Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letters to Editor
  • Published:

Reply to Doremus

Abstract

DOREMUS implies that the hydroxyl ion diffusion which I observed1 was in fact the result of the movement of monovalent cations, present as impurity ions in quartz. If this was so I was monitoring self-diffusion currents because I employed a platinum anode which was neither a source of alkali nor of hydrogen ions. The conductivity for a self-diffusion current decreases exponentially with time2 whereas for an ionic current the conductivity3,4 increases to a maximum constant value and therefore the one can be readily distinguished from the other. The currents I observed were of the latter type and the diffusing ions must have originated in the cathode. I used three different minerals, goethite, talc and kaolinite as cathodic sources of hydroxyl ions and observed a similar OH absorption band in the near infrared spectra of the quartz; I obtained a similar activation energy with each source. I did not detect an OH absorption band after self-diffusion experiments although this has been observed by others using a more sensitive infrared technique5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. White, S., Nature Physical Science, 230, 192 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wenden, H. E., Amer. Mineral., 42, 859 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vogel, R. C., and Gibson, G., J. Chem. Phys., 18, 490 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Verhoogen, J., Amer. Mineral, 37, 637 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brunner, G. O., Wondratschek, H., and Laves, F., Zeit. Electro- chem., 65, 735 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rybach, L., and Laves, F., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 31, 539 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. White, S., Nature, 225, 375 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. McLaren, A. C., and Retchford, J. A., Phys. Stat. Sol., 33, 657 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. McLaren, A. C., Osborne, C. F., and Saunders, L. A., Phys. Stat. Sol., a4, 235 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bums, I., and Roberts, J. P., Phys. Chem. Gtasses, 11, 106 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haider, Z., and Roberts, G. J., Glass Technology, 11, 158 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cockram, O. R., Haider, Z., and Roberts, G. J., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 10, 18 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hetherington, G., Jack, K. H., and Ramsay, M. W., Phys. Chem. Glasses, 6, 6 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koritnig, S., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 29, 361 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. White, S. H., thesis, Univ. Melbourne (1967).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WHITE, S. Reply to Doremus. Nature Physical Science 233, 63–64 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/physci233063b0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/physci233063b0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing