Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Gout

Why compare the effectiveness of suboptimal gout management?

Subjects

Comparative effectiveness research could help inform the choice of agent for urate-lowering therapy, the central component of successful gout management. However, if such studies reflect current clinical practice, are they comparing poor management with inadequate management?

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Khanna, D. et al. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 1: systematic nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic therapeutic approaches to hyperuricemia. Arthri tis Care Res. (Hoboken) 64, 1431–1446 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh, J. A., Akhras, K. S. & Shiozawa, A. Comparative effectiveness of urate lowering with febuxostat versus allopurinol in gout: analyses from large U.S. managed care cohort. Arthritis Res. Ther. 17, 120 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, M. A. et al. Febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with hyperuricemia and gout. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 2450–2461 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, M. A. et al. The urate-lowering efficacy and safety of febuxostat in the treatment of the hyperuricemia of gout: the CONFIRMS trial. Arthritis Res. Ther. 12, R63 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schumacher, H. R. Jr. et al. Effects of febuxostat versus allopurinol and placebo in reducing serum urate in subjects with hyperuricemia and gout: a 28-week, phase III, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. Arthritis Rheum. 59, 1540–1548 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rees, F., Jenkins, W. & Doherty, M. Patients with gout adhere to curative treatment if informed appropriately: proof-of-concept observational study. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 72, 826–830 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stamp, L. K. et al. Using allopurinol above the dose based on creatinine clearance is effective and safe in patients with chronic gout, including those with renal impairment. Arthritis Rheum. 63, 412–421 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldfien, R. D. et al. Effectiveness of a pharmacist-based gout care management programme in a large integrated health plan: results from a pilot study. BMJ Open 4, e003627 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Federal Coordinating Council for Comparative Effectiveness Research. Report to the President and Congress (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC, 2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.D. and L.K.S. are supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand (grant 11/203).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Dalbeth.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

N.D. declares she has received consulting fees, speaker fees or grants from Ardea, AstraZeneca, Cymabay, Fonterra, Menarini, Metabolex, Pfizer, Savient, Takeda and Teijin. L.K.S. declares she has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dalbeth, N., Stamp, L. Why compare the effectiveness of suboptimal gout management?. Nat Rev Rheumatol 11, 506–507 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.94

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2015.94

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing