) and studied the effect of divalent cations on steady-state desensitization by holding their concentrations constant in the test pH buffer (containing 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+). As shown in Fig. 3b, divalent cations and JNJ-799760 both cause acidic shifts in the pH dependence of steady-state desensitization, lowering the pH50 from 7.82 in the absence of divalent cations and JNJ-799760 to 7.43 in the presence of 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ and 7.66 in the presence of 100 nM JNJ-799760, respectively. This effect was also mirrored by JNJ-67869386 (which shares the same binding site as JNJ-799760), as previously reported23.
Taken together, divalent cations, as with JNJ-799760 and JNJ-67869386, destabilize the open and desensitized states in favor of the closed state.
JNJ-799760 and divalent cations decrease one another’s effects on channel gating
The qualitatively similar effects of divalent cations and the JNJ compounds on gating led us to investigate whether they might be functionally antagonistic to each other. To this end, we expanded the study to also include higher concentrations of JNJ-799760. As shown in Fig. 3b, JNJ-799760 concentration-dependently shifts the pH50 for steady-state desensitization to lower pH values in the absence of divalent cations (from 7.81 in the absence of JNJ-799760 to 7.56 in the presence of 10 µM JNJ-799760). This effect is saturated at 1 µM JNJ-799760 as 10 µM JNJ-799760 results in no additional shift. Addition of 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ to the 10 µM JNJ-799760 buffer further shifts the pH50 to a more acidic value (7.28) beyond that by either 10 µM JNJ-799760 alone (7.56) or 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ alone (7.43). However, the amount of acidic shift (ΔpH50) by 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ in the presence of 10 µM JNJ-799760 (− 0.28) is substantially smaller than that in the absence of JNJ-799760 (− 0.38). Likewise, ΔpH50 by 10 µM JNJ-799760 in the presence of 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ (− 0.15) is also less than that in the absence of 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ (− 0.25).
The occupancy of a divalent cation binding site is dependent on JNJ-799760
Recently, we reported a crystal structure of cASIC1 in complex with JNJ-799760 (ΔASIC1/JNJ-799760; PDB code: 6X9H) and showed that JNJ-799760 bound to a novel site in the acidic pocket in the channel’s closed state23 (also Fig. 4a and b). Inspection of the ΔASIC1/JNJ-799760 electron density maps in the extracellular domain reveals extra electron densities at two locations (per subunit), one in the acidic pocket (3.4 ~ 5.1 Å from T215, E220, D408 of one subunit and from S241 and E243 of a neighboring subunit; Fig. 4b) and the other in the central vestibule (3.0–6.3 Å from E80, Q277, E374, E412 and E417; Fig. 4c). These locations agree with those from studies of other compound-bound closed-state ΔASIC1 structures from our own group (manuscript in preparation) as well as with those described in the literature22,24. In ΔASIC1/JNJ-799760, however, no obvious extra electron densities are present near E98 (Fig. 4b), where a third (i.e. a second acidic-pocket) divalent cation binds in the above-mentioned studies. JNJ-799760 binds near this cation site and indeed, makes a hydrogen bond with the carboxyl side chains of E98 (Fig. 4b), raising the possibility that the close proximity of JNJ-799760 to this site may hinder or preclude cation binding here.
We also observed unallocated electron densities along the pseudo threefold axis in the pore just above the channel gate, ~ 2.5 Å from the oxygens of the D433 side chains (Fig. 4d). Interestingly, no ion binding near D433 has been reported to date in closed-state apo structures.
Diminished effects of divalent cations on the gating of ASIC1a E97A mutant channels
Previously, binding of divalent cations at the site near E98 was shown to be state dependent in favor of the closed state22. As shown above, this cation site is apparently unoccupied in the presence of JNJ-799760 (which interacts with E98 and may preclude cation binding here) even in the closed state. Together with our observation that JNJ-799760 functionally antagonizes gating modulation by divalent cations (Fig. 3b), these results strongly implicate a role of E98 in divalent cation binding and the resulting gating modulation. To further illuminate the contribution of E98, we neutralized the equivalent acidic residue (E97) in rASIC1a from glutamate to alanine and studied the effect of divalent cations on the gating of the mutant channel.
The pH dependence of steady-state desensitization of E97A is independent of divalent cations in the test pH buffer (Supplementary Fig. 1), as would be expected from their fast-kinetic effects on channel activation (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2) and slower kinetics of desensitization (Fig. 2)18,22,23. E97A causes a basic shift of the pH dependence of activation (Fig. 5a) and steady-state desensitization (Fig. 5b) relative to wild-type rASIC1a, consistent with the notion that this residue participates in proton-dependent gating. More importantly, gating modulation by 2/1 mM Ca2+/Mg2+ is greatly diminished in E97A compared to that in the wild-type channel, supporting the idea that E97 in rASIC1a is involved in binding of divalent cations and stabilization of the closed state—The divalent cation-induced acidic shift, ΔpH50, is -0.70 (WT) and -0.28 (E97A) units, respectively, for activation (Fig. 5a) and -0.38 (WT) and -0.22 (E97A) units, respectively, for desensitization (Fig. 5b).
Discussion
As shown in this and earlier studies, divalent cations and JNJ-799760/JNJ-67869386 exhibit several similarities in their modulation of ASIC1 channels. As with the JNJ compounds23, extracellular Ca2+/Mg2+ ions (1) decrease/increase the rate of ASIC1 activation/deactivation (Fig. 1), (2) slow the rate of closed-channel desensitization17, (3) accelerate the rate of open-channel desensitization19 (Fig. 2), (4) shift the pH dependence of activation and desensitization to more acidic pH values17,18 (Fig. 3), and (5) attenuate tachyphylaxis25. One difference is that divalent cations speed recovery from desensitization17,18, whereas the JNJ compounds do not alter this rate23. The broad similarities raise the possibility of a shared/related molecular mechanism of action for the two groups of modulators.
Studies of cASIC1 apo structures demonstrated that binding to two of the three divalent cation sites in the extracellular domain is state dependent22 (favoring the closed over desensitized state), raising the possibility of gating modulation by these cations. One of these sites is positioned near E98 and E239 in the acidic pocket. Intriguingly, we found no evidence of cation binding near E98/E239 in ΔASIC1/JNJ-799760 despite the channel being in the closed state, suggesting that JNJ-799760 may interfere with cation binding at this location. Indeed, the divalent cation (in the apo structure) and JNJ-799760 are both merely ~ 3 Å from E98, with which JNJ-799760 makes a hydrogen bond (The neuropeptide Big dynorphin, which also stabilizes the closed state of ASIC1a, binds at the acidic pocket26,27 and interacts with E98 as well, among other residues27). Thus, it is possible that JNJ-799760 sterically hinders cation binding to E98. Consistent with this possibility, the divalent cation-induced acidic shift in the pH dependence of desensitization in the presence of JNJ-799760 is significantly decreased (to 0.28 pH units from 0.38 units in the absence of JNJ-799760). This (decreased) value is similar to the divalent cation-induced shift in the mutant channel E97A (0.22 units) in which the divalent cation site at this residue is removed, arguing for a similar role of the mutation and J-799760 (i.e. retarding binding of divalent cations at this locus). Further supporting this idea, neutralization of the equivalent acidic residue in rASIC1a (E97) resulted in large basic shifts of the pH dependence of gating as well as greatly diminished gating modulation by divalent cations (Fig. 5). Qualitatively similar (albeit smaller with less statistical significance) effects on channel activation were also observed for E98Q in cASIC122. Other neutralizing mutations at the equivalent position in cASIC1 and hASIC1a have been shown to similarly cause alkaline shifts12,22. Our results, together with the literature reports, strongly indicate that E98 in cASIC1 plays a key role in the binding of, and the resulting gating modulation by, divalent cations.
Additional binding site(s) appear necessary to fully account for the observed gating modulation by divalent cations. This is evident in Fig. 3b, where divalent cations cause an additional shift of pH50 even in the presence of supra-saturating concentrations of JNJ-799760 that prevent cation binding to the site near E98. (Similarly, the residual amount of divalent cation-induced gating shift in E97A, which is comparable to that in the wild-type channel in the presence of JNJ-799760, also argues for the existence of additional site(s)). It has been suggested that binding of divalent cations to the central vestibule site, which is also state dependent, may also be relevant to gating modulation22. Indeed, we observe unallocated electron density in the central vestibule site in ΔASIC1/JNJ-799760 consistent with cation binding, being potentially responsible (at least in part) for the surplus effect of divalent cations seen in Fig. 3b.
We also observed unallocated electron densities at the channel gate of ΔASIC1/JNJ-799760 formed by D433. Cation binding at D433 has not been reported in closed-state apo structures, although Cs+ ions can bind to this region in open and desensitized states28,29. The equivalent residue in rat ASIC1a19 and ASIC321 has been shown to participate in open channel block by Ca2+. Additional studies will help to illuminate whether this JNJ-799760-induced cation binding contributes to gating modulation.
Methods
Whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology
Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells stably or transiently expressing rat ASIC1a wild-type or mutant channels were used. The extracellular solutions nominally free of divalent cations contained (in mM): 149 NaCl, 4 KCl, 5 glucose, 10 HEPES. To obtain divalent cation-containing extracellular solutions, 2 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 were added. The pH was adjusted by titrating either with NaOH or HCl (5 mM MES was added to solutions at pH 6.0 and lower). Pipette electrodes were filled with an intracellular solution containing (in mM): 135 KCl, 4 MgATP, 0.3 Na2GTP, 10 EGTA and 20 HEPES, pH 7.2. Currents were digitized at 10 kHz (Digidata 1550B) and lowpass filtered at 2 kHz (Axopatch 200B). Series resistance was 75% compensated. Responses were elicited by rapid perfusion of acidic solutions using the SF-77B Fast-Step Perfusion device (Warner Instruments) for 40 ms once every 30 s (unless indicated otherwise) and recorded till steady state was reached. The holding potential was 0 mV. JNJ-799760 was synthesized in house and solubilized in DMSO as 10 mM stocks.
Electrophysiology data analysis
Baseline values (i.e. current amplitudes at the conditioning pH) were subtracted to obtain responses evoked by the test pH. Responses were normalized for each cell before averaging. Concentration–response data were fitted to a logistic function of the form: R = (A1–A2)/(1 + (C/C0)h) + A2, where R is the normalized response, C is either pH or compound concentration, C0 is the pH/concentration at which half-maximal response occurs (pH50 or IC50), h is the Hill coefficient, and A1 and A2 are constants. The fitted data are shown as solid or dashed curves. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA or two-tailed Student’s t-test, as appropriate. Experimental results are reported as mean ± SEM over independent measurements on n different cells. Data fitting and statistical analyses were performed using Origin (Northampton, MA, USA).
Protein expression/purification, crystallization, and X-ray data collection/processing/ structure determination
These methods were all described in detail in a previous publication22.
Data availability
Coordinates of ΔASIC1/JNJ-799760 were deposited to the online database https://www.rcsb.org/ with accession code 6X9H. The source data underlying the graphs and charts presented in the main figures are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Krishtal, O. A. & Pidoplichko, V. I. A receptor for protons in the nerve cell membrane. Neuroscience 5, 2325–2327 (1980).
Waldmann, R., Champigny, G., Bassilana, F., Heurteaux, C. & Lazdunski, M. A proton-gated cation channel involved in acid-sensing. Nature 386, 173–177 (1997).
Jasti, J., Furukawa, H., Gonzales, E. B. & Gouaux, E. Structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1 at 1.9 Å resolution and low pH. Nature 449, 316–323 (2007).
Sherwood, T. W., Frey, E. N. & Askwith, C. C. Structure and activity of the acid-sensing ion channels. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 303, C699-710 (2012).
Wemmie, J. A. et al. The acid activated ion channel ASIC contributes to synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory. Neuron 34, 463–477 (2002).
Du, J. et al. Protons and ASICs are a neurotransmitter/receptor pair that regulates synaptic plasticity in the lateral amygdala. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 8961–8966 (2014).
Kreple, C. J. et al. Acid-sensing ion channels contribute to synaptic transmission and inhibit cocaine-evoked plasticity. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1083–1091 (2014).
González-Inchauspe, C., Urbano, F. J., Di Guilmi, M. N. & Uchitel, O. D. Acid-sensing ion channels activated by evoked released protons modulate synaptic transmission at the mouse calyx of Held synapse. J. Neurosci. 37, 2589–2599 (2017).
Xiong, Z. G. et al. Neuroprotection in ischemia: Blocking calcium-permeable acid-sensing ion channels. Cell 118, 687–698 (2004).
Friese, M. A. et al. Acid-sensing ion channel-1 contributes toaxonal degeneration in autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system. Nat. Med. 13, 1483–1489 (2007).
Pignataro, G., Simon, R. P. & Xiong, Z. G. Prolonged activation of ASIC1a and the time window for neuroprotection in cerebral ischaemia. Brain 130, 151–158 (2007).
Duan, B. et al. Extracellular spermine exacerbates ischemic neuronal injury through sensitization of ASIC1a channels to extracellular acidosis. J. Neurosci. 31, 2101–2112 (2011).
McCarthy, C. A., Rash, L. D., Chassagnon, I. R., King, G. F. & Widdop, R. E. PcTx1 affords neuroprotection in a conscious model of stroke in hypertensive rats via selective inhibition of ASIC1a. Neuropharmacology 99, 650–657 (2015).
Chen, C. C. et al. A role for ASIC3 in the modulation of high-intensity pain stimuli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 8992–8997 (2002).
Sluka, K. A. et al. Chronic hyperalgesia induced by repeated acid injections in muscle is abolished by the loss of ASIC3, but not ASIC1. Pain 106, 229–239 (2003).
de Weille, J. & Bassilana, F. Dependence of the acid-sensitive ion channel, ASIC1a, on extracellular Ca2+ ions. Brain Res. 900, 277–281 (2001).
Babini, E., Paukert, M., Geisler, H. S. & Grunder, S. Alternative splicing and interaction with di- and polyvalent cations control the dynamic range of acid-sensing ion channel 1 (ASIC1). J. Biol. Chem. 277, 41597–41603 (2002).
Immke, D. C. & McCleskey, E. W. Protons open acid-sensing ion channels by catalyzing relief of Ca2+ blockade. Neuron 37, 75–84 (2003).
Paukert, M., Babini, E., Pusch, M. & Gründer, S. Identification of the Ca2+ blocking site of acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 1: Implications for channel gating. J. Gen. Physiol. 124, 383–394 (2004).
Zhang, P., Sigworth, F. J. & Canessa, C. M. Gating of acid-sensitive ion channel-1: Release of Ca2+ block vs. allosteric mechanism. J. Gen. Physiol. 127, 109–117 (2006).
Zuo, Z. et al. Identification of a unique Ca2+-binding site in rat acid-sensing ion channel 3. Nat. Commun. 9, 2082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04424-0 (2018).
Yoder, N. & Gouaux, E. Divalent cation and chloride ion sites of chicken acid sensing ion channel 1a elucidated by x-ray crystallography. PLoS One 13, e0202134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202134 (2018).
Liu, Y. et al. Molecular mechanism and structural basis of small-molecule modulation of the gating of acid-sensing ion channel 1. Commun. Biol. 4, 174. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01678-1 (2021).
Yoder, N., Yoshioka, C. & Gouaux, E. Gating mechanisms of acid-sensing ion channels. Nature 555, 397–401 (2018).
Chen, X. & Gründer, S. Permeating protons contribute to tachyphylaxis of the acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 1a. J. Physiol. 579, 657–670 (2007).
Borg, B. C. et al. Mechanism and site of action of big dynorphin on ASIC1a. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 7447–7454 (2020).
Leisle, L. et al. Dynorphin neuropeptides decrease apparent proton affinity of ASIC1a by occluding the acidic pocket. J. Med. Chem. 64, 13299–13311 (2021).
Gonzales, E. B., Kawate, T. & Gouaux, E. Pore architecture and ion sites in acid-sensing ion channels and P2X receptors. Nature 460, 599–604 (2009).
Baconguis, I. & Gouaux, E. Structural plasticity and dynamic selectivity of acid-sensing ion channel-spider toxin complexes. Nature 489, 400–405 (2012).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.L. conceived, designed and carried out the electrophysiological studies and data analysis. J.M. and B.G. designed and J.M. carried out the crystallography studies. J.M., R.L.D. and J.L. performed the data processing/analysis. J.R. and M.L. were involved in designing/synthesizing the JNJ compounds. J.S. conducted the initial functional studies confirming the JNJ compounds’ effects. R.H. maintained cell cultures and contributed to the early functional conformation of the JNJ compounds’ effects. C.L. generated the channel plasmids. R.M. was involved in the expression of ΔASIC1 for crystallography. Y.L, J.M. and M.P.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to reviewing and revising the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
At the time of the work described in this manuscript, all authors were employees of Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a division of Johnson & Johnson, the funder of this study.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Ma, J., DesJarlais, R.L. et al. Molecular determinants of ASIC1 modulation by divalent cations. Sci Rep 14, 2320 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52845-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52845-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.