Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Change and choice: research and evidence-informed policy

Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals depends on population health in all countries. Implementation research is crucial for generating evidence on how to sustainably embed effective clinical interventions in health systems and local delivery mechanisms, thereby improving their likelihood of success, and informing policy change to improve population health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: An overview of implementation research.

References

  1. Peters, D. H., Tran, N. T. & Adam, T. Implementation Reseach in Health: A Practical Guide. (World Health Organization, 2013).

  2. Jager, K. J. et al. A single number for advocacy and communication-worldwide more than 850 million individuals have kidney diseases. Kidney Int 96, 1048–1050 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gopichandran, V. et al. Developing the ethics of implementation research in health. Implement Sci 11, 161 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauer, M. S., Damschroder, L., Hagedorn, H., Smith, J. & Kilbourne, A. M. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist. BMC Psychol 3, 32 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brownson, R. C., Chriqui, J. F. & Stamatakis, K. A. Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am J Public Health 99, 1576–1583 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wensing, M. & Grol, R. Knowledge translation in health: how implementation science could contribute more. BMC Med 17, 88 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Luyckx, V. A., Reis, A., Maher, D. & Vahedi, M. Highlighting the ethics of implementation research. Lancet Glob Health 7, e1170–e1171 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Weijer, C. et al. The Ottawa Statement on the Ethical Design and Conduct of Cluster Randomized Trials. PLoS Med 9, e1001346 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hemming, K., Haines, T. P., Chilton, P. J., Girling, A. J. & Lilford, R. J. The stepped wedge cluster randomised trial: rationale, design, analysis, and reporting. BMJ 350, h391 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Macklin, R. Ethical Challenges in Implementation Research. Public Health Ethics 7, 86–93 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivekanand Jha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

V.J. has grant funding from GlaxoSmithKline, Baxter Healthcare and Biocon, and receives honoraria from NephroPlus and Zydus Cadilla under the policy that all honoraria are paid to the affiliated academic organization. D.A. declares no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jha, V., Adu, D. Change and choice: research and evidence-informed policy. Nat Rev Nephrol 17, 9–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00361-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-00361-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing