Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Knowledge, perceptions, and beliefs about urinary tract infections in persons with neurogenic bladder and impacts on interventions to promote person-centered care

Abstract

Study design

Qualitative study.

Objectives

To explore how knowledge, perceptions, and beliefs about urinary tract infections (UTIs) among persons with neurogenic bladder (NB) may impact health behaviors and provider management and enhance person-centeredness of interventions to improve UTI management.

Setting

Three Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers.

Methods

Adults with NB due to spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D) or multiple sclerosis (MS) with UTI diagnoses in the prior year participated in focus groups. Transcripts were coded using deductive codes linked to the Health Belief Model and inductive codes informed by grounded theory.

Results

Twenty-three Veterans (SCI/D, 78%; MS: 18.5%) participated in discussions. Three themes emerged: (1) UTI knowledge; (2) factors affecting the intervention environment; and (3) factors affecting modes of delivery. Knowledge gaps included UTI prevention, specific symptoms most indicative of UTI, and antibiotic side effects. Poor perceptions of providers lacking knowledge about NB and ineffective patient–provider communication were common in the Emergency Department and non-VA facilities, whereas participants had positive perceptions of home-based care. Participants perceived lower severity and frequency of antibiotic risks compared to UTI risks. Participant preferences for education included caregiver involvement, verbal and written materials, and diverse settings like peer groups.

Conclusions

Identifying patient perspectives enhances person-centeredness and allows for novel interventions improving patient knowledge and behaviors about UTIs. Partnering with trusted providers and home-based caregivers and improving NB knowledge and communication in certain care settings were important. Patient education should address mental risk representations and incorporate preferences for content delivery to optimize self-efficacy and strengthen cues to action.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1
Fig. 2: Major themes with links to Health Belief Model constructs and concept(s) derived from focus group discussions with persons with neurogenic bladder.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) places legal restrictions on access to Veteran’s healthcare data, which includes both identifying data and sensitive patient information. The analytic data sets used for this study are not permitted to leave the VA firewall without a Data Use Agreement. However, VA data are made freely available to researchers behind the VA firewall with an approved VA study protocol. For more information, please visit https://www.virec.research.va.gov or contact the VA Information Resource Center (VIReC) at vog.av@CeRIV.

References

  1. Ginsberg D. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of neurogenic bladder. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19:s191–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Manack A, Motsko SP, Haag-Molkenteller C, Dmochowski RR, Goehring EL, Nguyen-Khoa BA, et al. Epidemiology and healthcare utilization of neurogenic bladder patients in a US claims database. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30:395–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siroky MB. Pathogenesis of bacteriuria and infection in the spinal cord injured patient. Am J Med. 2002;113:67S–79S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DeJong G, Tian W, Hsieh CH, Junn C, Karam C, Ballard PH, et al. Rehospitalization in the first year of traumatic spinal cord injury after discharge from medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:S87–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Evans CT, LaVela SL, Weaver FM, Priebe M, Sandford P, Niemiec P, et al. Epidemiology of hospital-acquired infections in veterans with spinal cord injury and disorder. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29:234–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rabadi MH, Aston C. Complications and urologic risks of neurogenic bladder in veterans with traumatic spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2015;53:200–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nicolle LE, Gupta K, Bradley SF, Colgan R, DeMuri GP, Drekonja D, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the management of asymptomatic bacteriuria: 2019 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68:e83–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD, Colgan R, Geerlings SE, Rice JC, et al. Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection in adults: 2009 International Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:625–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wirth M, Suda KJ, Burns SP, Weaver FM, Collins E, Safdar N, et al. Retrospective cohort study of patient-reported urinary tract infection signs and symptoms among individuals with neurogenic bladder. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;102:663–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Spivak ES, Burk M, Zhang R, Jones MM, Neuhauser MM, Goetz MB, et al. Management of bacteriuria in Veterans Affairs hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:910–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitzpatrick MA, Suda KJ, Safdar N, Goldstein B, Jones MM, Poggensee L, et al. Unique risks and clinical outcomes associated with extended-spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae in Veterans with spinal cord injury or disorder: a case-case-control study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37:768–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399:629–55.

  13. Marra AR, Perencevich EN, Nelson RE, Samore M, Khader K, Chiang HY, et al. Incidence and outcomes associated with Clostridium difficile infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3:e1917597.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Trautner BW, Grigoryan L, Petersen NJ, Hysong S, Cadena J, Patterson JE, et al. Effectiveness of an antimicrobial stewardship approach for urinary catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteriuria. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1120–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Carbo JF, Ruh CA, Kurtzhalts KE, Ott MC, Sellick JA, Mergenhagen KA. Male veterans with complicated urinary tract infections: influence of a patient-centered antimicrobial stewardship program. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:1549–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kelley D, Aaronson P, Poon E, McCarter YS, Bato B, Jankowski CA. Evaluation of an antimicrobial stewardship approach to minimize overuse of antibiotics in patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:193–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Broniatowski DA, Klein EY, Reyna VF. Germs are germs, and why not take a risk? Patients’ expectations for prescribing antibiotics in an inner-city emergency department. Med Decis Mak. 2015;35:60–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Spicer JO, Roberts RM, Hicks LA. Perceptions of the benefits and risks of antibiotics among adult patients and parents with high antibiotic utilization. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7:ofaa544.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Valentine-King M, Laytner L, Hines-Munson C, Olmeda K, Trautner B, Justice S, et al. Qualitative analysis of a Twitter-disseminated survey reveals new patient perspectives on the impact of urinary tract infection. Antibiotics. 2022;11:1687.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fitzpatrick MA, Wirth M, Nguyen J, Suda KJ, Weaver FM, Burns S, et al. Clinical outcomes associated with guideline-discordant management of asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection in hospitalized patients with neurogenic bladder. Antimicrob Steward Health Epidemiol. 2022;2:e195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2008.

  22. Guest G, Namey E, Chen M. A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0232076.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hartman EAR, Groen WG, Heltveit-Olsen SR, Lindbæk M, Høye S, Sundvall PD, et al. Decisions on antibiotic prescribing for suspected urinary tract infections in frail older adults: a qualitative study in four European countries. Age Ageing. 2022;51:afac134.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Cox S, Vleeming M, Giorgi W, Dinant GJ, Cals J, de Bont E. Patients’ experiences, expectations, motivations, and perspectives around urinary tract infection care in general practice: a qualitative interview study. Antibiotics. 2023;12:241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanyaolu LN, Hayes CV, Lecky DM, Ahmed H, Cannings-John R, Weightman A, et al. Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences and views of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: qualitative evidence synthesis and meta-ethnography. Antibiotics. 2023;12:434.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lecky DM, Howdle J, Butler CC, McNulty CA. Optimising management of UTIs in primary care: a qualitative study of patient and GP perspectives to inform the development of an evidence-based, shared decision-making resource. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;70:e330–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Duane S, Domegan C, Callan A, Galvin S, Cormican M, Bennett K, et al. Using qualitative insights to change practice: exploring the culture of antibiotic prescribing and consumption for urinary tract infections. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e008894.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Brookes-Howell L, Elwyn G, Hood K, Wood F, Cooper L, Goossens H. et al. ‘The body gets used to them’: patients’ interpretations of antibiotic resistance and the implications for containment strategies. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:766–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Izett-Kay M, Barker KL, McNiven A, Toye F. Experiences of urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;41:724–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lauridsen SV, Averbeck MA, Krassioukov A, Vaabengaard R, Athanasiadou S. UTI assessment tool for intermittent catheter users: a way to include user perspectives and enhance quality of UTI management. BMC Nurs. 2022;21:272.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by The Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development Rehabilitation Research and Development Career Development Award (B2826-W to MAF) and Research Career Scientist Award (RCS 20-192 to CTE; RCS 98-35 to FMW). The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAF was responsible for conceptualizing, designing, and writing the study protocol; recruiting participants; conducting focus groups; extracting and analyzing data; interpreting results; and writing the manuscript. PS was responsible for assisting with focus groups, extracting and analyzing data, interpreting results, and revising the manuscript. MW was responsible for recruiting participants, assisting with focus groups, extracting and analyzing data, interpreting results, and revising the manuscript. FW was responsible for conceptualizing, designing, and writing the study protocol; interpreting results; and revising the manuscript. KJS was responsible for conceptualizing, designing, and writing the study protocol; interpreting results; and revising the manuscript. SB was responsible for conceptualizing, designing, and writing the study protocol; interpreting results; and revising the manuscript. EC was responsible for conceptualizing, designing, and writing the study protocol; interpreting results; and revising the manuscript. NS was responsible for conceptualizing, designing, and writing the study protocol; interpreting results; and revising the manuscript. CTE was responsible for conceptualizing, designing, and writing the study protocol; interpreting results; and revising the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margaret A. Fitzpatrick.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fitzpatrick, M.A., Solanki, P., Wirth, M. et al. Knowledge, perceptions, and beliefs about urinary tract infections in persons with neurogenic bladder and impacts on interventions to promote person-centered care. Spinal Cord (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-00972-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-024-00972-z

Search

Quick links