Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

High-throughput identification and quantification of bacterial cells in the microbiota based on 16S rRNA sequencing with single-base accuracy using BarBIQ

Abstract

Bacteria often function as a community, called the microbiota, consisting of many different bacterial species. The accurate identification of bacterial types and the simultaneous quantification of the cells of each bacterial type will advance our understanding of microbiota; however, this cannot be performed by conventional 16S rRNA sequencing methods as they only identify and quantify genes, which do not always represent cells. Here, we present a protocol for our developed method, barcoding bacteria for identification and quantification (BarBIQ). In BarBIQ, the 16S rRNA genes of single bacterial cells are amplified and attached to a unique cellular barcode in a droplet. Sequencing the tandemly linked cellular barcodes and 16S rRNA genes from many droplets (representing many cells with unique cellular barcodes) and clustering the sequences using the barcodes determines both the bacterial type for each cell based on 16S rRNA gene and the number of cells for each bacterial type based on the quantity of barcode types sequenced. Single-base accuracy for 16S rRNA sequencing is achieved via the barcodes and by avoiding chimera formation from 16S rRNA genes of different bacteria using droplets. For data processing, an easy-to-use bioinformatic pipeline is available (https://github.com/Shiroguchi-Lab/BarBIQ_Pipeline_V1_2_0). This protocol allows researchers with experience in molecular biology but without bioinformatics experience to perform the process in ~2 weeks. We show the application of BarBIQ in mouse gut microbiota analysis as an example; however, this method is also applicable to other microbiota samples, including those from the mouth and skin, marine environments, soil and plants, as well as those from other terrestrial environments.

Key points

  • This protocol describes barcoding bacteria for identification and quantification, a method for identifying and quantifying bacteria in microbiota samples.

  • Barcoding bacteria for identification and quantification uses a barcoding and single-step droplet-based amplification strategy that enables it to more precisely determine bacterial species than conventional 16S rRNA sequencing methods do.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The BarBIQ workflow. BarBIQ identifies and quantifies bacterial cells in microbiota samples based on droplet-based barcoding and amplification of 16S rRNA genes from single bacterial cells.
Fig. 2: Typical result of the gel purification procedure.
Fig. 3: Typical result of the quality check of libraries in Step 98.
Fig. 4: Typical result of the quality check of spike-in control mixture in Step 163.
Fig. 5: Results of BarBIQ for a mock community and murine cecal microbiota.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The sequencing data generated using the protocol in the relevant study are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive under accessions PRJNA639639, PRJNA639647, PRJNA780331, and PRJNA780361. A demonstration dataset is available at github (https://github.com/Shiroguchi-Lab/BarBIQ_Pipeline_V1_2_0).

Code availability

The pipeline (v1.2.0) for BarBIQ is available at GitHub (https://github.com/Shiroguchi-Lab/BarBIQ_Pipeline_V1_2_0).

References

  1. Zmora, N., Suez, J. & Elinav, E. You are what you eat: diet, health and the gut microbiota. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16, 35–56 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamont, R. J., Koo, H. & Hajishengallis, G. The oral microbiota: dynamic communities and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 745–759 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Y. E., Fischbach, M. A. & Belkaid, Y. Skin microbiota–host interactions. Nature 553, 427–436 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Trevathan-Tackett, S. M. et al. A horizon scan of priorities for coastal marine microbiome research. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1509–1520 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jansson, J. K. & Hofmockel, K. S. The soil microbiome—from metagenomics to metaphenomics. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 43, 162–168 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T. & Singh, B. K. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 607–621 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Thompson, L. R. et al. A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature 551, 457–463 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin, J. et al. High-throughput identification and quantification of single bacterial cells in the microbiota. Nat. Commun. 13, 863 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Olsen, G. J., Lane, D. J., Giovannoni, S. J., Pace, N. R. & Stahl, D. A. Microbial ecology and evolution: a ribosomal RNA approach. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 40, 337–365 (1986).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pace, N. R., Stahl, D. A., Lane, D. J. & Olsen, G. J. in Advances in Microbial Ecology 1–55 (Springer, 1986).

  11. Mccaig, A. E., Glover, L. A. & Prosser, J. I. Molecular analysis of bacterial community structure and diversity in unimproved and improved upland grass pastures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 1721–1730 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kroes, I., Lepp, P. W. & Relman, D. A. Bacterial diversity within the human subgingival crevice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. Usa. 96, 14547–14552 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Navas-Molina, J. A. et al. Advancing our understanding of the human microbiome using QIIME. Methods Enzymol. 531, 371–444 (2013).

  14. Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. P. Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker-gene data analysis. ISME J. 11, 2639–2643 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kembel, S. W., Wu, M., Eisen, J. A. & Green, J. L. Incorporating 16S gene copy number information improves estimates of microbial diversity and abundance. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002743 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Louca, S., Doebeli, M. & Parfrey, L. W. Correcting for 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in microbiome surveys remains an unsolved problem. Microbiome 6, 41 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Vandeputte, D. et al. Quantitative microbiome profiling links gut community variation to microbial load. Nature 551, 507–511 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Props, R. et al. Absolute quantification of microbial taxon abundances. ISME J. 11, 584–587 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rao, C. et al. Multi-kingdom ecological drivers of microbiota assembly in preterm infants. Nature 591, 633–638 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, N., Warnow, T., Pop, M. & White, B. A perspective on 16S rRNA operational taxonomic unit clustering using sequence similarity. npj Biofilms Microbiomes 2, 16004 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. McDonald, D. et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 6, 610–618 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cole, J. R. et al. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D633–D642 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lan, F., Demaree, B., Ahmed, N. & Abate, A. R. Single-cell genome sequencing at ultra-high-throughput with microfluidic droplet barcoding. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 640–646 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Chijiiwa, R. et al. Single-cell genomics of uncultured bacteria reveals dietary fiber responders in the mouse gut microbiota. Microbiome 8, 1–14 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng, W. et al. High-throughput, single-microbe genomics with strain resolution, applied to a human gut microbiome. Science 376, eabm1483 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lloréns-Rico, V., Simcock, J. A., Huys, G. R. B. & Raes, J. Single-cell approaches in human microbiome research. Cell 185, 2725–2738 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Callahan, B. J. et al. High-throughput amplicon sequencing of the full-length 16S rRNA gene with single-nucleotide resolution. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e103 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kinoshita, Y., Niwa, H., Uchida-Fujii, E. & Nukada, T. Establishment and assessment of an amplicon sequencing method targeting the 16S-ITS-23S rRNA operon for analysis of the equine gut microbiome. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–12 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogawa, T., Kryukov, K., Imanishi, T. & Shiroguchi, K. The efficacy and further functional advantages of random-base molecular barcodes for absolute and digital quantification of nucleic acid molecules. Sci. Rep. 7, 13576 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K. Fukuhara for helping technical development in library preparation and sequencing. This work was supported by JST/PRESTO JPMJPR15F3 (K.S.), the Nakatani Foundation (K.S.), the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI grant numbers 17K19364 (K.S.) and 26115719 (K.S.), and Incentive Research Project from RIKEN (J.J.). J.J. was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Postdoctoral Fellowships for Foreign Researchers in Japan (P17389).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.S. developed the initial version of the library preparation and sequencing system for BarBIQ. J.J. developed the pipeline for BarBIQ and the final version of whole BarBIQ. R.Y. developed some steps of the ecDNA separation and gel purification for BarBIQ. J.J., R.Y. and K.S. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jianshi Jin or Katsuyuki Shiroguchi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

K.S., J.J. and R.Y. are co-inventors on a patent application based on this work filed by RIKEN.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Wataru Suda and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Jin, J. et al. Nat. Commun. 13, 863 (2022): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28426-1

Ogawa, T. et al. Sci. Rep. 7, 13576 (2017): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13529-3

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Methods 1 and 2.

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Information of oligomers and barcodes.

Supplementary Table 2

16S rRNA sequences of bacteria in mock community.

Supplementary Table 3

Quantification of bacteria in mock community.

Supplementary Table 4

16S rRNA sequences of bacteria in cecal samples.

Supplementary Table 5

Quantification of bacteria in cecal samples.

Supplementary Data 1

Example of ‘sample sheet’ for a MiSeq run.

Supplementary Data 2

16S rRNA sequences of cecal samples in fasta format with predicted taxonomies.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, J., Yamamoto, R. & Shiroguchi, K. High-throughput identification and quantification of bacterial cells in the microbiota based on 16S rRNA sequencing with single-base accuracy using BarBIQ. Nat Protoc 19, 207–239 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00906-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-023-00906-8

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing