Abstract
Previous research has established sex differences associated with nicotine intake, however a significant gap in knowledge remains regarding the molecular mechanisms that govern these differences at the transcriptional level. One critical regulator of transcription are microRNAs (miRNAs). miRNAs are a family of non-coding RNAs that regulate an array of important biological functions altered in several disease states, including neuroadaptive changes within the brain associated with drug dependence. We examined the prefrontal cortex (PFC) from male and female Sprague-Dawley rats following self-administration (22 days) of nicotine or yoked saline controls using next generation RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) technology and found an array of miRNAs to be significantly and differentially regulated by nicotine self-administration. Of these, we found the expression of miR-199a and 214, which are expressed on the same cluster of chromosome 1, to be upregulated in the female rats exposed to nicotine; upregulation in this group was further validated by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Bioinformatics analysis to assess common targets of miR-199/214 identified Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)- dependent deacetylase that plays a role in apoptosis, neuron survival, and stress resistance. Using western-blot, we confirmed downregulation of SIRT1 and increased cleaved caspase 3 expression in the brains of nicotine-exposed female rats and no change in expression levels in the other groups. Collectively, our findings highlight a miR-199/214 regulatory network that, through SIRT1, may be associated with nicotine seeking in females which may serve as a potential therapeutic target for sex-specific treatment approaches.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Smoking remains a significant health and economic burden in the United States, resulting in 480,000 deaths and costing more than $300 billion annually1. While many smokers report a desire to quit, most are unsuccessful in quit attempts2. The tenacity of this addiction can be, in part, attributed to nicotine, the primary addictive constituent in cigarettes3. Notable sex differences related to smoking and quitting have been identified [for a review see4]. While men are more likely to be smokers and smoke more cigarettes per day, women develop dependence to nicotine more rapidly. Women also have higher relapse rates than men and nicotine replacement therapy may be less effective4,5,6. These differences may reflect women’s greater sensitivity to non-pharmacokinetic effects of nicotine4,7.
While environmental and social factors likely play a role in some of these nicotine sex differences, biological factors including the effect of gonadal hormones on nervous system development, changes in circulating gonadal hormones across the lifespan, and differential expression of X and Y genes have also been implicated8,9,10,11,12. These factors produce well-described sex differences in the bio-behavioral processes that contribute to drug addiction–learning and memory, drug efficacy and toxicity, neuroinflammation, etc.13,14,15,16. Concomitantly, sex differences in pre-clinical animal models have also been demonstrated. Females rats show greater nicotine-induced locomotor sensitization, more pronouced withdrawal following nicotine cessation, enhanced conditoned reinforcement to nicotine-associated cues, and higher break points on a progressive ratio nicotine self-administratin schedule4,17,18,19. Previous studies have also demonstrated that endogenous neuropeptide experession is sex-dependently altered following nicotine self-administration20. Tissue levels of neurotensin in the PFC were increased in the male, but not female, rats following nicotine self-administration compared to saline controls, implicating the PFC as an area of interest when exploring sex differences related to nicotine intake20.
While nicotine sex differences have been established, a significant gap in knowledge remains regarding the molecular mechanisms that govern these differences at the transcriptional level. One critical regulator of transcription are microRNAs (miRNAs), which are a family of non-coding RNAs. At the molecular level miRNAs are about 21–23 nucleotides long and regulate gene expression through direct binding to the 3′ untranslated region (UTR) of gene targets, thereby inhibiting their translation into protein21. From a pathological perspective, miRNAs have been shown to regulate an array of important biological functions in several diseases including neuroadaptive changes within the brain caused by drugs of abuse22,23,24.
Given the effects of nicotine on brain areas involved in emotional and cognitive processing, we performed RNA-Seq on the prefrontal cortex (PFC) from female and male rats following long-term nicotine self-administration. The PFC was selected as it is critically involved in higher-order executive function, as well as regulation of behaviors associated with drug abuse and withdrawal in humans25,26,27 and non-human animals28,29,30. PFC involvement in the modulation of maladaptive behaviors associated with stimulant dependence is well supported, however little is known regarding differential PFC miRNAs expression between sexes in a preclinical animal model of nicotine taking (i.e., self-administration). Using RNA-Seq technology, which enables rapid and quantitative profiling of the transcriptome, we profiled the PFC of male and female Sprague Dawley rats that self-administered nicotine (0.0073 mg/infusion) or received yoked saline infusions for 22 days on a variable ratio 3 (VR3) paradigm to identify differentially expressed miRNAs. Nicotine self-administration in the females had a more notable effect compared to the males. Among the differentially expressed miRNAs, miR-199a and 214, which are both expressed on the same cluster of chromosome 1, were upregulated in the female rats self-administering nicotine compared to males. This was validated by real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Further, bioinformatics analysis to assess common targets of miR-199/214 identified Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1), a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)- dependent deacetylase that plays a role in apoptosis, neuron survival, stress resistance, and regulation of drug dependence31,32,33,34. Using western-blot, we confirmed expression of SIRT1 was only downregulated in the brains of nicotine exposed female rats, with no expression change in the males. To our knowledge, this is the first study to employ nicotine self-administration paradigm coupled with next generation sequencing technology to identify sex-specific miRNA signatures associated with long term nicotine self-administration. Collectively, our findings highlight a miR-199/214 regulatory network via downregulation of SIRT1 to be associated with nicotine self-administration in females but not males.
Results
Nicotine maintained robust self-administration
Both male and female rats maintained robust self-administration of nicotine on a VR3 schedule over the 22 sessions, while yoked-saline maintained very little responding (Fig. 1A). For active lever presses, there was a main effect of Group [F(1,21) = 410.25, p < 0.01] and Session [F(21,441) = 8.97, p < 0.01] but no effect of Sex (F < 1, p = 0.66). The 3-way Sex x Group x Session interaction [F(21, 441) = 1.03, p = 0.42] and the 2-way Sex x Group interaction [F(1,21) = 2.28, p = 0.14] were not significant. The Group x Session interaction was significant [F(21, 441) = 15.00, p < 0.01]. Saline-yoked rats responded more on session 1, but the nicotine rats responded more on sessions 2 to 22. The Sex x Session interaction was also significant [F(21,441) = 2.30 p < 0.01]; the female rats responded more than males on sessions 1 and 3 with equivalent responding on all other sessions. Responding on the inactive lever quickly decreased (Fig. 1B), demonstrating a clear discrimination between the active and inactive lever in male and female nicotine rats. For inactive lever presses, there was a main effect of Session [F(21,441) = 39.01, p < 0.01], but no main effect of Sex [F(1,21) = 1.79, p = 0.19] or Group [F(1,21) = 1.89, p = 0.18]. The 3-way interaction of Sex x Group x Session [F(21,441) = 1.49, p = 0.07], the 2-way interaction of Sex x Session [F(21,441) = 1.04, p = 0.40] and the 2-way interaction of Sex x Group (F < 1, p = 0.43) were not significant. There was a significant interaction of Group x Session [F(21,441) = 1.66, p < 0.05], with saline-yoked rats responding more on the inactive lever on session 1 and the nicotine rats responding more on the inactive lever on sessions 2, 5, and 11.
Interestingly, when differences in body weight were accounted for, males and females did differ in total nicotine intake [Fig. 2; t(11) = 4.886 p < 0.001]. Females (10.83 ± 0.35 mg/kg) had greater total nicotine intake than the males (8.01 ± 0.44 mg/kg) (Fig. 2A) when intake over all 22 days are summed. Male and female nicotine rats displayed an increase in general locomotor activity (Fig. 2B). There were main effects of Group [F(1,21) = 7.12, p < 0.05] and Session [F(21,441) = 6.21, p < 0.01] but no main effect of Sex (F < 1, p = 0.60). The 3-way Sex x Group x Session [F(21,441) = 1.07, p < 0.37], the 2-way Sex x Group (F < 1, p = 0.81), and the 2-way Sex x Session (F < 1, p = 0.68) interactions were not significant. There was a Group x Session interaction [F(21,441) = 3.26, p < 0.01]; the nicotine rats showed more general locomotor activity than the saline-yoked rats on sessions 2 to 22.
Differential expression of miRNAs post nicotine exposure
Following completion of the 22 self-administration sessions, total PFC RNA isolated from individual animals was subjected to miRNA sequencing using an RNA-Seq approach to identify differential miRNAs as sex-specific signatures associated with chronic nicotine exposure. We obtained between 5 and 34 million raw reads per sample per condition and observed an overall greater than 83% of mapped reads between the sexes (Supplemental Table 1). Among the 688 miRNAs profiled (Supplemental Table 2), we identified 45 miRNAs, 23 in females and 22 in males, to be differentially expressed after nicotine self-administration (Fig. 3A). Amongst the 23 miRNAs in females, 10 were up regulated and 13 down regulated while in the males, 9 were up regulated and 13 down regulated (Table 1). Interestingly, the overall levels of expression of the differentially expressed miRNAs were more subtle in the males post nicotine intake. Females, on the contrary, showed enhanced and robust expression of some miRNAs. Further applying a cutoff of ±1.5 fold change and p < 0.05 as our criteria, we found four miRNAs to be up regulated in the females post nicotine intake: miR-214-3p (+7.94 fold), miR-350-5p (+4.44), miR-19a-3p (+2.14), and miR-199a-5p (+1.77). For the males, only miR-451-5p (+1.69) was up regulated. None of the down regulated miRNAs met criteria in the females. However, miR-760-5p (−1.58 fold) was down regulated in the males after nicotine exposure.
Notably, miRs-199 and 214, which are co-expressed on the same cluster of chromosome 1, was significantly up regulated in female rats exposed to nicotine compared to males that received nicotine. The up regulation of these miRNAs solely in females self-administering nicotine and not in the males was further validated by RT-PCR (Fig. 3B). For miR-199a, the 3-way interaction of Sex x Group x Session [F(1,20) = 4.437, p = 0.048], the 2-way interaction of Sex x Session [F(1,20) = 4.481, p = 0.047] and the 2-way interaction of Sex x Group [F(1,20) = 5.146 p = 0.035] were significant. Similarly, for miR-214 the the 3-way interaction of Sex x Group x Session [F(1,16) = 10.14, p = 0.058], the 2-way interaction of Sex x Session [F(1,16) = 10.16, p = 0.006] and the 2-way interaction of Sex x Group (F(1,16) = 5.686, p = 0.030) was significant.
SIRT1 is a target of miR-199 and 214
As miRNAs can regulate the expression of several gene targets, we performed bioinformatics analysis to assess the common targets of miR-199 and 214 (Supplemental Table 3). One prominent target we identified was SIRT1 which plays a significant role in cellular processes33. Western blot analysis on the brain lysates showed a significant decrease in SIRT1 expression in the nicotine exposed female rats (3-way interaction of Sex x Group x Sesssion F(1,24) = 7.231, p = 0.013) but not in the males (Fig. 4A,B). The decrease in SIRT1 levels in nicotine self-administering females correlated with increased expression of cleaved caspase 3, a pro-apoptotic protein (3-way interaction of Sex x Group x Sesssion F(1,24) = 17.81, p < 0.001). Cleaved caspase did not differ between the male nicotine self-administration and yoked saline controls. To further elucidate if other brain regions unrelated to drug abuse also show sex-specific difference with SIRT1 expression, we examined the cerebellum and hippocampus. We observed no significant change in SIRT1 expression in both the brain regions with nicotine intake between the two sexes (Supplementary Figs 1 and 2). These data collectively show that down regulation of SIRT1 by nicotine is specific to regions involved in drug seeking and more specifically in female rats. In summary, our current findings demonstrate the co-expressed miRNAs 199 and 214, and their common gene target SIRT1 to be associated with chronic nicotine taking in female, but not male rats.
Discussion
Studies investigating potential sex differences in nicotine dependence have now begun to document evidence that women, despite being less prone to smoking, often show more pronounced measures of withdrawal and are more likely to relapse6,35,36,37,38. Using the rodent IV drug self-administration model that mimics human drug-taking behavior, we allowed male and female rats to self-administer IV nicotine for 22 days. Consistent with our recently published study20, we found that both male and female rats readily self-administered nicotine. In that study, we found that female rats had higher total nicotine intake than males (+1.26 fold), although in that study it did not meet the threshold for statistical significance. In the current report, we observed the same pattern with total intake in the females significantly higher than the males (+1.35 fold). Higher nicotine intake in females is in line with previously published works5,17,39,40,41,42. One possible reason for the higher intake in females could be the stage of estrous, which has been associated with the observed sex differences with drugs of abuse43,44. Previous studies have reported that intact female rats show greater behavioral response to psychostimulants such as cocaine in estrus compared to other stages of the estrous cycle45 or to males46. This observation further draws support from another study which showed females reaching higher breaking points during estrus than during other stages of the estrous cycle on a progressive ratio of cocaine self-administration47.
While there have been reports of some behavioral sex differences associated with chronic nicotine intake, the molecular mechanisms contributing to these observed sex differences remain poorly explained. The goal of the current study was to identify sex-specific miRNA signatures associated with chronic nicotine intake. miRNAs represent a class of noncoding RNAs that critically regulate gene expression by binding to the 3′ UTR of target transcripts, thus blocking their translation. Several studies have documented the role of these miRNAs in a plethora of diseases including maladaptive behavior associated with addiction to drugs of abuse22,23,24. Our current study did identify differentially expressed miRNAs between male and female rats post nicotine self-administration. While the relative expression levels of the significantly regulated miRNAs in males were subtle, females showed more robust changes in expression. The increase in miRNA expression may be a result of the elevated nicotine intake in the females, including the role of estrous as noted above, compared to the males.
Among the differentially regulated miRNAs in nicotine-taking females, we found miR-199 and 214, which are co-expressed on chromosome 1, to be up regulated. Co-expression studies showing the implications of miR-199a and 214 dysregulation have been very limited. Studies have implicated these miRNAs in several types of cancers48,49,50, and their roles have been documented in neural development51,52. Using a self-administration model of drug-intake, this study revealed that miR-199a and 214 may serve as novel markers associated with sex differences in nicotine intake. Post-nicotine exposure, females showed a significant increase in both miR-199a and 214 expression compared to the yoked saline controls. In the males, miR-199a was slightly increased in the nicotine group while miR-214 was decreased, albeit both of these miRNAs did not differ significantly compared to the saline controls. These findings were validated by RT-PCR.
miRNAs play a critical role in regulating gene expression and can target several gene targets. We performed a bioinformatics search that identified SIRT1 as one of the common targets for both miR-199a and 214. Western blot confirmed a significant reduction in SIRT1 in female rats that self-administered nicotine vs females that were in the saline group, an effect that was not found in the male groups. SIRT1 is a NAD- dependent deacetylase belonging to the class III histone/protein deacetylases and a member of the silent information regulator family that has been shown to play a significant role in several cellular processes in a number of diseases33. miRNAs have been shown to regulate the expression of SIRT1 in different disease models. This includes miR-34a in fatty liver disease53, miR-195a in lipotoxic cardiomyopathy and diabetic retinopathy54, and miR-199a in cardiac myocyte hypoxia55. Specific to drug dependence, previous work has notably shown that SIRT1 is upregulated in the NAc in male mice and rats administered (IP) cocaine, morphine, or heroin34. Although a follow-up study by Ferguson and collegues31,32 revealed that although the total number of SIRT1 binding sites is increased following 7 days of IP cocaine injections, drug administration results in depletion of SIRT1 from genic regions, specifically gene promoters. Divergent results from those studies and the work presented here, are likely a result of the type of drug utilized, the region of the brain examined, the sex and type of animal model employed, and the drug administration paradigm used.
In terms of neurodegenerative disorders, upregulation of miR-142 has been shown to decrease SIRT1 levels in a macaque model of neuroAIDS56,57. A recent study demonstrated that upregulation of miR-199a-5p caused a significant decrease in SIRT1 levels that subsequently led to neuronal loss and apoptosis in a rat model of epilepsy58. The role of SIRT1 in exerting neuroprotection both in vivo and in vitro has been well documented59. In an Alzheimer’s disease model, overexpression of SIRT1 caused reduction in beta amyloid production and toxicity60 as well as prevented neurotoxic tangles by deacetylating the microtubule binding protein tau61. In Huntington’s disease, SIRT1 overexpression ameliorates the neurotoxic effect of the mutant protein HTT while overexpression reverses this effect59. In a rodent model of Parkinson’s disease, overexpression of SIRT1 caused a reduction in alpha synuclein aggregates and increased longevity while knockout mice displayed opposite effects62.
The current study shows that the upregulation of miR-199 and 214 post-nicotine exposure in female rats resulted in a significant decrease in SIRT1 levels, which led to an increase in the expression of the pro-apoptotic protein cleaved caspase 3 in the PFC, but not in the cerebellum and hippocampus. Decreased neuroprotection specifically in the PFC via SIRT1 in females following long-term nicotine administration may play a role in female increased vulnerability to nicotine relapse6,38,63 and heighted sensitiveity to nicotine withdrawal4,17,18,19. Future work including a yoked-nicotine control will allow careful examination of how nicotine reinforcment, compared to passive nicotine intake, may alter expression of miRNAs. Additionally, a study holding nicotine intake constant across sex will allow determination if miRNA expression differences may be a result of differential exposure to nicotine in males and females. Future directions of this work will also include examining the effect of molecular manipulation of SIRT1 in the PFC of female and male rats on nicotine self-administration. Further, studies aimed at dissecting mechanisms associated with the increase in such apoptosis signaling molecules will lend significant insights into understanding the sex-based differences associated with chronic nicotine intake.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Sprague-Dawley rats (14 males; 15 females) were purchased from Harlan Laboratories, Inc. (Indianapolis, IN, USA) at approximately 9 weeks of age (males 275–300 g; females 175–200 g). Rats were individually housed in clear polycarbonate cages (48.3 × 26.7 × 20.3 cm) lined with TEK-Fresh cellulose bedding. Rats were allowed ad libitum access to water in home cages throughout the experiment. Following 3 days of acclimation to the colony room, food was restricted to maintain 90% of a rat’s free-feeding weight. The colony room was temperature and humidity controlled and maintained on a 12 h:12 h light/dark cycle. All experimental procedures were performed during the light cycle. Animal procedures and methods employed were approved by both the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and University of Nebraska Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Apparatus
Experimental procedures were conducted in 10 conditioning chambers (ENV-008CT; Med Associates, Georgia, VT), measuring 30.5 × 24.1 × 21.0 cm, enclosed in sound-attenuating cubicles. Each chamber had a variable-speed syringe pump (PMH-100VS; Med-Associates) located outside the cubicle. Tygon® tubing was threaded from the pump syringe through a leash into the chamber to be attached to the catheter port. A recessed receptacle (5.2 × 5.2 × 3.8 cm) was centered on one sidewall of each chamber. A dipper arm could be raised to provide access to 0.1 ml of 26% (w/v) sucrose in this recessed receptacle. Two retractable levers were located on each side of the receptacle. A white cue-light (2.54 cm diameter; 28 V, 100-mA) was mounted 7 cm above each lever and a house-light (two white 28 V, 100-mA lamps) was located in the cubicle, 10 cm above the chamber ceiling. An infrared emitter/detector unit was located 4 cm above the stainless steel rod floor and 14.5 cm from the side wall containing the receptacle. The number of times this beam was broken provided a measure of chamber activity.
Drugs
(-)-Nicotine hydrogen tartrate, obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), was dissolved in sterile saline and pH adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.2. Nicotine was infused intravenously at 35.74 μl over 1 sec at 0.0073 mg/infusion (i.e., 0.03 mg/kg/infusion given an average weight of 243 g per rat). Nicotine dose is reported as the free base.
Preliminary Lever Training
Following acclimation and food restriction, rats were trained to lever press in our lab’s standard procedure20,64,65. Preliminary lever training sessions were initiated by illumination of the house light and insertion of one of the two levers (randomly selected). A lever press or a lapse of 15 sec resulted in 4-sec access to sucrose, lever retraction, and a timeout (average duration = 60 sec; range = 30–89 sec). After the timeout, one of the two levers was again inserted randomly with the condition that the same lever would not be presented more than twice in a row. These procedures were repeated until all rats received 60 sucrose deliveries. Daily sessions ranged from 65 to 80 min depending on individual performance. Rats received daily sessions until a lever press was made on at least 80% of the lever insertions; all rats learned within 3–5 sessions.
Indwelling Jugular Catheter Surgery and Recovery
Rats were then implanted with indwelling jugular catheters following our lab’s standard procedures20,64,66. Briefly, rats were anesthetized with a 2:1 ketamine HCl (100 mg/kg) + xylazine HCl (20 mg/kg) cocktail (IM) and prepped for surgery. Two small incisions were made below the scapula and the back mount catheter was fit under the skin with the back plate lying flat and the cannula port exiting the more rostral incision. Another small incision was then made above the right jugular vein and the catheter tubing pulled subcutaneously from the back, over the shoulder, to the neck. The vein was then isolated and the catheter tubing fed into the vein and fastened securely. All incisions were then sutured and the rats administered buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg) for pain maintenance (also administered 24 h post-surgery) and atipamezole (0.5 mg/kg) to terminate anesthesia. Rats then recovered for 7 days, during which they remained in their home cages and their catheters were flushed daily with a cocktail of 0.2 ml cefazolin (50 Units/ml) and heparin (30 Units/ml). Patency was checked on the last day of recovery by IV infusion of 0.05 ml xylazine (20 Units/ml). Rats that displayed ataxia (e.g., impaired locomotor function, sedation) within 20 sec were considered patent. Rats that were not patent (1 male; 4 females) were excluded from the study.
Post-Surgery Lever Training
After recovery, rats received training sessions with sucrose available on a variable ratio (VR) 3 schedule; on average every third response was reinforced (range 1–5 presses). This training consisted of 3 daily sessions; during which 1 of the 2 levers was extended into the chamber and then retracted following requisite responding. Requisite responding resulted in 4-sec access to sucrose. After sucrose access, the opposite lever was inserted and functioned as the active lever. This process was repeated until the end of the 1-h session. These procedures produce robust lever responding with each lever having an equivalent learning history65.
Self-Administration
Prior to the self-administration phase of the experiment, female and male rats were separated into two groups creating a total of 4 groups (sample size from post-patency test): nicotine self-administration groups (nic-males, n = 7; nic-females, n = 6) and saline-yoked groups (sal-males, n = 6; sal-females, n = 5). During self-administration sessions (1 h) both levers were inserted to begin the session. Rats in the nicotine self-administration groups received nicotine infusions following responding on 1 of the 2 levers; responding on the other lever was recorded but held no programed consequence (i.e., only pressing on the active lever was reinforced). Assignment of active and inactive lever was counterbalanced for all groups. The schedule of reinforcement in the self-administration phase was again a VR 3. Following the nicotine infusion, a 20-sec timeout was signaled by the house light turning on and extraction of the levers. Levers were again inserted and the house light turned off following the timeout. Rats in the saline-yoked groups were presented with two inactive levers (i.e., responding was recorded but pressing held no programed consequence). Saline-yoked rats received saline infusions and signaled timeouts matched to a nicotine self-administering partner’s response pattern. This procedure produced controls that had equated handling, chamber exposure, time-outs, etc. yet they were void of nicotine exposure. Self-administration sessions were conducted daily for 22 days. Brains were extracted 24 h after the last self-administration session. Individual brain regions were immediately dissected, rapidly frozen, and stored at −80 °C until further use.
Dependent Measures
Active lever pressing, inactive lever pressing, and activity were the dependent measures utilized during the self-administration phase. Nicotine intake controlling for body weight was calculated by the equation: nicotine intake = [(group average weight (g) used to calculate dose/rat’s weight (g) on each self-administration day) * 0.03 mg * infusions earned]. Using this calculation, we were able to keep the dose of nicotine per infusion constant and still properly assess possible differences in total nicotine intake20. Total nicotine intake was calculated by summing nicotine intake on all self-administration sessions.
Total RNA extraction, Quality control, library preparation and small RNA-Seq
Total RNA from the PFC was isolated from individual rats from both sexes and treatment groups using the Direct-Zol RNA kit (Zymo Research, USA) based on the manufacturer’s protocol. Quantitation of extracted total RNA used Nanodrop 1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) and RNA integrity was determined by Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technology, USA). RNA samples were then sent on dry ice to LC Sciences (Houston, TX, USA) for miRNA sequencing. Briefly, total RNAs with a RIN value >7 were selected for library construction. A small RNA library was generated from the sample using the Illumina Truseq™ Small RNA Preparation kit according to Illumina’s TruSeq™ Small RNA Sample Preparation Guide. The purified cDNA library was used for cluster generation on Illumina’s Cluster Station and then sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq platform. Raw sequencing reads (50 nt) were obtained using Illumina’s Sequencing Control Studio software version 2.8 (SCS v2.8) following real-time sequencing image analysis and base-calling by Illumina’s Real-Time Analysis version 1.8.70 (RTA v1.8.70).
After trimming the adaptor sequence from the raw reads, mappable reads with the length ranging from 15 to 32 bases were mapped to miRBase v21 and the rat genome. Reads mapped to rat miRNAs in miRbase were annotated and the number of mapped reads counted for each identified rat miRNA. The raw counts of reads were normalized by the library size parameter of the corresponding sample. The library size parameter is a median value of the ratio between the counts of a specific sample and a pseudo-reference sample. A count number in the pseudo-reference sample is the count geometric mean across all samples and was calculated using the formula
where Sj is the library size parameter; cij is the count number of sequence i of sample j; m is the total number of samples involved.
Quantiative Real Time PCR
TaqMan miRNA and Gene Expression Assays (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used for cDNA synthesis and real time PCR according to manufacturer’s instructions. Small nuclear RNA U6 (U6) was used as a control for miRNA studies and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a control for mRNA studies. Delta-delta Ct method67 was used to calculate fold change (2−((CtmiRNA − CtU6)exp − (CtmiRNA − CtU6)control)) or (2−((CtmRNA − CtGAPDH)exp − (CtmRNA − CtGAPDH)control)). Statistical significance was determined using ΔCt values (CtmiRNA − CtU6) or (CtmRNA − CtGAPDH).
Bioinformatics Analysis
The detailed sequence information of miR-199 and miR-214 was extracted from miRBase (Release 21)68,69. Targets for miR-199 and miR-214-3p were identified using experimentally validated miRNA-target interaction database - miRTarBase (Release 6.0)70,71. TargetScan72,73 was used to predicted additional targets for miR-199-5p and miR-214-3p.
Western blot
Western blot using SDS-PAGE electrophoresis was performed using NuPAGE gel system (Invitrogen) as described in our previous studies74,75. Briefly, 30 µg (SIRT1) and 10 µg (cleaved caspase 3) of PFC brain lysates from all the animals were separated on a 4–12% and 10% Bis-Tris gels respectively under reducing conditions followed by transfer and immunodetection. Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked using Superblock (Thermofisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. Immunoblotting was carried out with antibodies against SIRT1 (1∶1000, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and cleaved caspase-3 (1: 1000, Cell Signaling,Technology, Danvers, MA) followed by secondary antibody (1∶3,000 HRP conjugated anti rabbit IgG for SIRT1 and 1∶3000 HRP conjugated anti rabbit for cleaved caspase-3 respectively (Thermofisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Blots were developed with 1∶1 solution of Super Signal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate and Luminol/Enhancer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA).
Statistical Analyses
Active lever presses, inactive lever presses, and chamber activity were analyzed by separate 3-way mixed measures ANOVAs (Type III Sum of Squares) with Sex (male vs female) and Group (nicotine vs saline) as between-subjects factors and Session (22) as a within-subjects factor. An independent samples t test was used to analyze differences in total nicotine intake between females and males in the nicotine self-administration groups. Least Significant Difference (LSD) tests were utilized for post-hoc analysis. Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05. For miRNA analysis, after normalization, a student t-test was done to identify miRNAs showing significant differences between groups (saline versus nicotine for each of the sex). miRNAs were filtered using False Discovery Rates (FDR) ≤ 5% and p < 0.05 were considered significant. For the western blots, 2-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s multiple comparision test with p < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical tests were performed with GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA, USA); data represented as Mean ± SEM on the graphs.
Data Availability
Most of the data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information file). All datasets generated during and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All Med-PC programs used to control the behavioral equipment are available upon request to RAB at rbevins1@unl.edu.
References
Xu, X., Bishop, E. E., Kennedy, S. M., Simpson, S. A. & Pechacek, T. F. Annual healthcare spending attributable to cigarette smoking: an update. Am J Prev Med 48, 326–333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.10.012 (2015).
Prevention, C. F. D. C. A. In Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 60, 1513–1519 (2011).
Benowitz, N. L. Nicotine addiction. N Engl J Med 362, 2295–2303, https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0809890 (2010).
Perkins, K. A. Sex differences in nicotine reinforcement and reward: influences on the persistence of tobacco smoking. Nebr Symp Motiv 55, 143–169 (2009).
Rezvani, A. H. et al. Neonatal 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the frontal cortex in rats: persisting effects on locomotor activity, learning and nicotine self-administration. Neuroscience 154, 885–897, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.04.020 (2008).
Wetter, D. W. et al. Gender differences in smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol 67, 555–562 (1999).
Perkins, K. A., Donny, E. & Caggiula, A. R. Sex differences in nicotine effects and self-administration: review of human and animal evidence. Nicotine Tob Res 1, 301–315 (1999).
Arnold, A. P. Mouse models for evaluating sex chromosome effects that cause sex differences in non-gonadal tissues. J Neuroendocrinol 21, 377–386, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2826.2009.01831.x (2009).
Beery, A. K. & Zucker, I. Sex bias in neuroscience and biomedical research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35, 565–572, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.07.002 (2011).
Cahill, L. Why sex matters for neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 7, 477–484, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1909 (2006).
Clayton, J. A. & Collins, F. S. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies. Nature 509, 282–283 (2014).
Wetherington, C. L. Sex-gender differences in drug abuse: a shift in the burden of proof? Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 15, 411–417, https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.15.5.411 (2007).
Carroll, M. E. & Anker, J. J. Sex differences and ovarian hormones in animal models of drug dependence. Horm Behav 58, 44–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.10.001 (2010).
Dalla, C. & Shors, T. J. Sex differences in learning processes of classical and operant conditioning. Physiol Behav 97, 229–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.02.035 (2009).
Fish, E. N. The X-files in immunity: sex-based differences predispose immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 8, 737–744, https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2394 (2008).
Nicolson, T. J., Mellor, H. R. & Roberts, R. R. Gender differences in drug toxicity. Trends Pharmacol Sci 31, 108–114, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2009.12.001 (2010).
Donny, E. C. et al. Nicotine self-administration in rats: estrous cycle effects, sex differences and nicotinic receptor binding. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151, 392–405 (2000).
Harrod, S. B. et al. Sex differences and repeated intravenous nicotine: behavioral sensitization and dopamine receptors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 78, 581–592, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2004.04.026 (2004).
O’Dell, L. E. & Torres, O. V. A mechanistic hypothesis of the factors that enhance vulnerability to nicotine use in females. Neuropharmacology 76 Pt B, 566–580, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.055 (2014).
Pittenger, S. T. et al. Sex differences in neurotensin and substance P following nicotine self-administration in rats. Synapse 70, 336–346, https://doi.org/10.1002/syn.21907 (2016).
Yelamanchili, S. V. & Fox, H. S. Defining larger roles for “tiny” RNA molecules: role of miRNAs in neurodegeneration research. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 5, 63–69, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11481-009-9172-4 (2010).
Bali, P. & Kenny, P. J. MicroRNAs and Drug Addiction. Front Genet 4, 43, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2013.00043 (2013).
Im, H. I. & Kenny, P. J. MicroRNAs in neuronal function and dysfunction. Trends Neurosci 35, 325–334, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2012.01.004 (2012).
Kenny, P. J. Epigenetics, microRNA, and addiction. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 16, 335–344 (2014).
Goldstein, R. Z. & Volkow, N. D. Drug addiction and its underlying neurobiological basis: neuroimaging evidence for the involvement of the frontal cortex. Am J Psychiatry 159, 1642–1652, https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1642 (2002).
Grant, S. et al. Activation of memory circuits during cue-elicited cocaine craving. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 12040–12045 (1996).
Volkow, N. D., Fowler, J. S. & Wang, G. J. The addicted human brain: insights from imaging studies. J Clin Invest 111, 1444–1451, https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI18533 (2003).
Fuchs, R. A. et al. The role of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, basolateral amygdala, and dorsal hippocampus in contextual reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 30, 296–309, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300579 (2005).
Kalivas, P. W. & McFarland, K. Brain circuitry and the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 168, 44–56, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-003-1393-2 (2003).
McFarland, K. & Kalivas, P. W. The circuitry mediating cocaine-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. J Neurosci 21, 8655–8663 (2001).
Ferguson, D. et al. Essential role of SIRT1 signaling in the nucleus accumbens in cocaine and morphine action. J Neurosci 33, 16088–16098, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1284-13.2013 (2013).
Ferguson, D. et al. SIRT1-FOXO3a regulate cocaine actions in the nucleus accumbens. J Neurosci 35, 3100–3111, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4012-14.2015 (2015).
Wojcik, M., Mac-Marcjanek, K. & Wozniak, L. A. Physiological and pathophysiological functions of SIRT1. Mini Rev Med Chem 9, 386–394 (2009).
Xia, B. et al. Effect of Sirtuin-1 on Synaptic Plasticity in Nucleus Accumbens in a Rat Model of Heroin Addiction. Med Sci Monit 24, 3789–3803, https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.910550 (2018).
Cepeda-Benito, A., Reynoso, J. T. & Erath, S. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: differences between men and women. J Consult Clin Psychol 72, 712–722, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.72.4.712 (2004).
Peters SAE, H. R. & Woodward, M. Do smoking habits differ between women and men in contemporary Western populations? Evidence from half a million people in the UK Biobank study. BMJ Open 41, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005663 (2014).
Piper, M. E. et al. Gender, race, and education differences in abstinence rates among participants in two randomized smoking cessation trials. Nicotine Tob Res 12, 647–657, https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq067 (2010).
Tunstall, C. D., Ginsberg, D. & Hall, S. M. Quitting smoking. Int J Addict 20, 1089–1112 (1985).
Chaudhri, N. et al. Sex differences in the contribution of nicotine and nonpharmacological stimuli to nicotine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 180, 258–266, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-005-2152-3 (2005).
Li, S. et al. Sex differences in yohimbine-induced increases in the reinforcing efficacy of nicotine in adolescent rats. Addict Biol 19, 156–164, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-1600.2012.00473.x (2014).
Lynch, W. J. Sex and ovarian hormones influence vulnerability and motivation for nicotine during adolescence in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 94, 43–50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2009.07.004 (2009).
Wang, T. et al. Propensity for social interaction predicts nicotine-reinforced behaviors in outbred rats. Genes Brain Behav 13, 202–212, https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12112 (2014).
Hu, M. & Becker, J. B. Acquisition of cocaine self-administration in ovariectomized female rats: effect of estradiol dose or chronic estradiol administration. Drug Alcohol Depend 94, 56–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.10.005 (2008).
Becker, J. B. & Hu, M. Sex differences in drug abuse. Front Neuroendocrinol 29, 36–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2007.07.003 (2008).
Sell, S. L., Dillon, A. M., Cunningham, K. A. & Thomas, M. L. Estrous cycle influence on individual differences in the response to novelty and cocaine in female rats. Behav Brain Res 161, 69–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2005.01.004 (2005).
Walker, Q. D. et al. Sex differences in cocaine-stimulated motor behavior: disparate effects of gonadectomy. Neuropsychopharmacology 25, 118–130, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0893-133X(00)00248-7 (2001).
Roberts, D. C., Bennett, S. A. & Vickers, G. J. The estrous cycle affects cocaine self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 98, 408–411 (1989).
Duan, Q. et al. ER stress negatively modulates the expression of the miR-199a/214 cluster to regulates tumor survival and progression in human hepatocellular cancer. PLoS One 7, e31518, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031518 (2012).
Kuninty, P. R. et al. MicroRNA-199a and-214 as potential therapeutic targets in pancreatic stellate cells in pancreatic tumor. Oncotarget 7, 16396–16408, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.7651 (2016).
Luo, Y. et al. Targeted Inhibition of the miR-199a/214 Cluster by CRISPR Interference Augments the Tumor Tropism of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Neural Stem Cells under Hypoxic Condition. Stem Cells Int 2016, 3598542, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3598542 (2016).
Lee, Y. B. et al. Twist-1 regulates the miR-199a/214 cluster during development. Nucleic Acids Res 37, 123–128, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn920 (2009).
Mellios, N. et al. MeCP2-regulated miRNAs control early human neurogenesis through differential effects on ERK and AKT signaling. Mol Psychiatry, https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.86 (2017).
Lee, J. et al. A pathway involving farnesoid X receptor and small heterodimer partner positively regulates hepatic sirtuin 1 levels via microRNA-34a inhibition. J Biol Chem 285, 12604–12611, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.094524 (2010).
Mortuza, R., Feng, B. & Chakrabarti, S. miR-195 regulates SIRT1-mediated changes in diabetic retinopathy. Diabetologia 57, 1037–1046, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-014-3197-9 (2014).
Rane, S. et al. Downregulation of miR-199a derepresses hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and Sirtuin 1 and recapitulates hypoxia preconditioning in cardiac myocytes. Circ Res 104, 879–886, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.193102 (2009).
Chaudhuri, A. D., Yelamanchili, S. V. & Fox, H. S. MicroRNA-142 reduces monoamine oxidase A expression and activity in neuronal cells by downregulating SIRT1. PLoS One 8, e79579, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079579 (2013).
Chaudhuri, A. D., Yelamanchili, S. V., Marcondes, M. C. & Fox, H. S. Up-regulation of microRNA-142 in simian immunodeficiency virus encephalitis leads to repression of sirtuin1. FASEB J 27, 3720–3729, https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.13-232678 (2013).
Wang, D. et al. Targeting of microRNA-199a-5p protects against pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus and seizure damage via SIRT1-p53 cascade. Epilepsia 57, 706–716, https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.13348 (2016).
Jiang, M. et al. Neuroprotective role of Sirt1 in mammalian models of Huntington’s disease through activation of multiple Sirt1 targets. Nat Med 18, 153–158, https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2558 (2011).
Chen, J. et al. SIRT1 protects against microglia-dependent amyloid-beta toxicity through inhibiting NF-kappaB signaling. J Biol Chem 280, 40364–40374, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M509329200 (2005).
Min, S. W. et al. Acetylation of tau inhibits its degradation and contributes to tauopathy. Neuron 67, 953–966, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2010.08.044 (2010).
Donmez, G. et al. SIRT1 protects against alpha-synuclein aggregation by activating molecular chaperones. J Neurosci 32, 124–132, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3442-11.2012 (2012).
Perkins, K. A. Smoking cessation in women. Special considerations. CNS Drugs 15, 391–411 (2001).
Charntikov, S. et al. Iptakalim attenuates self-administration and acquired goal-tracking behavior controlled by nicotine. Neuropharmacology 75, 138–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.07.019 (2013).
Pittenger, S. T., Barrett, S. T., Chou, S. & Bevins, R. A. The effects of varenicline on methamphetamine self-administration and drug-primed reinstatement in male rats. Behav Brain Res 320, 195–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2016.12.005 (2017).
Reichel, C. M., Murray, J. E., Grant, K. M. & Bevins, R. A. Bupropion attenuates methamphetamine self-administration in adult male rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 100, 54–62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.09.006 (2009).
Harrison, E. B. et al. Induction of miR-155 after Brain Injury Promotes Type 1 Interferon and has a Neuroprotective Effect. Front Mol Neurosci 10, 228, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2017.00228 (2017).
Griffiths-Jones, S., Grocock, R. J., van Dongen, S., Bateman, A. & Enright, A. J. miRBase: microRNA sequences, targets and gene nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 34, D140–144, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj112 (2006).
Kozomara, A. & Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 42, D68–73, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1181 (2014).
Chou, C. H. et al. miRTarBase 2016: updates to the experimentally validated miRNA-target interactions database. Nucleic Acids Res 44, D239–247, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1258 (2016).
Hsu, S. D. et al. miRTarBase: a database curates experimentally validated microRNA-target interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 39, D163–169, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq1107 (2011).
Agarwal, V., Bell, G. W., Nam, J. W. & Bartel, D. P. Predicting effective microRNA target sites in mammalian mRNAs. Elife 4, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05005 (2015).
Lewis, B. P., Burge, C. B. & Bartel, D. P. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 120, 15–20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035 (2005).
Charntikov, S. et al. Ibudilast reverses the decrease in the synaptic signaling protein phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein 1 (PEBP1) produced by chronic methamphetamine intake in rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 152, 15–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.04.012 (2015).
Pendyala, G., Buescher, J. L. & Fox, H. S. Methamphetamine and inflammatory cytokines increase neuronal Na+/K+-ATPase isoform 3: relevance for HIV associated neurocognitive disorders. PLoS One 7, e37604, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037604 (2012).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the State of Nebraska as part of the LB506 Cancer and Smoking grant (GP and RAB) and start up funds provided to SVY. STP was supported by (DA014241) while preparing this manuscript. The funding entity played no role in study design or its conduction. We thank the Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Core at UNMC which receives support from Nebraska Research Initiative (NRI), NIH (5P20GM103427; 5P30CA036727; 2P01AG029531 and 2P30MH062261) and NSF (OIA-1557417) for the bioinformatics analysis performed in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experimental design, data analysis and manuscript preparation by S.T.P., S.V.Y., R.A.B. and G.P. Experiments were performed by S.T.P., V.L.S., D.M., R.S.G. and S.K. All authors revewied the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Pittenger, S.T., Schaal, V.L., Moore, D. et al. MicroRNA cluster miR199a/214 are differentially expressed in female and male rats following nicotine self-administration. Sci Rep 8, 17464 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35747-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35747-z
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Impact of Adolescent Nicotine Exposure in Pre- and Post-natal Oxycodone Exposed Offspring
Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology (2023)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.