Abstract
Esophageal cancer (ESCA) is the seventh most frequent and deadly neoplasm. Due to the lack of early diagnosis and high invasion/metastasis, the prognosis of ESCA remains very poor. Herein, we identify skin-related signatures as the most deficient signatures in invasive ESCA, which are regulated by the transcription factor ZNF750. Of note, we find that TRIM29 level strongly correlated with the expression of many genes in the skin-related signatures, including ZNF750. TRIM29 is significantly down-regulated due to hypermethylation of its promoter in both ESCA and precancerous lesions compared to normal tissues. Low TRIM29 expression and high methylation levels of its promoter are associated with malignant progression and poor clinical outcomes in ESCA patients. Functionally, TRIM29 overexpression markedly hinders proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial–mesenchymal transition of esophageal cancer cells, whereas opposing results are observed when TRIM29 is silenced in vitro. In addition, TRIM29 inhibits metastasis in vivo. Mechanistically, TRIM29 downregulation suppresses the expression of the tumor suppressor ZNF750 by activating the STAT3 signaling pathway. Overall, our study demonstrates that TRIM29 expression and its promoter methylation status could be potential early diagnostic and prognostic markers. It highlights the role of the TRIM29-ZNF750 signaling axis in modulating tumorigenesis and metastasis of esophageal cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
ESCA is a frequently diagnosed malignancy of gastrointestinal cancer, with an estimated more than 600,000 new cases and 540,000 deaths worldwide in 2020 [1]. In China, about 246,000 new cases were diagnosed as ESCA, and about 188,000 people died of the disease in 2015 [2]. ESCA is a type of epithelial cancer and originates from lesions of esophageal mucosa [3], which is composed of squamous cells similar to those of the skin. It has two main subtypes: ~10% are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and ~90% are esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) [4]. In most cases, ESCC patients are diagnosed in advanced stages due to the absence of early clinical symptoms. Moreover, advanced ESCC often accompanies with invasion and distant metastasis, leading to a high mortality rate of ESCC patients, with a 5-year survival rate of 12% [5,6,7]. Through large-scale sequencing of ESCC, many genomic and epigenomic abnormalities have been identified, such as abnormal expression and mutations of oncogenes and tumor suppressors, and changes in DNA methylation [4, 8,9,10]. However, further research is still required to pinpoint the mechanisms behind ESCC tumorigenesis and progression, especially for metastasis. It would then be possible to identify novel biomarkers for diagnostic/prognostic purposes, as well as effective therapeutic targets, which could be beneficial for treating esophageal cancer.
ZNF750 (Zinc Finger Protein 750) is a novel zinc-finger transcription factor and regulates skin homeostasis by finely driving epidermal differentiation [11,12,13]. ZNF750 was often mutated and underexpressed in ESCA [9, 14, 15], which might give selective advantages to ESCA cells and promote the progress of ESCA [16]. Moreover, it was also reported as a potential predictor of survival of patients with ESCA [17, 18]. ZNF750 deficiency significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis in ESCC [17], and ZNF750 could hinder invasion through binding and inhibiting SNAI1, a factor crucial for epithelial-mesenchymal transition, in ESCA patients [19]. However, the underlying mechanism of ZNF750 deficiency in ESCA remains unclear.
TRIM29 mediates diverse physiological and pathological processes, including cell differentiation, immunity, and cancer [20,21,22,23,24]. However, its role in different cancers is elusive. TRIM29 has been shown to have oncogenic effects in pancreatic, lung, endometrial, bladder, gastric, and colorectal cancers [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. For example, it promoted the proliferation of lung cancer cells [26] and the invasion of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells, colorectal cancer, and bladder cancer [27, 30,31,32]. In contrast, TRIM29 could suppress tumorigenesis in other cancer types. For example, its expression was lower in prostate cancers than in normal tissues [33], and it was often silenced and inhibited the invasive behavior in breast cancers and squamous cell carcinoma [34, 35]. Thus, TRIM29 has a complex role depending on the type of cancer and the microenvironment, and its role in ESCA remains unclear.
This study examined the expression, clinical significance, and biological functions of TRIM29 in esophageal cancer. We found that TRIM29 expression was frequently down-regulated, induced by promoter hypermethylation in esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions. In addition, TRIM29 deficiency correlated with aggressive phenotype and poor prognosis in esophageal cancer. TRIM29 hindered the proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, and EMT of esophageal cancer. Furthermore, we elaborated on the possible mechanism that TRIM29 induces the expression of ZNF750 via modulating the activation of STAT3. These findings uncover a novel mechanism of progression and metastasis of ESCC mediated by the TRIM29-STAT3-ZNF750-Snail axis, and also suggest that TRIM29 expression and the methylation status of its promoter may serve as early diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for ESCC.
Results
TRIM29 expression highly correlates with ZNF750 expression and the invasive phenotype of esophageal cancer
In order to explore the critical molecular changes associated with the invasive transition of esophageal cancer, GSE21293, an ESCC dataset containing 23 noninvasive and 12 invasive ESCC samples, was used for comprehensive analysis. Through the gene differential expression analysis of invasive vs. noninvasive samples, 286 significantly upregulated genes and 417 significantly down-regulated genes were identified in invasive tumors (Fig. 1A). Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed that the down-regulated genes were mostly enriched in skin-related signatures, including epidermis development, skin development, epidermal cell differentiation, keratinocyte differentiation, and keratinization (Fig. 1B and Table S1). Deficiency in these genes often leads to invasion and metastasis [36]. Among these genes, ZNF750 deficiency in invasive samples was particularly noticeable (Fig. 1C). ZNF750 is a zinc-finger transcription factor essential for epidermal differentiation and could regulate the expression of a variety of keratin proteins [11,12,13]. Moreover, ZNF750 functions as a tumor suppressor through inhibiting the proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of ESCC. Its mutation and downregulation are one of the most frequent molecular abnormalities in esophageal cancer [9, 14, 19, 37]. These results suggested that ZNF750 plays key roles in inhibiting invasion and metastasis of esophageal cancer.
To identify genes that might regulate ZNF750 expression in esophageal cancer, Spearman’s correlation analysis between ZNF750 expression and all other genes was conducted in TCGA ESCA (Table S2). Of the top 20 genes whose expression most correlated with ZNF750 expression in esophageal cancer, 10 were epidermal differentiation and keratinization-related genes, such as LYPD3, KRT6A, KRT16, and IVL (Fig. 1E and Table S2). Of note, TRIM29, whose expression was also significantly reduced in invasive ESCC (Fig. 1D), also had a strong positive correlation with ZNF750 expression (R = 0.8507, p = 0, Fig. 1E). Moreover, TRIM29 expression positively correlated with expression of KLF4, TINCR, SPRR1B, IVL, HOPX, FLG, LCE3A, LCE3D, and SPRR1A (Fig. 1G), which have previously been reported to be positively regulated by ZNF750 [11, 37, 38]. And, TRIM29 expression negatively correlated with SNAI1 expression (Fig. 1G), which has previously been reported to be negatively regulated by ZNF750 [19]. These results were also validated in GSE21293 (Fig. 1F, H) (CALML3-AS1 and LCE3A were unavailable in GSE21293). Therefore, we hypothesized that TRIM29 might positively regulate the expression of ZNF750 and mediate its inhibitory function in invasion and metastasis of esophageal cancer.
TRIM29 expression is frequently downregulated in esophageal cancer
Analysis through the GTEx portal showed that both TRIM29 and ZNF750 were expressed at a much higher level in skin, esophagus mucosa, and vagina than in other human tissues (Fig. S1A, B). In addition, TRIM29 and ZNF750 expression positively correlated in normal skin and esophagus mucosa tissues (Fig. S1C–E). The results indicated that TRIM29 plays key roles in the development of esophagus mucosa. Therefore, abnormalities in TRIM29 are likely to contribute to ESCA progression. Comparisons of TRIM29 mRNA levels between tumor and normal tissues in TCGA showed that TRIM29 expression was significantly higher in multiple tumor types compared to the adjacent non-tumor tissues, including CESC, COAD, LUSC, OV, PAAD, READ, STAD, THCA, and THYM, while significantly lower in some other types of tumors, including ESCA, BRCA, KICH, PRAD, SKCM, and TGCT (Fig. 2A). Furthermore, the TRIM29 mRNA levels in multiple cancer types were also analyzed through the Oncomine platform. Among the 20 assigned cancer types compared with normal tissues, under the criteria of a fold‑change of 1.5 and p-value of 0.05, TRIM29 mRNA levels were downregulated in 22 datasets with eight different types of cancer, including three datasets of esophageal cancer (Fig. 2B).
We then examined the TRIM29 mRNA expression in 18 ESCA datasets from GEO and Arrayexpress. The results showed that TRIM29 expression in precancerous lesions of ESCA, including Barrett’s esophagus (BE) and dysplasia, was significantly lower than in matched adjacent/normal esophageal epithelial tissues (Fig. 2C–H). Concordant with the results of TCGA and Oncomine, TRIM29 mRNA expression was also much lower in the ESCA tissues, including EAC and ESCC, compared with adjacent/normal tissues in all these datasets (Fig. 2F–T). Consistently, TRIM29 protein levels in ESCC samples were significantly lower than in paired normal esophageal tissues, according to the analysis of a protein dataset “Liu2021” (Fig. 2U). Through western blotting analysis of 4 pairs of ESCC and matched adjacent tissues, we also confirmed that TRIM29 levels were downregulated in cancerous tissues (Fig. 2V). In addition, no TRIM29 mutation was identified in ESCA after analyzing whole-exome sequencing data of TCGA ESCA through the cBioPortal webtool (Fig. S2).
Taken together, these results demonstrate that TRIM29 is downregulated in ESCA and its precursor lesions, highlighting that TRIM29 deficiency is a marker of early-stage esophageal cancer and may contribute to the tumorigenesis of ESCA.
TRIM29 deficiency is associated with worse clinicopathological features and prognosis in ESCA
We then analyzed the relationship between TRIM29 expression levels and clinicopathological characteristics in multiple ESCA datasets, including five mRNA datasets (TCGA ESCA, GSE37200, GSE37201, GSE47404, and GSE19417) and a protein dataset (Liu2021). Low TRIM29 mRNA levels were associated with advanced T stage, N stage, M stage, pathologic stage, and histologic grade in TCGA ESCA (Fig. 3A-E), which was confirmed in GSE37200 and GSE37201 datasets (Fig. 3K, L). Analysis through TNMplot (https://tnmplot.com/analysis/) showed that TRIM29 mRNA level was significantly lower in metastatic ESCA samples than in primary tumors (Fig. 3J). And TRIM29 protein levels decreased in advanced N stage ESCA in Liu2021 dataset (Fig. 3P). TRIM29 mRNA level was significantly lower in ESCA with columnar metaplasia, columnar mucosa, and reflux history compared to their respective controls (Fig. 3F–H). Furthermore, it negatively correlated with the number of lymph nodes in TCGA ESCA (Fig. 3I). In addition, we found that both mRNA and protein levels of TRIM29 were impaired in poorly differentiated ESCA samples through analysis from GSE19417, GSE47404, and Liu2021 datasets (Fig. 3M–O).
Then, the prognostic value of TRIM29 expression in ESCA was also evaluated. As shown in plots using the Kaplan–Meier Plotter analysis, TRIM29 deficiency was associated with reduced OS (overall survival) (p = 0.066), DSS (Disease-specific survival) (p = 0.047), DFI (Disease-free interval) (p = 0.077), and PFI (progression-free interval) (p = 0.033) in TCGA ESCA (Fig. 3Q–T). Consistently, analysis from GSE53622 and GSE53624 also indicated a close association of lower TRIM29 mRNA levels with reduced OS in ESCC patients (p = 0.063, p = 0.001, respectively; Fig. 3U, V). Moreover, a trend towards decreased OS and DFS (disease-free survival) in patients expressing low protein levels of TRIM29 was also observed in Liu2021 dataset (p = 0.042; p = 0.073, respectively; Fig. 3W, X).
These results suggest that TRIM29 expression may serve as a prognostic and predictive marker for patients with ESCA.
TRIM29 deficiency is due to its promoter hypermethylation in ESCA
Subsequently, we investigated the possible causes and mechanisms that lead to TRIM29 deficiency in ESCA. Gene expression is often negatively regulated by DNA methylation of its promoter, which is defined as −2 kb to +2 kb relative to TSS (transcription start site). Methylation alterations of 12 CpG loci in TRIM29 promoter, including cg11466837, cg00437969, cg13907859, cg24593464, cg24611264, cg09977361, cg17436370, cg13625403, cg13285004, cg17971587, cg12201660, and cg20655548, were analyzed in DNA methylation array of TCGA ESCA. Among these CpG loci, the methylation levels of 8 loci, including cg11466837, cg00437969, cg13907859, cg13625403, cg13285004, cg17971587, cg12201660, and cg20655548, negatively correlated with TRIM29 mRNA expression (Figs. 4A and S3), and the average methylation levels of all 12 CpG sites in TRIM29 promoter region were also negatively correlated with TRIM29 mRNA levels significantly in TCGA ESCA (R = −0.52, p < 0.001, Fig. 4B). In addition, the average methylation levels of CpG loci in TRIM29 promoter also negatively correlated with its mRNA expression in esophageal cancer cells of CCLE (Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia; R = −0.36, p = 0.088, Fig. 4C).
The average methylation levels of all 12 CpG sites in TRIM29 promoter region were also analyzed in four DNA methylation datasets of ESCA, including GSE26784, GSE52826, GSE81334, and GSE104707. It showed that the methylation levels of TRIM29 promoter in esophageal cancer, including ESCC and EAC, were significantly higher than in normal tissues (Fig. 4D–G). In addition, its methylation levels in cancer-adjacent tissues and Barrett’s esophagus were also significantly higher than in normal tissues (Fig. 4D–G). These results indicated that TRIM29 promoter was hypermethylated in the early stage of ESCA, leading to TRIM29 deficiency.
To validate our findings in bioinformatic analysis, the expression and methylation levels of TRIM29 promoter in four cell lines (one normal esophageal cell line HEEC, and three ESCC cell lines KYSE30, KYSE410, and KYSE450) were analyzed. The genomic analysis of TRIM29 through the UCSC genome browser shows that there is a CpG island located in the first exon of TRIM29 (Fig. 4H). Bisulfite sequencing was applied to examine the methylation levels of selected CpG sites in this region. The results showed that hypermethylated KYSE30 cells had a low, while hypomethylated HEEC, KYSE410, and KYSE450 cells had a high endogenous protein and mRNA level of TRIM29 (Fig. 4I–K). It is noteworthy that the methylation level of TRIM29 promoter was negatively associated with TRIM29 expression levels (Fig. 4I–K). Treatment with 5-aza, a strong DNA demethylation inducer, upregulated the protein level of TRIM29 in KYSE30 cells significantly, confirming the negative regulation of TRIM29 expression by DNA methylation (Fig. 4L).
Furthermore, the high methylation level of several sites in TRIM29 promoter was associated with poor prognosis in TCGA ESCA (Fig. S4). Especially, high methylation levels of cg00437969 and cg20655548 were associated with shorter OS (Fig. S4A&B, p = 0.024 and p = 0.038, respectively) and DSS (Fig. S4C, D, p = 0.041 and p = 0.041, respectively) of patients with ESCA.
These results suggest hypermethylation of TRIM29 promoter contributes to TRIM29 deficiency in ESCA and precancerous lesions, suggesting it might be an early marker in the pathogenesis of ESCA.
TRIM29 deficiency promotes ESCC cell proliferation
As more than 90% of ESCA cases are ESCC, we next explore the function of TRIM29 in ESCC. Firstly, HALLMARKs associated with TRIM29 expression were investigated by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) in two datasets, including GSE21293 and TCGA ESCC (ESCC samples of TCGA ESCA). The common HALLMARKs significantly associated with TRIM29 expression in both datasets were used for further analysis (FDR q-value < 0.25). Only one HALLMARK, “Peroxisome”, was positively associated with TRIM29 expression, while fifteen HALLMARKs, such as “Epithelial-mesenchymal transition”, “Angiogenesis”, “IL6-Jak-STAT3 signaling”, “G2-M checkpoint”, and “Mitotic spindle”, were negatively associated with TRIM29 expression (Table S3).
Among the HALLMARKs negatively correlated with TRIM29 expression, two cellular signaling pathways were those implicated in cell cycle and proliferation, including “G2-M checkpoint” and “Mitotic spindle” (Fig. 5A–D). “G2-M checkpoint” and “Mitotic spindle” are both important events in mitosis, many genes included in these two HALLMARKs are highly expressed during mitosis. Through GSEA analysis, we found that in esophageal cancer tissues with low TRIM29 expression, many genes of these two HALLMARKs were highly expressed, suggesting that these tissues proliferated more vigorously. Furthermore, the expression of PCNA and MKI67 (Ki-67), two markers of mitosis, negatively correlated with TRIM29 at both mRNA and protein levels in TCGA ESCC, GSE21293, and Liu2021 datasets, while the mRNA level of CDKN1A, a cell cycle inhibitory gene, positively correlated with TRIM29 mRNA level in TCGA ESCC and GSE21293 (Fig. 5E–G). All these results indicated high proliferation rates in TRIM29-deficient ESCC.
To further validate these observations, KYSE30 was stably transfected with TRIM29-overexpression lentivirus, while KYSE410 and KYSE450 were transfected with TRIM29-shRNA lentivirus (Fig. 5H). TRIM29 overexpression increased the expression of p21 (CDKN1A), while decreased the level of cyclin D1, which drives cell-cycle progression, in KYSE30. Conversely, TRIM29 knockdown led to the opposite effect in KYSE410 and KYSE450 cells (Fig. 5H).
Functionally, the CCK-8 assays showed that TRIM29 overexpression impeded the proliferation of KYSE30 cells, while TRIM29 knockdown markedly promoted the proliferation of KYSE410 and KYSE450 cells (Fig. 5I–K). Furthermore, cell cycle analysis demonstrated that compared to wildtype KYSE410 and KYSE450, the TRIM29 knockdown cells displayed an accumulation in the G2/M phase, while TRIM29 overexpression in KYSE30 decreased the percentage of G2/M phase cells (Fig. 5L–N). In addition, soft agar colony formation efficiency was significantly inhibited by the overexpression of TRIM29 in KYSE30, while improved considerably by the knockdown of TRIM29 in KYSE410 and KYSE450 (Fig. 5O–Q).
Taken together, these data indicate that TRIM29 acts as a tumor suppressor to inhibit the proliferation of ESCC.
TRIM29 deficiency promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion, and metastasis of ESCC
Low TRIM29 expression was associated with advanced N/M stages and lymph node metastasis (Fig. 3B, C, I, J, and P). Moreover, GSEA analysis showed that “Epithelial-mesenchymal transition” was the most negatively associated signature with TRIM29 levels in both TCGA ESCC and GSE21293 (Fig. 6A, B and Table S3). Thus, we hypothesized that TRIM29 loss could promote invasion and metastasis. To further assess the association of TRIM29 expression with ESCC metastasis, we first tested whether altered expression of TRIM29 was sufficient to change the EMT transcriptional program in ESCC cell lines. There was an increase in the level of E-cadherin, an epithelial marker, but a decrease in mesenchymal markers, specifically vimentin and N-cadherin, in TRIM29-overexpressing KYSE30 compared to control (Fig. 6C). Also, TRIM29 markedly suppressed Snail expression, which is an EMT-inducing transcription factor. Besides, TRIM29 inhibited the expression of MMP9 and MMP2, key proteins involved in stimulating invasion and metastasis. As expected, opposite protein expression profiles were observed in TRIM29-silencing KYSE410 and KYSE450 cells (Fig. 6C). In addition, correlation analysis in TCGA ESCC, GSE21293, and Liu2021 showed that both mRNA and protein levels of TRIM29 positively correlated with CDH1 (E-cadherin), while negatively correlated with CDH2 (N-cadherin), VIM (vimentin), SNAI1 (Snail), MMP2 and MMP9 (Fig. 6D–I; SNAI1 was not available in Liu2021 dataset). These results demonstrated that TRIM29 could inhibit EMT of ESCC cells in vitro, and that its expression negatively correlated with EMT phenotype of ESCC in vivo.
EMT often correlates with increased invasiveness and metastasis in tumors. Wound healing and transwell assays demonstrated that migration and invasion capacity were significantly inhibited after TRIM29 overexpression in KYSE30 cells (Fig. 6J, M), while enhanced after TRIM29 silencing in KYSE410 and KYSE450 (Fig. 6K, L, N, O). To assess the effect of TRIM29 on metastasis of ESCC cells in vivo, the number of metastatic nodules on lung surfaces was counted in mice injected with tumor cells through tail vein. TRIM29 overexpression dramatically impaired the potential of KYSE30 cells to metastasize to lungs (Fig. 6P). Moreover, the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining examination confirmed the reduced lung metastases after TRIM29 overexpression (Fig. 6Q).
Collectively, these results indicate TRIM29 can inhibit EMT, invasion, and metastasis of ESCC both in vitro and in vivo.
TRIM29 induces ZNF750 expression in ESCC
Next, we aimed to identify the underlying molecular mechanism through which TRIM29 loss promotes ESCC progression. According to the analysis in Fig. 1, we hypothesized that TRIM29 might positively regulate the expression of tumor suppressor ZNF750, which inhibits cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of esophageal cancer [14, 16, 17, 19]. We then performed western blotting assays to detect changes in protein level of ZNF750 and its related genes following alterations in TRIM29 expression. It showed that TRIM29 exogenous overexpression stimulated protein expression of ZNF750 in KYSE30 cells, whereas TRIM29 silencing reduced ZNF750 expression in KYSE410 and KYSE450 cells (Fig. 7A). In addition, the expression of KLF4, a downstream protein of ZNF750 [11], showed very similar trends as that of ZNF750 (Fig. 7A). Moreover, we showed that both TRIM29 and ZNF750 inhibited the expression of Snail (Figs. 6C and 7E, respectively), which has been reported to be repressed by ZNF750 in a recent study [19].
ZNF750 is also a pivotal transcription factor for regulating the expression of multiple keratin proteins. Dysregulation of KRT5, a basal keratin marker, has been reported to promote cancer invasion and metastasis [35, 39, 40]. Analysis through JASPAR predicted three binding sites of ZNF750 on the KRT5 promoter (two sites have substantial overlap) (Fig. 7B, C). Analysis from two H2K4ME3 ChIP-sequencing datasets showed that the promoter of KRT5 in ESCC cell lines was active, and analysis from a ZNF750 ChIP-sequencing dataset indicated strong binding of ZNF750 in the promoter region of KRT5 (Fig. 7D). Besides, correlation analysis showed the positive relationship between TRIM29 and ZNF750, TRIM29 and KRT5, ZNF750 and KRT5 at both mRNA and protein levels in TCGA ESCC, GSE21293, and Liu2021 datasets (Fig. 7F–K). In addition, KRT5 expression could be remarkably induced by overexpression of TRIM29 or ZF750 in KYSE30 cells (Fig. 7A, E). Furthermore, pancancer analysis of 33 cancer types in TCGA revealed that TRIM29 expression positively correlated with ZNF750 and KRT5 levels in most cancer types (Fig. 7L). And, ZNF750 expression positively correlated with the KRT5 level in most cancer types (Fig. 7M).
Thus, these results suggest that TRIM29 deficiency leads to downregulation of ZNF750, which then modulates the expression of EMT-related proteins and epidermal differentiation/keratinization-related proteins (such as KRT5), thus promoting invasion and metastasis in ESCC.
TRIM29 regulates tumor progression through inducing ZNF750 expression via inactivating STAT3 signaling
We then sought to gain mechanistic insight into the regulation of ZNF750 by TRIM29. GSEA analysis in both TCGA ESCC and GSE21293 datasets showed that TRIM29 expression negatively correlated with the signature of “HALLMARK IL6-JAK-STAT3 SIGNALING” (Table S3 and Fig. 8A, B), which is often hyperactive in ESCC [41]. TRIM29 has been reported to inhibit cytokine production, such as IL6, and TRIM29 knockdown markedly enhanced the production of these cytokines [20, 21, 42, 43], which could activate STAT3 in multiple tumors, including esophageal cancer [44,45,46,47]. Consistent with this, correlation analysis in esophageal cancer samples showed that TRIM29 expression was negatively correlated with IL6 expression in TCGA ESCC and GSE21293 datasets (Fig. 8C, D). Indeed, STAT3 phosphorylation was dramatically inhibited by TRIM29 overexpression in KYSE30 cells, whereas it increased in TRIM29-silencing KYSE410 and KYSE450 cells (Fig. 8E).
To investigate whether the expression of ZNF750 is regulated by TRIM29 through IL6-STAT3 signaling pathway, cryptotanshinone (a specific p-STAT3 inhibitor) was applied to TRIM29-knockdown KYSE410 and KYSE450 cells. Western blot analysis showed that cryptotanshinone substantially suppressed phosphorylation level of STAT3, and enhanced the expression of ZNF750 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8F). It also significantly upregulated the expression of KRT5 and KLF4, which are the downstream proteins of ZNF750. Furthermore, it inhibited the EMT and expression of MMP2/MMP9 in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 8F). Functionally, cryptotanshinone reversed the pro-motile and pro-invasive effects of TRIM29-knockdown in KYSE410 and KYSE450 cells (Fig. 8G, H). These results indicated that the regulation of ZNF750 expression by TRIM29 in ESCC was mediated through IL6-STAT3 pathway.
Collectively, all these results suggest a model for how TRIM29 acts as a tumor suppressor via modulating ZNF750 expression in ESCC (Fig. 8I).
Discussion
In this study, we assessed the transcriptional regulation of TRIM29 and its role in tumorigenesis and progression of ESCA through extensive bioinformatics analysis and in vitro/vivo experiments. TRIM29 was downregulated in ESCA relative to normal specimens, and the TRIM29 deficiency was associated with malignant clinicopathological characteristics in esophageal cancer, including advanced T/N/M stage, histologic grade, metastasis, and poor survival. Notably, this TRIM29 deficiency was caused by the hypermethylation of its promoter in esophageal cancer. Functionally, its deficiency promoted cell proliferation, EMT, migration, invasion of ESCC cell lines in vitro, and metastasis of esophageal cancer in vivo. Mechanistically, TRIM29 functioned as a positive regulator of tumor suppressor gene ZNF750 via modulating IL6/STAT3 signaling pathway. These results suggest that hypermethylation-induced TRIM29 deficiency is one of the critical factors regulating ESCC tumorigenesis and progression.
Metastasis is one of the top causes of cancer mortality. The 5-year survival rate ranges from 43.6% in ESCC patients without lymph node metastases to 29.3% in patients with it, and the survival rate declined further with larger extent, number, and size of metastatic lymph nodes in ESCC patients [48]. Targeting those cancer cells with high invasion/metastasis potential from the primary site may be a promising field in anti-metastasis treatment. Through an analysis of invasive vs. noninvasive ESCC samples, we explored a number of significantly differentially expressed genes, most of which were related to skin homeostasis. Similar to the skin, esophageal mucosa is composed of squamous cells that are the cellular origin of ESCC. Noteworthy, the expression of these genes is reported to be regulated by ZNF750. In addition, both TRIM29 and ZNF750 are lowly expressed in invasive samples.
ZNF750 could orchestrate the expression of numerous genes as a zinc-finger transcription factor. It plays an essential role in both normal cell biology and tumorigenesis. For example, ZNF750 is a key factor for regulating skin homeostasis by finely driving epidermal differentiation [11,12,13]. Esophageal mucosa is composed of squamous cells similar to those of the skin. We demonstrated that TRIM29 could regulate ZNF750 expression, and both ZNF750 and TRIM29 expression is significantly higher in esophageal mucosa and skin than in other tissues. In addition, we also showed that TRIM29 could regulate the expression of KLF4, which is also an important transcription factor required for normal function of the skin [49]. Moreover, we showed that TRIM29 could regulate the expression of KRT5, which is a keratin protein and plays an important role in protecting epithelial cells. Thus, our study indicated that TRIM29 might be an important regulator for skin development and homeostasis as an upstream regulator of ZNF750.
Many studies have revealed that the aberration of ZNF750 promoted the progression of multiple kinds of tumors, such as ESCC. Missense, truncating mutations, and genomic deletions of ZNF750 were observed in ESCC [9, 14, 16], and ZNF750 deficiency promoted cell proliferation and was associated with impaired differentiation in ESCC [14], which originates from the lesions of esophageal mucosa [3]. Low ZNF750 levels were associated with lymph node metastasis in ESCC [17], and downregulation of ZNF750 promotes angiogenesis, EMT, and invasion in ESCC [19, 50]. In addition, ZNF750 is associated with better survival and functions as a tumor suppressor in melanoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, oral squamous cell carcinoma, and squamous cell carcinoma [37, 51,52,53,54,55]. Mechanistically, ZNF750 has been reported to mediate tumor-suppressive roles by regulating the expression of various downstream genes, such as TINCR, LAMC2, DANCR, FGF14, and SNAI1 [19, 37, 50, 51]. In this study, we found that TRIM29 could regulate the expression of snail, and EMT makers through promoting ZNF750 expression in ESCC. In addition, we also found that ZNF750 could directly bind the promoter and promote the expression of KRT5, dysregulation of which could promote cancer invasion and metastasis [35, 39, 40]. Furthermore, it is most likely that TRIM29 could regulate expression of ZNF750 and KRT5 in other tumors, as TRIM29 expression positively correlated with the expression of ZNF750 and KRT5 significantly in 18 tumor types, such as BLCA, CESC, HNSC, LUSC, PRAD, and SKCM. Thus, these results could explain why TRIM29 inhibits cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis in ESCC and probably in other tumors.
Aberrant STAT3 signaling was observed in nearly 70% of cancers [56]. For example, one study reported detected nuclear phospho-STAT3 positivity in 71% of ESCC specimens [41]. STAT3 hyperactivation could promote tumor cell proliferation, survival, angiogenesis, invasiveness, and metastasis [56] and is often associated with poor patient outcomes [57, 58]. Inhibitors of IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway have received FDA approval for various malignancies, or are currently in clinical and/or preclinical development [47]. Inhibition of STAT3 could effectively impede cell proliferation and migration of ESCA cells [41]. Similar findings were observed in our study, STAT3 inhibition could effectively reverse the cancer-promoting function of TRIM29 deficiency in ESCC. STAT3 is often activated by inflammatory factors, such as IL-6, IFN-β, and TNF-α. TRIM29 could target STING for ubiquitination and degradation as a ubiquitin E3 ligase, thus TRIM29 knockdown led to a remarkably elevated level of IL-6, IFN-β, and TNF-α [42]. Consistent with these results, we also found that TRIM29 expression negatively correlated with IL-6 expression in ESCC. Furthermore, IL6/STAT3 signaling pathway is involved in TRIM29 deficiency-mediated ZNF750 downregulation, which potentiates ESCC metastasis. Thus, our finding revealed a TRIM29-STAT3-ZNF750 signaling axis in the ESCC progression, which is summarized in Fig. 8I.
In summary, this study explores the oncosuppressive function of TRIM29 in ESCC and reveals that TRIM29 downregulation due to hypermethylation of its promoter, positively regulates tumor suppresser gene ZNF750 via modulating IL6/STAT3 signaling pathway. The aberrant methylation status and expression of TRIM29 in precancerous lesions indicate its possible diagnostic and predictive value.
Materials and methods
Datasets from TCGA ESCA
RNA sequencing and clinical data in TCGA ESCA were obtained from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas). TPM (Transcript per million) was calculated, and log2(X + 1) transformed. In addition, GEPIA (http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn) was used to explore the differential expression of TRIM29 between tumor and normal tissues across 33 TCGA cancer types.
The methylation levels (β value) of 12 CpG sites in the promoter region of TRIM29, including cg11466837, cg00437969, cg13907859, cg24593464, cg24611264, cg09977361, cg17436370, cg13625403, cg13285004, cg17971587, cg12201660, and cg20655548, were extracted from TCGA DNA methylation dataset (HumanMethylation450K), which was taken from UCSC XENA (https://xenabrowser.net/). The methylation level of TRIM29 promoter was calculated as the mean β value of these 12 CpG sites.
Datasets from other platforms
Twenty-six esophageal cancer datasets from GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) were used in this study, including GSE21293 [59], GSE36223 [60], GSE39491 [61], GSE34619 [62], GSE26886 [63], GSE13898 [64], GSE22954 [65], GSE5364 [66], GSE92396 [67], GSE74553 [68], GSE32424 [69], GSE17351 [70], GSE75241 [71], GSE77861 [72], GSE119436 [73], GSE70409 [74], GSE20347 [75], GSE23400 [76], GSE37200 [77], GSE37201 [77], GSE47404 [78], GSE19417 [79], GSE26784 [80], GSE52826 [81], GSE81334 [82], and GSE104707 [83]. The mRNA sequencing data, methylation data, and clinicopathological information of these datasets were directly downloaded from GEO platform. The mRNA sequencing data and clinicopathological information of E-MTAB-4054 dataset were obtained from Arrayexpress [84]. The Liu2021 protein dataset was obtained from the supplementary material of a recently published paper [85]. The clinicopathological characteristics of the datasets used were summarized in Table S4.
Gene set enrichment analysis
Firstly, we calculated the correlation coefficients of TRIM29 level with all other genes by Spearman’s correlation analyses and obtained a pre-ranked list. Then, the pre-ranked list was imported into GSEA software (version 4.1.0) for analysis with “h.all.v7.3.symbols.gmt”.
Survival analysis
Survival analyses, including overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), disease-free interval (DFI), progression-free interval (PFI), and disease-free survival (DFS), were ascertained using Kaplan–Meier methodology and analyzed by log-rank test with R packages “survminer” and “survival”. The patients were dichotomized into high and low groups based on an optimal cutoff value, which was determined with “survminer”.
Cell culture and lentivirus transfection
Three ESCC cell lines (KYSE30, KYSE410, and KYSE450) were gifted by Professor Zhan QiMin (Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute). All cell lines were genetically authenticated using STR profiling by Genesky Biotechnologies, Inc. The cells were cultured in RPMI1640 + 10% FBS (GIBCO).
The empty lentivector expressing GFP alone and recombinant lentivirus expressing TRIM29 were purchased from HanBio (Shanghai, China). The lentivirus encoding shRNA targeting TRIM29 was purchased from GenePharma (Shanghai, China). The shRNA sequences used were as follows: 5′- GAAGAGCTCCATCGTCTTGCCAcgaaTGGCAAGACGATGGAGCTCTTC -3′ and 5′-GCGACCCATCATCCAGTTTGTcgaaACAAACTGGATGATGGGTCGC -3′.
Full-length ZNF750 cDNA was amplified by PCR and cloned into pSIN-EF2-3×Flag for lentivirus production. HEK293T cells were transfected with pSIN-3×Flag-ZNF750 constructs, together with psPAX.2 and pMD2.G, using Attractene Transfection Reagent (Qiagen). The lentivirus-containing supernatant was collected and filtered 48 hours after transfection. To establish stable transfecting cell lines, cells were infected with lentivirus suspension (with 8 μg/ml polybrene) and then incubated with 2 μg/ml puromycin for 2 weeks.
Patients and samples
Tumor samples and paired paracancerous tissues were obtained from four ESCC patients, which were confirmed by pathology. The surgeries of these patients were done at Taixing People’s Hospital. The research was approved by Human Research Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University (permission number: 20210521).
Western blot
The assay was performed as previously described [86]. The primary antibodies: TRIM29 (CST #50292), ZNF750 (ProteinTech #21752-1-AP), STAT3 (Abclonal #A16975), Phospho-Stat3 (Tyr705) (CST #9145), p21 (ProteinTech #10355-1-AP), KLF4 (ProteinTech #11880-1-AP), KRT5 (ProteinTech #66727-1-Ig), MMP2 (ProteinTech #10373-2-AP), MMP9 (ProteinTech #10375-2-AP), E-cadherin (ProteinTech #20874-1-AP), N-cadherin (ProteinTech #66219-1-Ig), Vimentin (ProteinTech #10366-1-AP), Snail (CST #3895), Cyclin D (ProteinTech #60186-1-Ig), β-catenin (CST #8480), and GAPDH (ProteinTech #60004-1-Ig). The secondary antibodies: anti‑rabbit IgG (ProteinTech #SA00001‑2) and anti‑mouse IgG (ProteinTech #SA00001‑1). Primary antibodies were diluted at a ratio of 1:1000 and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The secondary antibody was diluted at a ratio of 1:5000 and incubated for 1.5 hours at 4 °C at room temperature. The blots were visualized using the SuperSignal West Pico PLUS (Thermo Scientific) on the Tanon4600 Automatic chemiluminescence image analysis system (Tanon, Shanghai, China). All assays were performed in triplicate.
Detection of DNA methylation level by bisulfite sequencing PCR
bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) analysis was performed to detect the differential methylation level of TRIM29 promoter in ESCC cell lines. The total genomic DNA of ESCC cell lines, including HEEC, KYSE30, KYSE410, and KYSE450, was extracted by DNAzol kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), then qualified and quantified by a NanoPhotometer (IMPLEN). Next, the genomic DNA was bisulfite converted using the EZ DNA Methylation–Gold Kit (ZYMO Research, D5006). The upstream CpG island of TRIM29 was amplified using the primers as follows: forward, 5′-TTTTTAGGTGGGGTTTGAGAT-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAAACTACCAAAAAACCACCC-3′. The amplified products were then cloned into T-vector and sequenced. Five different clones of each cell line were sequenced.
qRT–PCR
The assays were performed as previously described [86]. The sequences of the primers: TRIM29 forward, GACGACCTGCTCAATGTATGC, and reverse, GTTGTTCACATAGCGATGGTCA; GAPDH forward, GGAGCGAGATCCCTCCAAAAT, and reverse, GGCTGTTGTCATACTTCTCATGG. All the experiments were performed in triplicate.
Demethylating treatment
To investigate the effects of methylation on TRIM29 expression, KYSE30 cells were treated with 50 μM 5-aza-dC (Sigma-Aldrich, A3656) for three days with a daily exchange of culture medium. Cells were then collected and subjected to western blotting.
JASPAR analysis
The ZNF750-binding sites in the KRT5 promoter region were predicted using JASPAR database. The sequence of KRT5 promoter region, 2000bp upstream and 100 bp downstream of KRT5 TSS (transcription start site), was obtained from NCBI, and then imported to JASPAR for ZNF750 motif binding analysis (Relative profile score threshold = 80%).
ChIP-sequencing analysis
We used published ChIP-sequencing data from GEO for H3K4ME3 (GSE28332:GSM1303758 and GSE35583:GSM945286) [87, 88] and ZNF750 (GSE57702:GSM1387027) [12]. These ChIP-sequencing data were analyzed using Cistrome [89] and visualized with UCSC Genome Browser on human (GRCh38/hg38).
Cell proliferation and colony formation assay
For the cell proliferation assays, the cells were cultured with 200ul medium/well in 96-well plates for four days. At the indicated intervals (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days), relative cell number was measured with a microplate reader after incubating with medium containing 10 μl of CCK8 (APExBIO #K1018) for 2 h. All assays were repeated at least three times.
For the colony formation assays, equal numbers of cells in the same groups (KYESE30 control vs. KYSE30 TRIM29-OE; KYSE410 control vs. KYSE410 TRIM29-shRNA; KYSE450 control vs. KYSE450 TRIM29-shRNA) were seeded in six-well plates and grown for 7–10 days. Then, the cell colonies were fixed with methanol, stained with crystal violet solution (0.5%), and counted.
Flow cytometry analysis of cell cycle
Cells were trypsinized, washed twice with PBS, fixed in 70% ethanol, and stored at –20 °C overnight. Then, the cells were washed twice with PBS and incubated with a staining solution containing 0.1% RNaseA (100 µg/ml, Beyotime), 0.2% TritonX-100, and 1% propidium iodide staining solution (50 µg/ml) on ice for 30 min in the dark. The samples were analyzed using a Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, NJ, USA), and the percentages of G1, S, and G2/M phase cells were calculated with FlowJo software. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Wound healing and invasion assays
The ability of cell migration was examined via scratch wound healing as previously described [86]. Briefly, the wound healing was made when the cells were grown to 90% confluence and then detected at the time point as mentioned in the respective figures. The ability of cell invasion was determined using a Boyden chamber assay using transwell chambers (8 μm pores, Corning) pre-coated with Matrigel (BD Biosciences). After being resuspended in serum-free medium, cells were plated in the upper compartment of 24-well Transwell plates (5 × 104 cells/well) and incubated for 48 h, while the lower compartment was filled with growth medium. The inserts were fixed in 4% PFA for 15 min after removing cells from their top sides, and then stained with crystal violet solution. Cells on the lower sides of the membrane were counted. The assays were repeated three times.
In vivo lung metastasis assay
The tail vein-lung metastasis mouse model was used to determine the ESCC cell’s ability to metastasize in vivo. Equal amount of KYSE30-control and KYSE30 TRIM29-overexpression cells (2 × 106 cells/mouse) suspended in 250 μl normal saline were injected intravenously through the tail vein of the SCID/Beige mice, respectively. Mice were randomly grouped. Each group included five mice. Twelve weeks later, mice were killed by cervical dislocation, and their lungs were dissected and fixed in Bouin’s solution (Sigma-Aldrich, #HT10132) for 24 h at room temperature (RT). Then, the lungs were washed with PBS, metastatic colonies on the lung surface were counted, and the tumor lesions within the lungs were confirmed by H&E staining. The experiments were approved by the Ethics Committees of Anhui Medical University (permission number: LLSC20212790).
Hematoxylin and eosin staining
After being fixed in Bouin’s solution for 24 h at RT, the lung specimens of mice were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 3 μm, sequentially rehydrated, and stained with H&E.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons between the two groups were conducted using two-sided Student’s t-tests for normally distributed data or Mann–Whitney test for non-normally distributed data. Spearman’s correlation was used for all correlation analyses. The independent experiments were repeated a minimum of three times. The statistical significance level was set at p < 0.05. The analyses were conducted in GraphPad (v9.3.0) or R (v4.1.1). ∗ (p < 0.05), ∗∗ (p < 0.01), ∗∗∗ (p < 0.001), ∗∗∗∗ (p < 0.0001).
Data availability
The data used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71: 209-49.
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115–32.
Thrumurthy SG, Chaudry MA, Thrumurthy SSD, Mughal M. Oesophageal cancer: risks, prevention, and diagnosis. BMJ. 2019;366:l4373.
Lin DC, Wang MR, Koeffler HP. Genomic and epigenomic aberrations in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and implications for patients. Gastroenterology. 2018;154:374–89.
Islami F, Kamangar F, Aghcheli K, Fahimi S, Semnani S, Taghavi N, et al. Epidemiologic features of upper gastrointestinal tract cancers in Northeastern Iran. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:1402–6.
Tran GD, Sun XD, Abnet CC, Fan JH, Dawsey SM, Dong ZW, et al. Prospective study of risk factors for esophageal and gastric cancers in the Linxian general population trial cohort in China. Int J Cancer. 2005;113:456–63.
De Angelis R, Sant M, Coleman MP, Francisci S, Baili P, Pierannunzio D, et al. Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5-a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:23–34.
Song Y, Li L, Ou Y, Gao Z, Li E, Li X, et al. Identification of genomic alterations in oesophageal squamous cell cancer. Nature. 2014;509:91–5.
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network et al. Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma. Nature.2017;541:169–75.
Teng H, Xue M, Liang J, Wang X, Wang L, Wei W, et al. Inter- and intratumor DNA methylation heterogeneity associated with lymph node metastasis and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Theranostics. 2020;10:3035–48.
Sen GL, Boxer LD, Webster DE, Bussat RT, Qu K, Zarnegar BJ, et al. ZNF750 is a p63 target gene that induces KLF4 to drive terminal epidermal differentiation. Dev Cell. 2012;22:669–77.
Boxer LD, Barajas B, Tao S, Zhang J, Khavari PA. ZNF750 interacts with KLF4 and RCOR1, KDM1A, and CTBP1/2 chromatin regulators to repress epidermal progenitor genes and induce differentiation genes. Genes Dev. 2014;28:2013–26.
Sun BK, Boxer LD, Ransohoff JD, Siprashvili Z, Qu K, Lopez-Pajares V, et al. CALML5 is a ZNF750- and TINCR-induced protein that binds stratifin to regulate epidermal differentiation. Genes Dev. 2015;29:2225–30.
Lin DC, Hao JJ, Nagata Y, Xu L, Shang L, Meng X, et al. Genomic and molecular characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nat Genet. 2014;46:467–73.
Cui Y, Chen H, Xi R, Cui H, Zhao Y, Xu E, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of 508 patients identifies key molecular features associated with poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Res. 2020;30:902–13.
Zhang L, Zhou Y, Cheng C, Cui H, Cheng L, Kong P, et al. Genomic analyses reveal mutational signatures and frequently altered genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96:597–611.
Otsuka R, Akutsu Y, Sakata H, Hanari N, Murakami K, Kano M, et al. ZNF750 expression is a potential prognostic biomarker in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncology. 2018;94:142–8.
Otsuka R, Akutsu Y, Sakata H, Hanari N, Murakami K, Kano M, et al. ZNF750 expression as a novel candidate biomarker of chemoradiosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncology. 2017;93:197–203.
Kong P, Xu E, Bi Y, Xu X, Liu X, Song B, et al. Novel ESCC-related gene ZNF750 as potential Prognostic biomarker and inhibits Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition through directly depressing SNAI1 promoter in ESCC. Theranostics. 2020;10:1798–813.
Xing J, Weng L, Yuan B, Wang Z, Jia L, Jin R, et al. Identification of a role for TRIM29 in the control of innate immunity in the respiratory tract. Nat Immunol. 2016;17:1373–80.
Xing J, Zhang A, Zhang H, Wang J, Li XC, Zeng MS, et al. TRIM29 promotes DNA virus infections by inhibiting innate immune response. Nat Commun. 2017;8:945.
Yuan Z, Villagra A, Peng L, Coppola D, Glozak M, Sotomayor EM, et al. The ATDC (TRIM29) protein binds p53 and antagonizes p53-mediated functions. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30:3004–15.
Hatakeyama S. TRIM proteins and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:792–804.
Reymond A, Meroni G, Fantozzi A, Merla G, Cairo S, Luzi L, et al. The tripartite motif family identifies cell compartments. EMBO J. 2001;20:2140–51.
Wang L, Heidt DG, Lee CJ, Yang H, Logsdon CD, Zhang L, et al. Oncogenic function of ATDC in pancreatic cancer through Wnt pathway activation and beta-catenin stabilization. Cancer Cell. 2009;15:207–19.
Tang ZP, Dong QZ, Cui QZ, Papavassiliou P, Wang ED, Wang EH. Ataxia-telangiectasia group D complementing gene (ATDC) promotes lung cancer cell proliferation by activating NF-kappaB pathway. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63676.
Palmbos PL, Wang L, Yang H, Wang Y, Leflein J, Ahmet ML, et al. ATDC/TRIM29 drives invasive bladder cancer formation through miRNA-mediated and epigenetic mechanisms. Cancer Res. 2015;75:5155–66.
Kosaka Y, Inoue H, Ohmachi T, Yokoe T, Matsumoto T, Mimori K, et al. Tripartite motif-containing 29 (TRIM29) is a novel marker for lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2543–9.
Mutter GL, Baak JP, Fitzgerald JT, Gray R, Neuberg D, Kust GA, et al. Global expression changes of constitutive and hormonally regulated genes during endometrial neoplastic transformation. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;83:177–85.
Sun J, Zhang T, Cheng M, Hong L, Zhang C, Xie M, et al. TRIM29 facilitates the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and the progression of colorectal cancer via the activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2019;38:104.
Wang L, Yang H, Abel EV, Ney GM, Palmbos PL, Bednar F, et al. ATDC induces an invasive switch in KRAS-induced pancreatic tumorigenesis. Genes Dev. 2015;29:171–83.
Xu W, Xu B, Yao Y, Yu X, Cao H, Zhang J, et al. RNA interference against TRIM29 inhibits migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2016;36:1411–8.
Kanno Y, Watanabe M, Kimura T, Nonomura K, Tanaka S, Hatakeyama S. TRIM29 as a novel prostate basal cell marker for diagnosis of prostate cancer. Acta Histochem. 2014;116:708–12.
Ai L, Kim WJ, Alpay M, Tang M, Pardo CE, Hatakeyama S, et al. TRIM29 suppresses TWIST1 and invasive breast cancer behavior. Cancer Res. 2014;74:4875–87.
Yanagi T, Watanabe M, Hata H, Kitamura S, Imafuku K, Yanagi H, et al. Loss of TRIM29 alters keratin distribution to promote cell invasion in squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6795–806.
Karantza V. Keratins in health and cancer: more than mere epithelial cell markers. Oncogene. 2011;30:127–38.
Hazawa M, Lin DC, Handral H, Xu L, Chen Y, Jiang YY, et al. ZNF750 is a lineage-specific tumour suppressor in squamous cell carcinoma. Oncogene. 2017;36:2243–54.
Chen SY, Ishii MA, Cheng B, Otten ABC, Sun BK. HOPX Is a ZNF750 target that promotes late epidermal differentiation. J Invest Dermatol. 2019;139:2039–42.e2.
Eckstein M, Wirtz RM, Gross-Weege M, Breyer J, Otto W, Stoehr R, et al. mRNA-expression of KRT5 and KRT20 defines distinct prognostic subgroups of muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer correlating with histological variants. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:3396.
Breyer J, Wirtz RM, Otto W, Erben P, Kriegmair MC, Stoehr R, et al. In stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), high KRT20 and low KRT5 mRNA expression identify the luminal subtype and predict recurrence and survival. Virchows Arch. 2017;470:267–74.
Timme S, Ihde S, Fichter CD, Waehle V, Bogatyreva L, Atanasov K, et al. STAT3 expression, activity and functional consequences of STAT3 inhibition in esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and Barrett’s adenocarcinomas. Oncogene. 2014;33:3256–66.
Li Q, Lin L, Tong Y, Liu Y, Mou J, Wang X, et al. TRIM29 negatively controls antiviral immune response through targeting STING for degradation. Cell Discov. 2018;4:13.
Xing J, Zhang A, Minze LJ, Li XC, Zhang Z. TRIM29 negatively regulates the type I IFN production in response to RNA virus. J Immunol. 2018;201:183–92.
Leu CM, Wong FH, Chang C, Huang SF, Hu CP. Interleukin-6 acts as an antiapoptotic factor in human esophageal carcinoma cells through the activation of both STAT3 and mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. Oncogene. 2003;22:7809–18.
Dvorak K, Dvorak B. Role of interleukin-6 in Barrett’s esophagus pathogenesis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:2307–12.
Dvorak K, Chavarria M, Payne CM, Ramsey L, Crowley-Weber C, Dvorakova B, et al. Activation of the interleukin-6/STAT3 antiapoptotic pathway in esophageal cells by bile acids and low pH: relevance to barrett’s esophagus. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:5305–13.
Johnson DE, O’Keefe RA, Grandis JR. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15:234–48.
Zhao Z, Zhang Y, Wang P, Wang X, Li M. The impact of the nodal status on the overall survival of non-surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:161.
Segre JA, Bauer C, Fuchs E. Klf4 is a transcription factor required for establishing the barrier function of the skin. Nat Genet. 1999;22:356–60.
Bi Y, Guo S, Xu X, Kong P, Cui H, Yan T, et al. Decreased ZNF750 promotes angiogenesis in a paracrine manner via activating DANCR/miR-4707-3p/FOXC2 axis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11:296.
Zhang P, He Q, Lei Y, Li Y, Wen X, Hong M, et al. m(6)A-mediated ZNF750 repression facilitates nasopharyngeal carcinoma progression. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:1169.
Yang H, Pan L, Xu C, Zhang Y, Li K, Chen S, et al. Overexpression of tumor suppressor gene ZNF750 inhibits oral squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Oncol Lett. 2017;14:5591–6.
Pan L, Yang H, Xu C, Chen S, Meng Z, Li K, et al. ZNF750 inhibited the malignant progression of oral squamous cell carcinoma by regulating tumor vascular microenvironment. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;105:566–72.
Yang HL, Xu C, Yang YK, Tang WQ, Hong M, Pan L, et al. ZNF750 exerted its Antitumor Action in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by regulating E2F2. J Cancer. 2021;12:7266–76.
Du Y, Lv G, Jing C, Liu J, Liu J. ZNF750 inhibits the proliferation and invasion of melanoma cells through modulating the Wnt/b-catenin signaling pathway. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2020;58:255–63.
Tolomeo M, Cascio A. The multifaced role of STAT3 in cancer and its implication for anticancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:603.
Zhang N, Zhang M, Wang Z, Gao W, Sun ZG. Activated STAT3 could reduce survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by up-regulating VEGF and Cyclin D1 expression. J Cancer. 2020;11:1859–68.
O’ Sullivan KE, Michielsen AJ, O’ Regan E, Cathcart MC, Moore G, Breen E, et al. pSTAT3 levels have divergent expression patterns and associations with survival in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1720.
Michaylira CZ, Wong GS, Miller CG, Gutierrez CM, Nakagawa H, Hammond R, et al. Periostin, a cell adhesion molecule, facilitates invasion in the tumor microenvironment and annotates a novel tumor-invasive signature in esophageal cancer. Cancer Res. 2010;70:5281–92.
Ostrowski J, Mikula M, Karczmarski J, Rubel T, Wyrwicz LS, Bragoszewski P, et al. Molecular defense mechanisms of Barrett’s metaplasia estimated by an integrative genomics. J Mol Med (Berl). 2007;85:733–43.
Hyland PL, Hu N, Rotunno M, Su H, Wang C, Wang L, et al. Global changes in gene expression of Barrett’s esophagus compared to normal squamous esophagus and gastric cardia tissues. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e93219.
di Pietro M, Lao-Sirieix P, Boyle S, Cassidy A, Castillo D, Saadi A, et al. Evidence for a functional role of epigenetically regulated midcluster HOXB genes in the development of Barrett esophagus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:9077–82.
Wang Q, Ma C, Kemmner W. Wdr66 is a novel marker for risk stratification and involved in epithelial-mesenchymal transition of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2013;13:137.
Kim SM, Park YY, Park ES, Cho JY, Izzo JG, Zhang D, et al. Prognostic biomarkers for esophageal adenocarcinoma identified by analysis of tumor transcriptome. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e15074.
Aoyagi K, Minashi K, Igaki H, Tachimori Y, Nishimura T, Hokamura N, et al. Artificially induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in surgical subjects: its implications in clinical and basic cancer research. PLoS One. 2011;6:e18196.
Yu K, Ganesan K, Tan LK, Laban M, Wu J, Zhao XD, et al. A precisely regulated gene expression cassette potently modulates metastasis and survival in multiple solid cancers. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000129.
Peng D, Guo Y, Chen H, Zhao S, Washington K, Hu T, et al. Integrated molecular analysis reveals complex interactions between genomic and epigenomic alterations in esophageal adenocarcinomas. Sci Rep. 2017;7:40729.
Ferrer-Torres D, Nancarrow DJ, Kuick R, Thomas DG, Nadal E, Lin J, et al. Genomic similarity between gastroesophageal junction and esophageal Barrett’s adenocarcinomas. Oncotarget. 2016;7:54867–82.
Tong M, Chan KW, Bao JY, Wong KY, Chen JN, Kwan PS, et al. Rab25 is a tumor suppressor gene with antiangiogenic and anti-invasive activities in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2012;72:6024–35.
Lee JJ, Natsuizaka M, Ohashi S, Wong GS, Takaoka M, Michaylira CZ, et al. Hypoxia activates the cyclooxygenase-2-prostaglandin E synthase axis. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:427–34.
Couto-Vieira J, Nicolau-Neto P, Costa EP, Figueira FF, Simao TA, Okorokova-Facanha AL, et al. Multi-cancer V-ATPase molecular signatures: a distinctive balance of subunit C isoforms in esophageal carcinoma. EBioMedicine. 2020;51:102581.
Erkizan HV, Johnson K, Ghimbovschi S, Karkera D, Trachiotis G, Adib H, et al. African-American esophageal squamous cell carcinoma expression profile reveals dysregulation of stress response and detox networks. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:426.
Xu F, Zhang S, Liu Z, Gu J, Li Y, Wang L, et al. TEX9 and eIF3b functionally synergize to promote the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2019;19:875.
Chen YK, Tung CW, Lee JY, Hung YC, Lee CH, Chou SH, et al. Plasma matrix metalloproteinase 1 improves the detection and survival prediction of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30057.
Hu N, Clifford RJ, Yang HH, Wang C, Goldstein AM, Ding T, et al. Genome wide analysis of DNA copy number neutral loss of heterozygosity (CNNLOH) and its relation to gene expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Genomics. 2010;11:576.
Su H, Hu N, Yang HH, Wang C, Takikita M, Wang QH, et al. Global gene expression profiling and validation in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and its association with clinical phenotypes. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:2955–66.
Silvers AL, Lin L, Bass AJ, Chen G, Wang Z, Thomas DG, et al. Decreased selenium-binding protein 1 in esophageal adenocarcinoma results from posttranscriptional and epigenetic regulation and affects chemosensitivity. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:2009–21.
Sawada G, Niida A, Hirata H, Komatsu H, Uchi R, Shimamura T, et al. An integrative analysis to identify driver genes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0139808.
Peters CJ, Rees JR, Hardwick RH, Hardwick JS, Vowler SL, Ong CA, et al. A 4-gene signature predicts survival of patients with resected adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, junction, and gastric cardia. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1995–2004 e15.
Lima SC, Hernandez-Vargas H, Simao T, Durand G, Kruel CD, Le Calvez-Kelm F, et al. Identification of a DNA methylome signature of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and potential epigenetic biomarkers. Epigenetics. 2011;6:1217–27.
Li X, Zhou F, Jiang C, Wang Y, Lu Y, Yang F, et al. Identification of a DNA methylome profile of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and potential plasma epigenetic biomarkers for early diagnosis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e103162.
Yu M, Maden SK, Stachler M, Kaz AM, Ayers J, Guo Y, et al. Subtypes of Barrett’s oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma based on genome-wide methylation analysis. Gut. 2019;68:389–99.
Luebeck EG, Curtius K, Hazelton WD, Maden S, Yu M, Thota PN, et al. Identification of a key role of widespread epigenetic drift in Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Epigenet. 2017;9:113.
Maag JLV, Fisher OM, Levert-Mignon A, Kaczorowski DC, Thomas ML, Hussey DJ, et al. Novel aberrations uncovered in barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma using whole transcriptome sequencing. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:1558–69.
Liu W, Xie L, He YH, Wu ZY, Liu LX, Bai XF, et al. Large-scale and high-resolution mass spectrometry-based proteomics profiling defines molecular subtypes of esophageal cancer for therapeutic targeting. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4961.
Tian T, Hong F, Wang Z, Hu J, Chen N, Lv L, et al. HSD17B6 downregulation predicts poor prognosis and drives tumor progression via activating Akt signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7:341.
Pedersen MT, Agger K, Laugesen A, Johansen JV, Cloos PA, Christensen J, et al. The demethylase JMJD2C localizes to H3K4me3-positive transcription start sites and is dispensable for embryonic development. Mol Cell Biol. 2014;34:1031–45.
Thurman RE, Rynes E, Humbert R, Vierstra J, Maurano MT, Haugen E, et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature. 2012;489:75–82.
Zheng R, Wan C, Mei S, Qin Q, Wu Q, Sun H, et al. Cistrome Data Browser: expanded datasets and new tools for gene regulatory analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D729–D35.
Acknowledgements
We thank those who contributed to the previously published public datasets used in this study. This study is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (12075275 and 12135016 to PB, 81602230 to LL), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2208085MH249 to QY), the Provincial Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Colleges (KJ2020A0147 to QY), and the Youth Fund of Anhui Cancer Hospital (2022YJQN014 to LL and 2020YJQN003 to FC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LL and PB conceived and designed the study.; QY and LL analyzed the bioinformatic data and wrote the original manuscript; YZ, RX, QW, FC, and RZ performed the experiments; YZ and RX analyzed the data; PB revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The current study was reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee and the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of Anhui Medical University. All animal procedures were performed in accordance with the NIH Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animal.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Yi, Q., Zhao, Y., Xia, R. et al. TRIM29 hypermethylation drives esophageal cancer progression via suppression of ZNF750. Cell Death Discov. 9, 191 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01491-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-023-01491-1
This article is cited by
-
IGF2BP3 prevent HMGB1 mRNA decay in bladder cancer and development
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters (2024)