The concept of energy security is multifaceted, and can cover a number of seemingly distinct energy- and climate-related risks. Now, research shows that public opinion about energy security reflects the geographic variation in these risks, such that cross-country differences in public concern are explained by national energy context and indicators.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Sovacool, B. K. (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Energy Security (Routledge, London, 2010).
Dyer, H. & Trombetta, M. J. (eds) The International Handbook of Energy Security (Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, 2013).
Greene, D. L. & Ahmad, S. Costs of U.S. Oil Dependence: 2005 Update (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2005).
Demski, C. et al. Nat. Energy https://doi.org/s41565-018-0235-8 (2018).
Sovacool, B. K. & Mukherjee, I. Energy 36, 5343–5355 (2011).
Sovacool, B. K. et al. Environ. Sci. Policy 16, 44–64 (2012).
Sovacool, B. K. Ecol. Econ. 88, 148–158 (2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sovacool, B.K. National context drives concerns. Nat Energy 3, 820–821 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0246-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0246-5
