Central role of Tim17 in mitochondrial presequence protein translocation

The presequence translocase of the mitochondrial inner membrane (TIM23) represents the major route for the import of nuclear-encoded proteins into mitochondria1,2. About 60% of more than 1,000 different mitochondrial proteins are synthesized with amino-terminal targeting signals, termed presequences, which form positively charged amphiphilic α-helices3,4. TIM23 sorts the presequence proteins into the inner membrane or matrix. Various views, including regulatory and coupling functions, have been reported on the essential TIM23 subunit Tim17 (refs. 5–7). Here we mapped the interaction of Tim17 with matrix-targeted and inner membrane-sorted preproteins during translocation in the native membrane environment. We show that Tim17 contains conserved negative charges close to the intermembrane space side of the bilayer, which are essential to initiate presequence protein translocation along a distinct transmembrane cavity of Tim17 for both classes of preproteins. The amphiphilic character of mitochondrial presequences directly matches this Tim17-dependent translocation mechanism. This mechanism permits direct lateral release of transmembrane segments of inner membrane-sorted precursors into the inner membrane.

The presequence translocase of the mitochondrial inner membrane (TIM23) represents the major route for the import of nuclear-encoded proteins into mitochondria 1,2 .About 60% of more than 1,000 different mitochondrial proteins are synthesized with amino-terminal targeting signals, termed presequences, which form positively charged amphiphilic α-helices 3,4 .TIM23 sorts the presequence proteins into the inner membrane or matrix.Various views, including regulatory and coupling functions, have been reported on the essential TIM23 subunit Tim17 (refs.5-7).Here we mapped the interaction of Tim17 with matrix-targeted and inner membrane-sorted preproteins during translocation in the native membrane environment.We show that Tim17 contains conserved negative charges close to the intermembrane space side of the bilayer, which are essential to initiate presequence protein translocation along a distinct transmembrane cavity of Tim17 for both classes of preproteins.The amphiphilic character of mitochondrial presequences directly matches this Tim17dependent translocation mechanism.This mechanism permits direct lateral release of transmembrane segments of inner membrane-sorted precursors into the inner membrane.
Presequence-carrying preproteins imported from the cytosol must first traverse the channel of the translocase of the outer membrane (TOM complex) and are then translocated by the translocase of the mitochondrial inner membrane (TIM23) complex across the hydrophobic lipid bilayer of the inner membrane.Until now, Tim23 was thought to function in membrane translocation in the form of a hydrophilic channel [8][9][10][11][12] .However, the role of the additional homologous essential TIM23 subunit Tim17 in membrane translocation of preproteins has not been clarified 1,2,5,6 .TIM23 subunits crucial for translocation across the inner membrane should be in close vicinity of preprotein segments spanning the core of the membrane.Therefore, we accumulated preproteins in the mitochondrial TOM-TIM23 import site and performed site-specific crosslinking.We used two model preproteins of identical length, both consisting of the N-terminal matrix-targeting signal of cytochrome b 2 and the carboxy-terminal passenger protein dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) (Fig. 1a) 13,14 .The mature domain of the preprotein b 2 (84) +7 -DHFR (named b 2 (84)) contains a transmembrane segment (also called the stop-transfer signal) that is laterally released into the inner membrane.In the preprotein b 2 (110) Δ19 -DHFR (named b 2 (110) Δ ), the stop-transfer signal has been deleted by removing the residues 47-65, and thus, the preprotein is directed into the matrix 15,16 .Upon incubation of the 35 S-labelled preproteins with isolated yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) mitochondria in the presence of the DHFR ligand methotrexate (MTX), the b 2 portion enters the mitochondrial TOM-TIM23 import site.The preprotein is proteolytically processed between residues 31 and 32 by the matrix processing peptidase (MPP), whereas the MTX-stabilized DHFR moiety remains on the cytosolic side of TOM [17][18][19] (Fig. 1b).

Precursor proteins interact with Tim17
We generated a C86S cysteine-free (CF) variant (#) of the mature part of b 2 (110) Δ19 -DHFR # to introduce unique cysteine residues at positions 47-54 of the b 2 (84)-DHFR and b 2 (110) Δ -DHFR # constructs for cysteine-specific crosslinking.These residues mark the start of the transmembrae domain (lateral sorting signal) of the b 2 (84)-DHFR construct and span the inner membrane when the two precursor proteins are arrested at the TOM-TIM23 import site 14 (Fig. 1b).MPP processing of arrested b 2 (84)-DHFR constructs (containing the sorting signal) generates the naturally CF wild-type intermediate (i) form of the precursor.Chemical crosslinking with a short (7.3 Å) cysteine-and amino-reactive crosslinker (m-maleimidobenzoyl-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (MBS)) revealed efficient crosslinking products with a molecular mass of approximately 45 kDa, specific for cysteines introduced at positions 48-54 (Fig. 1c).With the equivalent matrix-destined b 2 (110) Δ -DHFR # protein (lacking the sorting signal), crosslinking products with a molecular mass of approximately 45 kDa were formed for all variants analysed even in the absence of engineered cysteine residues (Extended Data https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06477-8Article Fig. 1a).This result suggests that the protein crosslinked to the arrested mitochondrial precursor protein contains itself a cysteine residue, which can be utilized for crosslinking to b 2 (110) Δ -DHFR # .Therefore, both experiments were repeated with a short homo-bifunctional cysteine crosslinker (bismaleimidoethane (BMOE)).Position-specific crosslinking products of 45 kDa were generated with b 2 (84)-DHFR with cysteines from position 48 to 52 and with b 2 (110) Δ -DHFR # for positions 47-50 (Extended Data Fig. 1b,c).The mass of all these observed crosslinking products corresponds to the MPP processed intermediate (i) forms of the precursor proteins (approximately 28 kDa) and the TIM23 core subunit Tim17 (17 kDa).To determine whether the crosslinks really represent an adduct between the precursor and one of the two central subunits of the TIM23 complex, we generated a yeast strain expressing both Tim17 with a 2xStrep tag (Tim17 2xStrep , approximately 4 kDa molecular mass shift) and Tim23 with a HisSUMOstar tag ( HisS* Tim23, approximately 14 kDa molecular mass shift) 20 (Fig. 1d).Arrest of the precursor proteins in wild-type Tim17 and in Tim17 2xStrep (2xS)/ HisS* Tim23(HS*) mitochondria followed by chemical crosslinking revealed a small specific shift to a higher molecular mass of all crosslinking bands, which corresponds to the increased mass of 2xStrep-tagged Tim17 (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Fig. 1a-c).Together, the efficient Tim17 crosslinking products of b 2 (84)-DHFR and b 2 (110) Δ -DHFR # between positions 47 and 54 demonstrate that Tim17 is in close proximity to both a matrix-targeted as well as a laterally sorted preprotein accumulated in the TOM-TIM23 import sites (Fig. 1b).To determine whether the crosslinking efficiency to Tim17 is correlated with Tim17 activity, we arrested matrix-destined and inner membrane-sorted precursor proteins in temperature-sensitive tim17-mutant mitochondria after heat shock and performed subsequent chemical crosslinking 21 .The strong reduction in the formation of the precursor protein-Tim17 crosslink in tim17-4 and tim17-5 temperature-sensitive mitochondria indicates that crosslinking of precursor protein to Tim17 directly correlates with the activity of Tim17 (Extended Data Fig. 1d).Together, these results indicate that Tim17 is a major interaction partner of mitochondrial precursor proteins translocating the inner membrane.

Tim17 lateral cavity for translocation
In addition to Tim17 and Tim23, the Tim17 protein family also contains Tim22 (ref.22).To further analyse the function of Tim17, we modelled the Tim17 transmembrane structure using the cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of Tim22 from yeast and human as templates.Both models are in good agreement with the AlphaFold prediction of Tim17 (Fig. 1e and Extended Data Fig. 2a) [23][24][25] .However, in contrast to the previous view on mitochondrial protein translocation across the inner membrane, neither the presequence translocase subunits Tim17 and Tim23 nor the carrier translocase (TIM22 complex) subunit Tim22 seem to form channels for precursor protein translocation across or membrane insertion into the inner membrane.The Tim17 and Tim23 models feature four transmembrane domains that form a curved surface, with the lateral cavity opening to the lipid bilayer similar to Tim22 24,25 .To test whether hydrophilic residues within the lateral cavity of Tim17 are crucial for precursor protein translocation, we generated Tim17 N64L (the second transmembrane domain, TM2) and Tim17 S114L (TM4) mutants located on opposing sides of the cavity (Fig. 1e).Compared with wild type, the growth of TIM17 N64L yeast was slightly affected at elevated temperatures (Extended Data Fig. 2b).Isolated Tim17 N64L and Tim17 S114L mutant mitochondria from cells grown at low temperature have protein levels, TIM23 complexes and a membrane potential (Δψ) across the inner membrane comparable with wild-type protein (Fig. 1f and Extended Data Fig. 2c,d).In contrast to normal processing of mitochondrial presequence proteins sorted into the inner membrane and Dic1 assembly (which is dependent on the TIM22 complex/carrier translocase), the Tim17 N64L and Tim17 S114L mutants specifically exhibited strong import defects of radiolabelled presequence proteins destined to the mitochondrial matrix (as assessed by MPP cleavage and formation of the processed intermediate (i) and mature (m) bands) (Fig. 1g and Extended Data Fig. 2e,f).These results indicate that the hydrophilic residues on the matrix side of the lateral cavity of Tim17 are crucial for mitochondrial matrix protein translocation across the inner membrane.

Tim17 and Tim23 interact back to back
During our study, a structural model of the Tim17-Tim23 core complex was generated based on co-evolution analysis, which is consistent with the ColabFold prediction and a preprint of a TIM23 core complex cryo-EM structure (Fig. 2a and Extended Data Fig. 3a,b) 26,27 .Even though this Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer does not form a channel, its interaction interface is consistent with previous studies.TM1 and TM2 of both Tim17 and Tim23 were found to be crucial for the structural integrity/functionality of the Tim17-Tim23 complex, and therefore, both subunits are essential for viability [28][29][30] .To prove that Tim17 and Tim23 interact back to back in the native lipid environment, we generated a semi-cysteine-free (SCF) Tim17 C118G_C120V construct (which only contains two cysteines at positions 10 and 77 required for intramolecular disulfide bond formation) 31,32 .To probe the interaction between Tim17 and Tim23, we introduced specific single-cysteine residues into the SCF Tim17 SCF (Extended Data Fig. 3c).We engineered the Tim17 N16C in close proximity to the natural cysteine 98 of Tim23 located within the first transmembrane domain.On non-reducing SDS gels, a Tim17 N16C -specific conjugate of approximately 40 kDa was detected by antibodies directed against Tim17 and Tim23, which was absent on reducing gels (Extended Data Fig. 3d).These results indicate that a disulfide bond was formed between Tim17 and Tim23 in organello.Subsequently, we treated isolated mitochondria with an oxidant resulting in a very efficient disulfide bond formation between Tim17 and Tim23, providing evidence that the cavities of Tim17 and Tim23 are indeed not facing each other (Fig. 2b).Specific disulfide bond and cysteine crosslink formation between further cysteine pairs in the Tim17 SCF and CF Tim23 CF background further confirmed this back-to-back orientation (Extended Data Fig. 3e,f).To analyse whether the TIM23 complex adopts the same orientation while engaging with a precursor protein, we arrested the recombinant matrix-destined Jac1-sfGFP precursor in Tim17 N16C mitochondria and performed a subsequent oxidation assay 20 .Analysis of the anti-GFP purification eluate by non-reducing SDS-PAGE shows a similar efficiency of disulfide bond formation between Tim17 and Tim23 compared with the TIM23 complex without precursor (Fig. 2c).This indicates that the TIM23 complex engaged with precursor protein also adopts the back-to-back orientation of Tim17 and Tim23.Another possibility would be that two heterodimeric TIM23 complexes associate in a way that a channel-like structure is formed between two lateral cavities facing each other (for example, the Tim17 lateral cavity of the first heterodimer and the Tim23 lateral cavity of the second heterodimer) 20,33,34 .To analyse the oligomeric state of the Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer during precursor translocation, we arrested recombinant Jac1-sfGFP in mitochondria co-expressing both Tim17 WT and Tim17 2xStrep or Tim23 WT and HisSUMOstar Tim23 (Fig. 2d,e, load) 20 .Analysis of the TIM23 complexes purified by Tim17 2xStrep and HisSUMOstar Tim23 reveals a very strong enrichment of the tagged form over the non-tagged form of the same subunit (Fig. 2d,e, first elut.) 20.To specifically analyse the oligomeric state of the precursor protein-carrying TIM23 complex, a subsequent second anti-GFP purification was performed, which enriches the precursor arrested at the TOM-TIM23 supercomplex (Fig. 2d,e, second elut.).Although the ratio of the tagged Tim17 or Tim23 subunits to the non-tagged Fractions were analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunodecoration.Load, 0.25%; first elut., first elution (2.5%); second elut., second elution (100%).

Article
subunits remains similar to the first purification of the translocase, we observe an intense enrichment of Jac1-GFP and of TOM complex subunits in the second purification.This indicates that higher-order Tim17-Tim23 heterodimers are not stably associated, neither in the presence nor absence of engaged precursor.Together, these results and the structural modelling data (Extended Data Fig. 4) support the view that Tim17 and Tim23 do not form stable channel-like structures by direct association of their lateral cavities.

Negative charges of Tim17 are essential
A sequence alignment of Tim17 family proteins indicated the highest conservation of negative charges within the transmembrane domains of Tim17 itself, located on the intermembrane space side of the transmembrane domains within the lateral cavity (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 5a,b).We generated single-point mutants of the three conserved negative charged residues within the transmembrane domains of Tim17 in yeast.Arginine (charge reversal) or phenylalanine (large residue) mutants exhibited a very strong growth phenotype (specifically for D17 and D76; for example, no growth on non-fermentable glycerol medium (YPG)) 27 (Extended Data Fig. 5c and Extended Data Table 1).By contrast, replacement with small residues such as alanine did not cause obvious growth defects.Therefore, we selected the well-tolerated alanine mutants to perform functional assays.Isolated Tim17 D17A and Tim17 D76A mitochondria had protein levels and a TIM23 core complex assembly comparable with wild-type Tim17 (Extended Data Fig. 6a,b).Moreover, the membrane potential supported assembly of the metabolite carrier protein Dic1 comparable with wild-type protein (Extended Data Fig. 6c,d).To assess whether the negatively charged residues of Tim17 are crucial for mitochondrial biogenesis, we performed import of presequence-containing proteins.Import of matrix-destined and inner membrane-sorted precursor proteins was slightly affected in the D76A mutants and especially pronounced in the D17A mutant mitochondria (Fig. 3b).The passenger domain of the b 2 (220)-DHFR is imported into the mitochondrial intermembrane space (the precursor is processed by MPP, sorted into the inner membrane and subsequently cleaved a second time by the mitochondrial inner membrane protease).Upon import of b 2 (220)-DHFR in the presence of the DHFR ligand MTX, the fully processed precursor accumulates at the TOM complex 14 .This assay confirms that presequence protein import is affected in the Tim17 D76A mutant and even more pronounced in the Tim17 D17A mutant (Fig. 3c).It is tempting to speculate that Tim17 proteins of higher eukaryotes contain two directly adjacent negatively charged residues at positions equivalent to residues 16 and 17 in yeast owing to the crucial role of this negatively charged site for the import of presequence proteins (Extended Data Fig. 5a).
To analyse whether the negative charged residues of Tim17 contact translocating precursor proteins, we generated the cysteine mutants Tim17 D76C and Tim17 E126C (in agreement with Extended Data Fig. 5c and Extended Data Table 1, the Tim17 D17C yeast strain displayed strong growth defects and was, therefore, not further analysed) (Extended Data Fig. 6e).
Cysteine-specific crosslinking of arrested matrix-destined precursor proteins confirmed that they are translocated in the immediate vicinity of the conserved negatively charged residues of Tim17 (Extended Data Fig. 6f).All three Tim17 D17, D76 and E126 double alanine mutants did not grow on non-fermentable medium (Extended Data Table 1).A Tim17 D17A_D76A_E126A triple mutant was not viable, indicating that the conserved negative charges within the lateral cavity of Tim17 together are essential for presequence protein translocation across the inner membrane (Extended Data Table 1).By contrast, Tim23 mutants lacking the negative charges within the transmembrane and adjacent segments grow similar to wild type (Extended Data Fig. 6g).Moreover, the Tim17 D17A_D76A_E126A triple mutant could be rescued neither by introducing analogous charges into the lateral cavity of Tim23 nor by introducing equivalent negative charges into Tim17 placed approximately two or three turns closer toward the middle of the bilayer (Extended Data Fig. 6h,i).Tim17 mutants with additional negative charges within the lateral cavity were also not viable (Extended Data Fig. 6i).

Tim17 translocation initiation site
To analyse severe Tim17 mutants, we placed the chromosomal copy of TIM17 under the control of the galactose promotor (pGAL-TIM17) and expressed the TIM17 alleles of interest from an essential plasmid on non-fermentable glycerol medium (YPG) (Extended Data Fig. 7a,b).Growth of these strains on YPG agar plates was strongly affected for the Tim17 D76A_E126A mutant and even more pronounced for the Tim17 D17A_D76A and Tim17 D17A_E126A mutants (Fig. 4a).The initial growth of the Tim17 D17A_D76A_E126A triple mutant was comparable with the empty vector control, confirming that the conserved negative transmembrane charges are essential for viability.We selected the Tim17 D17A_D76A mutant for further analysis because the previous results indicated that those two residues are the most critical residues and because the Tim17 D17A_D76A protein was more stable compared with the other mutant variants.
To isolate mitochondria at permissive conditions, a time point was selected at which the growth of the Tim17 WT , the Tim17 D17A_D76A mutant and the empty vector control strains was comparable with each other (Extended Data Fig. 7c).We isolated mitochondria of the Tim17 D17A_D76A strain and of Tim17 WT* with similar protein levels of Tim17, further TIM23 subunits and TIM23 complexes (Fig. 4b and Extended Data Fig. 7d-f).
The membrane potential of the Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria and their ability to assemble the TIM22-dependent carrier protein Aac2 were not affected compared with wild-type mitochondria (Extended Data Fig. 7g,h).Import of presequence-containing precursor proteins in Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria was strongly diminished compared with wild-type mitochondria, no matter if matrix-destined or inner membrane-sorted precursors were analysed (Fig. 4c and Extended Data Fig. 7i).These results were confirmed by analysing the import and assembly of presequence-containing precursor protein-DHFR fusion constructs in the presence of MTX.The formation of the TOM-TIM23 supercomplex by arrest of b 2 (167) Δ -DHFR 18 and the formation of the TOM-b 2 (220)-DHFR were strongly reduced in the Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria (Fig. 4d,e).These results unambiguously demonstrate that the negative charges within the lateral transmembrane cavity of Tim17 are crucial for the translocation of the precursor protein across the inner membrane.

Translocation path for preproteins
Our b 2 -DHFR precursor crosslinking assays indicated that the arrested precursor proteins are specifically crosslinked to Tim17 transmembrane domain (Fig. 1c and Extended Data Fig. 1).However, an exact mapping of the position of the crosslinks to Tim17 was not possible using this in organello assay.To perform a position-specific crosslinking of mitochondrial presequence precursor proteins with Tim17 transmembrane portions, we inserted single cysteines along the lateral cavities in Tim17 SCF and Tim23 CF backgrounds (Fig. 5a and Extended Data Fig. 8a).Arrest of matrix-and inner membrane-sorted precursor proteins followed by cysteine-specific crosslinking revealed a similar crosslinking pattern with Tim17 K36C and Tim17 N64C (Fig. 5b,c and Extended Data Fig. 8b), whereas no comparable crosslinks were observed with cysteines located within the lateral cavity of Tim23 (Extended Data Fig. 8c-e).To test whether the presequence precursor proteins can also be crosslinked within the lateral Tim17 cavity in the absence of the inner membrane potential, we incubated the precursor proteins in the presence and absence of a membrane potential followed by cysteine-specific crosslinking.The membrane potential-dependent crosslink formation (Extended Data Fig. 8f) indicated that presequence-containing precursor proteins cross the inner membrane in a membrane potential-dependent manner at the lateral cavity of the Tim17 membrane domain.This analysis was confirmed by a cysteine-bispecific crosslinking approach after arresting the matrixand inner membrane-destined precursors with single-cysteine residues in the sorting signal (used in Fig. 1 and Extended Data Fig. 1) in the mitochondria with single cysteines along the lateral cavities of Tim17 SCF or Tim23 CF (used in Fig. 5b,c and Extended Data Fig. 8b-f).This analysis demonstrated a gradual change of the site-specific crosslinking efficiencies, which depend on the localization of the specific cysteines within the precursor protein and within the Tim17 lateral cavity.Although arrested b 2 -DHFR precursor protein constructs with cysteines at positions 47 and 49 mainly formed crosslinks with Tim17 K36C and Tim17 N64C , precursors with cysteines at position 51 or 54 were additionally crosslinked to Tim17 D76C (Fig. 5d and Extended Data Fig. 8g,h).This analysis confirms that arrested precursor proteins are associated along the lateral cavity of Tim17 from D76 (one of the conserved negative charges of Tim17 located on the intermembrane space side within the lateral cavity in TM2) over N64 (hydrophilic residue within the lateral cavity crucial for matrix translocation (Fig. 1e-g and Extended Data Fig. 2) in the middle of Tim17-TM2) to K36 (a residue at

Article
the matrix side of the lateral cavity located in Tim17-TM1).Together, our results support the view that the translocation path across the inner membrane through the Tim17 cavity starts at the conserved negatively charged patch close to the intermembrane space side and continues through the cavity along the extended TM1 of Tim17 to reach the mitochondrial matrix.

Mitochondrial presequence translocation
Based on our results, we propose that mitochondrial presequences are translocated across the inner membrane at the Tim17 bilayer interface.However, the prevailing doctrine based on numerous publications from different groups was the assumption that the Tim17 protein family members Tim23 and Tim22 are the core subunits of the presequence and carrier translocases, which form hydrophilic channels for precursor protein translocation across and/or for membrane insertion into the inner mitochondrial membrane [8][9][10][11][12][35][36][37] . To suport this assumption, over the years several sophisticated methods were used, which accumulated data in support of the Tim23 channel model (for example, refs.11,38).It cannot be disputed that the major Tim17 family proteins Tim17, Tim22 and Tim23 all form assemblies with channel-like properties.Martinez-Caballero et al. 39 performed patch clamping of TIM23 from reconstituted inner membranes and observed two equal-sized 'pores', which show cooperative gating behaviour.Depletion of Tim17 induced a collapse of the twin pores into a single pore 39 .Therefore, we speculate that the narrow lateral transmembrane cavities of Tim17 and Tim23 (presequence translocase) and Tim22 (carrier translocase) all show channel-like properties in electrophysiological experiments, which led to the current models of mitochondrial inner membrane translocation and insertion through hydrophilic channels 1,2,5-7 .To reflect on the translocation mechanism across the inner membrane, we consider the properties of mitochondrial presequences.(1) Presequences can form an amphiphilic helix and perturb the phospholipid bilayer 40 .
(2) Amphiphilicity is essential for mitochondrial presequence function 41 .(3) Interaction of the precursor (that is, presequence) with a lipid bilayer may represent a key aspect of protein import into mitochondria 42 .These properties are not required for translocation through an aqueous channel.The amphiphilic character of mitochondrial presequences rather directly matches a Tim17-dependent translocation mechanism at the bilayer interface.As a secondary consequence, the properties of the presequence receptor Tom20 (hydrophobic groove lined with a negatively charged residue 43 ) and of the protein-conducting β-barrel channel Tom40 (hydrophobic and negatively charged patches within the aqueous channel 44 ) of the TOM complex evolved to recognize and translocate the positively charged amphiphilic presequences across TOM.The intermembrane space domains of the TIM23 subunits Tim50, Tim23 and Tim21 mediate the recognition and transfer of the presequences to the inner membrane 1,2,5,6 .In addition, two conserved negative charges in the N terminus of Tim17 immediately adjacent to the inner membrane (N-terminal of TM1) were reported to be crucial for the import of presequence proteins 45 .The non-essential TIM23 subunit Mgr2 (implicated in regulation of lateral sorting) is predicted by co-evolution analysis and structural modelling to shield the lateral cavity of Tim17 and to form a protein enclosed environment within the bilayer reminiscent of a channel-like structure but with a hydrophobic interior surface 14,26,46 (Fig. 6a and Extended Data Fig. 9a,b).Modelling of the Tim17-Tim23-Mgr2 heterotrimer including a presequence with ColabFold, generated an assembly where the presequence is specifically associated at the Tim17 lateral cavity 47 (Extended Data Fig. 9c).However, it remains to be determined if Mgr2 really associates with the lateral cavity of Tim17 to shield the translocating precursor protein from the bilayer.Enhanced dissociation from the Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer in the absence of precursor protein could help to preserve the permeability barrier for the maintenance of the mitochondrial membrane potential.Because mitochondrial protein translocation also works in the absence of the non-essential lateral gate keeper subunit Mgr2 (ref.48), we propose the following basic model for the translocation of mitochondrial presequences across the inner membrane (Fig. 6b).
The acidic patch of the lateral transmembrane cavity of Tim17 is located close to the intermembrane space side, positioned to attract the positive charge of the N terminus of the precursor protein.Therefore, we name this acidic patch the Tim17 translocation initiation site (TIS).Concomitantly, the hydrophobic residues of the amphiphilic presequence engage with the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer, which stabilizes the α-helical conformation of the presequence and reinforces the interaction between the presequence and the TIS.On the hydrophilic side, mitochondrial presequences are rich in further positive charged residues, which are frequently three to four positions apart such that they occur at roughly every turn and face the same side of the helix 49 .These subsequent positively charged residues on the hydrophilic side of the α-helical presequence enable insertion of the hydrophobic face into the lipid bilayer in steps of single turns.The negatively charged phospholipid head groups on the intermembrane space side and on the matrix face likely support the translocation.Presequences have a predominant length between 15 and 40 residues and can span the thinned inner membrane at the Tim17 cavity, which was similarly observed for other translocases and insertases 3,27,50 .Precursor proteins with shorter presequences, like the ATP synthase subunit Atp17/ Suf, are compatible with the same mechanism, as they often contain presequence-like features within their mature region adjacent to the presequence.The mitochondrial membrane potential (Δψ) is essential for presequence protein translocation 51,52 .We propose that Δψ is crucial to support the initial extraction of the mitochondrial presequences from the inner membrane such that the essential presequence translocase-associated import motor (PAM) subunit mtHsp70 can bind to the first hydrophobic part of the presequence after it emerges into the matrix.This model of mitochondrial protein translocation across the inner membrane is based on functional defects of tim17 point mutants and site-specific crosslinking along the lateral cavity of Tim17 from the intermembrane space side to the mitochondrial matrix (Fig. 6c).So far, we discussed how the presequence is translocated across the inner membrane and envision three major cases of how the mature part of the precursor is translocated.(1) The mature part of the precursor has presequence-like features, and translocation can proceed as described.(2) The subsequent mature part of the precursor has chemical characteristics of side chains, which are not attracted by the Tim17 lateral cavity.In case the mature part has adopted an α-helical conformation, we envision that the import motor driving force will cause an unfolding of the precursor secondary structure on the intermembrane space side 53,54 .The translocation of the extended chain along the narrow lateral cavity of Tim17 is supported by hydrophilic residues (Fig. 1e-g), and association with Mgr2 might reduce the contact to the bilayer as much as possible.(3) The translocation at the Tim17 bilayer interface enables the lateral release of a subsequent transmembrane domain/stop-transfer signal of inner membrane-sorted proteins likely by dissociation of Mgr2, in agreement with the report that Mgr2 modulates the threshold hydrophobicity for membrane insertion 55 .
Together, we believe that our detailed site-specific interaction studies that map the precursors to the Tim17 lateral cavity and vice versa, the back-to-back conformation of the Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer as a functional unit for precursor translocation, the import defects using tim17 mutants and the additional evidences presented above are sufficient to make the following three major conclusions.(1) Tim17 (and not Tim23) is the major subunit of the presequence translocase directly involved in translocation of presequence proteins across the inner membrane.
(2) Mitochondrial presequence proteins can be imported across the inner membrane at the Tim17 bilayer interface.The negatively charged patch on the intermembrane space side of the lateral transmembrane cavity of Tim17 acts as a TIS to import the presequences along the cavity across the inner membrane.(3) We propose that the essential Tim22 core subunit of the carrier translocase, required for the biogenesis of mitochondrial metabolite carrier proteins, operates by using a similar membrane insertion mechanism at the Tim22 bilayer interface.

Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06477-8. .The hydrophobic residues of the amphiphilic presequence engage with the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer, which stabilizes the α-helical conformation of the presequence and reinforces the interaction between the presequence and the TIS (2).Successive positively charged residues on the hydrophilic side of the α-helical presequence enable insertion of the hydrophobic face into the lipid bilayer in steps of single turns (3 and 4).The negatively charged phospholipid head groups on the matrix face of the inner membrane attract the positively charged amino terminus (5).The membrane potential (Δψ) and following positive residues support the emergence of the presequence on the matrix side ( 6) and engagement with the mitochondrial presequence translocase-associated motor, which aids the remaining steps of import into the matrix (7).c, Summary of the findings of the current study depicted onto the ColabFold structural model of the interaction between Tim17 (tan) and Tim23 (grey).Red, residues of the Tim17 TIS; orange, hydrophilic residues; dark red, residues crosslinked to arrested precursor protein intermediates.
performed on a ClarioStar microplate reader (BMG LabTech), and data were collected for up to 90 h.Amino acid substitutions of Tim17 or Tim23 were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using the centromeric plasmid pFL39 containing the native promoter, terminator and wild-type open reading frame of S. cerevisiae TIM17 or TIM23 (Supplementary Table 2) as a template for PCR amplification with primers encoding the desired mutation(s) (Supplementary Table 3) using KOD high-fidelity polymerase (Novagen).The plasmid template was digested (37 °C, 3 h) with DpnI (NEB), and the PCR products were subsequently transformed into competent XL-1 Blue Escherichia coli cells.Single colonies were selected, and plasmids were prepared using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen) and verified by sequencing.
For Gibson cloning, individual DNA fragments were generated by PCR using KOD Hot Start DNA Polymerase.The resulting PCR products were incubated with DpnI (NEB) at 37 °C for 1-3 h to remove template DNA.The PCR products were purified with the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and subsequently ligated using Gibson Assembly Master Mix (NEB) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Introduction of individual cysteines in b 2 (84)-DHFR and b 2 (110) ∆ -DHFR was done by single-primer site-directed mutagenesis.Plasmids pGEM4Z-b 2 (84)-DHFR and pGEM4Z-b 2 (110) ∆ -DHFR were used as templates for single-primer PCR reactions with Q5 polymerase master mix (NEB) and primers encoding the mutations (Supplementary Table 3).After the PCR reaction, matching reverse and forward PCRs were mixed, denatured and slowly annealed to receive double-stranded products containing the desired mutation.After 2 h of DpnI (NEB) digestion at 37 °C, the reactions were transformed into competent MachT1 E. coli cells.Single colonies were picked and inoculated in ampicillin-or carbenicillin-containing LB medium, and the plasmids were isolated using the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen).Positive plasmids were identified by sequencing.

Protein expression and purification
Recombinantly expressed Jac1-sfGFP was purified as described by Gomkale et al. 20 with modifications.In brief, plasmids (a gift from the Rehling group) containing the gene for overexpression of 14His-SUMO-Jac1-sfGFP were transformed into competent Rosetta (BL21 DE3) cells and cultured overnight (37 °C, 180 rpm) before dilution to an OD 600 of 0.1.Expression was induced when cells reached an OD 600 of 0.6 by addition of 1 mM IPTG at 37 °C and 180 rpm.After 4 h, cells were collected by centrifugation (2,500g, 15 min).Purification was performed on an ÄKTA pure system (Cytiva).Cells were resuspended in buffer A (40 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole), lysed by sonication and centrifuged (16,000g, 20 min), and the filtered supernatant was applied to a HisTrap HP column (Cytiva) pre-equilibrated with buffer A. Elution was performed using a linear gradient of buffer B (40 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, 500 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole).Protein-containing fractions were analysed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie brilliant blue staining.Relevant fractions were pooled and dialysed overnight at 4 °C against buffer A2 (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl).Removal of the 14His-SUMO* tag utilized for purification was achieved by overnight incubation with His-tagged SUMO protease (20 U mg −1 protein in the presence of 1 mM DTT) at 4 °C.To remove uncleaved 14His-SUMO-Jac1-sfGFP, His-tagged SUMO protease and 14His-SUMO* tag, the mixture was applied to the HisTrap HP column again using buffer A2 for equilibration and buffer B for regeneration of the column.Flow-through fractions were collected, and the protein content was analysed by SDS-PAGE and staining with Coomassie brilliant blue.Protein concentration was determined, and purified protein was snap frozen in aliquots and stored at −20 °C.

Mitochondrial protein import and formation of the TOM-TIM23 supercomplex
Radiolabelled mitochondrial precursor proteins were generated using a TNT SP6 Coupled Reticulocyte Lysate System (Promega) with plasmid DNA, according to the manufacturer's instructions.In vitro translation was performed with plasmids carrying the gene of interest downstream of the SP6 promoter as a template in the presence of [ 35 S]methionine.For synthesis of radiolabelled Cox5a-sfGFP and Dic1, the open reading frame fused to the SP6 promoter sequence was amplified by PCR.mRNA transcripts were produced using the mMESSAGE mMACHINE transcription kit (Promega) and purified with the MEGAclear transcription cleanup kit (Thermo Fisher).mRNA transcripts were used for in vitro translation in the presence of [ 35 S]methionine using the TNT SP6 Coupled Reticulocyte Lysate System or the Flexi Rabbit Reticulocyte Lysate System (Promega).
Isolated mitochondria were incubated with radiolabelled or recombinant precursor proteins in import buffer (3% (wt/vol) fatty acid free bovine serum albumin, 10 mM MOPS/KOH, pH 7.2, 250 mM sucrose, 80 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl 2 , 5 mM methionine, 2 mM KH 2 PO 4 ) containing 4 mM ATP (Roche), 4 mM NADH (Roth), 2 mM creatine phosphate (Roche) and 2 mM creatine kinase (Roche).To deplete the membrane potential (−Δψ), AVO mix (8 µM antimycin A (Sigma), 1 µM valinomycin (Sigma) and 20 µM oligomycin (Sigma)) was added, whereas NADH was excluded; 6-10% (vol/vol) of rabbit reticulocyte lysate was added, and import reactions were incubated at 25 °C and 300 rpm for the indicated time periods.Import was stopped by adding AVO and placing samples on ice.Where indicated, samples were treated with proteinase K (50 µg ml −1 ) for 10 min on ice followed by the addition of 2 mM PMSF for 5-10 min on ice to inhibit protease activity.Translocation arrest of precursor proteins was achieved by folding and stabilization of the DHFR domain with 5 µM MTX 18,59 .Mitochondria were isolated (20,000g, 5 min), washed in cold SEM buffer and analysed by either BN or denaturing gel electrophoresis.
The formation of an import intermediate by stable arrest at the TOM-TIM23 supercomplex was performed as previously described 14,20,21 .Radiolabelled Cox5a(1-130)-sfGFP and DHFR-containing precursor protein fusions b 2 (167) ∆19 -DHFR, b 2 (220)-DHFR, b 2 (84) +7 -DHFR and b 2 (110) ∆19 -DHFR_C86S (b 2 (110) ∆19 -DHFR # ) or cysteine-containing variants (C47 to C54) were initially incubated for 5-10 min at 25 °C in BSA-containing import buffer (as described above) supplemented when required with 5 µM MTX to permit folding of the DHFR domain.For certain experiments, AVO mix was additionally added to the reaction.For import of recombinantly expressed Jac1-sfGFP, purified protein was diluted to a concentration of 40 µM in 20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.4, and 100 mM NaCl and added to import reactions to a final concentration of 2.5 µM.Subsequently, mitochondria were added, and the import reactions were incubated for 30 min at 25 °C (300 rpm).Protein import reactions were stopped by addition of AVO mix, and mitochondria were isolated by centrifugation (20,000g, 5 min, 4 °C).If mitochondria were subsequently used for crosslinking or affinity purification, the individual reactions were layered over an S 500 EM (10 mM MOPS/KOH, pH 7.2, 500 mM sucrose, 1 mM EDTA) cushion (equal to or double the total import reaction volume) followed by centrifugation (20,000g, 15 min, 4 °C).The resulting mitochondrial pellets were additionally washed with SEM buffer to remove residual radiolabelled protein lysate (20,000g, 5 min, 4 °C).
Heat shock of Tim17 temperature-sensitive mutants was performed as previously described 21 .Wild-type Tim17, 17-4, 17-5 and Tim17 2xStrep -HisSUMO* Tim23 mitochondria were incubated in import buffer (lacking NADH, ATP, CP and CK) at 37 °C for 10 min.Heat-shocked mitochondria were directly added to complete import buffer, and import was performed at 25 °C and 300 rpm.

In vitro oxidation of mitochondria
Mitochondria were incubated in 100 µl of SEM buffer supplemented with 2 mM PMSF and 1× protease inhibitor (EDTA free; Roche) and treated with 0.2 mM 4-DPS for 10 min on ice.Oxidation reactions were stopped by the addition of 50 mM iodoacetamide and 10 mM EDTA and incubated on ice for 10 min.Mitochondria were isolated by centrifugation (20,000g, 10 min, 4 °C), resuspended in reducing (containing 50 mM DTT) or non-reducing Laemmli buffer and analysed by SDS-PAGE followed by western blotting.

In organello crosslinking
Following formation of an arrested import intermediate at TOM-TIM23 import sites, washed mitochondrial pellets were resuspended in fresh SEM buffer, aliquoted and supplemented with DMSO (no crosslinker control), DMSO-solubilized MBS (Thermo Fisher; 1 mM final concentration) or BMOE (Thermo Fisher; 1 mM final concentration) for 30 min on ice.The reactions were quenched by the addition of quencher (SEM buffer supplemented with 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, and 100 mM iodoacetamide) at a 1:1 ratio for MBS crosslinking or iodoacetamide (resuspended in distilled water) to a final concentration of 50 mM for BMOE crosslinking approaches.Next, the quenched samples were centrifuged (20,000g, 15 min, 4 °C) and washed again with fresh SEM buffer (20,000g, 5 min, 4 °C).The washed mitochondrial protein pellets were resuspended in 2× Laemmli buffer supplemented with 2 mM PMSF at a ratio of 2 µg protein per 1 µl and denatured at 65 °C (1,400 rpm, 15 min).The resulting samples were loaded onto 10% Tris-Tricine SDS-PAGE gels (total amount per lane: 70-100 µg mitochondrial protein) and run at 120 V and 30 mA (per gel) for 14.5-16 h.Proteins were semi-dry blotted onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane, or protein-containing gels were dried.Membranes and gels were exposed to Phosphoimager screens and analysed by autoradiography.
Radiolabelled Cox5a-sfGFP-containing crosslinked products and oxidized Jac1-sfGFP-containing import intermediates were purified using GFP nanobody magnetic agarose.Mitochondria were solubilized in GFP solubilization buffer containing 1% (wt/vol) digitonin end over end for 30 min at 4 °C.Clarified lysate was added to equilibrated GFP agarose and incubated end over end for 1 h at 4 °C.GFP agarose was washed (three times), and bound proteins were eluted in 0.2 M glycine, pH 2.5.Eluates were neutralized with 1 M Tris-Cl, pH 9.4, combined with Laemmli buffer containing 2 mM PMSF and analysed by SDS-PAGE.

Mitochondrial membrane potential assessment
Mitochondrial membrane potential was assessed by fluorescence quenching.Isolated mitochondria were incubated in potential buffer (0.6 M sorbitol, 0.1% (wt/vol) BSA, 10 mM MgCl 2 , 0.5 mM EDTA, 16 mM K 2 HPO 4 , 4 mM KH 2 PO 4 , pH 7.4) supplemented with 5 mM L-malate, 5 mM succinate and 2 µM 3,3′-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide (Invitrogen).Absorption was measured on a Aminco Bowman II luminescence spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Corporation) at an excitation wavelength of 622 nm and emission wavelength of 670 nm until an equilibrium was reached, followed by the addition of 1 µM valinomycin to dissipate the membrane potential.

Multiple sequence alignment of Tim17 family proteins
Multiple sequence alignment was performed using TMcoffee 60 .N-and C-terminal regions as well as the loop between TM1 and TM2 (denoted by dots in the sequence alignment between TM1 and TM2 in Extended Data Fig. 5a) were removed for simplification of the alignment figure.Location of transmembrane domain was assigned according to the cryo-EM structure of Tim22 (ref.25) (Protein Data Bank (PDB) ID 6LO8) and following TMcoffee sequence alignment of S. cerevisiae Tim17 with Tim22.

TIM23 complex modelling
SWISS-MODEL was used to model the full-length Tim17 monomer structure.The published structures of S. cerevisiae and Homo sapiens Tim22 (PDB ID 6LO8 and PDB ID 7CGP) were used as model templates, and the resulting predicted structure was exported into UCSF Chi-meraX (v.1.6.1) 61for figure generation.Structural prediction of the Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer and heterotetramer as well as the interaction between further subunits of the TIM23 complex (Tim17-Tim23-Mgr2 and Tim17-Tim23-Mgr2-Pam17-Tim21-Tim50) was performed with ColabFold 47 .For these protein complex predictions, non-membrane predicted unstructured and partially disordered regions were excluded from modelling.Therefore, sequences used for modelling were as follows: Tim17 (∆143-158); Tim23 (∆1-90); Mgr2 (∆1-11 and ∆86-113); Pam17 (∆1-47); Tim21 (Δ1-60 and Δ219-239); and Tim50 (∆1-101 and ∆177-476).For structural prediction including cytochrome b 2 presequence, residues 1-40 were used.The highest ranked model was selected for analysis and figure generation.For the Tim17-Tim23 heterotetramer, the second-highest ranked model was additionally selected for comparison as it showed a different arrangement of the modelled subunits.Where relevant, residues were modified using the mutagenesis function in PyMOL (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, v.2.4; Schrödinger LLC), and the disulfide bond between Tim17 N16C and Tim23 C98 formed.Predicted local distance difference test, predicted template modelling and interface predicted template modelling scores as well as predicted aligned error (PAE) plots were obtained from ColabFold predictions.PAE plots were visualized with PAE viewer 62 .

Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.Extended Data Fig. 2 | Hydrophilic residues within the lateral Tim17 cavity are crucial for matrix translocation.a, Tim17 (S. cerevisiae) modelled on the Tim22 (S.c.) structure (top; PDB ID 6LO8) and Tim22 (H.sapiens) structure (middle; PDB ID 7CGP).Dashed lines indicate the transmembrane (TM) segments of Tim17 (orange, asparagine 64 (N64), and serine (S114) residues).Predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT) score together with predicted aligned error plot (PAE) as well as surface representation of Tim17 as seen from the intermembrane space of the Tim17 AlphaFold model depicted in Fig. 1e (bottom).IMS, intermembrane space.b, Growth analysis of yeast strains expressing WT, Tim17 N64L or Tim17 S114L variants on agar with fermentable (dextrose/glucose, YPD) and non-fermentable (glycerol, YPG) medium at the indicated temperatures.c, Protein amounts of WT, Tim17 N64L and Tim17 S114L mitochondria isolated from yeast cells grown on non-fermentable media (YPG) at 23 °C, analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunodecoration against the indicated antibodies.d, Membrane potential assessment of isolated WT, Tim17 N64L and Tim17 S114L mitochondria (from yeast cells grown in YPG at 23 °C).The membrane potential was assessed by fluorescence quenching using the potential sensitive dye 3,3'-dipropylthiadicarbocyanine iodide and subsequently dissipated by addition of valinomycin.e, Import of radiolabelled metabolite carrier protein dicarboxylate carrier 1 (Dic1) into isolated WT, Tim17 N64L and Tim17 S114L mitochondria, followed by blue native PAGE and autoradiography.Δψ, membrane potential; DIC1 (2) , assembled Dic (oligomer) .f, Import of radiolabelled b 2 (167)-DHFR and cytochrome c 1 into isolated WT, Tim17 N64L and Tim17 S114L mitochondria followed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.Predicted TMDs were assigned following sequence alignment of S. c. Tim17 with S. c. Tim22 and according to the cyro-EM structure of Tim22 (6LO8) 25 .Grey boxes, predicted transmembrane (TM) domains; Red, highly conserved negatively charged residues within predicted TM domains; Arrowheads, negatively charged residues analysed in this study.b, Tim17 and Tim23 amino acid sequence conservation mapped onto the surface of the ColabFold predicted Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer (upper panel).Space filling model of the Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer with the conserved negatively charged acidic patch formed by D17, D76 and E126 indicated (lower panel).c, Growth analysis of WT and tim17 mutants in tim17Δ background related to Extended Data Table 1.Yeast strains expressing WT or the indicated tim17 mutant variant were grown on non-fermentable (glycerol, YPG) or fermentable (dextrose/glucose, YPD) agar medium at the indicated temperatures.

Extended Data
Extended Data Fig. 6 | See next page for caption.
Extended Data Fig. 6 | Tim17 D17A and Tim17 D76A mitochondria have no obvious secondary defects and introduction of equivalent negative charges into Tim23 or lower parts of the lateral cavity of Tim17.a, Protein amounts of WT, Tim17 D17A , Tim17 D76A and Tim17 E126A mitochondria isolated from yeast cells grown in YPG at 23 °C, followed by SDS-PAGE and immunodecoration with the indicated antibodies.b, Protein complexes of isolated Tim17 WT and mutant yeast mitochondria analysed by BN-PAGE and immunodecoration with the indicated antibodies.TIM23, presequence translocase of the inner membrane; TOM, translocase of the outer mitochondrial membrane.c, Assessment of the mitochondrial membrane potential of isolated mitochondria as described in Extended Data Fig. 2d.d, Import of radiolabelled metabolite carrier protein Dic1 into isolated WT and tim17 mutant mitochondria, followed by BN-PAGE and autoradiography.e, Growth analysis of tim17 tim23 mutant yeast strains expressing Tim17 SCF +Tim23 CF or Tim17 D17C +Tim23 CF on agar media containing galactose (YPGal) and glycerol (YPG) at 23 °C.f, Import of 35 S-labelled b 2 (110) ∆19 -DHFR # into Tim17 WT or cysteine mutant mitochondria in the presence of MTX followed by chemical crosslinking (MBS; XL), SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.g, ColabFold structural protein complex model of S. c. Tim17 (tan) and Tim23 (grey) heterodimer with the location of the negatively charged residues (red) within the transmembrane domains and adjacent segments of Tim23 (upper panel).Growth analysis of tim23 mutant yeast strains expressing Tim23 WT or negative charge mutant variants as for Extended Data Fig. 2b (lower panel).AAA, Tim23 D95A D96A D167A.h, i, ColabFold structural protein complex model as for g with the location of residues equivalent to Tim17 D17, D76 and E126 that were introduced into the transmembrane regions of Tim23 (h) or locations with equivalent charged residues, located lower within the lateral cavity of Tim17, were introduced (i) (red; upper panels).Growth phenotypes of tim17 tim23 mutant yeast strains in the tim17∆tim23∆ background (h) or tim17 mutants in the tim17∆ and tim17∆, Tim17 D17A_D76A_E126A background (i) on 5-FOA medium at 23 °C (lower panel).

Extended Data Fig. 7 | See next page for caption.
Extended Data Fig. 7 | Yeast expressing Tim17 D17A_D76A and analysis of Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria.a, Graphical depiction of the approach to generate Tim17 mutants by placing chromosomal TIM17 under the control of the galactose promotor (pGAL-TIM17) in a TOM22 deletion background.This strain was transformed with single copy pFL(TRP) plasmids, encoding WT TOM22 and the desired TIM17 alleles.After elimination of the pYEP(URA)-TOM22 cover plasmid by 5-Fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) treatment, the pFL plasmid is maintained, as the yeast cells require the TOM22 gene for viability.pGal, galactose inducible promoter; TRP, tryptophan; URA, uracil; Mut., tim17 mutant.b, Analysis of Tim17 WT protein depletion by shifting the pGAL-TIM17 WT strain from galactose to fermentable glycerol medium for 21 h.Protein levels in yeast whole cell extracts (WCE) were analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunodecoration.c, Growth analysis of tom22Δ, pGal-TIM17 WT + pFL39-TOM22 yeast strains expressing Tim17 WT (blue), Tim17 D17A_D76A (red) or no Tim17/'empty' (yellow) in glycerolcontaining media at 25 °C.Arrow indicates the time before the growth of the strain expressing Tim17 D17A_D76A is affected compared to the WT strain.d, Protein amounts of WT* and Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria isolated from yeast cells shifted to non-fermentable media (YPG) at 23 °C, analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunodecoration against the indicated antibodies.WT*, WT strain with Tim17 protein levels comparable to Tim17 D17A_D76A mutant e, Protein complexes of isolated Tim17 WT and Tim17 D17A_D76A mutant yeast mitochondria were analysed by BN-PAGE and immunodecoration.III 2 IV, III 2 IV 2 , respiratory chain supercomplexes.f, TIM23 complex isolation from digitonin-solubilised Tim17 WT + Tim21 ProtA or Tim17 D17A_D76A + Tim21 ProtA mitochondria.Bound protein complexes were analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunodecoration with the indicated antibodies.ProtA, Protein A; Load, 1%; Eluate 100%.g, Mitochondrial membrane potential of WT and Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria isolated from yeast cells grown in non-fermentable glycerol medium.Assessment of the membrane potential of isolated mitochondria as described in Extended Data Fig. 2d.h, Import of radiolabelled metabolite carrier ADP/ATP carrier (Aac2) into isolated WT and Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria followed by BN-PAGE and autoradiography.AAC (2) , assembled ADP/ATP carrier (oligomer) .i, Import of radiolabelled pSu9-DHFR (top) and F 1 β (Atp2, bottom) into WT and Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria isolated as described in Extended Data Fig. 2f.Extended Data Fig. 9 | TIM23 complex modelling.a, ColabFold structural protein complex prediction of the interaction between S. c. Tim17, Tim23 and Mgr2 as depicted in Fig. 6a (left) and displayed 'cut-open' with hydrophilic and hydrophobic residues mapped onto the protein surface (middle and right).b, ColabFold structural prediction of the complex formed by S. c. Tim17 (tan), Tim23 (grey), Mgr2 (blue), Pam17 (salmon), Tim21 (green) and Tim50 (pink) with associated pLDDT scores and PAE plots.The TIM23 subunits with transmembrane segments Mgr2, Pam17, Tim21 and Tim50 are all predicted to associate at the Tim17 side of the Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer.Compared to the high confidence prediction that Mgr2 can directly associate to the Tim17 lateral cavity; all the other subunits have lower confidence predictions and are more peripheral compared to Mgr2.c, ColabFold structural protein complex prediction of the heterotrimer formed by S. c. Tim17 (tan), Tim23 (grey), Mgr2 (blue) and residues 1-40 of cytochrome b 2 (pb 2 ) including the presequence with associated pLDDT scores and PAE plots.Dotted lines, putative interactions between Tim17 D17 and D76 and indicated positively charged residues of pb 2 ; red, Tim17 TIS residues.

Fig. 4 |
Fig. 4 | Tim17-dependent presequence translocation is initiated at the negative charged patch.a, Growth analysis of yeast strains expressing wildtype or tim17 variants with the indicated double or triple negative charge mutation on non-fermentable glycerol (YPG) medium at 19 °C.b, Mitochondrial protein complexes were analysed by BN-PAGE as described in Fig. 1f.WT*, mitochondria isolated from tom22Δ, pGal-TIM17 WT + pFL39-TOM22 yeast cells with levels of Tim17 comparable with Tim17 D17A_D76A mutant mitochondria.c, Protein import into wild-type and Tim17 D17A_D76A mitochondria was analysed as described for Fig. 3c.d, Radiolabelled b 2 (167) Δ -DHFR was imported and accumulated in import sites of isolated mitochondria in the presence of MTX as indicated.Samples were analysed by BN-PAGE and autoradiography.TOM-TIM, TOM-TIM23 preprotein stabilized supercomplex.e, Accumulation of radiolabelled b 2 (220)-DHFR in TOM-TIM23 import sites of isolated mitochondria as in Fig. 3c, followed by treatment with proteinase (Prot.)K.

Fig. 6 |
Fig. 6 | Model for mitochondrial presequence translocation across the inner mitochondrial membrane.a, Structural protein complex model of the interaction between Tim17 (tan), Mgr2 (blue) and Tim23 (grey) generated by ColabFold, shown as cartoon (left) and surface (right) representations.b, The Tim17 TIS composed of the acidic patch of the lateral transmembrane cavity of Tim17 is positioned close to the intermembrane space side and attracts the positive charge of the N terminus of the precursor protein (1).The hydrophobic residues of the amphiphilic presequence engage with the outer leaflet of the lipid bilayer, which stabilizes the α-helical conformation of the presequence and reinforces the interaction between the presequence and the TIS (2).Successive positively charged residues on the hydrophilic side of the α-helical

Fig. 3 |
See next page for caption.Extended Data Fig. 3 | Analysis of the Tim17-Tim23 back-to-back interaction with lateral cavities on opposing sides of the heterodimer.a, Predicted Local Distance Difference Test (pLDDT) score plotted onto the Tim23 AlphaFold model (AF-P32897) alongside the associated predicted aligned error plot (PAE).b, Tim17-Tim23 heterodimer modelled by ColabFold.pLDDT score (upper), predicted aligned error (PAE, middle) and surface structure hydrophobicity (lower) plots.c, Growth analysis of yeast strains expressing WT or Tim17 cysteine mutant variants in the semi-cysteine-free background (SCF) as described for Extended Data Fig. 2b.d, Analysis of mitochondria isolated from yeast strains expressing WT, semi-cysteine-free Tim17 (SCF) and Tim17 cysteine variants by non-reducing (Non-red.)and reducing (Red.)SDS-PAGE and immunodecoration with the indicated antibodies.Tim17, Tim17 monomer; Extended Data Fig. 4 | Structural modelling of Tim17-Tim23 heterotetramers.a,b, Representative ColabFold structural protein complex models of Tim17 (a/b: tan/orange) and Tim23 (a/b: grey/dark grey) within putative weakly predicted heterotetrameric arrangements with associated pLDDT scores, PAE plots, predicted TM score (pTM) and interface pTM (ipTM) scores.These two distinct models predicted by ColabFold represent those with the highest ranking.Extended Data Fig. 5 | Sequence alignment of Tim17 protein family with conserved negative charges within the TMDs and growth phenotype of corresponding tim17 mutants.a, Sequence alignment of Tim17 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Neurospora crassa, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melongaster, Danio rerio, Homo sapiens, Mus musculus and Arabidopsis thaliana (paralog 1) generated by TMcoffee 60 .