Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Predicting the age of mosquitoes using transcriptional profiles

Abstract

The use of transcriptional profiles for predicting mosquito age is a novel solution for the longstanding problem of determining the age of field-caught mosquitoes. Female mosquito age is of central importance to the transmission of a range of human pathogens. The transcriptional age-grading protocol we present here was developed in Aedes aegypti, principally as a research tool. Age predictions are made on the basis of transcriptional data collected from mosquitoes of known age. The abundance of eight candidate gene transcripts is quantified relative to a reference gene using quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR). Normalized gene expression (GE) measures are analyzed using canonical redundancy analysis to obtain a multivariate predictor of mosquito age. The relationship between the first redundancy variate and known age is used as the calibration model. Normalized GE measures are quantified for wild-caught mosquitoes, and ages are then predicted using this calibration model. Rearing of mosquitoes to specific ages for calibration data can take up to 40 d. Molecular analysis of transcript abundance, and subsequent age predictions, should take 3–5 d for 100 individuals.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Overview of the transcriptional age-grading technique.
Figure 2: SAS output file showing the percentage of variance in gene expression measures (highlighted with red box) explained by adult female mosquito age.
Figure 3: SAS output showing the regression statistics for linear regression of the first redundancy variate on adult female mosquito age.
Figure 4: Microsoft Excel worksheet exported from the second SAS procedure.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook, P.E., McMeniman, C.J. & O'Neill, S.L. Modifying insect population age structure to control vector-borne disease. In Transgenesis and the Management of Vector-borne Disease (ed. Askoy, S.) (Landes Bioscience, Austin, TX, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook, P.E. et al. The use of transcriptional profiles to predict adult mosquito age under field conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18060–18065 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gerade, B.B. et al. Field validation of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) age estimation by analysis of cuticular hydrocarbons. J. Med. Entomol. 41, 231–238 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Detinova, T.S. Age-grouping methods in Diptera of medical importance with special reference to some vectors of malaria. Monogr. Ser. World Health Organ. 47, 13–191 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayes, E.J. & Wall, R. Age-grading adult insects: a review of techniques. Physiol. Entomol. 24, 1 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lehane, M.J. Determining the age of an insect. Parasitol. Today 1, 81–85 (1985).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robson, S.K., Vickers, M., Blows, M.W. & Crozier, R.H. Age determination in individual wild-caught Drosophila serrata using pteridine concentration. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 3155–3163 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, D. & Lehane, M.J. Pteridine fluorescence for age determination of Anopheles mosquitoes. Med. Vet. Entomol. 13, 48–52 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Penilla, R.P., Rodríguez, M.H., López, A.D., Viader-Salvadó, J.M. & Sánchez, C.N. Pteridine concentrations differ between insectary-reared and field-collected Anopheles albimanus mosquitoes of the same physiological age. Med. Vet. Entomol. 16, 225–234 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holt, R.A. et al. The genome sequence of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Science 298, 129–149 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanders, H.R., Evans, A.M., Ross, L.S. & Gill, S.S. Blood meal induces global changes in midgut gene expression in the disease vector, Aedes aegypti. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 33, 1105–1122 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nolan, T., Hands, R.E. & Bustin, S.A. Quantification of mRNA using real-time RT-PCR. Nat. Protoc. 1, 1559–1582 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ståhlberg, A., Håkansson, J., Xian, X., Semb, H. & Kubista, M. Properties of the reverse transcription reaction in mRNA quantification. Clin. Chem. 50, 509–515 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ståhlberg, A., Kubista, M. & Pfaffl, M. Comparison of reverse transcriptases in gene expression analysis. Clin. Chem. 50, 1678–1680 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bustin, S.A. & Nolan, T. Pitfalls of quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. J. Biomol. Tech. 15, 155–166 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Luu-The, V., Paquet, N., Calvo, E. & Cumps, J. Improved real-time RT-PCR method for high-throughput measurements using second derivative calculation and double correction. BioTechniques 38, 287–293 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasmussen, R. Quantification on the Lightcycler. In Rapid Cycle Real-time PCR: Methods and Applications (eds. Meuer, S.C., Wittwer, C. & Nakagawara, K.) pp. 21–34 (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, C.R., Long, S.A., Russell, R.C. & Ritchie, S.A. Field efficacy of the BG-sentinel compared with CDC backpack aspirators and CO2-baited EVS traps for collection of adult Aedes aegypti in Cairns, Queensland, Australia. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 22, 296–300 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sambrook, J. & Russell, D.W. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wilfinger, W.W., Mackey, K. & Chomczynski, P. Effect of pH and ionic strength on the spectrophotometric assessment of nucleic acid purity. BioTechniques 22, 474–476 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data Reprint ed. (Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chomczynski, P. & Sacchi, N. The single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction: twenty-something years on. Nat. Protoc. 1, 581–585 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Jeremy C. Brownlie, Conor J. McMeniman and Grant Hughes for constructive reviews of earlier drafts of this manuscript. This research was funded by grants from the Australian Research Council (LP0455732), the Mosquito and Arbovirus Research Committee, and the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health through the Grand Challenges in Global Health Initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott L O'Neill.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Note

SAS syntax required to implement statistical analyses (PDF 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cook, P., Hugo, L., Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I. et al. Predicting the age of mosquitoes using transcriptional profiles. Nat Protoc 2, 2796–2806 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.396

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2007.396

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing